Honorable Mentions: ACLU, Barbra Streisand, Bill Clinton, Bill Moyers, Bill Richardson, Brian DePalma, CAIR, Chuck Schumer, Code Pink, Columbia University, David Gregory, Dennis Kucinich, Ellen DeGeneres, George Soros, Glenn Greenwald, Helen Thomas, Ho…

http://www.nypost.com/seven/12132007/news/regionalnews/rev__under_at_tax_393585.htm

This is from a larger article.

By JOHN MAZOR and CHUCK BENNET

The woman allegedly behind the breakup of the Rev. Al Sharpton’s 23-year marriage was slapped with a subpoena…. The two were romantically linked as late as 2004 and traveled together frequently throughout his presidential run, staying at luxury hotels and flying first class.

It’s always the quite ones, this is must be somekind of “witch hunt” GRIN

Burner..let me give you a little friendly advice. I have not really read enough of your posts to really kno what side of the aisle you are on yet, as your posts really haven’t had any substance to them politically as of yet. Now hear me out, this is not a slam…yet. I assume you have read my posts enough to know when the smack down is being laid down, and you should know this ain’t it. THis is friendly, constructive criticism on a Right-Wing netiqueette.

I am not sure, like I said, where your politics lie, but I am going to take a stab at it and say you are a leftward leaning type. I am going to take that from the way you have responded to the way some of my brethren here have smacked at you. Let me give you this advice, kinda clarify, if I may, the way someone else tried to tell you earlier.

There is a way to flame people on a site and there is a way not to flame people. One way will keep you around and may actually garner you a following, albeit a questionable following, but a following none the less. The other way will find yourself hated, smacked around like a cheap, illiterate crack addict looking for a hit from her pimp n the middle of the Tenderloin on a Friday while you get yourself banned from the site forever, while trying to figure out just what the heck it is you did wrong, all the while knowing what it was, and living in a world of self-denial and cursing the Right Wingers for the rest of your life, and never accepting responsibility for the wrongs that you yourself have done.

Hopefully I have not lost you yet.

The goal first of all is to NEVER…and I mean NEVER use the foul language that you have been using on this thread. It just isn’t done here or basically on any reputable Right-Wing or COnservative site. That kind of junk may work on every single Liberal site out there, but not on the COnservative ones. When you use it, prepare to be ostrisized. Also, do not make excuses. Do not blame others for your mistales. DO not say you only did it because so and so made you do it. that is a typical Liberal cop out. Around here, we Conservatives accept responsibility for our words, deeds and actions.

If you want to fit in, you need to play by the rules. Else ways, you just end up being labled a Liberal troll such as some of the others have. When you attack and insult and use profanity, eventually you will get booted off. Michelle is a patient and tolerant host, but like all beautiful, patient and tolerant hosts, she has her limits, and so do the regulars. If you want to stay and play in the sand box, you have to play nice with the others, otherwise you will be spanked on your little pooper and sent home.

Capisce?

Now run along and play nice with the other kids. I have some things I gotta take care of.

On December 13th, 2007 at 9:56 pm, SHoward said:

Diver, I saw the humor in your post, and no, the point wasn’t lost on me. I think if Burner were able to laugh at himself, like the rest of the human race, he might have as well. It was really a lot more funny than it was condescending.

No fear SHoward, #80 wasn’t directed at you by any means and my apologies if I gave that impression. I am sure that almost everyone got the point and I hope that most people found it humorous.

I thank you sir!

We aim to please here at swj’s House of Snide Remarks…

Good response, swj.

Now, Burner, rememebr what I said in 68, that it is how you respond to something unpleasant that defines you? Yes, 61 was a tad condescending, but aren’t you reaching into a bit too much vulgarity with 64? Again, not a very gentlemanly or adult response. If you want some respect, here or anywhere else, take swj’s advice and show some class.

Also, your post 60 was the initiation. Since it probably won’t happen in any event, enough of the he said she said.

As for the topic of this thread, it was said in another thread that Alan Keyes may have been let into the debate because he is black; who here thinks Sharpton will get different treatment from the press based on his ethnicity?

AJ never needed to defend Sharpton, as the MSM will do a fine job of that.