<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gee, thanks, Oprah!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/12/gee-thanks-oprah/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/12/gee-thanks-oprah/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:42:47 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: A Tale of Oprah&#8217;s Mama and the Credit&#8230;Kinda Like the Bailout and the Taxpayer &#171; Mcnorman&#8217;s Weblog</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/12/gee-thanks-oprah/comment-page-1/#comment-478607</link>
		<dc:creator>A Tale of Oprah&#8217;s Mama and the Credit&#8230;Kinda Like the Bailout and the Taxpayer &#171; Mcnorman&#8217;s Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 17:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/12/gee-thanks-oprah/#comment-478607</guid>
		<description>[...] someone take this woman out for coffee and explain this to her since her daughter is tooo  busy working it for Obama?  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] someone take this woman out for coffee and explain this to her since her daughter is tooo  busy working it for Obama?  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin &#187; What Hillary supporter Robert L. Johnson, founder of Black Entertainment Television, said</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/12/gee-thanks-oprah/comment-page-1/#comment-217421</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin &#187; What Hillary supporter Robert L. Johnson, founder of Black Entertainment Television, said</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 13:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/12/gee-thanks-oprah/#comment-217421</guid>
		<description>[...] What will Oprah do?  Posted in: 2008 campaign, Hillary Clinton  Send to a Friend Printer Friendly   comments [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] What will Oprah do?  Posted in: 2008 campaign, Hillary Clinton  Send to a Friend Printer Friendly   comments [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HeatherRadish</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/12/gee-thanks-oprah/comment-page-1/#comment-197889</link>
		<dc:creator>HeatherRadish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 22:42:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/12/gee-thanks-oprah/#comment-197889</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I don’t know too many American Presidents who had Daddy issues.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Bill Clinton.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I don’t know too many American Presidents who had Daddy issues.</p></blockquote>
<p>Bill Clinton.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin &#187; The real Oprah effect: Doubting Obama&#8217;s electability</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/12/gee-thanks-oprah/comment-page-1/#comment-197184</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin &#187; The real Oprah effect: Doubting Obama&#8217;s electability</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 02:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/12/gee-thanks-oprah/#comment-197184</guid>
		<description>[...] remember that last week, Oprah hedged her bet on Obama in an interview with ABC News : &#8220;Well obviously, Obama’s great because I’m believing that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] remember that last week, Oprah hedged her bet on Obama in an interview with ABC News : &#8220;Well obviously, Obama’s great because I’m believing that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Salt</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/12/gee-thanks-oprah/comment-page-1/#comment-195243</link>
		<dc:creator>Salt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 23:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/12/gee-thanks-oprah/#comment-195243</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;dakine said:

Other than being sort of interesting from an “election junkie” point of view, Oprah’s endorsement of Obama means very little to me. However, unless I’m missing something here, I believe that Oprah is simply saying that if Obama does not in fact get the nomination, then she reserves the right to endorse another candidate (e.g., Clinton). Not sure what the big deal is.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

This is typically assumed.  The issue here is that she&#039;s saying it before it&#039;s even settled, hence hedging her bets as Michelle put it.  Either she believes that Obama is the best candidate or she doesn&#039;t.  Saying it now would likely, assuming one believes she has the power to sway an election, cause the previously confident voter blindly following her opinion to second guess.

Granted, I don&#039;t put much stock in Oprah&#039;s ability to sway, either.  However, I was a bit surprised to here her read-between-the-lines slams against Hillary during her speech.  Seems like she&#039;s backing off of them.  Lucky for her, most of the media already edited those out of the clips they showed of her speech.


&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;So my vote for is not a vote against anybody. It’s just a vote for.”&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Too bad Oprah doesn&#039;t understand the nature of voting.

Perhaps she can, like she does on her show, give her vote to everyone on the ballet to take home with them.  She can just put an extra smiley face next to Obama to show that she really likes him instead of &#039;just likes&#039; him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>dakine said:</p>
<p>Other than being sort of interesting from an “election junkie” point of view, Oprah’s endorsement of Obama means very little to me. However, unless I’m missing something here, I believe that Oprah is simply saying that if Obama does not in fact get the nomination, then she reserves the right to endorse another candidate (e.g., Clinton). Not sure what the big deal is.
</p></blockquote>
<p>This is typically assumed.  The issue here is that she&#8217;s saying it before it&#8217;s even settled, hence hedging her bets as Michelle put it.  Either she believes that Obama is the best candidate or she doesn&#8217;t.  Saying it now would likely, assuming one believes she has the power to sway an election, cause the previously confident voter blindly following her opinion to second guess.</p>
<p>Granted, I don&#8217;t put much stock in Oprah&#8217;s ability to sway, either.  However, I was a bit surprised to here her read-between-the-lines slams against Hillary during her speech.  Seems like she&#8217;s backing off of them.  Lucky for her, most of the media already edited those out of the clips they showed of her speech.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;So my vote for is not a vote against anybody. It’s just a vote for.”</p></blockquote>
<p>Too bad Oprah doesn&#8217;t understand the nature of voting.</p>
<p>Perhaps she can, like she does on her show, give her vote to everyone on the ballet to take home with them.  She can just put an extra smiley face next to Obama to show that she really likes him instead of &#8216;just likes&#8217; him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bear1909</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/12/gee-thanks-oprah/comment-page-1/#comment-194415</link>
		<dc:creator>bear1909</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 03:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/12/gee-thanks-oprah/#comment-194415</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;She is an incredible business woman, but I don’t think that I could be that destructive to millions of people watching me just to make a buck.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Oprah is surrounded by some of the finest marketing minds in media.  When she puts herself out there on her own it is a different story-- the fiasco in the girl&#039;s school in South Africa.

What if that had happened here? Oops.

Sure, she deserves credit for building herself up from a local newsroom.

But was it all her doing?  Once media conglomerates kick in their support, it becomes more of a juggernaut than somebody&#039;s business acumen. 

Gotta hand it to her-- she reads people well and uses them accordingly.  In time we&#039;ll find out what many of them have experienced in service to the Diva of all Divas.

This shameless backing of a noodleheaded presidential candidate doesn&#039;t speak well of her, and certainly not of noodlehead.

Real power doesn&#039;t need a stage.  There is something tinny about this cattle show she put on for Osmarma.

Embarassing to many.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>She is an incredible business woman, but I don’t think that I could be that destructive to millions of people watching me just to make a buck.</p></blockquote>
<p>Oprah is surrounded by some of the finest marketing minds in media.  When she puts herself out there on her own it is a different story&#8211; the fiasco in the girl&#8217;s school in South Africa.</p>
<p>What if that had happened here? Oops.</p>
<p>Sure, she deserves credit for building herself up from a local newsroom.</p>
<p>But was it all her doing?  Once media conglomerates kick in their support, it becomes more of a juggernaut than somebody&#8217;s business acumen. </p>
<p>Gotta hand it to her&#8211; she reads people well and uses them accordingly.  In time we&#8217;ll find out what many of them have experienced in service to the Diva of all Divas.</p>
<p>This shameless backing of a noodleheaded presidential candidate doesn&#8217;t speak well of her, and certainly not of noodlehead.</p>
<p>Real power doesn&#8217;t need a stage.  There is something tinny about this cattle show she put on for Osmarma.</p>
<p>Embarassing to many.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bear1909</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/12/gee-thanks-oprah/comment-page-1/#comment-194406</link>
		<dc:creator>bear1909</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 03:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/12/gee-thanks-oprah/#comment-194406</guid>
		<description>Osmarma is made of wood wishing he could be real.

I don&#039;t know too many American Presidents who had Daddy issues.

Wonder if he is going to come clean about it on the Oprah Show.

The madrassa issue refuses to die.  Some are dying to call it an &quot;urban legend&quot;.

Again--- an unresolved Daddy issue.

As for Hillary--- she is so inevitable she can&#039;t deal with Osmarma on any substantive grounds.  The more she picks at him the worse she looks.  Nice team, Hillary.  Can&#039;t wait to see who you circle yourself with in the White House, God forbid.

Ugh.

Oprah Winfrey....honestly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Osmarma is made of wood wishing he could be real.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know too many American Presidents who had Daddy issues.</p>
<p>Wonder if he is going to come clean about it on the Oprah Show.</p>
<p>The madrassa issue refuses to die.  Some are dying to call it an &#8220;urban legend&#8221;.</p>
<p>Again&#8212; an unresolved Daddy issue.</p>
<p>As for Hillary&#8212; she is so inevitable she can&#8217;t deal with Osmarma on any substantive grounds.  The more she picks at him the worse she looks.  Nice team, Hillary.  Can&#8217;t wait to see who you circle yourself with in the White House, God forbid.</p>
<p>Ugh.</p>
<p>Oprah Winfrey&#8230;.honestly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beenthere</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/12/gee-thanks-oprah/comment-page-1/#comment-194356</link>
		<dc:creator>beenthere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 02:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/12/gee-thanks-oprah/#comment-194356</guid>
		<description>I wonder if there is a more interesting question here: what on earth is causing the surge in Obama&#039;s and Huckabee&#039;s respective candidacies?  They&#039;re both a couple of zeros as far as any rational person can see.  Neither has anything resembling a program or principles.  They pretty much tell whatever group they are with what they want to hear.  Standard issue you say, yet they do so in a way that is almost contemptuous.  The republican candidates are bores and the democrat candidates are truly frightening, but are these two the answer to the American people&#039;s dreams?    Do desperate times call for vacuous men?

BTW, If you want to go determinably mad, go off by yourself where no one can hear you, and start repeating, snapping your finger if it helps: &quot;Oh Bam Ah Huck A Bee!&quot;  There is kind of a rhythm to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if there is a more interesting question here: what on earth is causing the surge in Obama&#8217;s and Huckabee&#8217;s respective candidacies?  They&#8217;re both a couple of zeros as far as any rational person can see.  Neither has anything resembling a program or principles.  They pretty much tell whatever group they are with what they want to hear.  Standard issue you say, yet they do so in a way that is almost contemptuous.  The republican candidates are bores and the democrat candidates are truly frightening, but are these two the answer to the American people&#8217;s dreams?    Do desperate times call for vacuous men?</p>
<p>BTW, If you want to go determinably mad, go off by yourself where no one can hear you, and start repeating, snapping your finger if it helps: &#8220;Oh Bam Ah Huck A Bee!&#8221;  There is kind of a rhythm to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deepdiver</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/12/gee-thanks-oprah/comment-page-1/#comment-194320</link>
		<dc:creator>deepdiver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 01:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/12/gee-thanks-oprah/#comment-194320</guid>
		<description>Is the oprah show crowd the same as the view crowd?  She is an incredible business woman, but I don&#039;t think that I could be that destructive to millions of people watching me just to make a buck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is the oprah show crowd the same as the view crowd?  She is an incredible business woman, but I don&#8217;t think that I could be that destructive to millions of people watching me just to make a buck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlameAmericaLast</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/12/gee-thanks-oprah/comment-page-1/#comment-194271</link>
		<dc:creator>BlameAmericaLast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 00:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/12/gee-thanks-oprah/#comment-194271</guid>
		<description>Yeah, didn&#039;t someone say she hasn&#039;t voted in the primaries since the 80s or something? Did I hear that right?

Why all the sudden interest? Oh yeah, I know why...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, didn&#8217;t someone say she hasn&#8217;t voted in the primaries since the 80s or something? Did I hear that right?</p>
<p>Why all the sudden interest? Oh yeah, I know why&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gayle</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/12/gee-thanks-oprah/comment-page-1/#comment-194262</link>
		<dc:creator>gayle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 00:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/12/gee-thanks-oprah/#comment-194262</guid>
		<description>Oprah is just covering her media bases.

She doesn&#039;t want to &quot;offend&quot; anyone.

Another fence sitter who doesn&#039;t usually vote.

The irony.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oprah is just covering her media bases.</p>
<p>She doesn&#8217;t want to &#8220;offend&#8221; anyone.</p>
<p>Another fence sitter who doesn&#8217;t usually vote.</p>
<p>The irony.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlohaGuy</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/12/gee-thanks-oprah/comment-page-1/#comment-193989</link>
		<dc:creator>AlohaGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 20:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/12/gee-thanks-oprah/#comment-193989</guid>
		<description>Please, please, please can we get to the important issues - what does Oprah&#039;s BFF Gail think!?
  I won&#039;t know how to vote until I hear from Gail!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please, please, please can we get to the important issues &#8211; what does Oprah&#8217;s BFF Gail think!?<br />
  I won&#8217;t know how to vote until I hear from Gail!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tennessee Dave</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/12/gee-thanks-oprah/comment-page-1/#comment-193982</link>
		<dc:creator>Tennessee Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 20:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/12/gee-thanks-oprah/#comment-193982</guid>
		<description>Oprah was for Obama before she was not against anyone else....  
Is that what she&#039;s saying?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oprah was for Obama before she was not against anyone else&#8230;.<br />
Is that what she&#8217;s saying?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laree</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/12/gee-thanks-oprah/comment-page-1/#comment-193970</link>
		<dc:creator>Laree</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 19:54:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/12/gee-thanks-oprah/#comment-193970</guid>
		<description>Tammy Bruce, called Obama, a Straw Man and said, that Oprah Winfrey would support Clinton, this was a month or so ago. I listen to Tammy Bruce, she is usually right on in her analyses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tammy Bruce, called Obama, a Straw Man and said, that Oprah Winfrey would support Clinton, this was a month or so ago. I listen to Tammy Bruce, she is usually right on in her analyses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shooter</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/12/gee-thanks-oprah/comment-page-1/#comment-193956</link>
		<dc:creator>shooter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 19:46:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/12/gee-thanks-oprah/#comment-193956</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Basically Oprah just laid out the exact criteria in her pecking order to select a Presidential candidate in the primary elections:
1. A Black Democrat
2. A Female Democrat
3. Any other Democrat left standing&lt;/blockquote&gt;
BINGO!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Basically Oprah just laid out the exact criteria in her pecking order to select a Presidential candidate in the primary elections:<br />
1. A Black Democrat<br />
2. A Female Democrat<br />
3. Any other Democrat left standing</p></blockquote>
<p>BINGO!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- NEW -->
