Unhinged: Nancy Pelosi channels Pete Stark

By Michelle Malkin  •  December 13, 2007 02:59 PM

The NRCC blows the whistle on San Fran Nan’s latest unhinged remarks:

Pelosi Comes Unhinged, Spews Pete Stark-like Vitriol: Republicans “Like this War”

Washington– With plummeting approval ratings and no legislative accomplishments to point to, Nancy Pelosi is melting down in the final days of the first session of the 110th Congress. Military success on the ground in Iraq also seems to be agitating the San Francisco Speaker who appears to be despondent over the fact that General Petraeus’ surge is working.

In a press conference today, Pelosi’s frustration manifested itself:

“The grassroots are justifiably disappointed, and I am too, that we could not do something to end this war. The assumption that I made, that the Republicans would soon see the light and listen to their constituents, was not an accurate one.”

They like this war. They want this war to continue…” (Press Conference, 12/13/07)

Pelosi’s desperation continues to grow as the clock appears to be running out on the Democrats. Their failure to address the nation’s problems like rising prices, the seemingly inevitable return of the alternative minimum tax, and their gross abdication of their responsibility to our troops in the field have left the Americans restless and angry at their incompetence.

Will Nancy Pelosi apologize before the House for her Pete Stark-like remarks? The American people and America’s men and women in uniform are waiting.

More from The Hill:

On Iraq in particular, Pelosi acknowledged at her Thursday news conference she’d misjudged the resolve of Republicans.

“They like this war,” she said. “They want this war to continue. That was a revelation to me. I had thought they would listen to their constituents and change their position.”

Pelosi later qualified her remark that Republicans “like” the war to say they like Bush’s strategy.

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Michelle Malkin » The Iowa Democrat debate: Schoolmarm returns; Update: Schoolmarm is all giggles; Update: No “show of hands,” schoolmarm not amused by Hillary’s joke
  2. Neocon News » No duh?
  3. Right Voices » Blog Archive » Pelosi Just Realized That She Has Failed..
  4. Flopping Aces
  5. Pelosi in hormonal frenzy (and taking no prisoners) « Full Metal Cynic
  6. The Baltimore Reporter
  7. This ain’t Hell, but you can see it from here » Getting to sense
  8. ROK Drop Weekly Linklets - 16DEC07 at ROK Drop
  9. Michelle Malkin » An unexpected phone call from Nancy Pelosi

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #195065
    On December 13th, 2007 at 3:02 pm, TexasTiger said:

    Pelosi later qualified her remark that Republicans “like” the war to say they like Bush’s strategy.

    Oh. A joke. She was telling a joke. Righhhhht.

  2. #195073
    On December 13th, 2007 at 3:05 pm, TexasTiger said:

    “They like this war,” she said.

    They really, really like it!

  3. #195077
    On December 13th, 2007 at 3:08 pm, publiuswarmac9999 said:

    Last time I checked upwards of 80% of the people in uniform, those putting their lives on the line for all of us, vote Republican. I seriously doubt that those Republicans like war, but I have no doubt that they love their country.

    Pelosi is just a wonderful example of why we need term limits for representatives, senators and the dictatorial judiciary.

  4. #195080
    On December 13th, 2007 at 3:09 pm, jrlingreenbay said:

    Term Limits: Spot On

    Amen

  5. #195082
    On December 13th, 2007 at 3:11 pm, ACHefty said:

    My final CO from the Marine Corps told us in a squadron meeting:

    No one likes to go to war, especially those that have to fight it.

    Take note, Nanny Pelosi. We are doing it so you won’t suffer the wrath of Osama ever again. You’re welcome. Ingrate!

  6. #195085
    On December 13th, 2007 at 3:11 pm, Rogue said:

    Well, I like the way the war has been fought lately…and I do want the current trend to continue…so she’s not totally wrong.

    I had thought they would listen to their constituents and change their position.”

    translation: I thought they would finally lose their will and become America-haters and surrender monkeys like myself and my liberal nut-root constitutents.

