Incandescent stupidity: Washington outlaws 100-watt lightbulbs

By Michelle Malkin  •  December 19, 2007 03:30 PM

You know the energy bill that Congress passed and President Bush signed into law today? Tucked into the legislation is a provision that mandates the phase-out of the 125-year-old incandescent bulb in the next four to 12 years in favor of a new generation of trendy, supposedly energy-efficient Gorebulbs.

First, Australia. Then the EU. And now us. Well-intended bulb-pushers said they weren’t supporting mandates. Just “voluntary adoption” of lighting alternatives. But the road to eco-meddling is always paved with “voluntary” intentions–along with threats to your children that if you don’t volunteer to buy environmentally correct lights, Santa and his reindeer will DIE DIE DIE!

The Business and Media Institute blasts the bulb ban and notes some of the drawbacks of CFLs:

The light bulb provision phases out traditional bulbs by gradually increasing efficiency requirements through 2020.

Conveniently for manufacturers like Philips, which has been pushing for legislation that would phase out incandescent bulbs (and level the playing field among competitors while giving Philips the public relations credit), the compact fluorescent bulbs (CFLs) already meet the 2020 requirement. Proponents of government intervention into the light bulb market argue the change will save consumers money – Davidson reported it will save $40 billion in energy and other costs in the next 22 years. But while Davidson mentioned one drawback of CFLs – that their “yellowish tints” are annoying to some eyes – he failed to mention the major flaw of the new technology: mercury. Mercury, a toxic metal famously found in thermometers, helps create the increased efficiency of a CFL bulb. If the bulb breaks, the small amount of mercury can contaminate the area.

The Financial Post reported in April that a broken CFL bulb cost a Maine woman more than $2,000 to clean when the state Department of Environmental Protection referred her to a cleanup company. At $5 in energy savings per bulb per month (as Davidson reported), one broken bulb could eat up 33 years’ worth of savings! The federal EPA doesn’t recommend professional cleanup for a broken bulb. It recommends you open a window, leave the room for 15 minutes, then put on some rubber gloves, scoop up the broken bits and seal them in a plastic bag, then put that bag in another plastic bag before throwing it out. Then wash your hands. But don’t worry, Tree Hugger – which calls itself the “leading media outlet dedicated to driving sustainability mainstream” – says the bulbs aren’t dangerous despite those recommended measures.

Even if the bulb doesn’t break, CFL users are supposed to dispose of used bulbs through state-run household hazardous waste programs, which aren’t nearly as simple or convenient as tossing a burnt bulb in the trash. Some states, like Maine, tell residents to hold hazardous materials in their homes until designated collection days. Many others, like Virginia, require participants to take the bulbs to waste disposal sites for special processing.

These feel-good dim bulbs give you crappy lighting, don’t live up to their longevity promises, and are a pain in the neck to dispose of–but they sure make enviro-nitwits and Big Greenie water-carriers feel good about themselves.

What happened to keeping government out of our bedroom? And our bathroom? And our utility closets?

The Gore-ing of America continues…

Posted in: Enviro-nitwits

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. The Strata-Sphere » Blog Archive » The Federal Light Bulb Police Squad Has Been Established
  2. Plumb Bob Blog » Were We Asleep?
  3. How the Mayor Stole Christmas… Updated: Now Washington has OUTLAWED 100-Watt Ligthbulbs!
  4. Snarky Bastards » Blog Archive » The Government Hates Me
  5. Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator
  6. RightWingGeek.com
  7. Pencil Nub » Wednesday WTFs
  8. Liberal Hypocrisy » Blog Archive » You just might be a liberal hypocrite
  9. Treeworn.Com » Incandescent stupidity: Washington outlaws 100-watt lightbulbs
  10. The Low Wattage Of The Liberal Mindset | Stuck On Stupid
  11. BizzyBlog » Couldn’t Help But Notice (122007)
  12. Michelle Malkin » President Bush’s year in review
  13. The Dan Lee Report » Blog Archive » Incadescent Light Bulb Ban.. Who will be the first to pirate Incadescents for the Black Market? I Vote China!
  14. The EcoLibertarian
  15. The Dan Lee Report » Blog Archive » Over 400 Prominent Scientists Disputed Man-Made Global Warming Claims in 2007! FOUR HUNDRED!
  16.   Global Warming Today: Those CFL’s Are Great. And Required — Pirate’s Cove
  17. Pickerhead :: Pickings from the Webvine ::December 23, 2007
  18. Michelle Malkin » Eco-scrooges can’t give it a rest
  19. Quiglag.com » RIP incandescent light bulb.
  20. » Global Warming in 2008: same stuff, different year » Leaning Straight Up » Blog Archive »
  21. usa today high school football poll
  22. A discussion most illuminating « HoodaThunk?
  23. Michelle Malkin » Lights out at MichelleMalkin.com
  24. Solidarity « nuke gingrich
  25. Michelle Malkin - Should incandescent light bulbs be banned?
  26. Michelle Malkin » Bagless in Seattle: Green cultists to tax plastic and paper
  27. Michelle Malkin » Bagless in Seattle: Green cultists to tax plastic and paper
  28. Michelle Malkin » Townhall columnist has bright idea about Gorebulbs
  29. Michelle Malkin » Democrat mayor says healthy food is “the new patriotism”.
  30. Happy Fourth of July, Citizen. How Would You Like Your Fascism Grilled? | The Sundries Shack

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #199381
    On December 19th, 2007 at 3:34 pm, bloghooligan said:

    yay! another way to screw poor people. yippie! and just in time for the holiday!

  2. #199384
    On December 19th, 2007 at 3:37 pm, swj719AWG said:

    The one thing about the bulbs that bothers me is that they don’t work well for dimmers/three-way-bulb applications…

    For those, I’ll keep using Incans, thank you…

  3. #199385
    On December 19th, 2007 at 3:38 pm, Barry F. said:

    Sounds like the wattage in Congress is getting dimmer by the minute or, at least, the session.

  4. #199387
    On December 19th, 2007 at 3:39 pm, puhiawa said:

    These bulbs cost a fortune in resources to make as compared to the incandescent bulbs. Then there is the disposal problem. And there is the fact that while almost all of our incandescents are manufactured in the USA or Canada, not a single factory in either country manufactures these particular CFL bulbs. More jobs to China. Liberals again trying to deconstruct the industrial base of America.

  5. #199388
    On December 19th, 2007 at 3:39 pm, rcool487 said:

    As long as they keep making 100-watts, I’ll keep buying them. Sheesh, this is ridiculous!

  6. #199389
    On December 19th, 2007 at 3:39 pm, Barry F. said:

    Oh! And, I think I need to make a run by the discount store and stockpile some incandescent bulbs for hard times to come. ;-)

  7. #199393
    On December 19th, 2007 at 3:43 pm, jrlingreenbay said:

    I bought a bunch of these bulbs – not because I’m an eco-nut – but figured, if they save money in the long run – what the heck – plus they were on sale at the local hardware store for $0.99 for the 60 watt equivalent.

    While most give out adequate lighting for our needs – the bathroom bulbs were terrible – my wife complained immediately. And I even went up the 100watt equivalent and they STILL were dim.

    So now we’ve got regular 100 watt bulbs in there… can I expect the Gestapo to come by and take them out?

    On a similar note – do the hollywood types use these newfangled dim substitutes for their make-up tables?

    HMmmmmmmmmmmmmmm????

  8. #199395
    On December 19th, 2007 at 3:43 pm, Radiojoe1470 said:

    What’s the chance these guidelines will go the way of the guidelines for the border fence?

    Yeah, I know. Just our luck.

  9. #199397
    On December 19th, 2007 at 3:45 pm, cpodug said:

    So what happens to this one? Does it go dark, too? Or will they figure out some way to make this a National Monument?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centennial_Light

  10. #199398
    On December 19th, 2007 at 3:45 pm, hatelibs said:

    I do use the new light bulbs in a lot of fixtures. They haven’t totally worked out the 3-way or dimmer applications yet but will soon. The hazardous materials are a serious concern especially if you have children.

    Having said that, I absolutely disagree with any mandates! That is going way too far. I suspect this will be pulled back. Next there will be an increase of people start having vision problems because of low wattage requirements.

  11. #199399
    On December 19th, 2007 at 3:46 pm, madchef said:

    I will go to Home Depot tomorrow and buy all of the incandescent bulbs I can get. If I have to fill my entire basement up with bulbs so be it. I hate those damn CFLs, they don’t light up the room worth a darn and it’ hard to read with them.

    What’s next, make us all use Beeswax candles? Damn Greenies and there Goreology!

  12. #199402
    On December 19th, 2007 at 3:48 pm, malkin_fan said:

    Sounds like the dim bulbs…..

    …..are ALL IN WASHINGTON.

  13. #199404
    On December 19th, 2007 at 3:49 pm, dutchcedar said:

    Everybody… quick… buy CFL lights to replace your incandescents, because within 24 months, the far superior (light quality) and more efficient (than incandescents and CFL) LED lightbulbs will hit the markets like a hurricane… so in the meantime, enjoy the pause after turning on the switch, as you wait for the CFL lights to gone on… its you thanks for Algorythms moment.

  14. #199405
    On December 19th, 2007 at 3:49 pm, madchef said:

    First they made us use low-flow toilets now it’s CFLs, Stop the Madness!

  15. #199406
    On December 19th, 2007 at 3:49 pm, Wade said:

    As long as they keep making 100-watts, I’ll keep buying them

    You will end up in “the too much light prison”. You are being forced to use Gorebulbs with mercury inside them. Do you have to call the DEM if you break one.

    Here in Rhode Island we have a barometer break in a school and they shutdown the school for 3 days.

  16. #199407
    On December 19th, 2007 at 3:50 pm, kemphd said:

    Sorry in advance for what will likely be a lengthy post. I find this very distrubing because of my nephew. He has Irlen’s Syndrome or Scotopic Sensitivity. This means that his brain doesn’t process certain wavelengths of light properly, so he has to wear glasses that have colors on the lens to help him see. This is particularly important for reading. People with Irlen’s syndrome tend to see the spaces between letters get bigger as one reads down a page or halos around letters or the letters moving in a wave across the page. One of the things that makes this syndrome worse is flourescent lighting. So, of course, it is very problematic for kids in schools. I remember in the early 80s people complaining about how bad flourescent lighting was, but then that argument went away. Well, after working in a junior high and knowing what my nephew goes through, I can tell you there are a lot of kids who have Irlens and have been diagnosed as hyperactive. Much of that hyperactive-ness could be solved for many kids by just having the colored lens. Unfortunately, not all eye doctors recognize the reality of this problem. If it now is mandated that we have flourescent lighting in our homes as well as schools and workplaces, those with Irlens are in for a very difficult time. And, as I suspect, if the number of people with Irlens is as high as some suggest, then this will impact a large segment of the population. The mercury is obviously another problem, particularly since some medics think it might be related to autism. I wish the enviro-nuts would let individuals make their own decisions.

  17. #199408
    On December 19th, 2007 at 3:51 pm, kmasitti said:

    I have first-and experience with these bulbs. I bought a bunch, before global warming and energy crisis scare. They were marketed to last what, years per bulb. This simply is not true. I have incandescent bulbs that have lasted longer. I hate changing bulbs. They are also almost regular bulb shaped and supposed to be the same size as a regular bulb, another lie. They are bigger and I couldn’t use them in most of my fixtures. At $8.00 a bulb, somebody is making out, but it’s not me. Anybody want to buy some bulbs? Gore?

  18. #199410
    On December 19th, 2007 at 3:52 pm, madchef said:

    When incandescent bulbs are outlawed, only outlaws will have incandescent bulbs!

  19. #199411
    On December 19th, 2007 at 3:52 pm, CommentGuy said:

    swj719AWG

    Don’t try using them in dimmers that becomes a fire hazard!

    Also there are now 3 way compact fluorescents on the market for about the last year and a half.

  20. #199412
    On December 19th, 2007 at 3:52 pm, max said:

    whale oil i say!

  21. #199413
    On December 19th, 2007 at 3:52 pm, tarpon said:

    Stupidity was always Dems strong suit.

  22. #199414
    On December 19th, 2007 at 3:53 pm, loob said:

    Next up, mandatory mercury spill coverage for greener homeowner insurance policies.

    Stock up on incandescents before its too late.

  23. #199415
    On December 19th, 2007 at 3:53 pm, kmasitti said:

    Oh Yeah, and I’m going to go stock up on regular bulbs while they still sell them.

  24. #199416
    On December 19th, 2007 at 3:54 pm, hatelibs said:

    Just wait. The first child the dies from mercury poison in one of these bulbs….it was Bush’s fault. He signed the law.

  25. #199418
    On December 19th, 2007 at 3:57 pm, reppac122 said:

    #23

    I am with you on this one. I am stocking up!

  26. #199419
    On December 19th, 2007 at 3:59 pm, singlemalt_18 said:

    You have got to be kidding!

    The next thing you know, Congress will be passing laws that limit the amount of water I can sit my bare ass over when I take a crap…

    Oh, I forgot, they’ve ALREADY DONE THAT.

  27. #199422
    On December 19th, 2007 at 4:00 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    Than can have my 100watt incan’s when they pry them from my cold dead hands!!!

  28. #199424
    On December 19th, 2007 at 4:03 pm, Marshall Russ said:

    This idiocy needs to stop. We need to elect a POTUS and a congress that will stop this idiocy. With so many things that need to be done in the area of energy,conservation and self reliance this is like spitting(a Geraldo)in the ocean!

  29. #199425
    On December 19th, 2007 at 4:04 pm, uhangtight said:

    freedom of choice is going, going, gone..

    what happens when government curtails capitalism, besides turning towards socialism/communism, we loose our freedom and our ability to have choices. pathetic. and, when 10 years down the road we have found that ‘disposal’ of this product has not been done properly and we really have problems, we find ourselves having to deal with a real crisis. what will the gorebots do then? take more freedoms away, that is their job…

    someone somewhere has to be making big bucks on this. my guess is the Phillips lobbying of our congress critters has gotten them a big piece of some $$$ pie.

  30. #199428
    On December 19th, 2007 at 4:05 pm, sdillard said:

    Jeez, now I’m going to have to drive to Mexico to buy lightbulbs.

    I will not submit.

  31. #199429
    On December 19th, 2007 at 4:05 pm, CommentGuy said:

    What they have done is duplicate what the EU mandated a year or so back.

    Nanny state requirements rather than try to convince consumers by their own choice.

    If I want a higher gas mileage my car then I want that to be my choice and not their mandate.

    If I want CFL bulbs (and I do use a lot) then that is my consumer choice.

    If I want LED bulbs than that is also my choice.

    However there are places I can not use a CFL. My vent hood in my kitchen has dimmers on the lighting and you can not use CFL’s with a dimmer.

    They don’t work well in appliance lighting as a refrigerator or oven for example.

    I am getting very tired of all these nanny state mandates and it won’t be a major point in congressional elections but it will be used to measure in some part.

