See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

1. Hot Air » Blog Archive » Mr. Clean gets dirty

Trackback URL

Comments

1. #1
   On December 11th, 2007 at 8:01 am, TexasTiger said:

   MEMORANDUM TO: Bob Nash

   SUBJECT: Obama Dirt

   The term “community organizer” is a synonym for poverty pimp. Rest assured that as a “community organizer,” Obama wasn’t organizing litter pickups, encouraging fathers to support their “shorties” or leading community watch teams.

   Follow the money–especially the grant money.

2. #2
   On December 11th, 2007 at 8:05 am, JohnnyD said:

   This is true Clintonian style. But just try to do it to her and see what happens. She’ll scream so bloody loud that no one will hear the wisper in the background about how she is doing the same thing.

   Shhhh, just listen for it….

3. #3
   On December 11th, 2007 at 8:15 am, wrcnossen said:

   It is a true sign of weakness to be more concerned about making your opponent look bad instead of putting forth your own clear ideas and goals.

4. #4
   On December 11th, 2007 at 8:18 am, 30 pcs of silver said:

   Mrs. Clinton your slip is showing…

   No one (in their right mind!) is surprised by her “I can dish it out but I can’t take it” attitude or my favorite – The big bad boys are picking on me. Grow a pair and man up. You’re in the big leagues now.

5. #5
   On December 11th, 2007 at 8:20 am, Tennessee Dave said:

   Mr. Nash, 59, did not respond to an e-mail request seeking comment. A campaign official said he was unaware of the matter, but would look into it.

   TRANSLATION: We haven’t actually been caught red-handed and the MSM hasn’t reported it, so it hasn’t happened. If it gathers too much steam we’ll cry “bullying tactics.”

6. #6
   On December 11th, 2007 at 8:27 am, WORK949 said:

   At the risk of insulting folks’ intelligence (those who already have figured it out), I’ll predict that this is going to be one of the filthiest, if not the dirtiest, low-down, mud-slinging, throat-ripping, eviscerating, rochambeauing campaigns in the history of this nation.

7. #7
   On December 11th, 2007 at 8:29 am, diggafromdover said:

   Three words:

   Circular Firing Squad…

8. #8
   On December 11th, 2007 at 8:29 am, ajmontana said:

   It’s already the most childish.

9. #9
   On December 11th, 2007 at 8:33 am, twiggman said:

   Does self implode ring a bell….

10. #10
    On December 11th, 2007 at 8:41 am, gayle said:

    ….and this is supposed to shock us?……

    Wait till we find out that Hillary may have had a sex change during her/his youth.

11. #11
    On December 11th, 2007 at 8:48 am, PBoilermaker said:

    Hillary.must.be.stopped.

12. #12
    On December 11th, 2007 at 8:53 am, ackrite55 said:

    Why didn’t they just take the racist black church approach. That was laid out for them.

13. #13
    On December 11th, 2007 at 9:03 am, hatelibs said:

    It is amazing to watch her bitch and moan about a simple direct question from Russert and be so downright dirty and nasty to anyone who gets in her way.

    What kind of mental makeup is needed to not see the double standard and think like that? (Rhetorical question) The Clintons arrogance and ego defies description. It will be interesting to watch her when she gets it with both barrels from our side in the real election campaign. I can just hear it now….”How dare they say things like that about me!” (Forget that they are true.) We can only hope and pray that she truly flips out and loses it in public at some point to put the nail in her coffin for good.

14. #14
    On December 11th, 2007 at 9:23 am, DesertLover said:

    Agree with what is being said by others regarding Clintonian tactics, “I can throw mud but you can’t”, “I’m being picked on because I am a woman”, etc.

    I can’t even visualize the immense amount of laundry detergent it will take to get all the dirt and mud out after the elections …

    This is the typical Democrat approach to not only this election but to any election … lots of talk without saying anything … much pontification about nothing … and everything else they say and do is intended to be a diversion by creating a smoke screen to keep people from asking serious questions about what they stand for …

    I defy anyone to tell me the platform the current Democrats in Congress were elected on … you can’t … because there wasn’t one … all you heard was putting down the President, calling the administration liars, yelling for “Frog Marches” for Dick Cheney and Karl Rove and Scooter Libby, putting down the troops, and playing the “impeachment” card, etc.

    The Democrats can’t afford to layout any of their real plans because they can’t get elected on them … raising taxes, socialized medicine, more welfare programs, and leftist indoctrination programs for our children under the guise of educational reform won’t work today … so they lie and hide their real plans …

15. #15
    On December 11th, 2007 at 9:36 am, California Unclaimed Money said:

    I can’t disclose my sources just yet, but I have it on good authority that someone from the Hillary campaign will stealthily expose some shocking dirt on Obama within the next week. I’m hearing it involves him accusing girls of having cooties in preschool, giggling in sex ed. class in high school, and not eating his vegetables which forced his mother to send him to bed without dessert. Brace yourself Obama, it’s about to get wild.

16. #16
    On December 11th, 2007 at 9:40 am, hatelibs said:

    Desert Lover

    Well said. I would add that they are experts at pandering to any and every special interest group with goodies and empty promises of $$$$$$$$$$$$$$.

    Unfortunately I must say that there is huge percentage of the American voters that are completely uninformed or dare I say “ignorant” of reality. They hear only that they will get help from the government and flock to the Dems. How else can the left continue to use “tax cuts for the rich” or “tax cuts cause deficits” and get away with it? Neither claim has a shred of accuracy but are constantly spewed without being challenged. Facts are facts but when the Lame Stream Media is in your back pocket they have a huge advantage over Republicans.

    That’s why they don’t get pinned down on their real plans. They have always been able hide their true beliefs and fool enough ignorant and clueless people to keep voting for them.

    They play to the gimme gimme gimme crowd while conning the middle.

17. #17
    On December 11th, 2007 at 9:41 am, uhangtight said:

    does this mean we aren’t going to hear ‘i can do better than bush’? have they realized now that they are not running against bush? i think they do. i bet hitlary is checking on the backgrounds of every republican, too. she just didn’t think she was going to have to do that to obama. she thought her coronation would run as planned. i guess you can say she got caught with her pants down on not having the dirt on obama sooner…

    catch up hitlery.. catch up..

18. #18
    On December 11th, 2007 at 11:15 am, TXRose said:

    If we think the smear tactics were bad when they were in office and Slick got caught
    playing around and she got caught with FBI files she should not have had in the first
    place….well, we “ain’t seen nothin’ yet folks.” This is pure dee Hillary. Go directly for
    the jugular but start crying and tattling like a 5 year old when the prey rears up and
    starts fighting back. However, I haven’t seen a candidate on the GOP side, yet, that
    seems to have the grit to fight back unless it would be Hunter or Tancredo and we
    don’t see and hear enough about them to know if they would forcefully stand up to
    HRC.

19. #19
    On December 11th, 2007 at 11:37 am, Boomer said:

    I love the way this woman screams to high heaven how she is being picked on when she puts her own foot in her mouth after a legitimate question (ala Tim Russet). Don’t even think about digging up any facts on her prior behavior without being labeled as a sexist or for picking on her. This is just part of the “Clinton War Room” usual smear tactics. The only good thing about this is it makes her look like the small and petty woman she is further destroying her viability as a serious candidate for POTUS. I guess it is her own version of self inflicted Arkancide.

20. #20
    On December 11th, 2007 at 11:44 am, shooter said:

    On December 11th, 2007 at 9:23 am, DesertLover

    Well done.
    BUT, will anyone really know? How much of the truth will get past the MSM, the Clinton filter?

21. #22
    On December 11th, 2007 at 1:57 pm, WarTip said:

    The sad part is, many “minds” will find some way to justify both her actions and their votes for her.

    Amazing!

22. #23
    On December 11th, 2007 at 7:34 pm, secondsight said:

    “I’m melting. I’m melting…”

23. #24
    On December 11th, 2007 at 9:34 pm, garyt said:

    Do you suppose if Hillary gets elected she can find dirt on foreign leaders especially conservative ones like the ones in Canada, France and Germany? It would be really wild if she can find dirt on Islam leaders but that day won’t ever happen. God help us if this vile woman gets in the Whitehouse.