Scrooges on the Hill: Saying no to Christmas resolution

By Michelle Malkin  •  December 12, 2007 03:18 PM

From the office of GOP Rep. Steve King:

Congressman Steve King reacted this morning to the nine “NO” votes on his resolution to honor Christmas and the Christian faith. The vote shocked Capitol Hill observers because votes on similar resolutions honoring the holidays of Islam and Hinduism passed without any NO votes.

Appearing this morning on the Fox News Channel’s Fox and Friends, King said, “The [nine] naysayers didn’t make it to the floor to debate. I would like to know how they could vote Yes on Islam, Yes on the Indian Religions and No on Christianity when the foundation of this nation and our American culture is Christianity…I think there’s an assault on Christianity in America.”

The nine Members voting NO were Rep. Gary Ackerman (D-NY), Rep. Yvette Clarke (D-NY), Rep. Diana DeGette (D-CO), Rep. Alcee Hastings (D-FL) (FL), Rep. Barbara Lee (D-CA), Rep. Jim McDermott (D-WA), Rep. Bobby Scott (D-VA), Rep. Pete Stark (D-CA), and Rep. Lynn Woolsey (D-CA). None of the nine voted against resolutions honoring the Islamic holiday of Ramadan and the Hindu holiday of Diwali.

Here’s video:

More:

Nine Democrats voted No – Ackerman, Clarke, DeGette, Hastings (FL), Lee, McDermott, Scott (VA), Stark and Woolsey.
Nine Democrats voted Present – Conyers, Frank (MA), Holt, Payne, Schakowsky, Schwartz, Wasserman Schultz, Welch (VT) and Yarmuth

This is interesting because of this group 17 of the 18 Ds above voted FOR a resolution honoring Ramadan (Lee missed the vote). Note that the King resolution was based on the language in the Ramadan resolution. You can compare them if you want, but King’s is more benign. Ramadan – H.Res. 635 and Christmas – H. Res. 847

H. Res. 847: recognizing the importance of Christmas and the Christian faith

FINAL VOTE RESULTS FOR ROLL CALL 1143

~ For the latest breaking news, be sure to join Michelle's e-mail list ~
Posted in: Politics

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments


  1. #1
    On December 12th, 2007 at 3:24 pm, right_on said:

    May Allah heap holiday (Holy Day) blessings on them all!

  2. #2
    On December 12th, 2007 at 3:27 pm, granite said:

    This just further supports what I’ve been saying for several years – that American leftists/socialists are as great a threat to our culture and way of life as are the radical Muslim crazies that we are fighting…perhaps more so.

    Talk about self-loathing, clueless dangerous, “useful idiots”, who are happy, for whatever reasons they have, to mindlessly eat our cultural seed-corn.

    God help us.

  3. #3
    On December 12th, 2007 at 3:34 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    And this surprises anyone? These are the ultimate PC folks here at “work”.

  4. #4
    On December 12th, 2007 at 3:37 pm, TexasTiger said:

    Why look! They’re all Democrats! Who’d a thunk it?

  5. #5
    On December 12th, 2007 at 3:38 pm, gandolphxx said:

    May the fleas of a thousand camels infest the beds of these nine.

  6. #6
    On December 12th, 2007 at 3:42 pm, jfish said:

    Wow, how f’ing inclusive of them. Gotta agree with granite #2 that these jokers are easily as dangerous as ‘radical Muslim crazies’, especially since we can’t seem to just draw them all into Iraq …

  7. #7
    On December 12th, 2007 at 3:42 pm, DesertLover said:

    I suggest we all send each of them a lump of coal for Christmas … courtesy of Ebenezer Scrooge …

  8. #8
    On December 12th, 2007 at 3:43 pm, RetFireman said:

    Is nyone that surprised? The trolls will rejoice in this news and come up with some lame rationale, but ultimately it is the full on attack against Christianity and Christmas that the Liberals deny thats is the reason. This is Multi-culturalism at it’s finest. And look at who the Dems were…the biggest Dhimmis in Congress, thus it should be no surprise

    Had Ramadan not been recognized, CATR would have sued and The Religion of Peace would have taken it as an insult to the prophet 9stink be upon him0 and the riots and murders would have commenced. However, these bigots can go and spit on the Christians and the holiday that they will be happily taking WITH PAY and not worry about a thing. After all, what are the Christians going to do about it? That’s right, nothing. Not even a discrimination suit brought against these bigots and dhimmis.

    And yet there they will be come next election ctcle, standing in each AME and Baptist church, pretending and pandering, begging for the Christian vote, Bible in hand, and people will continue to let them do it.

  9. #9
    On December 12th, 2007 at 3:44 pm, Tennessee Dave said:

    On December 12th, 2007 at 3:38 pm, gandolphxx said:
    May the fleas of a thousand camels infest the beds of these nine.

    Wouldn’t that be considered cruel and unusual punishment………for the fleas?

  10. #10
    On December 12th, 2007 at 3:52 pm, walterc said:

    King said, “The [nine] naysayers didn’t make it to the floor to debate. I would like to know how they could vote Yes on Islam, Yes on the Indian Religions and No on Christianity when the foundation of this nation and our American culture is Christianity…I think there’s an assault on Christianity in America.”

    Gee, ya think? Front runner for understatement of the year.

  11. #11
    On December 12th, 2007 at 3:54 pm, Bear said:

    What can you expect from Democrats? Democrats always seem to do what ever they can to destroy the U.S.

  12. #12
    On December 12th, 2007 at 3:56 pm, ajmontana said:

    1/3 of them from Cal. disgusting crapweasels.

  13. #13
    On December 12th, 2007 at 3:57 pm, madchef said:

    Then I expect to see the nine of them working on Christmas!

  14. #14
    On December 12th, 2007 at 4:01 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    LOL – Donk’s all mine = A$$ ‘n nine!

    Twice today I did that!

  15. #15
    On December 12th, 2007 at 4:02 pm, meatpieandtatters said:

    Since the Christians saw fit to vilify the heaven worshipers calling them pagans, in a sort of secular turnabout, saying no is ok. All religions can stand on their own quite well without some blow-hard politicos weighing in for their own PR purposes. It doesn’t effect anybody else’s celebration does it?

  16. #16
    On December 12th, 2007 at 4:04 pm, uhangtight said:

    definitely there is an assault on christians. when religious freedom is the backbone of this country, implemented by our forefathers (a majority of christians). do they think that Moslems would have instituted such a freedom, Hindus or any other so called religion? no, but what do they do? they take and recognize two very oppressive religions. while slighting the one that actually thought of providing this very basic constitutional foundation of freedom of religion.

    what idiots.

  17. #17
    On December 12th, 2007 at 4:07 pm, clos2thedge said:

    Unfortunately, McDermott is from my home state. He doesn’t want the United States to eavesdrop, he just wants to be able to do it. He can often be found here at Evergreen State College, the same school that produced many of the anti-America crowd trying to stop the troops from getting the supplies they needed at the port of Olympia. He has told students there that Bush is worse than Sadaam Hussein, America is the cause for all the world problems, etc. He is a sorry excuse for a U.S. representative, and the people here in Washington should be ashamed that they keep voting him in.

  18. #18
    On December 12th, 2007 at 4:07 pm, taylork said:

    Amazing that before reading the list of Congressman who voted no, I predicted 14 of the no’s.
    I guess Kucinich is on the campaign trail. This vote seems right up his alley.

  19. #19
    On December 12th, 2007 at 4:23 pm, max said:

    meatpieandtatters said:
    Since the Christians saw fit to vilify the heaven worshipers calling them pagans, in a sort of secular turnabout, saying no is ok.

    so pagans are secular? …. hmmm i think maybe not…

    also, you don’t address the most noxious aspect of these Congressmens behavior, which is recognizing Ilsam et al and not Christianity…

  20. #20
    On December 12th, 2007 at 4:23 pm, Go_Fish said:

    I know I’m gonna get trounced for this, but I couldn’t care less if Congress issues a resolution praising Christmas or not. They pass resolutions for all sorts of ridiculous stuff. Honestly, issuing a proclamation saying “We Love Christmas” is about as meaningful as one that says “We like to hug puppies and kittens.”

    Pass a damned spending bill already.

  21. #21
    On December 12th, 2007 at 4:25 pm, englishqueen01 said:

    But no…whenever we say there’s a “war on Christmas” and Christianity in general, the left says…”NO! There isn’t!”

    In the report I read, one of the politicians who voted against the resolution did so because she was afraid it would violate the “separation of church and state” clause.

    So, just to make sure I understand this:

    Voting FOR resolutions recognizing Ramadan and Dawali is NOT a violation of the First Amendment and that non-existent “separation of church and state” clause that liberals love to use, but voting for the Christmas resolution – a holiday on par with Ramanda and Dawali – does? Especially when you consider our country was founded on Judeo-Christian values and principles?

    Funny how people who consider the Constitution a “living, breathing” document happen to take a clause that does not appear anywhere in the Constitution (“the separation of church and state”) literally – always openly discriminating against CHURCHES and CHRISTIANS.

    No, no subversive attack on Christianity here.

    Countdown to the outright outlawing of Christianity…3…2…1…

  22. #22
    On December 12th, 2007 at 4:29 pm, meatpieandtatters said:

    The only actual assault on Christians lately was in Colorado Springs and Arvada. The regular bemoaning about Christians can be heard daily on your local Lame Stream Media outlet….and Air America Radio where available.

  23. #23
    On December 12th, 2007 at 4:29 pm, hatelibs said:

    This is revolting but not a surprise given the sickening PC climate that is destroying the very fabric this country was founded on.

    Islam a “great” religion of the world but Christianity is not? . Excuse me while I throw up! I just wonder what the American people think about it. One can only hope that this is not a one day story and the left gets KILLED by it. There is no damn excuse period.

    It’s bad enough for members of both parties to even think Islam is a great religion let alone cast a silly symbolic vote. For any member of Congress to vote against Christianity like this is gtounds for impeachment….I’m serious. This is not a laughing matter.

    Ladies and gentleman we are watching the intentional destruction of the United States happen right before our eyes by elected politicians.

  24. #24
    On December 12th, 2007 at 4:33 pm, nbarry said:

    #7, some of them actually need a lump of coal for Christmas – to dye their hair.

  25. #25
    On December 12th, 2007 at 4:35 pm, Romeo13 said:

    As a Theist… I have to ask why in the heck Congress is wasteing time on ANY of these resolutions, when they have not passed the needed spending bills to keep our troops in the feild and government going?

  26. #26
    On December 12th, 2007 at 4:48 pm, Wile E Coyote said:

    Have any of you (aside from Michelle) actually taken the time to read both resolutions? Although the top quote states the King resolution was based on the Ramadan resolution, the devil is in the details.

    Whereas there are approximately 225,000,000 Christians in the United States, making Christianity the religion of over three-fourths of the American population;

    Whereas there are approximately 2,000,000,000 Christians throughout the world, making Christianity the largest religion in the world and the religion of about one-third of the world population;

    Whereas Christians identify themselves as those who believe in the salvation from sin offered to them through the sacrifice of their savior, Jesus Christ, the Son of God, and who, out of gratitude for the gift of salvation, commit themselves to living their lives in accordance with the teachings of the Holy Bible;

    These are very specifically religious in nature. The Ramadan resolution didn’t mention these sorts of things at all.

  27. #27
    On December 12th, 2007 at 5:11 pm, DesertLover said:

    These types of meaningless resolutions are passed routinely by both houses of congress … which is why they are invariably passed unanimously … they are pretty much ceremonial recognition at best …

    Therefore … regardless of the parsing of the verbage in these resolutions the real problem here is that they unanimously passed resolutions recognizing religious holidays for Islam and India (I assume that would be Hinduism but it is not spelled out specifically in the story), as is customary, then didn’t back the Christian holiday resolution equally …

  28. #28
    On December 12th, 2007 at 5:24 pm, graysonret said:

    Let’s keep it up, democrats. Word will get out. Then, come November, don’t stand there open-mouthed when you find the country against you completely.

  29. #29
    On December 12th, 2007 at 5:33 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    simple:

    Democrat = socialist.

    Is this what the public wants?

    VOTE and make a difference.

  30. #30
    On December 12th, 2007 at 5:37 pm, granite said:

    #27 On December 12th, 2007 at 5:11 pm, DesertLover said:

    “Therefore … regardless of the parsing of the …then didn’t back the Christian holiday resolution equally …”

    Exactly.

    These clowns saw an opportunity to give the finger to America, and they took advantage of it.

    It is simultaneously frightening and fascinating to consider how accurate those folks were, who in the 60s (I remember) and 70s were warning about the terrible societal and cultural impact the stupid changes occurring at that time would have – changes in education, morality, pornography, the “arts”, law enforcement, and other aspects I can’t think of right now.

    So, I am not surprised – saddened, disgusted, and outraged, to be sure; but, not surprised – that these “useful idiots” in Congress did this.

    Politicians are interested in reelection, and/or in pursuing their worldview agenda – not in representing their constituents’ or America’s interests.

    And, it’s not unlikely that a substantial proportion of them are the product of our dopey public education system, cesspool popular culture, socialist media,…you get the picture.

    I hope I am wrong, but I am not optimistic that incremental improvement and restoration of our culture and society will occur.

    Although I hope not, I’m afraid that it is going to take something drastic and sudden, something metaphorically similar to Hercules’ cleaning of the Augean stables in a single day; if our nation, society, and culture are to survive in a recognizable form.

  31. #31
    On December 12th, 2007 at 5:45 pm, Mark Jaquith said:

    I think there’s an assault on Christianity in America.

    Let it not be said that Muslims are alone in their unending thirst for religious victimhood.

    Why is Congress wasting their time on religious recognition wankery in the first place? I don’t care what they think of my religion — or any other — as long as everyone is free to worship as they please.

    Do the American people a favor and do something about illegal immigration or the income tax.

  32. #32
    On December 12th, 2007 at 5:52 pm, granite said:

    #31 On December 12th, 2007 at 5:45 pm, Mark Jaquith said:

    “Why is Congress wasting their time on religious recognition wankery in the first place?”

    “Do the American people a favor and do something about illegal immigration or the income tax.”

    Agreed, wholeheartedly.

    If I am correct, the point of most of these comments (at least of mine) is that, the situation being that Congress did vote on a nonbinding resolution, the above-named members, both those who actively voted, and those who merely voted “present” (whatever the hell that means – why not just say “abstain”?)gave the middle finger salute to America.

  33. #33
    On December 12th, 2007 at 6:01 pm, englishqueen01 said:

    Let it not be said that Muslims are alone in their unending thirst for religious victimhood.

    Give me a break, Mark. My time, and the comboxes, do not have nearly enough room to dissect just how completely ignorant and erroneous that statement is.

    :roll:

  34. #34
    On December 12th, 2007 at 6:20 pm, Leatherneck said:

    I bet good money these non-Americans get most of their campain money from secular humanist groups that hate morality, and the G-d that created them and died for them.

    They would rather believe a lie.

  35. #35
    On December 12th, 2007 at 6:49 pm, elpresidente said:

    My rep, Democrat Diana DeGette, explained her vote:

    DeGette’s chief of staff, Lisa Cohen, told FOXNews.com that she had not heard King’s comments until she spoke with a reporter, but DeGette previously has opposed similar bills on Christianity because she “has concerns about separation of church and state.” Other lawmakers’ offices did not immediately respond to requests for comment Wednesday.

    Does DeGette really believe that by affirming a resolution such as this that she is somehow establishing Christianity as the state religion? I’m sure the raging Christianists in liberal Denver will riot in the streets over this offensive dismissal of their religion. Oh wait, they won’t. But nice to see DeGette buy into the conspiratorial “Christians are trying to subvert the Constitution by establishing it as the state religion” moonbattery.

  36. #36
    On December 12th, 2007 at 6:57 pm, Yashmak said:

    Once again, I am left to apologize on behalf of my state (CA) for the actions of the morons elected by the morons who live in this state with me.

  37. #37
    On December 12th, 2007 at 7:08 pm, sfcmac said:

    Rep. Gary Ackerman (D-NY), Rep. Yvette Clarke (D-NY), Rep. Diana DeGette (D-CO), Rep. Alcee Hastings (D-FL) (FL), Rep. Barbara Lee (D-CA), Rep. Jim McDermott (D-WA), Rep. Bobby Scott (D-VA), Rep. Pete Stark (D-CA), and Rep. Lynn Woolsey (D-CA).

    The usual gang of moonbats.

  38. #38
    On December 12th, 2007 at 7:32 pm, gayle said:

    Since the basic fundamental rights of our country are based on Christian beliefs, I would hold those that voted “NO” to remove themselves from office effective immediately.

    Send them to the friendly sands of Iran.

    Taxpayers should demand it now.

    What an outrage.

  39. #39
    On December 12th, 2007 at 7:55 pm, maisy said:

    And of course this means they will be WORKING on December 25th, right???

  40. #40
    On December 12th, 2007 at 7:57 pm, maisy said:

    Yashmak…hey ..good to see your apology as I often have to apologize for living in amongst the liberal loons in MA responsible for Teddy “Mohammed” Kennedy and Kerry Swiftboater…..It’s a burden let me tell ya!!!

  41. #41
    On December 12th, 2007 at 8:49 pm, deepdiver said:

    BS from the usual suspects.

  42. #42
    On December 12th, 2007 at 9:06 pm, Boomer said:

    Just when the Democrats couldn’t go any lower they just keep digging. I am so glad these crapweasels took the time to show their love for diversity and dimitude by recognizing other religious events too bad they couldn’t honor the real religion of peace (Christianity).

  43. #43
    On December 13th, 2007 at 2:09 am, pgtips said:

    While it angers me that they have rejected this resolution while passing others pertaining to other religions, I gotta ask myself why does it even matter?

    Should they be wasting time voting on resolutions that change nothing?

  44. #44
    On December 13th, 2007 at 3:07 am, WarTip said:

    Can we call for a vote of our own ….. Secession comes to mind.

  45. #45
    On December 13th, 2007 at 4:24 am, graysonret said:

    I never thought I’d see the day when the U.S. gov’t begins to persecute Christianity. This vote is just the start.

  46. #46
    On December 13th, 2007 at 8:09 am, Dread Pirate Roberts VIII said:

    Heh. Jan Schakowski votes “oui” to the dhimmi Ramadan resolution, and “present” to the Christmas resolution, despite Christmas being celebrated in 90+% of the households in her district.

    I think Jan is Jewish, and of course she’s a radical leftist. Are we a little raving self-hater, Jan?

  47. #47
    On December 13th, 2007 at 9:26 am, diggafromdover said:

    Don’t blame the crapweasels – they are just pandering to the idiots who elected them. I pity their neighbors…

  48. #48
    On December 13th, 2007 at 12:18 pm, Right is right said:

    Once again, a concept, I can’t believe was even entertained by our gov’t, is embraced by the left. As far as I’m concerned it makes the people paying attention choose a side and vehemently defend it, so hopefully these ninecompoops will be looking for work soon.

  49. #49
    On December 13th, 2007 at 8:02 pm, garyt said:

    Jesus said there would be persecution against Christians and He also said those who hate Him will hate His followers. Most democrats I believe do not have a personal relationship with Christ so I am not shocked by this vote. Anyway I wish someone in congress who voted for Islam being a great religion tell me why it is such a great one?

  50. #50
    On December 14th, 2007 at 4:19 pm, nyc123me said:

    Of course nothing has come of this from our dhimmi-ridden media, and nobody is even aware of it outside readers of this site. I’m starting to believe this country is destined to fall, and it is idiot politicians like these that will contribute so much to the downfall.

    Freedom of religion – unless you’re Christian.
    Freedom of race bias – unless you’re white.
    Freedom of all the rights of citizenship – unless you’re a legal citizen.

    Wow, I’ve got to stop reading back into archives, I’m getting worked up!

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Video: Mr. America

February 13, 2012 10:23 AM by Michelle Malkin

26 Comments

Greece Erupts After Vote for Austerity Measures to Secure Another Bailout

February 12, 2012 10:19 PM by Doug Powers

54 Comments

Preview of coming attractions?

More CPAC speeches in 20 words

February 11, 2012 06:53 PM by Michelle Malkin

72 Comments

US State Department Expands Travel Warning for Mexico

February 11, 2012 03:29 PM by Doug Powers

43 Comments

War zones

‘Occupy CPAC’ Protester Paid $60 a Day

February 10, 2012 02:32 PM by Doug Powers

45 Comments

Living wage?

‘To Stop the Multiplication of the Unfit’

February 10, 2012 09:06 AM by Michelle Malkin

199 Comments

L.A. Board of Supervisors Impose $1,000 Fine for Having Fun on the Beach

February 9, 2012 04:42 PM by Doug Powers

77 Comments

Illegal activity


Categories: Politics

Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook