This may shock you but most of the Yanks do not desire to live under Muslim law.

Restoring Sanity in America
one blog blow at a time.
The beauty of the MSM not taking the Serious Blogsphere seriously is that it walked up behind them & *blamo*.
Good bye NYSlimes….just die & go away.
signed: ‘I LOVE AMERICA!’

The left will not rest until we trump the EU.

The NY Times is the least of our problems. Our schools are killing our country’s future by polluting our children’s minds.

My son is 26 and I figure that I’ve got another four or five years to go before he can finally balance rhetoric and truth.

For every descent public school teacher you may know, there are another 100 who hate this country and want socialism as the new bedrock of American society.

Hillary Clinton summed up what is wrong with the school system, the liberal media, and public education with her so called holiday campaign ad.

Regarding the White House response to the NYT. Bravo!

It’s about time that Bush stopped turning the other cheek.

lgm said:
This is misdirection. The substance of the NYTimes article is true.

Seems I’ve heard something similar from CBS & Dan Rathergate. LGM’s logic is that if no one challenges a fools allegations, what the fools says is true. Proverbs gives many warnings about answering a fool. NYT=fool

Now it’s Boooosh’s fault that the NY Slimes corrected it.

/sarc

Jerks!

On December 19th, 2007 at 6:34 pm, John Ansell said:
What did those fish do to be wrapped in that rag of a paper?

Methinks they were red herrings. It would be fitting.

lgm said:
blah blah blah um blah blah Bush’s fault blah blah Cheney started the fire blah blah impeach them all blah blah.

I have watched for 7 years as liberals have taken the most inconsequential pieces of evidence and trumpeted them to the skies as proof of an impeachable offense.

You are wildly exaggerating. It is a matter of dispute exactly what the judge in the Moussai case was asking for in regard to taped interrogations. And the fact that the WH had discussions with the CIA – probably the CIA asking if they could destroy the tapes – and that the WH turned them down would, in the world where the sane inhabit, tend to exonerate the Administration of complicity -

Unless, of course, you are making the arguement that the WH was telling the CIA one thing while “winking” that they should go ahead and do another.

Only on some planet where the criminally insane rule would that be considered evidence of “obstruction.”

I happen to believe the CIA was wrong to destroy the tapes. And as far as the Rodriguez “fall guy” theory allow me to let you in on a little secret; sometimes it is only one guy who screws up.

I saw a headline at Memorandum from a liberal blog that this case was a “Watergate” moment for the Bushies. Do you people live on the same planet as the rest of us? We heard the same thing when liberals went on a witchhunt to find out who Jeff Gannon slept with in the WH (Rove? Bush?) to get a press pass. Ditto the 2 dozen WH aides who were going to be frogmarched off to jail as a result of “outing” Valerie Plame.

You guys truly are rank fools. Blowing things out of all proportionate reality is par for the course for liberals. And until you stop exaggerating, twisting the facts, and just making stuff up in order to “prove” your utterly preposterous and fantastical conspiracy theories, no one will take you seriously.

(Removing Skoal Bandit…no wait, that’s my tongue…from my cheek)

eric aka the Tygrrrr Express