…

This is a brilliant post by Michelle Malkin on how the GOP has drifted so far left as to have a bright green halo over it.
As I’ve said before…numerous times…the GOP is unrecognizable and the candidates have totally departed from the …

And argued with me, I just have to say, I dug up the number. In Stossel’s report, he cited a poll showing that 86% of Americans think global warming is a “serious issue”.

Again, I think global warming is such crap. Even family members of mine (who don’t buy it either) will say “it’s global warming” when we get an unseasonably warm day (which we haven’t since Oct. btw), just to irritate me, because they know it pisses me off and will set me off on a rant. Trust me, I have nothing but fury for the religion of global warming, and I honestly want to jail people like RFK Jr. and Al Gore when this matter is finally put to rest at some point, hopefully in the next decade.

But that said, with 86% of the public buying this crap, these front runners have to pander so that Hillary or Obama doesn’t take them down in the general election with that single issue. It’s not like they’re going to give Fred a national broadcast on all channels to bring up climate change skeptic scientists and educate people, and we all see how the media treats the issue.

It’s sad, but it’s true, this is a “sound byte” game, and I don’t know what makes you think that taking an anti-global warming position is going to help in the general election, because the message will simply not get out. Hell even that turd Shep Smith on Fox News pulls that “the debate is over” crap, and Hannity only whines about the hypocrisy, not the actual debunking.

Look, of course the RINOs in the lead aren’t ideal candidates, and I’m not saying “pick them over Fred”. I’m just a forward looking person, and recognize that it will be one of them (not Fred), and telling you why they can’t be seen as “deniers” or we might as well swear in the Dem nominee today.

Not one of you has countered my logic about how any GOP candidate will never be able to get the “global warming is a hoax” message out, you just want to act like Ron Paul supporters and say “Fred is the best!” Wake up, I’m talking general election here, based on the assumption Fred doesn’t get the nod. He likely won’t, pretend he doesn’t. Do you want to stay home and be principled and not vote for Romney over Hillary (effectively casting a half of a vote FOR Hillary)? Because that’s what you’re saying.

He may not have raised his hand, but I think we are now witnessing a definite FINGER IN THE WIND TEST from the Fred Camp.

I don’t trust a lawyer who thinks that Bill Clinton’s perjury wasn’t an impeacheable offence.

Who might HE pardon, next???

What kind of JUDGE – who isn’t concerned about crimes of PERJURY!

FOOEY ON FRED!

On December 13th, 2007 at 2:17 pm, SHoward said:#94
If you compare just these two issues, the ozone layer and global warming, it sounds like someone is always looking for a “Crisis of the Month.”

Liberalism/progessivism doesn’t work unless there is a crisis. The democrat party hold no sway over anyone unless there is a non-military crisis. Their entire platform is about duping stupid little Janey,who is the victim of an NEA controlled government education indoctrination, into voting for them because they are going to save her or her children from some perceived crisis.

If there is no crisis to save her from, the platform of “we are going to confiscate money from you, your family and your children and give it to other people who don’t work as hard as you do to earn a living and are generational welfare recipients, and to farmers (including multi-national conglomerates with billions of dollars in annual profits) to subsidize their product but not to subsidize the products of other small business owners, and to terrorist governments, and to dictators who starve and abuse their people, and to a bunch of other stupid crap that no one really wants or needs so that we politicians can stay in power,” doesn’t float at all even with 30 something year old single women living in Chicagostan or New York even who have had 3 abortions, 100 sexual partners, have been on birth control since Jr High, currently are on WIC, were abused as a child, sexually harassed at work and is now bouncing against the glass ceiling. Even a flaming liberal with that background, without the context of a crisis, would see that the democrat party is about power not compassion, wealth destruction not wealth creation, subjugation not freedom, and … oh crap, I just realized, that’s why the liberals love the muslim fanatics – they are exactly the same underneath it all!

The leading NASA Gorical, James Hansen, claimed for a year or two that 2005 was the warmest year on record. It wasn’t, his data was wrong – discredited by a Canadian scientist. It’s not even in the top ten. NASA changed the data quietly – shown in the graph in #87 above, but his claim regularly comes back from the dead in the MSM.

From This Article:

…his analysis caused NASA to revise their data down 0.15 degrees Celsius. Prior to the correction of the error, NASA claimed that global temperatures for 2005 were 0.75 degrees Celsius above the average between 1950 and 1980. This is a 20% error, hardly insignificant. In fact, from a statistician’s point of view this is a huge mistake.

Fast forward — no one has actually been able to demonstrate beyond a reasonable doubt that CO2 emissions are in fact causing even the slightest increase in temperatures, yet we are in a big hurry to control them — this time at a high economic cost. To think we can just snap our fingers and make it happen like they can on Star Trek is really juvenile. We need to be certain, and right now we are not.

If you compare just these two issues, the ozone layer and global warming, it sounds like someone is always looking for a “Crisis of the Month.” Right now, that is global warming.

Those aren’t temperature forecasts, they’re historical records of average annual temperature. Unless you’re accusing NASA of being dishonest and misrepresenting historical data, I don’t see why using their graphs presents a problem.