Reality TV: “Who wants to marry a U.S. citizen?”

By Michelle Malkin  •  November 30, 2007 02:43 PM

There’s a new reality tv show in the works (hat tip – reader Craig):

There’s a new reality TV show,produced by Morusa Media, called “Who wants to marry a U.S. citizen?” that aims at creating marriages between U.S. citizens and immigrants who have temporary visas. The show is already generating mix reaction from some who say the show hurts the immigration process. However, others praise the match-making concept.

“We’re out to prove love knows no borders,” says Adrian Martinez, creator of the show. “Besides, that’s what America is all about — a multi-cultural nation.”

Similar to the “Dating Game,” one bachelorette (a U.S. citizen seeking aspouse) asks three bachelors (immigrants with temporary visas) various questions. Towards the end of the show, she decides which one she would marry.

According to the show’s host, Angelo Gonzales, the show makes it clear toall contestants that it does not guarantee marriage or legal status, but willpay for a wedding party and honeymoon should a marriage result from the show.

“We’re just out to play matchmaker,” says Gonzales. “There are thousands of U.S. citizens seeking a spouse, and just as many immigrants seeking thesame. So we want to make it a win-win situation for all involved.”

Hezbollah gives the show “two thumbs up!”

Posted in: Immigration

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Video-Hook-A Citizen-Assorted Babble by Suzie
  2. » Has Reality TV Finally Gone Too Far - By ¡Para Justicia y Libertad!
  3. Scholars and Rogues » Has Reality TV Finally Gone Too Far
  4. c85f0e21c0dc2e096701

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #184332
    On November 30th, 2007 at 2:44 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    Wouldn’t this be aiding and abetting?

  2. #184339
    On November 30th, 2007 at 2:49 pm, Boomer said:

    Obviously these mental midgets have never been to a Military installation in a foreign country. I remember going TDY to RAF Mildenhall, UK and the women would line up outside the NCO Club to get signed in to stalk American GI as husband material. Most were looking for a quick ticket to the “land of the big BX” dumping their husbands as soon as they earned their citizenship. There were those that actually married for love and liked the way we “Yanks” treated them. This is just one example I have seen it all over Europe and the Pacific were there was a permanent US Military presence. This game has been going on since the end of WWII. My wife is right there are no more original ideas left if Hollyweird.

  3. #184342
    On November 30th, 2007 at 2:50 pm, Boomer said:

    if s/b in

  4. #184343
    On November 30th, 2007 at 2:50 pm, pgtips said:

    Does marriage automatically guarantee citizenship? I know for a fact that here in the UK, you need to be married for over 2 years before being allowed to apply for citizenship.

    I’m kinda stuck even though I married my wife almost 3 years ago. I just never really bothered to send the papers in and now I gotta wait another year before being able to apply :S. But I digress.

  5. #184352
    On November 30th, 2007 at 2:52 pm, tmkeith said:

    From what I can tell, they’d still need to jump through the same hoops those who play by the rules jump through…one of them being proof that it’s a bona-fide marriage or engagement, depending on what long-term visa they apply for. So, when the interviewing officer asks: “Where did you meet?”, is “On a game show” going to pass muster?

    Either way, it’s small potatoes compared to what our wonderful leaders are trying to do with their amnesty proposals.

  6. #184358
    On November 30th, 2007 at 2:54 pm, ackrite55 said:

    No, but a visa can be obtained.. then theres like 7 other documents that must completed.

  7. #184366
    On November 30th, 2007 at 2:57 pm, Blind_Mule said:

    I saw this story on Cavuto

  8. #184371
    On November 30th, 2007 at 2:57 pm, Blind_Mule said:
  9. #184396
    On November 30th, 2007 at 3:09 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    Does marriage automatically guarantee citizenship?

    No. My sister-in-law from Colombia, who came here legally, got married to my brother in 2000, took several years for her to become a naturalized citizen.

  10. #184448
    On November 30th, 2007 at 3:28 pm, hatelibs said:

    If getting married to and American citizen doesn’t guarantee citizenship, please don’t tell these people. They are trying to stick it to the US for not wanting illegals thinking they will beat us to the punch. Although it would be tough to deport someone married to a citizen, we can have the last laugh because they are under the impression this is a way to beat the system. NOT

  11. #184478
    On November 30th, 2007 at 3:37 pm, Chuck said:

    marrying an American citizen gets you a resident alien visa (the so-called green card, no longer green); you still have to fill out enough paperwork to overflow a landfill to get the visa and then you have to wait at least two years before being able to try the citizenship test, etc. for naturalization.

  12. #184481
    On November 30th, 2007 at 3:40 pm, whm3113 said:

    The name of the show isn’t “Who wants to be an American citizen?” It is “Who wants to marry an American citizen?”. Marriage allows a U.S. citizen to sponsor a spouse for status as a permanent resident. This status is conditional for two years. At the end of that period the couple must reappear for an interview where it is determined whether it is a bonafide marrage. If they pass, the conditional status of the permanent residency is lifted. At that point he/she can stay in that status until death. At no point does he/she need to apply to be a U.S. citizen. They would only need to do that if they want to vote, serve on a jury or apply for certain government jobs.

  13. #184493
    On November 30th, 2007 at 3:44 pm, Tennessee Dave said:

    On November 30th, 2007 at 2:49 pm, Boomer said:
    I remember going TDY to RAF Mildenhall, UK and the women would line up outside the NCO Club to get signed in to stalk American GI as husband material. Most were looking for a quick ticket to the “land of the big BX” dumping their husbands as soon as they earned their citizenship.

    I spent some time at RAF Chicksands in the early 1990s and saw it happen with guys and girls.
    One American girl I knew got engaged and married to a British man. She was warned that he was just looking to get out of the country, but she was in love.
    Not long after getting to the “land of the big BX” they got into an arguement and he admitted that he married her just to get out of England.
    She called INS the next day and had him deported. The score:
    Love 0, Deportation 1

  14. #184514
    On November 30th, 2007 at 3:53 pm, englishqueen01 said:

    Because we all know how well the last “Who Wants to Marry” show worked out…right, Darva Conger?

    It’s sad that our laws, and marriage, are mocked in such a manner.

  15. #184529
    On November 30th, 2007 at 3:57 pm, Boomer said:

    The funny thing was Mrs. Boomer and I met at RAF Mildenhall when we were both stationed at Beale AFB. I had to go half way around the world to meet my future bride. She was (and still is in my opinion) a drop dead gorgeous Administrative Specialist in the U-2 squadron and I was a cocky Boom Operator in one of the tanker squadron’s chasing the SR-71 around the world. She has told me some pretty interesting stories she overheard in the Ladies room in the NCO Club about how the women were manipulating a young GI to bring them home. Not pretty!

  16. #184571
    On November 30th, 2007 at 4:11 pm, aunursa said:

    After this they can have a new version next season: WHO WANTS TO MARRY A TERRORIST? It could feature eligible moonbats paired up with young Arab men from the Middle East who want to take flying lessons in the U.S.

    Or something along that line.

  17. #184578
    On November 30th, 2007 at 4:16 pm, reppac122 said:

    Will Elvira Arellano be on the show?

  18. #184635
    On November 30th, 2007 at 4:35 pm, tmkeith said:

    No for Elvira, the show (apparently) takes those here on temporary visas. They’d hafta change the title of the show to: “Who wants to marry an illegal alien with so much baggage you won’t have enough room to store it all?”

  19. #184642
    On November 30th, 2007 at 4:36 pm, TeutonicNomad said:

    Boomer-I remember the Galaxy Club when I was a kid in High School over at Lakenheath; it made Playboy’s world’s top ten list of clubs in the late seventy’s. Before I joined my mother advised me not to marry foreign women; best advice, especially since she is German!

  20. #184679
    On November 30th, 2007 at 4:58 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    They’re not filming this at an Atlanta hotel are they? :)

  21. #184787
    On November 30th, 2007 at 6:10 pm, ajmontana said:

    I heard the questions were planted. :roll:

  22. #184798
    On November 30th, 2007 at 6:26 pm, Larry L. Sharp said:

    These people are just making a mockery of marriage. No commitment. No love. No honor. No respect. No for better or for worse and in sickness and in health. I certainly pray they don’t bring children into such a sterile relationship.

  23. #184813
    On November 30th, 2007 at 6:39 pm, uhangtight said:

    besides mocking the institution of marriage, isn’t this illegal?

  24. #184822
    On November 30th, 2007 at 6:45 pm, tmkeith said:

    In many situations, depending on the type of temporary nonimmigrant visa the lucky suitor/bride-to-be is on, it will raise USCIS eyebrows to see when someone here on a visa that implies no intent to immigrate suddenly submits an immigration-based visa application.

    Those do receive more scrutiny. Let’s just hope USCIS keeps their eyes open on this show and raises a red flag on the “winners’” visa applications.

  25. #184841
    On November 30th, 2007 at 7:17 pm, terrig said:

    Hmmh, well my father in law is married to a “foreign national” and has been for about two years. She finally got her green card to come from Jamaica of all places and will be here for Christmas. She’s 25 and he’s 62-can you say sham marriage just like one that would come out of this show would be?
    Boomer, 18 years ago my husband was a young 19 year old stationed in Panama. A friend of his introduced him to this sister of his girlfriend who had just broken up with her Officer boyfriend because he didn’t want to marry her. So 8 months later my husband marries her and she brings everyone in her family except for the family pet over. She gets her citizenship 2 years later and once she has everyone securely here she dumps him for the Officer she continued to keep in touch with during the 4 years she was married to him. The same thing happend to my cousin in the 80’s when he was stationed in Germany and believe it or not it also happens to us girls.

  26. #184857
    On November 30th, 2007 at 7:38 pm, nbarry said:

    Yes, I’m sure there are many more horror stories of gold digging, green card lusting foreigners targeting Americans. The author of “How Stella Got Her Groove Back” was dumped by the man who inspired the book and movie. However, I feel that American men are casting a roving eye on foreign women because too many local women have been brainwashed by feminism into fearing the worst in the men they meet until proven otherwise instead of assuming the guys are worthy until proven otherwise.

  27. #184867
    On November 30th, 2007 at 8:00 pm, TMoney said:

    I don’t think it’s as exciting as the reality show I created in 2002 called “Border Crossings”, where contestants are judged on their abilities to illegally cross into other countries. Of course they have several tasks to perform, like getting a fake license, obtaining work and a place to live, etc. If they get deported or put in jail, they are disqualified.
    But the marrying show might have its possibilities.

  28. #184886
    On November 30th, 2007 at 8:52 pm, geb4000 said:

    one bachelorette desperate chick

    fixed

  29. #184903
    On November 30th, 2007 at 9:21 pm, Boomer said:

    terrig,

    I’ve seen a lot of stories like that during my time around the Military buy normally it happened to guys. Now that the population of women has continued to grow since my early days around it I can see how some dirty bag can pull the same trick on the ladies too. Scamming a GI to get American citizenship appears to be more popular than I thought. Thanks for sharing.

  30. #184926
    On November 30th, 2007 at 9:52 pm, WarTip said:

    … says Adrian Martinez, creator of the show. “Besides, that’s what America is all about — a multi-cultural nation.”

    What unadulterated BS! It was and should be the great MELTING POT where, while we do celebrate our unique cultures, we live, work and strive to integrate to American Society not immigrate to destroy it!

    IMHO

  31. #185076
    On December 1st, 2007 at 6:21 am, jamesgreenidge said:

    What unadulterated BS! It was and should be the great MELTING POT where, while we do celebrate our unique cultures, we live, work and strive to integrate to American Society not immigrate to destroy it!

    Know where you’re coming from but ruefully deep in my heart I believe we’ve lost this battle. In another twenty-five years or so, except for pockets of hold-outs, America’s cultural landscape will seem as alien to us as the world of the 1940’s/50’s seems today. Never should’ve even toyed with bilingualism in the ’60’s; it was just the camel’s nose under the tent. I just don’t see enough people in power alarmed enough to DO something about it. What gets me is there are Americans who sincerely believe our traditional-cultural dilution is a positive thing, even though even France is wisening up (maybe too late). Norman Rockwell might as well pack up and go to the moon.

    James Greenidge
    Queens New York

  32. #185082
    On December 1st, 2007 at 6:45 am, graysonret said:

    I’m married to a foreign national-Indonesian. The paperwork is horrible. So far, it’s been a year and still more to file and pay. By the way, marrying a immigrant means you’re responsible for that person for 10 years, now. Used to be 2. So for some reason, these so-called contestants split, the citizen is responsible. Also, there is a “defrauding the government” charge that can be brought, if the split occurs right after the paperwork is finished. Remember the young ladies marrying 80 year old men for $5K so they could get a green card? Uh, uh…the gov’t is wise about that now. I don’t believe the show will last; once the lawsuits against it start being filed.

  33. #185094
    On December 1st, 2007 at 7:47 am, ArmoredCAV said:

    The market for this show should take care of the problem within the first season.
    By the way, I once worked in the OPS shop of a brigade in Germany in which I had the only American-born wife. Many of these marriages work out.

  34. #185106
    On December 1st, 2007 at 8:33 am, DaveC said:

    So if there ever was an argument to end the Writer’s strike, it would be to end reality shows like this..

    And get back to filming ‘Lost’

  35. #185191
    On December 1st, 2007 at 12:48 pm, georgej said:

    I’ve got an idea for a new show:

    WHO WANT’S TO MARRY A SHOE BOMBER?

    Richard Reid, via closed circuit TV, interviews one of 3 American liberal chicks and selects one to marry. After the Muslim ceremony, Richard and bride, board a remote-controled jet liner, while he is wearing his exploding shoes. Richard is given a bic lighter and the opportunity to “complete his Holy mission” OR to complete the flight with his bride and live in happiness as a newly enrolled member of the Mile High Club.

    Videos of the consumation will be available only on the Playboy Channel.

    Videos of the Ka-BOOM will be available only on the Military Channel.

    Now all I have to do is find the financing….

  36. #185367
    On December 1st, 2007 at 5:59 pm, Mr_Conservative_Cat said:

    Don’t allow this to be misunderstood or bigoted, but what I find infuriating is the “cuteness factor”, in this instance defined as both the creator of the show and the host having HISPANIC names.

    A. It appears to presume that Hispanics – because of the unconscionable actions of their fellow Hispanics on the boarder and elswehere breaking US law – are now the “immigrant of choice” (there are hundreds of countries). Isn’t that hip? Isn’t that absolutely adorable?

    B. It gives the impression of reducing multi-generational US citizens to second-class citizens in their own country. Why not a host named Jones? or Goldstein? or Chow? Or Tashimaki? or Ramaratan? Or Ratoff? Or O’Malley? Nope. Gonzales. For a show which seems to push the idea of marriages of convenience to circumvent immigration law. Isn’t that delightful? Isn’t that just too dee-lish?

    let them keep being cute. When the societal backlash comes – from the people, not the fawning love-the-criminal-antihero, let’s-live-out-our-favorite-scene-from-Pulp-Fiction MSM, I have a feeling that Websters will need to redefine the word “prejudice”. That will be a shame, but at this rate, perhaps not entirely undeserved. Hispanics need to get with the program and change their national spokespeople in a hurry, before this country, fed up to the point of distraction, really does start hating Hispanics out-of-hand. And stopping the casual and arrogant breaking of our immigration laws by the millions might not be a bad idea, either.

  37. #185687
    On December 2nd, 2007 at 1:55 pm, Alphonse said:

    I find fault with the Bush/Senate de facto policy of simply letting migrants and terrorists flood across the Mexican border and giving their jackpot babies citizenship, but the TV concept seems innocuous to me.

  38. #185776
    On December 2nd, 2007 at 6:12 pm, GaijinBob said:

    graysonret said:

    …marrying a immigrant means you’re responsible for that person for 10 years, now. Used to be 2. So for some reason, these so-called contestants split, the citizen is responsible.

    When was it 2 years? How long ago was that? When I first started looking into this process back in ‘97~’98, the rule was 40 quarters (10 years). But not to worry, that rule is enforced less than internal illegal immigration enforcement rules for hiring undocumented workers. In all that time, from the more than half dozen web forums & BBSes I’ve been a part of dealing with courtship and marriage to foreign nationals , no one has ever mentioned that the Feds came to collect money due when his visa shark ex-spouse went on public assistance. Your typical runner is happy just to have his/her legal documentation to allow them to work and send money home and stay off the government’s radar. The only way it affects you is if you divorce and go back and try again, you must list the first wife as a sponsored dependent which will factor in to whether they deem that you have the ability to sponsor another émigré.

    Though MC_Cat is right. That they would use a Hispanic host is “Verrry interesting … but shtupid.”

  39. #186343
    On December 3rd, 2007 at 3:22 pm, ThackerAgency said:

    I bet this show would get great ratings. This is where everything is going it seems. The marriage for citizenship issue has been around for a long time. That would be the easiest way for anyone to gain citizenship and I’m sure it goes on all the time. It is a shame, but I don’t know what the government can do about it when they offer services and citizenship to everyone who crosses the river.

    Blue Advantage Insurance

You must be logged in to post a comment.

The “media justice” mob strikes again

October 30, 2009 12:19 PM by Michelle Malkin

68 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

Witch hunt.

Lou Dobbs discusses physical attacks, harassment

October 29, 2009 10:35 AM by Michelle Malkin

40 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

Culture of Corruption: Obama U.S. Attorney nominee clams up

October 28, 2009 10:23 AM by Michelle Malkin

52 Comments | 1 Trackback

Stephanie Villafuerte, evader.

Yes, Senate Dems do want illegal alien Obamacare coverage

September 30, 2009 03:10 PM by Michelle Malkin

35 Comments | 1 Trackback

House Dems push for illegal alien health care coverage

September 28, 2009 09:42 AM by Michelle Malkin

78 Comments | 9 Trackbacks


Categories: Immigration



Weekly Standard

» Obama's Talking Points

HotAir GreenRoom