“The Abaya Monologues”

By Michelle Malkin  •  December 10, 2007 02:32 PM

1abaya.jpg

Danielle Crittenden spent a week donning a full-length black burka. She blogged the results here. Video here.

Flashback: Love your burka.

Flashback II: Burka Blue…

Posted in: Islam

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Life in an Abaya « Mr. Skulduggery

Trackback URL

Comments

  1. #1
    On December 10th, 2007 at 2:46 pm, madchef said:

    Ya gotta love the blues!

  2. #2
    On December 10th, 2007 at 2:48 pm, Dimsdale said:

    It is one thing if living like this is your choice, but choice is the one thing that Islamic women don’t get, if they did, I wonder how many would choose to stay under that state of repression? Apparently, the degree of clothing suppression is directly proportional to the degree of female suppression.

    And how DO they recognize each other?

  3. #3
    On December 10th, 2007 at 2:50 pm, yt1300inHtown said:

    I love Primus.

  4. #4
    On December 10th, 2007 at 2:51 pm, gunslingerpatriot said:

    Elvis Presley and Otis Redding must be turning over in their graves to see such a wonderful genera of music treated like that. :(

    GSP
    Dhimi or Freedom-Your Choice!

  5. #5
    On December 10th, 2007 at 3:24 pm, TXRose said:

    Quite a few women have lived this way for so long that they wouldn’t uncover if
    they were told they could.
    I am remembering the theater in several different countries. People dressed
    entirely in black move freely around the stage, changing sets, etc and really are
    not seen. You know things have been moved but you didn’t even notice the
    people that moved them. Same for women that are so covered. They are not
    seen, they don’t exist.
    The reason women are required to dress this way is because Muslim men cannot
    seem to stop having “impure thoughts” about them when they are in street clothes. Why, just the thought of a bare shoulder!
    I loved it when the Pakistani man said she could put the niqab on like Zorro
    and she could use it again for Hallowe’en.

  6. #6
    On December 10th, 2007 at 3:24 pm, meatpieandtatters said:

    A burka cures whatever is ailing you: hairy legs, bad breath, carry a concealed weapon or shielding a terrorist!

  7. #7
    On December 10th, 2007 at 3:31 pm, 30 pcs of silver said:

    Wanna let yourself go, a burka is the answer. Hairy legs, no problem, bad breath, got it covered. You can purchase your burka today for only $51.95 - call now and if you call within the next ten minutes you’ll a Qu’ran absolutely free!!

    DIAL 1-800-BUY-A-BURKA

  8. #8
    On December 10th, 2007 at 3:59 pm, Boomer said:

    My wife has stated more than once the only way anyone will put a burka on her will be as a shroud to cover her corpse.

    Every free Western woman sing along:

    Durka! Durka! Durka! I will never wear a Burka!

  9. #9
    On December 10th, 2007 at 4:19 pm, malkin_fan said:

    One can only imagine the hysteria coming from the MSM, the feminazi’s and EVERY liberal group in America if the Catholic church required women to start wearing a death shroud(burka).

  10. #10
    On December 10th, 2007 at 4:22 pm, Tennessee Dave said:

    After her describing what she wore under her burka, plus the amount of bodily heat generated by all of that clothing, it makes you wonder what the daring Muslim women wear under their’s. Maybe a G-string and a push up bra.
    I guess it’s sorta like the other question of the ages: What does a Scotsman wear under his kilt.
    The world may never know.

  11. #11
    On December 10th, 2007 at 5:10 pm, ajmontana said:

    Thank goodness I live in Sunny California.

    California Burka
    I love the USA

  12. #12
    On December 10th, 2007 at 5:18 pm, walterc said:

    TXRose said: The reason women are required to dress this way is because Muslim men cannot
    seem to stop having “impure thoughts” about them when they are in street clothes.

    I believe in actuality it is not because they have impure thoughts about their women, it’s that they are too insecure with their own sexuality to allow other men to have thoughts (impure or just admiration) about their women.

    Just as they are insecure about their religion, when one criticizes islam the first response is violence.

    You see the same thing when you make fun of children, being children they don’t know how to respond intelligently, so they scream and hit.

  13. #13
    On December 10th, 2007 at 5:30 pm, reutersrutter said:

    I Remember as a child and my grand father or parents would say “watch out the boogie man will get you”! Now It’s the boogie woman or Osama in drag.

  14. #14
    On December 10th, 2007 at 5:33 pm, MTNEER said:

    At one point Ms Crittenden stated that everyone was so tolerant and accepting of her burkha. I wonder how tolerant they would be if it was white with a tall pointy hat? I guess context is everything. When I see a burkha, I am more likely to react with pity for the poor woman condemned to second class citizenship by a bunch of primitive religous mysogynists. Someone in a white robe and pointy hat says something else entirely to me.

  15. #15
    On December 10th, 2007 at 5:33 pm, jimbo said:

    Tennessee Dave said:
    I guess it’s sorta like the other question of the ages: What does a Scotsman wear under his kilt.

    The usual answer to this… His socks!

  16. #16
    On December 10th, 2007 at 5:44 pm, jukin said:

    It is self-evident that the left and islam are very close in women’s rights.

    Still no outrage from the feminist NGOs.

  17. #17
    On December 10th, 2007 at 5:52 pm, gunslingerpatriot said:

    Wondering what a guy wears under the kilt ladies, check out SportKilt.com and they have a good set of links dealing with the wearing of the tartan.

    Of course, depending on who is asking me what I wear under my kilt (yes, I own one and wear it at least once/twice a week) gets one of several colorful answers. :P

    GSP
    BTW-I am of Irish descent.

  18. #18
    On December 10th, 2007 at 6:06 pm, englishqueen01 said:

    One can only imagine the hysteria coming from the MSM, the feminazi’s and EVERY liberal group in America if the Catholic church required women to start wearing a death shroud(burka).

    Malkin_Fan: You are right, but…they (feminists) took a firm stand against the mantilla (the veil the Catholic church once required women to wear, and which some women still wear, to Mass) as being a sign and symbol of the “oppressive” patriarchy of the church way back in 1968:

    Because the wearing of a head covering by women at religious services is a symbol of subjection within many churches, NOW recommends that all chapters undertake an effort to have all women participate in a ‘national unveiling’ by sending their head coverings to the task force chairman. At the Spring meeting
    of the task force of women and religion, these veils will be publicly burned to protest the second class status of women in all churches. (Dec. 1968)

    Keep in mind that chapel veils are usually made of lace or a similar light material, can be as small as a doily with some perhaps going to the shoulder.

    I own two of them. They are put on before a woman enters the church, and can be taken off when she leaves.

    While modest dress is a Church teaching, women I know can wear short sleeves, skirts that show ankle or pants, tank tops in the summer, and swimsuits. You can see their faces and bodies because - gasp! - Christianity teaches men are responsible for keeping their thoughts and behaviors in check, and it’s not a woman’s fault if she is raped (unlike Islamic teaching) or otherwise injured.

    The Church teaches that women and men are equal, but different, each with their own innate strengths and abilities that compliment the other’s (think a yin-yang symbol, if you will, to get my drift). The relationship between men and women is symbolized in the relationship of Christ and the Church - loving, caring, and devoted.

    Doesn’t that sound vastly different from the relationship between men and women in Islam? Where women are possessions rather than people, who can be traded, abused, and killed at the drop of a hat?

    It does to me.

    So I can totally see how a chapel veil is equally as oppressive as this. :roll:

    Which shows when people believe so strongly in moral relativism, it’s impossible to discern TRUE right and wrong.

  19. #19
    On December 10th, 2007 at 6:58 pm, TXRose said:

    My brother and his wife seemed to be about to be sent to Iran just before the Iran
    hostage situation. I remember a Persian (someone who left Iran before it became
    known as Iran) telling him what they (he and his family) should be prepared to do
    or not to do. One of the things was to guard their little boys. It’s the first time that
    I remember someone saying this but not the last, “Boys are for pleasure, females
    are for procreation.” I know that Islam claims to be against homosexuality but there
    are still killings over the favors of a sugar boy over there. I also heard some very
    pointed language about what Iranian men see when they look at women in slacks
    or jeans ( by that I mean, what they think they see) and that you do not wear slacks, shorts, sleeveless tops, short skirts, etc. Now, I am not saying that every
    Muslim man in bisexual and I’m not saying that every Muslim man cannot
    control himself when he sees a woman that is not dressed in a burkha, but it
    is one of the reasons why women are all covered up. I have Muslim friends that
    say that when they go home to visit family, they feel much safer covered up while they are there. These are very Americanized women.

  20. #20
    On December 10th, 2007 at 7:11 pm, deepdiver said:

    On December 10th, 2007 at 6:06 pm, englishqueen01 #18 said:

    Thank you. Very informative post.

  21. #21
    On December 10th, 2007 at 7:24 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Thank goodness I live in Sunny California.

    California Burka
    I love the USA

    California Burka would be a fine brand name. To go with the men’s line the Big Mo’ “Speedo”.

    PS - I checked the link and that Burka thing worked - I only saw her beautiful eyes…

  22. #22
    On December 10th, 2007 at 8:13 pm, Alphonse said:

    I know just how Danielle feels. When I cross dress in my girdle, pantyhose, and bra, it seems like I just can’t get comfortable. The worst are those fashionable high heels with the long pointy toes.

  23. #23
    On December 10th, 2007 at 8:23 pm, TXRose said:

    Please Alphonse. Don’t tell us you are a tall ship. The secret is as much cotton as you can find to wear and stay away from pointy toe high heels. They are not good
    for your feet and give your face an expression very close to Pelosi’s.

  24. #24
    On December 11th, 2007 at 2:21 am, Papa Louie said:

    And how DO they recognize each other?

    My guess is gang signs…

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Winds of change: The uprising in Iran

June 13, 2009 10:55 PM by Michelle Malkin

103 Comments | 20 Trackbacks

The phonies at CAIR

June 12, 2009 11:01 AM by Michelle Malkin

27 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

Update: Ahmed and Sadequee’s jihad adventure

June 10, 2009 01:23 PM by Michelle Malkin

21 Comments | 0 Trackbacks

Mourning Pvt. Long

June 8, 2009 10:32 AM by Michelle Malkin

56 Comments | 8 Trackbacks

Obama’s Wahhabi bling-bling

June 4, 2009 11:43 AM by Michelle Malkin

109 Comments | 14 Trackbacks

“Goodness gracious, that’s something there.”

Rainbows and unicorns and a world without the j-word

June 4, 2009 09:17 AM by Michelle Malkin

161 Comments | 34 Trackbacks

Fantasy Island.

Meanwhile, back in the Bronx

June 3, 2009 12:22 PM by Michelle Malkin

38 Comments | 6 Trackbacks


Categories: Islam



Pundit & Pundette

» Is the tide turning?

Weekly Standard

» Anchor Men