  7. #195087
    On December 13th, 2007 at 3:12 pm, 30 pcs of silver said:

    She would be my bestest friend forever if she would just keep her trap shut and fund the troops. That’s really all I want from her.

    Nobody “likes” this war. The troops aren’t on vacation.
    However, what they don’t seem to understand is that if we don’t win this war, the America that they want to run with every fiber of their being would be overrun and then she can sit their with that stupid look on her face and say “That was a revelation to me.”

    Surprise!

  8. #195088
    On December 13th, 2007 at 3:13 pm, madchef said:

    It’s not so much that we like this war, but we really like pissing off democrats. Proving lieral wrong…priceless.

  9. #195089
    On December 13th, 2007 at 3:13 pm, RetFireman said:

    The Republicans did listen to their constituents. Their contituents told them that they did not want them to surrender to the enemy. They told them that they wanted them to fund the troops and not to abandon them. They told them that the election was about corruption and that Iraq was item number 6 on the list of items that the election was about and to not listen to what the Liberals and the media was attempting to tell America it was about. The Republicans were actually the ones that were listening to the majority of their constituents and not some special interest group run from a web site funded by a wealthy Liberal with a really strong and bad accent bent on destroying this country and turning it into a Socialist hell that would ultimately take away his wealth that he is too stupid to realize.

    It is Nancy Pelosi herself who has failed in her job, has failed her constituents and failed this country. She is the absolute worst speaker this country has ever had and will go down in history as such, and not only as the worst but as the largest embarassment and will make it so much more difficult for the next female speaker. She was the first female speaker of the House, and has done such irreparable damage that it may be years before the job will be entrusted to a woman again. What a shame, for there were so many other far more qualified women for the job. Of course, it just shouldn’t have ever gone to a liberal. Should never again be placed in the hands of a Liberal, especially during war time.

  10. #195090
    On December 13th, 2007 at 3:14 pm, madchef said:

    Proving liberals wrong.. priceless

  11. #195092
    On December 13th, 2007 at 3:14 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    Dern TexasTiger – beat me to it!

  12. #195094
    On December 13th, 2007 at 3:15 pm, cpodug said:

    RetFireman

    what he said

  13. #195100
    On December 13th, 2007 at 3:17 pm, TexasTiger said:

    On December 13th, 2007 at 3:08 pm, publiuswarmac9999 said:
    Pelosi is just a wonderful example of why we need term limits for representatives, senators and the dictatorial judiciary.

    Must respectfully disagree with you. Term limits would only give us the same stupidity in a different skull.

    More effective than term limits would be congressional redistricting practices that reduce the number of safe, gerrymandered seats in the House. Voters in the current 8th District will never hold Pelosi accountable for her lunacy.

  14. #195110
    On December 13th, 2007 at 3:23 pm, ACHefty said:

    Let’s not forget the repeal of Amendment 17. We as a nation should give the power of appointing senators back to the state legislatures. But only when the states re-draw their congressional maps properly.

    Gerrymandering is wrong, no matter who comes out on top!

  15. #195116
    On December 13th, 2007 at 3:26 pm, bloghooligan said:

    lol. seriously, it can’t get better. they’re losing their minds.

    “don’t they get it?! we’re trying to help them!! the reps won’t let us help the people!! they like war! they like people dying!! we want to save people!! why don’t they understand?!”

    meanwhile, some dem strategist is sitting around trying to figure out how to ’sell’ up this failure.

    maybe 2006 had a reason after all.

  16. #195123
    On December 13th, 2007 at 3:30 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    Pelosi later qualified her remark that Republicans “like” the war to say they like Bush’s strategy.

    Must’ve been a Botox moment.

  17. #195125
    On December 13th, 2007 at 3:31 pm, publiuswarmac9999 said:

    Texas Tiger: My only point is that redistricting is not enough. We need a real guarantee that moves these professional politicians, too many of which are lawyers, back out into the public sector where they have to live with the laws they create.

    I can remember the “great” Eugene McCarthy complaining about the very laws he created that basically ruined his family’s business and sent him to bankruptcy court. I want Madam Pelosi to have to live in San Fran and live under the laws she uses to experiment with all our lives.

  18. #195127
    On December 13th, 2007 at 3:32 pm, TexasTiger said:

    Unhinged: Nancy Pelosi channels Pete Stark the Judean People’s Front crack suicide squad

    Ve are the Judean People’s Front crack suicide squad. Suicide squad! Attack! (stab selves)
    :lol:

  19. #195128
    On December 13th, 2007 at 3:32 pm, uhangtight said:

    it is a revelation to her that Americans want to win this war? has she been reading the emails, letters and faxes from the constituents to know what the Republicans are being asked? i think not.

    republicans were angry over the drunken sailor type spending that was going on in the republican controlled congress. the only way to stop it was to allow the dems to take control and fail. dems have never figured out how to be the ‘minority’ as they have always been in the majority (excluding last 12 years).

    sure glad we do have some experienced republicans in congress to make these dimly lit dems look like bigger crapweasels.

  20. #195132
    On December 13th, 2007 at 3:34 pm, walterc said:

    Term Limits: Spot On

    Two terms, one in office. . . one in prison.

  21. #195135
    On December 13th, 2007 at 3:36 pm, swj719AWG said:

    A friend of mine in the Arkansas National Guard (She’s an MP) just got back from the abyss of Ft Chaffe for some up-training…

    She’ll be headed to The Sandbox soon, and she’s thankful because of some physical issues she’s had (shoulder injury during training a while back).

    Some whack-job on her LJ page made the following comment:

    There’s currently a small window for a successful knee-cap- or leg-related ’salvation run’ if she’s scheduled soon to die for Exxon and Cheney.
    Sorry, [redacted], but that’s how I see it.

    My response was:

    And boy, ain’t it grand she’s serving this country so you can say retarded shit like that…

    You go for her knees/legs, and I’m going for your head.

    Not that I think you would be suicidal enough to try and injure [redacted]. I’m just sayin’.

    These people really are totally f***ing insane…

  22. #195138
    On December 13th, 2007 at 3:37 pm, cpodug said:

    professional politicians, too many of which are lawyers,

    Maybe an open season on lawyers? Or would you need a special tag? Maybe catch-and-release them back into their native habitat? Or would their native habitat even WANT them? We have the highest percentage of lawyers per capita than anywhere else in the world. Maybe we could share them with underdeveloped countries?

  23. #195139
    On December 13th, 2007 at 3:38 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    I want Madam Pelosi to have to live in San Fran and live under the laws she uses to experiment with all our lives.

    It won’t matter/affect her at all. She’s a multi-multi millionaire. She has the resources that most of us regular Kalifornians can’t even imagine.

  24. #195142
    On December 13th, 2007 at 3:46 pm, hatelibs said:

    Just another example of a liberal lashing out at her political opposition in a nasty way. Oh..I forgot…Republicans are the mean spirited ones.

    The left always has to be vicious while Republicans almost always try to be respectful in their tone.

    Can a Dem ever be civil and not get personal/nasty? (Don’t answer that question.) When you can’t win on merit, sling mud.

  25. #195143
    On December 13th, 2007 at 3:46 pm, wren said:

    TexasTiger is absolutely right about the need for redistricting in California!

    Most people don’t realize that not only does Nancy Pelosi represent the most liberal city in the country, but because of careful gerrymandering NANCY PELOSI REPRESENTS THE MOST LIBERAL PORTION OF SAN FRANCISCO!!!

    Take a look at this map to see how Nancy Pelosi’s district excludes as many of the more conservative homeowners in San Francisco as possible.

    http://www.govtrack.us/congress/findyourreps.xpd?state=CA&district=8

  26. #195145
    On December 13th, 2007 at 3:50 pm, meatpieandtatters said:

    She’s crazier than an outhouse owl!

  27. #195147
    On December 13th, 2007 at 3:54 pm, KaosKlerik said:

    MM
    Their failure to address the nation’s problems like rising prices, the seemingly inevitable

    I think you meant to say …rising oil prices…

    I could be wrong though. My wife can tell you about that. :)

  28. #195148
    On December 13th, 2007 at 3:54 pm, mnmike said:

    “The grassroots are justifiably disappointed, and I am too, that we could not do something to end this war.

    Grass roots my behind. More like whacky tobaccey

  29. #195150
    On December 13th, 2007 at 3:57 pm, Bigurn said:

    Michelle mentioned the alternative minimum tax. Where can I get more eductated on this? This is one where I’m not up to speed.

  30. #195152
    On December 13th, 2007 at 3:57 pm, TexasTiger said:

    Equitable redistricting might have the same effect as term limits. If seats changed more frequently owing to balanced districts, term lengths would drop.

    I can think of one thing better than Pelosi living under the laws she pushes: living with Code Pink on her front lawn! Bwah-hah-hah-hah!

  31. #195154
    On December 13th, 2007 at 4:00 pm, CommentGuy said:

    I watched that on Cspan on the lead up to the dem press conference.

    A simply pathetic performance of trying to justify failure as a good way to act by proposing pie in the sky instead of spending time working on thoughtful legislation and wasting so much time you have to shove 11 or more finance bills into a week just to get things done

  32. #195155
    On December 13th, 2007 at 4:02 pm, CommentGuy said:

    I think she confuses running for office and lying to your crowd with being in office and trying to accomplish something.

  33. #195156
    On December 13th, 2007 at 4:04 pm, DesertLover said:

    The U.S. Military … doing the jobs Liberal Democrats won’t do …

  34. #195160
    On December 13th, 2007 at 4:09 pm, old trooper said:

    Pelosi is becoming less relevent through her comments every day.

    She and Harry Reid need to look at the approval rating for Congress, an all time low. They are only fooling themselves, most Americans are not fooled.

    Look for a change in 2008.

  35. #195162
    On December 13th, 2007 at 4:10 pm, jfish said:

    #28:

    Start with a quick overview of recent poor Dem attempts to fix AMT:

    http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110010970

    and here are some thoughts from Cato:

    http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/2007/06/25/an-almost-ideal-plan-to-fix-the-amt/

  36. #195167
    On December 13th, 2007 at 4:15 pm, blacktygrrrr said:

    I am a republican, I am a constituent, I vote, and while the republican party has been tone deaf on some issues, they ARE listening to me about Iraq.

    (Grabbing a bullhorn to remind them)

    WIN…THE…D@MN…THING!

    Just win. break the enemy in half, and then into further little pieces.

    The Pelosiraptor can now go back to her regularly scheduled breakdowns.

    Respectfully,

    eric
    http://www.blacktygrrrr.wordpress.com

  37. #195169
    On December 13th, 2007 at 4:16 pm, cpodug said:

    Bigurn, I’m not much of an expert on it, either, but what I know is that it started out as a tax on the wealthy, and gradually worked its way down to middle-class folks like you and me. The idea is simple: if you make a certain amount, and you can deduct enough, you won’t have to pay a lot of tax. The way they get you is – you pay whichever is more – the tax as figured by your accountant/tax preparer, or the AMT. In other words, if you play the game honestly, we’re gonna get you anyhow, sucka!

  38. #195170
    On December 13th, 2007 at 4:17 pm, Tennessee Dave said:

    “The grassroots nutroots are justifiably disappointed, and I am too, that we could not do something to end this war. The assumption that I made, that the Republicans would soon see the light and listen to their constituents bow down to my almightyness, was not an accurate one.”

    I had to fix that quote for San Fran Nan.
    BTW-she’s scary looking!

  39. #195172
    On December 13th, 2007 at 4:17 pm, Boomer said:

    Let the Congressional record show the 110th Democrat lead Congress was an abject failure thanks for the leadership of this woman and her San Francisco values and her buddy “Dirty Harry.” They have more than earned their 11% approval rating the worst in Congressional History.

    Their failure to pass funding for those in the combat zone will quickly start to affect those of us in Garrison. The Army is talking about laying off 100,000 plus souls (Civil Service and Contractors) still no word on what the Air Force will do at this time, but expect them to do what is right to fund the troops in the field. Once the layoffs hit it will not be long before they may see crowds with torches and pitchforks on Capital Mall. I really despise how the liberals continue to play chicken with lives of our fighting men and women.

  40. #195179
    On December 13th, 2007 at 4:26 pm, California Unclaimed Money said:

    Drudge was linking to an AP article, that includesthis:

    “They like this war. They want this war to continue,” Pelosi, D- Calif., told reporters. She expressed frustration over Republicans’ ability to force majority Democrats to yield ground on taxes, spending, energy, war spending and other matters.

    We thought that they shared the view of so many people in our country that we needed a new direction in Iraq,” Pelosi said at her weekly news conference in the Capitol. “But the Republicans have made it very clear that this is not just George Bush’s war. This is the war of the Republicans in Congress.”

    Asked to clarify her remarks, Pelosi backed off a bit.

    “I shouldn’t say they like the war,” she said. “They support the war, the course of action that the president is on.”

    Just have to point out how the media continues to let them get away with this crap… “New direction”? WTF do you think the surge is, Speaker Botox? We took that “new direction” with astoundingly positive results (so far). And I’m not one who likes to hype the positive results, because I’d hate to let our guard down and have the enemy rush back in with more desperate attacks, like they’ve done when they’ve been losing badly in the past. But how can this worthless woman continue whining about a “new direction”? Disgusting.

  41. #195180
    On December 13th, 2007 at 4:27 pm, NascarFan70 said:

    She doesn’t know what winning mean in a war that is why she and the rest of her nutroots are against this war when they can plainly see that it is working

  42. #195182
    On December 13th, 2007 at 4:33 pm, RetFireman said:

    I just think it is hillarious that she is attempting to place the blame for this failed Congress and Senate on the Republicans. When they blamed the Republicans for failure when the Republicans were in power, that was deserved, tey screwed up. The Republicans never really acted like they were in charge and were in the majority. They kept acting like they had to kiss the Democrats butts, and the Dems kept acting like they ran the place for 12 years.

    Well Nanci, the place is yours, lock, stock and barrell. Everything that has happened for the last year has rested entirely on Democrat shoulders. You cannot, in any way, blame these record low approval rating numbers that you and Harry Reid have most deceidedly earned with every word and deed on a single Republican.

    It has indeed been you most decidedly anti-American, anti-Military, defeatist, seditious metality and actions that have earned these numbers for you. It has been the repeated way in which you have sought to leave our military hanging with their butts in the wind to be shot off by our enemies, with their only option being to surrender to our enemies in the face of victory, an option that the people of this country historically have never and will never agree to that has helped to put the nails into the coffin of your legacy…I’m sorry, your “leg-she”.

    It has also been you much publicised and well known alliance with an anti-American special interest grooup that serves no purpose but their own known to eeryone as Moveon.oorg that finised the deal. Your Overlords and Masters have continually gone on record to make you look like the puppets you are, showing the country that you are not there to do the people’s business, but that of the highest bidder.

    While I cannot say for certain whether or not the country has forgiven the GOP enough to make them become the party to run the Congress again next year, the numbers you have in addition to your failure to accept blame and where you are placing said blame might not make their forgiveness of the GOP necessary for them to realize that they can not afford the likes of your foolishness and sedition in the halls of our government another day.

  43. #195184
    On December 13th, 2007 at 4:35 pm, ThackerAgency said:

    “They like this war America,” she said. “They want this war America to continue WIN. That was a revelation to me. I had thought they would listen to their constituents America’s enemies and change their position.”

    This from the third most powerful person in the world. I am amazed that she even considers herself American. We could just as easily say, ‘It is a revelation to us that the Speaker of the House of Representatives listens to the enemies of America over her constituents. It is a revelation to us that she wants our troops to lose so much that she sabotages our chances to win from her position of authority.’

  44. #195186
    On December 13th, 2007 at 4:38 pm, whysoangry said:

    I think she’s perfect and I think she’s done a perfect job.

    Some predicted that they’d be themselves when they won the majority, but that was too optimistic for me. I couldn’t have imagined how much like themselves they would actually be.

  45. #195188
    On December 13th, 2007 at 4:38 pm, Milwaukee Mike said:

    Can’t she see that the “new direction” in Iraq was a winning strategy?
    Unless the Dems get this, they will free fall in popularity.
    No congress so far has been more inept!
    This is why I have hope for the Republican party in 2008!

  46. #195195
    On December 13th, 2007 at 4:47 pm, Ditkaca said:

    I knew this would happen. I knew in 2006 that the Democrats would fail to back up the empty promises used to get the majority. They were in the perfect position….fail and it’s Bush’s/Republican’s fault, succeed and they take the credit.

    No personal responsibility or accountability…..it’s the New America!

  47. #195198
    On December 13th, 2007 at 4:48 pm, CharlieT said:

    During my combat tour, I gave advice or made decisions that resulted in enemy soldiers dying. While I prayed for their souls and felt sorrow that someone had to die, I had no remorse because it was my duty. It doesn’t mean that I ever liked causing other men to die. No sane person likes war; but a truly insane person likes losing a war. Pelosi and Reed would rather lose the war than lose an election

  48. #195203
    On December 13th, 2007 at 4:58 pm, Salt said:

    Typical childish logic: You shouldn’t do anything you don’t like to do; therefore, since Republicans believe the war should be fought and won, they must like it.

    Can I apply the same logic to paying taxes?

  49. #195208
    On December 13th, 2007 at 5:02 pm, Salt said:

    California Unclaimed Money said:

    Just have to point out how the media continues to let them get away with this crap… “New direction”? WTF do you think the surge is, Speaker Botox?

    Good point.

    There’s no gray for the opposition. To many of them, the war should be managed as a binary operation. One direction is “fight”, the other is “flee”. Anything short of “flee” is mocked as being more of the same and “not new”.

  50. #195210
    On December 13th, 2007 at 5:03 pm, graysonret said:

    Well, that was a wasted “Congress”. I wonder what next year will show. A kindergarden class could do as well as this democratic Congress…fussing and fighting and accomplishing nothing. On second thought, my apologies, kids, you could do better.

  51. #195217
    On December 13th, 2007 at 5:09 pm, Salt said:

    graysonret said:

    Well, that was a wasted “Congress”. I wonder what next year will show.

    I’m still holding my breath. What, exactly, was accomplished in those first 100 hours? Oh, wait, by their form of measurement, they’re still only on hour 37, right?

  52. #195222
    On December 13th, 2007 at 5:17 pm, bloghooligan said:

    wren, great link.

    you think your gerrymandering is bad? check out my district:

    http://www.govtrack.us/congress/findyourreps.xpd?state=NJ&district=6

    i was wondering how my rep was dem. it’s because my district is diluted with all of Edison. i don’t even know how this is legal.

  53. #195225
    On December 13th, 2007 at 5:24 pm, right_on said:


    “They like this war,” she said. “They want this war to continue.”

    Pelosi later qualified her remark that Republicans “like” the war to say they like Bush’s strategy.

    She didn’t need to qualify her remarks. She meant them the way she uttered them. And here I thought only drunks spoke candidly once their inhibitions were lowered…I guess “drunk with power” fits into that category as well!

  54. #195234
    On December 13th, 2007 at 5:39 pm, 29Victor said:

    …but a walking shadow, a poor player that struts and frets his hour upon the stage and then is heard no more. It is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.

    -Willie

    Just classin’ this joint up a little. And it suits her to a tee.

  55. #195235
    On December 13th, 2007 at 5:42 pm, Ditkaca said:

    I personally think the arrogance and elitist attitude of the Dems will ultimately be their downfall.

    Many Americans can be sold easily with talking points like “it’s for the children”. Mostly due to the fact they have their heads down trying to live their lives taking care of their families instead of thinking about what is going on in their local governments and Washington.

    Even though the biased MSM is softening the arrogance, Americans are still able to see the Democrats for who they are, Anti-American Socialists that want to run every aspect of our lives from cradle to grave all paid for by taxpayers.

    I would like to see us go to a system where only people who pay taxes/and or are homeowners get to vote

  56. #195238
    On December 13th, 2007 at 5:45 pm, Speakup said:

    A despondent Nancy acting like a loon surrounded by water on three sides.

  57. #195247
    On December 13th, 2007 at 6:05 pm, DesertLover said:

    New Book Title:

    Nothing In – Nothing Out

    A history of the United States Congress 2006-2008

  58. #195255
    On December 13th, 2007 at 6:13 pm, Ron Rockstar said:

    Nancy states that she and the other socialist in this country are disappointed that congress couldn’t do anything to end the war. News flash Nancy, this war will never end. They (Islam the collective) declared war on us. And I don’t see them ending their war until they are dead. The marines can do that if you will just stay out of the way and let the grownups handle it. The people we are fighting are nuts. But if you don’t believe me check out what they do to their own children. I think we ought to kill them all just for that. If you don’t see that as evil, Nancy, then the only explanation is you agree with what they believe.

  59. #195257
    On December 13th, 2007 at 6:17 pm, CommentGuy said:

    It was interesting to hear Pelosi admit the energy bill was #6 on her first 100 hours agenda.

    My how time flies when you are having fun.

  60. #195263
    On December 13th, 2007 at 6:23 pm, CommentGuy said:

    They are in a bad position.

    The far left is screaming at them to fight or die and the blue dog new kids are telling them try it and your majority will be gone

  61. #195264
    On December 13th, 2007 at 6:23 pm, Milwaukee Mike said:

    The Iraq War: “They like me! They really, really like me!”

  62. #195284
    On December 13th, 2007 at 6:47 pm, wren said:

    To: Bloghooligan

    LOL! I completely agree that you win the contest for the most creative gerrymandering for your Congressional District! But I want bonus points for the most frightening Congressional District as the most liberal portion of San Francisco keeps re-electing Nancy Pelosi!

    We should all be aware of how gerrymandering distorts democracy!

    If folks want to check their own congressional districts for gerrymandering, here is the link:

    http://www.govtrack.us/congress/findyourreps.xpd

  63. #195288
    On December 13th, 2007 at 6:55 pm, MCPO Airdale said:

    As someone, in the Democrat party’s view, that is too stupid to write down my feelings about the Speaker’s statement, I’ll just ask a question; “Do you want America to lose in Iraq, Madame Speaker?”

  64. #195291
    On December 13th, 2007 at 6:57 pm, tpierce2 said:

    What the libs don’t get is that we like to win! No surrender.

    I swear, prior to taking the oath of office there should be a sanity test for these dunderheads! Most would probably not pass!

    Savage said: “Liberalism is a mental disorder. Extreme liberalism is a mental disease!”

    Amen!

  65. #195325
    On December 13th, 2007 at 7:39 pm, brooklyn red said:

    Hopefully, somewhere a plan is being drawn up for a surge to return San Francisco to the Union.

  66. #195333
    On December 13th, 2007 at 7:50 pm, groundhunter said:

    The anti-war Dems are reliving the seventies. It ain’t working. Every bet they have made against the war has come back to bite them. 9-11 changed everything…this is a war to the death because the enemy insists on it. We are not quitters and we know we can win. The only way we can loose is if the Dems succeed in persuading the American people that it is in their best interest to loose and that is not an argument that can carry the day. Even the Hill runs away from an argument like that. Insanity doesn’t quite describe the Dems right now. I don’t have a good word for it.

  67. #195349
    On December 13th, 2007 at 8:20 pm, RetFireman said:

    It is astonishing to me that they actually believe their own rhettoric. There is what they say in private and what they say in public. Unfortunately, for these yahoos, I am entirely convinced that they are one in the same and they honestly believe their own crap.

    They honestly believe that it is everyone else’s fault but theirs and they “could have got away with it too if it weren’t for those meddeling Repblicans”

  68. #195457
    On December 13th, 2007 at 11:41 pm, docflash said:

    After her Midol Molly moment she realized that it was the fall back statement(Bushes fault).Thats all they have and its worn out.RUSTY ! RUSTY ! You here BRO

  69. #195464
    On December 13th, 2007 at 11:58 pm, Alphonse said:

    The surge is working so well, we should follow it up with a sur-surge.

    Commanders want more GIs in Iraq

    BAGHDAD — U.S. military commanders in northern Iraq told Defense Secretary Robert Gates here Wednesday that they need more troops to battle increased attacks by al-Qaida terrorists who have fled north after being pushed out of the Baghdad region.

    The call for the movement of Iraqi and U.S. forces into the north comes as Gates hailed the improved security in Baghdad and said a stable Iraq is within reach. Just before Gates spoke in the heavily fortified Green Zone, however, a car bomb exploded across the Tigris River in a largely Shiite Baghdad neighborhood, killing at least 14 people, police said.

    Up in Mosul, Army Col. Tony Thomas, deputy commander of U.S. forces in the north, told reporters traveling with Gates that commanders would like more U.S. troops, as well as the return of 1,400 Iraqi troops who were sent to Baghdad as part of the military buildup there earlier this year. The plan could shift extra troops from other areas of the country that are more secure.

  70. #195561
    On December 14th, 2007 at 6:43 am, TMoney said:

    The people who ‘like’ war are the A**H***S who are able to politicize it for their own diabolical political gains. Yep, that puts Pelosi’s butt right smack in the middle of the situation. Partisan all the way, even when after that piece of lard Murtha says the new tack is working.

    For victory, dial USA-ARMED-FORCES!

  71. #195585
    On December 14th, 2007 at 7:44 am, rainbow said:

    And to think she is so close in-line to be president! Barf!! God help us!!!

  72. #195589
    On December 14th, 2007 at 8:05 am, simon77047 said:

    On December 13th, 2007 at 3:23 pm, ACHefty said:
    Let’s not forget the repeal of Amendment 17. We as a nation should give the power of appointing senators back to the state legislatures. But only when the states re-draw their congressional maps properly.

    Gerrymandering is wrong, no matter who comes out on top!

    Right on! I couldn’t agree more, but somehow I don’t see this happening.

  73. #195625
    On December 14th, 2007 at 9:00 am, cpodug said:

    I’ll just ask a question; “Do you want America to lose in Iraq, Madame Speaker?”

    Master Chief, that’s known as a rhetorical question.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Protesting Pelosicare in her own backyard

November 16, 2009 10:37 AM by Michelle Malkin

21 Comments | 1 Trackback

Ho-hum: Pelosicare hikes costs $289 billion

November 14, 2009 10:40 PM by Michelle Malkin

42 Comments | 5 Trackbacks

Hey, Nancy: Can you hear America now?

November 5, 2009 03:19 PM by Michelle Malkin

72 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

She doesn’t have the votes

October 23, 2009 12:01 PM by Michelle Malkin

60 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

Ostrich award: Nancy Pelosi joins Charlie Gibson

September 17, 2009 12:26 PM by Michelle Malkin

62 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

You make me wanna shout

September 17, 2009 11:48 AM by Michelle Malkin

69 Comments | 4 Trackbacks


Categories: Nancy Pelosi, White Flag Democrats



Mudville Gazette

» The five-year plan
Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook