<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: P.C. at the BBC, part 999</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/05/pc-at-the-bbc-part-999/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/05/pc-at-the-bbc-part-999/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 01:24:41 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: AlohaGuy</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/05/pc-at-the-bbc-part-999/comment-page-1/#comment-187945</link>
		<dc:creator>AlohaGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 19:09:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/05/pc-at-the-bbc-part-999/#comment-187945</guid>
		<description>...in other news the BBC today confirmed it is giving cutlery away to Muslim who participate in their &quot;Name the Teddy&quot; contest.  &quot;We wanted to show them that we trust them with sharp objects - even when they are enraged over some perceived slight&quot; said the spokeswoman who could not be identified through her veil.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;in other news the BBC today confirmed it is giving cutlery away to Muslim who participate in their &#8220;Name the Teddy&#8221; contest.  &#8220;We wanted to show them that we trust them with sharp objects &#8211; even when they are enraged over some perceived slight&#8221; said the spokeswoman who could not be identified through her veil.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Archon</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/05/pc-at-the-bbc-part-999/comment-page-1/#comment-187916</link>
		<dc:creator>Archon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 18:19:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/05/pc-at-the-bbc-part-999/#comment-187916</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;where exercises included somersaults, pole-vaulting and paintballing&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I&#039;ll be honest here. So long as the jihadi&#039;s training includes this kind of John Woo BS, I&#039;m all for it. It makes it that much easier to send them on a magic carpet ride.


And people, learn to ignore sausage. I&#039;ve managed to learn this lesson in my short time here, and my stay is much better for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>where exercises included somersaults, pole-vaulting and paintballing</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;ll be honest here. So long as the jihadi&#8217;s training includes this kind of John Woo BS, I&#8217;m all for it. It makes it that much easier to send them on a magic carpet ride.</p>
<p>And people, learn to ignore sausage. I&#8217;ve managed to learn this lesson in my short time here, and my stay is much better for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PBoilermaker</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/05/pc-at-the-bbc-part-999/comment-page-1/#comment-187904</link>
		<dc:creator>PBoilermaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 18:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/05/pc-at-the-bbc-part-999/#comment-187904</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;On December 5th, 2007 at 8:13 am, sausage said: 
Yes, the BBC is very PC. But, the quality of it’s content is generally excellent and pretty much fair and balanced.

True, the BBC doesn’t fawn over Israel like the American media does… but then the UK isn’t run by far right evangelicals trying to send Jewish people back to their homeland for the second coming of Christ &lt;/blockquote&gt;

I&#039;ll ask again...why did you come to the US?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>On December 5th, 2007 at 8:13 am, sausage said:<br />
Yes, the BBC is very PC. But, the quality of it’s content is generally excellent and pretty much fair and balanced.</p>
<p>True, the BBC doesn’t fawn over Israel like the American media does… but then the UK isn’t run by far right evangelicals trying to send Jewish people back to their homeland for the second coming of Christ </p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;ll ask again&#8230;why did you come to the US?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RetFireman</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/05/pc-at-the-bbc-part-999/comment-page-1/#comment-187898</link>
		<dc:creator>RetFireman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 18:07:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/05/pc-at-the-bbc-part-999/#comment-187898</guid>
		<description>Remember when the BBC kept the nation&#039;s hopes up and their morale strong when the country was being bombed night after endless night by unseen Nazi bombers and V1 weapons of death?  Remember when it was the &quot;Voice of Freedom&quot; to the soldiers held captive or just shot down behind enemy lines and needed to xero in on it&#039;s friendly signal to find their way home?  Remember when they were the people who brought us such fabulous comedians like Monty Python&#039;s Flying Circus?

Just exactly what happened to that company, and when are they going to come back?  I think someone needs to tell them that we are, again, in the middle of a World War and they need to, once again, rally the troops and the country to come in for the big win, especially since the thing that was feared the most during the last World War...enemy infiltration into the Home Country....has not only already occurred, but is ongoing and welcomed even into this late date.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember when the BBC kept the nation&#8217;s hopes up and their morale strong when the country was being bombed night after endless night by unseen Nazi bombers and V1 weapons of death?  Remember when it was the &#8220;Voice of Freedom&#8221; to the soldiers held captive or just shot down behind enemy lines and needed to xero in on it&#8217;s friendly signal to find their way home?  Remember when they were the people who brought us such fabulous comedians like Monty Python&#8217;s Flying Circus?</p>
<p>Just exactly what happened to that company, and when are they going to come back?  I think someone needs to tell them that we are, again, in the middle of a World War and they need to, once again, rally the troops and the country to come in for the big win, especially since the thing that was feared the most during the last World War&#8230;enemy infiltration into the Home Country&#8230;.has not only already occurred, but is ongoing and welcomed even into this late date.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bipartisancomplainer</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/05/pc-at-the-bbc-part-999/comment-page-1/#comment-187894</link>
		<dc:creator>bipartisancomplainer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 18:03:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/05/pc-at-the-bbc-part-999/#comment-187894</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Sausage says: Yes, the BBC is very PC. But, the quality of it’s content is generally excellent and pretty much fair and balanced.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

You can&#039;t be both.  You are either fair &amp; balanced or have your news dictated by pc concerns.  The two don&#039;t mesh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Sausage says: Yes, the BBC is very PC. But, the quality of it’s content is generally excellent and pretty much fair and balanced.</p></blockquote>
<p>You can&#8217;t be both.  You are either fair &amp; balanced or have your news dictated by pc concerns.  The two don&#8217;t mesh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sister Toldjah</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/05/pc-at-the-bbc-part-999/comment-page-1/#comment-187842</link>
		<dc:creator>Sister Toldjah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 17:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/05/pc-at-the-bbc-part-999/#comment-187842</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Un-BBC-lievable...&lt;/strong&gt;

The BBC has stepped into it again.  It appears that a paintball trip they funded for a few Islamists as part of a BBC &#8220;reality&#8221; series - a series that is supposed to make western &#8220;paranoia&#8221; over Islamists seem unfounded - has ba...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Un-BBC-lievable&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>The BBC has stepped into it again.  It appears that a paintball trip they funded for a few Islamists as part of a BBC &#8220;reality&#8221; series &#8211; a series that is supposed to make western &#8220;paranoia&#8221; over Islamists seem unfounded &#8211; has ba&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Random Nuclear Strikes &#187; Sometimes the jokes write themselves</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/05/pc-at-the-bbc-part-999/comment-page-1/#comment-187816</link>
		<dc:creator>Random Nuclear Strikes &#187; Sometimes the jokes write themselves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 16:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/05/pc-at-the-bbc-part-999/#comment-187816</guid>
		<description>[...] maybe a joke with more &#8220;international flavor&#8221; might be better The BBC funded a paintballing trip for men later accused of Islamic terrorism and failed to pass on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] maybe a joke with more &#8220;international flavor&#8221; might be better The BBC funded a paintballing trip for men later accused of Islamic terrorism and failed to pass on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Inzax</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/05/pc-at-the-bbc-part-999/comment-page-1/#comment-187807</link>
		<dc:creator>Inzax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 16:22:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/05/pc-at-the-bbc-part-999/#comment-187807</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;BBC funds terrorist&#160;training...&lt;/strong&gt;

It appears the BBC funded a paintball outing involving the 21/7 bombers.  The report was intent on showing how innocent Muslims can have fun.  I am sure they planned on showing how ridiculous it is to assume a Muslim paintballer is a jihadist.  They...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>BBC funds terrorist&nbsp;training&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>It appears the BBC funded a paintball outing involving the 21/7 bombers.  The report was intent on showing how innocent Muslims can have fun.  I am sure they planned on showing how ridiculous it is to assume a Muslim paintballer is a jihadist.  They&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LarryD</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/05/pc-at-the-bbc-part-999/comment-page-1/#comment-187758</link>
		<dc:creator>LarryD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 15:38:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/05/pc-at-the-bbc-part-999/#comment-187758</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Yes, the BBC is very PC. But, the quality of it’s content is generally excellent and pretty much fair and balanced.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

If it&#039;s PC, then it&#039;s content &lt;em&gt;cannot&lt;/em&gt; be fair and balanced.  By the very nature of Political Correctness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Yes, the BBC is very PC. But, the quality of it’s content is generally excellent and pretty much fair and balanced.</p></blockquote>
<p>If it&#8217;s PC, then it&#8217;s content <em>cannot</em> be fair and balanced.  By the very nature of Political Correctness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WarTip</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/05/pc-at-the-bbc-part-999/comment-page-1/#comment-187745</link>
		<dc:creator>WarTip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 15:26:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/05/pc-at-the-bbc-part-999/#comment-187745</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt; On December 5th, 2007 at 7:29 am, breg man said: Where are all the so-called sympathizers who should be worried if a nuclear attack were to take place? Or are they considered expendable if it meant wiping out Israel?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I think this would make them martyrs and allow them to be greeted by 72 VirginIANs. 

Never mind the fact that the actual Palestinian state never existed. One was created for them by Jimmy Carter and they walked away from the table. Never mind that ALL of the land there was desert and the Israelis were the only ones who successfully farmed it and turned it into what it has become today. Never mind that the Israeli &quot;Occupation&quot; covers less than 5% (I think, though it could have been less) of the entire Middle Eastern Region. Never mind the fact that the &quot;high ground&quot; they now possess is theirs because it was taken in a battle which was started by other nations against them. Dang those facts sure as pesky critters aren&#039;t they? 

Never mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> On December 5th, 2007 at 7:29 am, breg man said: Where are all the so-called sympathizers who should be worried if a nuclear attack were to take place? Or are they considered expendable if it meant wiping out Israel?</p></blockquote>
<p>I think this would make them martyrs and allow them to be greeted by 72 VirginIANs. </p>
<p>Never mind the fact that the actual Palestinian state never existed. One was created for them by Jimmy Carter and they walked away from the table. Never mind that ALL of the land there was desert and the Israelis were the only ones who successfully farmed it and turned it into what it has become today. Never mind that the Israeli &#8220;Occupation&#8221; covers less than 5% (I think, though it could have been less) of the entire Middle Eastern Region. Never mind the fact that the &#8220;high ground&#8221; they now possess is theirs because it was taken in a battle which was started by other nations against them. Dang those facts sure as pesky critters aren&#8217;t they? </p>
<p>Never mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GOP and College</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/05/pc-at-the-bbc-part-999/comment-page-1/#comment-187726</link>
		<dc:creator>GOP and College</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 14:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/05/pc-at-the-bbc-part-999/#comment-187726</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Well, Doesn&#039;t That Suck A Big Fatty...&lt;/strong&gt;

The BBC took a few Muslims out to play paintball, and apparently it&#039;s a great terrorist trainer.  Makes sense....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Well, Doesn&#8217;t That Suck A Big Fatty&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>The BBC took a few Muslims out to play paintball, and apparently it&#8217;s a great terrorist trainer.  Makes sense&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Jawa Report</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/05/pc-at-the-bbc-part-999/comment-page-1/#comment-187720</link>
		<dc:creator>The Jawa Report</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 14:45:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/05/pc-at-the-bbc-part-999/#comment-187720</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;BBC Paid Muslim to Train for Terror...&lt;/strong&gt;

Well, we&#039;ve all suspected there was a relationship. Might as well make it official. Times Online:The BBC paid for [Mohammed] Hamid and fellow defendants Muhammad al-Figari and Mousa Brown to go on a paintballing trip at the Delta Force centre......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>BBC Paid Muslim to Train for Terror&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Well, we&#8217;ve all suspected there was a relationship. Might as well make it official. Times Online:The BBC paid for [Mohammed] Hamid and fellow defendants Muhammad al-Figari and Mousa Brown to go on a paintballing trip at the Delta Force centre&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uhangtight</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/05/pc-at-the-bbc-part-999/comment-page-1/#comment-187719</link>
		<dc:creator>uhangtight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 14:45:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/05/pc-at-the-bbc-part-999/#comment-187719</guid>
		<description>the BBC, Babbling Baffoonery Countdown, that is what it appears to be to me, yet this BBC is considered Europe&#039;s Journalist Frontrunner.  wow..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the BBC, Babbling Baffoonery Countdown, that is what it appears to be to me, yet this BBC is considered Europe&#8217;s Journalist Frontrunner.  wow..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nbarry</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/05/pc-at-the-bbc-part-999/comment-page-1/#comment-187710</link>
		<dc:creator>nbarry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 14:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/05/pc-at-the-bbc-part-999/#comment-187710</guid>
		<description>The BBC&#039;s antisemitism and pro-jihad bias has long been documented at http://www.honestreporting.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The BBC&#8217;s antisemitism and pro-jihad bias has long been documented at <a href="http://www.honestreporting.com." rel="nofollow">http://www.honestreporting.com.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: granite</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/05/pc-at-the-bbc-part-999/comment-page-1/#comment-187702</link>
		<dc:creator>granite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 14:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/05/pc-at-the-bbc-part-999/#comment-187702</guid>
		<description>Re #17:

&quot;Yes, the BBC is very PC. But, the quality of it’s(sic) content is generally excellent and pretty much fair and balanced.&quot;

???Incredible.
I&#039;m waiting for this individual to tell us how beautiful the knives are that the beheaders use; or how high-quality the nuts, bolts, nails, and screws are that the homicide bombers pack for shrapnel into their bombs.

&quot;True, the BBC doesn’t fawn over Israel like the American media does… but then the UK isn’t run by far right evangelicals trying to send Jewish people back to their homeland for the second coming of Christ(sic)&quot;

?????Speechless.
Straw man?
.01% of .01% of .01% of the media, or of individuals, or of organizations???
What&#039;s next, a unicorn alert?

Folks are right:

JUST

IGNORE

HIM

...Although, I have to say, comments like #17 are terrific as buffoon (a few miles past simply comic) relief.
One just could not make stuff like that up!  Oh, wait,  it seems that #17 WAS made up.

*Sigh....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re #17:</p>
<p>&#8220;Yes, the BBC is very PC. But, the quality of it’s(sic) content is generally excellent and pretty much fair and balanced.&#8221;</p>
<p>???Incredible.<br />
I&#8217;m waiting for this individual to tell us how beautiful the knives are that the beheaders use; or how high-quality the nuts, bolts, nails, and screws are that the homicide bombers pack for shrapnel into their bombs.</p>
<p>&#8220;True, the BBC doesn’t fawn over Israel like the American media does… but then the UK isn’t run by far right evangelicals trying to send Jewish people back to their homeland for the second coming of Christ(sic)&#8221;</p>
<p>?????Speechless.<br />
Straw man?<br />
.01% of .01% of .01% of the media, or of individuals, or of organizations???<br />
What&#8217;s next, a unicorn alert?</p>
<p>Folks are right:</p>
<p>JUST</p>
<p>IGNORE</p>
<p>HIM</p>
<p>&#8230;Although, I have to say, comments like #17 are terrific as buffoon (a few miles past simply comic) relief.<br />
One just could not make stuff like that up!  Oh, wait,  it seems that #17 WAS made up.</p>
<p>*Sigh&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- NEW -->