  32. #199430
    On December 19th, 2007 at 4:07 pm, sdillard said:

    Wait a minute…what about 90 watt bulbs? 60 watt? 40 watt? Is it only 100 watts? That’s easy…make 99 watt bulbs and everybody is happy.

  33. #199431
    On December 19th, 2007 at 4:11 pm, Uplander said:

    LED arrays are much more efficient, much brighter and disposal is safer than a ‘aaa’ battery. When arrayed properly they can be used as ’spotlights’ to a degree, although so far, not the million candle power kind. They are great reading lamps, and can be spectrum adjusted for other uses.

  34. #199434
    On December 19th, 2007 at 4:14 pm, Chief RZ said:

    sdillard. Excellent idea. What a bunch of communists. It is my choice how I illuminate my house. I pay the electric bills. Perhaps this is the real beginning of socialism. The Federal government mandates paying everyone’s electric bill?

  35. #199435
    On December 19th, 2007 at 4:15 pm, CommentGuy said:

    What they are going to gain in savings by mandating this concept is going to be more than offset by ownership of those projectors for HDTV and power point presentations that are selling like hotcakes in the consumer market.

    Some one please bend those people over and give them a swift kick.

    I am tired of these people acting like Al Bores theory has been proven and costing me more and more each day for their religion as they continue to try to suppress mine.

  36. #199437
    On December 19th, 2007 at 4:17 pm, Uplander said:

    I forgot to add that LEDs on a clean electrical circuit will last 30 to 35 YEARS. Have you noticed Semi-trailers on the highway the last few years? Their Tail lights are large, round and full of ‘dots’. What might you think those ‘dots’ are, eh?

  37. #199440
    On December 19th, 2007 at 4:19 pm, Boomer said:

    I guess I will have to start stockpiling real bulbs too with a few other items. I am so disgusted with the growing dictatorship in Washington DC. This has really been a disappointing week as the sellout from our political ruling class continues to grow exponentially.

  38. #199442
    On December 19th, 2007 at 4:21 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    Rate them like we price a gallon of gas – 99.9 watts

  39. #199443
    On December 19th, 2007 at 4:22 pm, JHSII said:

    Sheesh. I just got done putting dimmers on 90% of the lights in my house, and now they want to regulate a type of bulb that I can’t use.

    Looks like I’m going to be one of those who stocks up on real light bulbs – and then when those run out will go to the criminal underground incandescent mafioso to get my lighting fix.

    When incandescent lights are criminalized, only criminals will have incandescent lights (and they’ll be the only ones not in the dark).

    Just out of idle curiosity: Do CFL bulbs work in Easy-Bake ovens? If not then “Stay away from CFL bulbs – for the children!”

  40. #199444
    On December 19th, 2007 at 4:23 pm, allrsn said:

    At $5 in energy savings per bulb per month

    I have been useing these bulbs in specific situations (on for extended periods of time) for almost 8 years.

    This statement is bold faced LIE. Yes I do save some money but nothing close to this!!!

    These bulbs lose most efficiency when only used of short peroids of time.

  41. #199447
    On December 19th, 2007 at 4:27 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    You sure this isn’t the work of Big Bulb?

    Someone ought to check who’s getting a big payoff from this. Who’s getting big contributions?

    (from the lib handbook of big oil, big pharma, etc.)

  42. #199448
    On December 19th, 2007 at 4:28 pm, John Ansell said:

    Be back in fifteen minutes. Going to drive the car around the block a few times just to feel better.

  43. #199452
    On December 19th, 2007 at 4:30 pm, The Raging Republican said:

    Nanny State

  44. #199456
    On December 19th, 2007 at 4:31 pm, rbb said:

    I’ve never had an incandescent bulb try to start a fire, but I have had at least 3 CFLs make an attempt. The problem is that many, for some reason, do not like to be place vertically with the bulb pointing down. In each case, the ballast got so hot as to start melting the case and making noise…

  45. #199460
    On December 19th, 2007 at 4:34 pm, rightisright said:

    #12 you have that right…as the saying goes…”follow the money”

  46. #199464
    On December 19th, 2007 at 4:39 pm, nyc123me said:

    I tried a 100W one of these in our kitchen – it was the most horrid depressing non-light ‘light’ I’ve experienced – it actually gave me a dull headache and slight depression. The dishes washed under that light had to be re-washed the next day.

    An MTA bus I was on in Brooklyn the other night was fitted with them inside.. everyone looked pale and sickly (even moreso than usual), and fortunately I only had a short ride, otherwise I would’ve got out and waited for another bus, it was that bad.

    What’s the bet that not a single one of the idiots who passed this ‘law’ uses these bulbs in their own home.

  47. #199469
    On December 19th, 2007 at 4:44 pm, cpodug said:

    What’s the bet that not a single one of the idiots who passed this ‘law’ uses these bulbs in their own home.

    Or ever will – that’s the beauty of being in Congress – you aren’t bound by the laws you pass. It’s like Leona Helmsley’s famous comment that “only the little people pay taxes.” Welcome to the “Little People.”

    What’s really sad, but totally unsurprising is that they’ve got time to pass crap like this, but no time to take care of the troops(until they’re finally backed into a corner with no escape), or any of the thousands of other, really important things we send them there to do.

  48. #199471
    On December 19th, 2007 at 4:46 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    I tried a 100W one of these in our kitchen – it was the most horrid depressing non-light ‘light’ I’ve experienced.

    You’re right. It is depressing. Almost institutional-like.

  49. #199472
    On December 19th, 2007 at 4:46 pm, graysonret said:

    Well, if they are going to have a Prohibition on bulbs, maybe we can all be “bulbleggers”. Heck, if Joseph Kennedy (Ted’s dad) can make a fortune off of illegal booze, maybe we can do well with illegal bulbs. Just call me “Caponeret”. I get the southside of No. Va.. They already are working on telling us what we can and cannot eat, what we can and cannot drive, what we can and cannot say. With socialized Hillarycare, they will transfer me to another medical field, because I’m more “needed” there than where I am now. Soon, they’ll be telling us what we can and cannot dream. That will be all that is left. (Maybe I shouldn’t have said that). There are so many laws/rules, it’s a wonder how they still call this country, the “Land of the Free”!

  50. #199473
    On December 19th, 2007 at 4:49 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    I am betting the ALGORE owns a light bulb factory sweat shop in China that produces CFL bulbs.

  51. #199475
    On December 19th, 2007 at 4:52 pm, Rev Wolf said:

    Never mind that THEY DON’T EVEN SAVE ENERGY! Sure they save initial electricity, but all that waste in heat now has to be created by the “normal” heaters instead. In a cold climate the net savings are minimal. Let the Californians ban it, but it’s just pointless for us in the northern parts.

  52. #199476
    On December 19th, 2007 at 4:54 pm, backwoods conservative said:

    If they are successful in doing away with incandescent bulbs, I would much rather see LED’s than CFL’s. I have experience with LED’s in flashlights. While the white light LED flashlights do not spread as wide a cone of light as a regular bulb, the area they do light is easily seen. And as for the ability to work with dimmers, that is well established. I’m an amateur astronomer. And almost every amateur astronomer I know carries a variable red LED flashlight on the oberving field.

    I have yet to see an LED burn out. And it takes forever to wear out batteries with them.

  53. #199479
    On December 19th, 2007 at 4:57 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    If they are successful in doing away with incandescent bulbs, I would much rather see LED’s than CFL’s.

    Actually LEDs are coming here. They are pretty big in Europe, and Philips has a division dedicated to bringing more LEDs to the consumer market. It’s their LumiLEDs division. Google it and you’ll find more info.

    I’m MUCH rather do the LED thing, than be forced to use the CFLs.

  54. #199480
    On December 19th, 2007 at 4:57 pm, Common Sense said:

    I have to disagree with some of you, we’ve used CFL for 7 years (there are a lot of lights in our new house), and they’ve lasted a very long time and have never been a fire hazard, despite being installed in can lights, i.e. “upside down”.

    We’ve only had to change them once in 7 years. Most of the bulbs lasted 5-6 years.

    We’re not moonbat environmentalists, but did it to save money, we use a lot of power. I’d get solar panels if I could afford it. I would feel quite triumphant having Excel Energy pay me for the extra juice generated each month instead of the huge checks we send them now. And our roof faces directly south, in Colorado, a state that averages 300 days of sunshine a year.

    Granted, the lights can bee a bit weird until they ‘warm up’, but they work for most rooms in the house. All of the lights in our kitchen are CFLs and they work just fine.

    That said, I’d like to know how it’s constitutional for the government to ban a safe and legal product? Where is product management stated in the Constitution? What is the world coming to?

    Don’t get me started on the ethanol mandates…..

  55. #199481
    On December 19th, 2007 at 4:58 pm, deadeye said:

    I replaced 3 100 watt security floodlights in my back yard with the “acceptable” (read politically correct) replacements. They were useless. They don’t work in the cold and I didn’t provide enough light when they warmed up. I put the old ones back up.

  56. #199482
    On December 19th, 2007 at 5:02 pm, Common Sense said:

    As an aside, I’d love to switch all of our Christmas lights to LED, but they’re still too expensive and the variety isn’t there yet. And since the light is very different, you can’t switch them a string at a time and maintain a uniform look.

    But the thought of all of the benefits is tempting:
    – they stay cool reducing any fire hazard (not that there’s much of a risk anyway)
    – If one bulb goes out the rest of the string stays on
    – They last a really long time

  57. #199483
    On December 19th, 2007 at 5:04 pm, meatpieandtatters said:

    Anytime you have a bunch of bureaucrats outlawing a freaking light bulb it IS time for a revolution! Seriously, these idiots are our worst enemy. Open borders, who cares? Death to 100 Watt light bulbs, absolutely! Calling Dr. Paul. Calling Dr. Paul. Patient is in critical condition. Time for an intervention.

  58. #199484
    On December 19th, 2007 at 5:04 pm, puhiawa said:

    Shorted out a lamp by putting a CFL in a 3 way. But I generally have the micros in most rooms. They are made in china. :(

  59. #199485
    On December 19th, 2007 at 5:05 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    I will be heading out to purchase copious quantities of incandescent, high wattage bulbs.

    I will bask in their warm, steady, bright light and laugh.

  60. #199488
    On December 19th, 2007 at 5:06 pm, docflash said:

    I see it coming (bulb smugglers/dealers).Hey man,all I have is 60s and 100s.75s are at a primo now,my supplier cant keep up.Maybe next week.Im making a trip across the border ,theres no fence so its no problem.I only take cash.

  61. #199489
    On December 19th, 2007 at 5:09 pm, hawkeye54 said:

    My wife replaced all of our incandescent bulbs with the CFLs. that is except, for out three way lamps, don’t work in those.

    Right now the danger from the mercury in the bulbs is minimal due to the low level of mercury used in the bulbs and because not many people are using them yet.

    WHEN these CFLs do become the norm, THEN there will most likely be a problem with the mercury when the bulbs are discarded.

    I can see yet another special container just for hazardous waste to be added to the ones cities now use to seperate recyclying, yard trimmings, and trash.

  62. #199491
    On December 19th, 2007 at 5:11 pm, Frank Siegler said:

    I turned their claims against them. They made the mistake of claiming seven years life. I had our townhome association replace the incandescent bulbs (which burned out every three months) with the CLF’s…and kept the receipt. I now take the brunt out CLF’s back for replacement showing the service person the sales claim. So far, replaced 8 of 17 at no cost. Truly savings but not the way they intended!

  63. #199494
    On December 19th, 2007 at 5:11 pm, ctmom said:

    What am I supposed to put in the pod lights I have in my ceiling?

  64. #199496
    On December 19th, 2007 at 5:13 pm, TexasTiger said:

    Q: How many liberals does it take to change a lightbulb?

    A: None. Liberals don’t change lightbulbs. They pass legislation forcing the citizenry to the change the bulbs.

    Crapweasels. :(

  65. #199497
    On December 19th, 2007 at 5:14 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    You are being forced to use Gorebulbs with mercury inside them.

    I’m sure he has a mercury-credit scam in the works.

    LEDs are a bit expensive but seem to have better potential.

    But it doesn’t matter – all that matters to Congress is being able to tell you what to do!

  66. #199502
    On December 19th, 2007 at 5:22 pm, John Ansell said:

    LOL Greysonret, I’m on board. Bulblegging sounds like it will make us very rich. I’ll be a driver and I promise to make good time because it eats up more gas like that.

  67. #199510
    On December 19th, 2007 at 5:27 pm, d1carter said:

    I did not know that the Goracle was on the Board of Phillips Electric.

  68. #199513
    On December 19th, 2007 at 5:28 pm, waveman said:

    On December 19th, 2007 at 4:05 pm, sdillard said:
    Jeez, now I’m going to have to drive to Mexico to buy lightbulbs.

    I will not submit.

    Doubt you will find them there. In my travels to El Salvador and Northern to South Central Mexico in 2004-2006 I don’t recall seeing a single incandescent. They have been using CFLs for years. Reason, their electricity costs are 4-6 times or more the costs here in the US.

  69. #199516
    On December 19th, 2007 at 5:34 pm, DesertLover said:

    Maybe next time we want to throw something at one of these politicians we should substitute the traditional rotten tomatoes with CFL’s thrown at their feet so they can see the danger first hand of these things …

    It seems incredulous to me that the EU would saddle all electronics companies with RoHS (Reduction of Hazardous Substances) rules that have costs companies billions to put in place or lose their right to sell their products in EU countries would be pushing these Mercury monstrosities … especially since Mercury is one of the main substances the RoHS rules outlaws along with lead …

    Anyone else see the hypocrisy of this since Philips is an EU major player?

  70. #199517
    On December 19th, 2007 at 5:34 pm, steveegg said:

    Guess there is no conservatism in “compassionate ‘conservatism’”.

    Damn.

  71. #199521
    On December 19th, 2007 at 5:41 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    I can see yet another special container just for hazardous waste to be added to the ones cities now use to seperate recyclying, yard trimmings, and trash.

    Uh no. They’ll just put a special TAX on them.

  72. #199523
    On December 19th, 2007 at 5:44 pm, nyc123me said:

    If I get mercury poisoning, can I sue the government for forcing me to use these bulbs, when they are fully aware of the dangers of mercury?

  73. #199525
    On December 19th, 2007 at 5:52 pm, CommentGuy said:

    You might want to bookmark this one in case you break a CFL

     

    Ten steps to be done if a CFL breaks from the British Parliament 

  74. #199526
    On December 19th, 2007 at 5:53 pm, gayle said:

    Guess I won’t be filling out any tax forms since I won’t be able to see well.

  75. #199528
    On December 19th, 2007 at 5:56 pm, ajmontana said:

    Faux News Alert
    Both the house and the senate have just passed the Charmin law !!
    all other TP wil be OUTLAWED!
    Poo Poo Police will be on the look out for the doo doo wrong doer’s for using cheap imitations or leaves in the forest.
    fines will be severe,
    and yes, you’re takin it in the rear.
    film at 11:00

  76. #199530
    On December 19th, 2007 at 5:59 pm, Rick Moran said:

    Those CFL jobs give off at least 1/3 less light than the regular bulbs.

    To compensate for the loss, I suggest we go back to using whale oil. Whale oil lamps, candles, incense burners…

    And when we run out of whales, we can start burning the fat off of politicians who continue to try and force us to do silly, stupid things in the name of a cleaner environment.

  77. #199532
    On December 19th, 2007 at 6:01 pm, DesertLover said:

    Rick

    Don’t we then get all the Whale lovers in another uproar over killing off the whales?

  78. #199533
    On December 19th, 2007 at 6:03 pm, ajmontana said:

    the Whales have mercury in them also. or was that tuna/ dolphin?

  79. #199535
    On December 19th, 2007 at 6:05 pm, et said:

    Tax incandescent bulbs. Then they will be around forever. Politicians will never give up the money.

  80. #199536
    On December 19th, 2007 at 6:06 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    I know that as each successive American generation gets older, questions are inevitably asked that amount to “WTF has happened to America”?

    But seriously, WTF has happened to America? I feel like an old man who walked uphill in snow to and from school and I’m not old.

  81. #199537
    On December 19th, 2007 at 6:08 pm, Cameron said:

    So let me make sure I have it right.

    We will have an increase in vehicle usage as people drive to hazmat facilities to dispose of these bulbs when they burn out (I live in MD and Rockville, at 20-30 minutes driving time is the closest place for me), which will increase the amount of pollutants.

    Or they can spend a lot of money to have more facilities put in place, along with a staff to run it.

    But we’re saving the Earth and we feel good, so that’s all that counts, correct?

    I should find the name of the company I bought those boxes of incandescent lights from. 4 years later and I have yet to go through all of them.

  82. #199540
    On December 19th, 2007 at 6:10 pm, Hank said:

    A promising development today is a car that runs on fat.

    Al Gore alone could replace the whole Hertz fleet …

  83. #199541
    On December 19th, 2007 at 6:11 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    Blubberboat. Great. What next?

  84. #199543
    On December 19th, 2007 at 6:12 pm, jeanie said:

    Well, time to corner the market on 100 watt bulbs and black market them when the time comes. Does Canada sell them? Idiot government strikes again.

  85. #199546
    On December 19th, 2007 at 6:14 pm, Roman Con said:

    Figures. They HAVE to pass a law to get people to do something this lame-brained. If they let the market take care of itself, then nobody would buy Gorebulbs.

    That does it. I am just going to stop recycling anything.

    ‘cept jokes.

  86. #199549
    On December 19th, 2007 at 6:18 pm, Wade said:

    That does it. I am just going to stop recycling anything.

    ‘cept jokes.

    and politicians

  87. #199553
    On December 19th, 2007 at 6:22 pm, backwoods conservative said:

    All this talk of burning whale oil is scaring me. With the middle-age spread I have, I’ll be dodging harpoons every time I go for a swim. :shock:

  88. #199554
    On December 19th, 2007 at 6:24 pm, ajmontana said:

    did anyone catch the “Boston Legal” episode last night? I think you can watch it on-line… they capped all over Hybrids and the Greenies… denny crane! :lol: pulled out an m-16 paintball gun and blasted a great grouping right into an evirowhackos chest….. close range… :)

  89. #199560
    On December 19th, 2007 at 6:30 pm, Azygos said:

    It’s already almost impossible to find 100 watt bulbs here in Phoenix. If you are going to stock up on bulbs go to an electrical supply house and ask for a case of 10,000 hour bulbs. They should last for years.

  90. #199564
    On December 19th, 2007 at 6:31 pm, Common Sense said:

    Cameron -

    Don’t forget the rubber gloves and 2 plastic bags required to dispose of the broken blub.

    Since they’re contaminated with mercury, you can’t recycle them.

    An increase in petroleum products, I don’t think the enviros will like that.

  91. #199570
    On December 19th, 2007 at 6:43 pm, deepdiver said:

    Freedom? What’s that?

    I use a lot of the CPFLDQRSW, or whatever the hell they are called, bulbs. They last for a long time and, in less expensive lamps/fixtures, the fixture itself lasts longer due to the lower heat output. The floodlight type work well in the can lighting in the office. They also work well in light sensor activated outside fixtures. I have a 3-way lamp in the office with an appropriate 3-way CFL that burns ~9-10 hours a day, 5 days a week and has for 3 years so far with no replacement.

    I also use a lot of incandescent bulbs. Every CPFLDQRSW bulb I have seen specifically says on the packaging “not for use with rheostat or dimmer”. So I don’t use those with a dimmer. I also don’t use them inside the fridge or oven, nor do I use them in short time burn security lights or motion detector lights as they take a few minutes to warm up to full brightness and they take even longer in the cold.

    I like making those choices for myself and my business. I like balancing between energy savings, practicality, functionality and any other thing that strikes me to include in the decision process. I think I like deciding that because it reminds me that I own my own home and my own business in America and making decisions about things on those properties make me appreciate the freedom we have in America. It reminds me of the multitude of choices we have in America. It reminds me that I am a free man, in a free country, protected by the Constitution of the United States of America. In the future the lack of these choices will remind me that the sheep elected and re-elected the crapweasels who stole those rights, who stole those choices from me, my children and the generations to follow.

  92. #199573
    On December 19th, 2007 at 6:44 pm, steveegg said:

    On December 19th, 2007 at 5:59 pm, Rick Moran said:

    And when we run out of whales, we can start burning the fat off of politicians who continue to try and force us to do silly, stupid things in the name of a cleaner environment.

    Why don’t we start with politicians. Three of them should keep us in fuel and electricity for about 50 years.

  93. #199582
    On December 19th, 2007 at 6:57 pm, hawkeye54 said:

    On December 19th, 2007 at 6:10 pm, Hank said:
    A promising development today is a car that runs on fat.

    Al Gore alone could replace fuel the whole Hertz fleet

    Lookout ethonal – here comes liposuction! : )

  94. #199585
    On December 19th, 2007 at 6:59 pm, The Raging Republican said:

    The ironic hypocrisy behind all of this is that The Great Al Gore and that Edwards chic have none of those fancy earth saving light bulbs in their own houses.

  95. #199587
    On December 19th, 2007 at 7:01 pm, DelosWorld said:

    Just out of idle curiosity: Do CFL bulbs work in Easy-Bake ovens? If not then “Stay away from CFL bulbs – for the children!”

    Good question! And I don’t think my vintage quail hatcher will work with a CF bulb either!
    http://www.hometrainingtools.com/images/479/600×350/ld-incubat.jpg

    With regards to the mercury problem Popular Mechanics apparently ran some numbers and determined that the electric power plant would emit more mercury powering a normal bulb during its lifetime than is contained in a CFL bulb (which should last longer).
    http://www.popularmechanics.com/blogs/home_journal_news/4217864.html
    There are primarily two different compounds of mercury (elemental and organic) and one is worse than the other. Not sure what’s in bulbs or power plant emissions. If Popular Mechanics says 50.7 toms of mercury were emitted by US power plants in 2006 I’d say that’s probably not a desireable thing. From a waste disposal standpoint you’d rather have the waste concentrated than spread around the whole landscape and ultimately concentrated in rivers and lakes (and fish).

    Both CF bulbs and LED bulbs degrade in their output light levels over time whereas incandescent bulbs tend to just burn out. (Sometimes they get brighter just before they blow!) I’m not sure how they measure CF bulb lifetimes to calculate savings, but they probably use a half-brightness point. I have 10 year old CF flood bulbs in some ceiling cans and even though they still work the light levels are so low they are now worthless for reading. I would have left the incandescents floods in there except in the summer the heat would trigger a thermal breaker in the cans and the lights would flash on and off every few minutes. The CF bulbs generate less heat and don’t trigger the breakers.

    Here’s a place that sells some LED bulbs. Still very expensive although you could probably find a cheaper source, and the prices should drop over time.
    http://www.thinkgeek.com/gadgets/lights/9ceb/

    Uh, I can’t think up any more trivia about bulbs and mercury. This has been today’s electrical engineer perspective. That is all for now.

  96. #199589
    On December 19th, 2007 at 7:04 pm, walterc said:

    Apparently it didn’t occur to any of them to increase domestic oil & gaas production along with better use technology such as coal gasification, nuclear energy etc.

    Instead they have us buying expensive, toxic light bulbs.

    Good plan guys. Hey, I know, why don’t we eliminate the border fence too. Oh too late, congress has already thought of that.

  97. #199591
    On December 19th, 2007 at 7:06 pm, blacktygrrrr said:

    Let Santa and his Reindeer die. Santa is an anti-semite, only giving presents to the Christian kids. This Jewish boy never got a thing from him.

    Also, Reindeer meat (rumor has it) apparently tastes better than any steak, and I for one will be happy to try the new Blitzen Porterhouse at Black Angus.

    I am not sure if it is Kosher. Somebody slaughter some Reindeer and I shall consult with my Rabbi.

    Then we can use Rudolph’s nose to light up the world, and not need any light bulbs anyway.

    eric :) aka the Tygrrrr Express

You must be logged in to post a comment.

The global warming scandal of the century

November 20, 2009 12:23 PM by Michelle Malkin

115 Comments | 13 Trackbacks

On fire.

Fighting “climate change”…with free condoms

November 18, 2009 10:58 AM by Michelle Malkin

258 Comments | 7 Trackbacks

EPA lawyers: Cap-and-trade bill is “fatally flawed”

November 10, 2009 11:00 AM by Michelle Malkin

62 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

Inconvenient truth.

All by her lonesome: Sen. Boxer and the empty chairs

November 3, 2009 02:31 PM by Michelle Malkin

64 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

Hey, there, lonely girl.

Barbara Boxer’s eco-power grab

November 3, 2009 09:38 AM by Michelle Malkin

38 Comments | 1 Trackback

Schooling global warming blowhard John Kerry

October 28, 2009 01:22 PM by Michelle Malkin

81 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

Tinker Bell coopted by U.N. eco-zealots

October 27, 2009 10:55 AM by Michelle Malkin

71 Comments | 1 Trackback


Categories: Enviro-nitwits



Mudville Gazette

» The five-year plan
Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook