<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: President Bush&#8217;s year in review; Update: Budget director will review earmarks; On the GOP prez race&#8230;&#8221;You can&#8217;t be the president unless you have a firm set of principles to guide you;&#8221; &#8220;I believe we will keep the White House&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/20/president-bushs-year-in-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/20/president-bushs-year-in-review/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 06:24:38 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: vickisoup</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/20/president-bushs-year-in-review/comment-page-1/#comment-200699</link>
		<dc:creator>vickisoup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 02:34:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/20/president-bushs-year-in-review/#comment-200699</guid>
		<description>So, while Paris burned....as they say, anyway. Did you all know that the Social Security taxable income level was raised from $90k in 2007 to $108k in 2008? That&#039;s roughly a $1350+ tax increase. More than $100/month. 
Anyone see that coming, or was it snuck through someplace? Or maybe I was dancing or sleeping or something besides paying attention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, while Paris burned&#8230;.as they say, anyway. Did you all know that the Social Security taxable income level was raised from $90k in 2007 to $108k in 2008? That&#8217;s roughly a $1350+ tax increase. More than $100/month.<br />
Anyone see that coming, or was it snuck through someplace? Or maybe I was dancing or sleeping or something besides paying attention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: On-my-soap-box</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/20/president-bushs-year-in-review/comment-page-1/#comment-200386</link>
		<dc:creator>On-my-soap-box</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 19:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/20/president-bushs-year-in-review/#comment-200386</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I’m still Trying to Figure out how you got to be a troll in the first place.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Must be the bridge my wife is building me! :shock:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I’m still Trying to Figure out how you got to be a troll in the first place.</p></blockquote>
<p>Must be the bridge my wife is building me! <img src='http://michellemalkin.com/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_eek.gif' alt=':shock:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: On-my-soap-box</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/20/president-bushs-year-in-review/comment-page-1/#comment-200382</link>
		<dc:creator>On-my-soap-box</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 19:56:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/20/president-bushs-year-in-review/#comment-200382</guid>
		<description>SHoward,

Had to be it.  I thought everyone here knew I had a sarcastic, caustic personality?  &lt;strong&gt;T&lt;/strong&gt;ough &lt;strong&gt;F&lt;/strong&gt;or me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SHoward,</p>
<p>Had to be it.  I thought everyone here knew I had a sarcastic, caustic personality?  <strong>T</strong>ough <strong>F</strong>or me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al in St. Lou</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/20/president-bushs-year-in-review/comment-page-1/#comment-200329</link>
		<dc:creator>Al in St. Lou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 19:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/20/president-bushs-year-in-review/#comment-200329</guid>
		<description>Michelle, thanks for putting each update at the bottom!

Soap, how seriously can you take someone who thinks &quot;taters&quot; is spelled with three t&#039;s?

OffTopic: I saw something on TV where they previewed the next segment by saying they were going to show &quot;The good, the bad, and the Rosie,&quot; and displayed a photo of Ms. O&#039;Donnell when they said her first name! I groaned, but I enjoyed it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michelle, thanks for putting each update at the bottom!</p>
<p>Soap, how seriously can you take someone who thinks &#8220;taters&#8221; is spelled with three t&#8217;s?</p>
<p>OffTopic: I saw something on TV where they previewed the next segment by saying they were going to show &#8220;The good, the bad, and the Rosie,&#8221; and displayed a photo of Ms. O&#8217;Donnell when they said her first name! I groaned, but I enjoyed it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Speakup</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/20/president-bushs-year-in-review/comment-page-1/#comment-200284</link>
		<dc:creator>Speakup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 18:57:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/20/president-bushs-year-in-review/#comment-200284</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;”You can’t be the president unless you have a firm set of principles to guide you;”&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yeah, a &lt;em&gt;full set&lt;/em&gt; of Constitutionally mandated principles. 

Fulfilling one out three major mandates isn&#039;t very firm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>”You can’t be the president unless you have a firm set of principles to guide you;”</p></blockquote>
<p>Yeah, a <em>full set</em> of Constitutionally mandated principles. </p>
<p>Fulfilling one out three major mandates isn&#8217;t very firm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Health Care BS</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/20/president-bushs-year-in-review/comment-page-1/#comment-200267</link>
		<dc:creator>Health Care BS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 18:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/20/president-bushs-year-in-review/#comment-200267</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;SCHIP BROKE UP ON THE SHOALS OF PUBLIC OPINION...&lt;/strong&gt;

At the Health Affairs blog, Sarah Dine affects mystification at the failure of this year&#8217;s SCHIP expansion effort:
The failure to reauthorize a SCHIP program that allows states to continue the flexibility represented by the Republican frontrunne...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>SCHIP BROKE UP ON THE SHOALS OF PUBLIC OPINION&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>At the Health Affairs blog, Sarah Dine affects mystification at the failure of this year&#8217;s SCHIP expansion effort:<br />
The failure to reauthorize a SCHIP program that allows states to continue the flexibility represented by the Republican frontrunne&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SHoward</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/20/president-bushs-year-in-review/comment-page-1/#comment-200232</link>
		<dc:creator>SHoward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 18:25:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/20/president-bushs-year-in-review/#comment-200232</guid>
		<description>Methinks Soap&#039;s jab about stealing the election was &lt;strong&gt;T&lt;/strong&gt;aken &lt;strong&gt;F&lt;/strong&gt;ar too literally. 

Oh, and thanks from me, Chad!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Methinks Soap&#8217;s jab about stealing the election was <strong>T</strong>aken <strong>F</strong>ar too literally. </p>
<p>Oh, and thanks from me, Chad!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: backwoods conservative</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/20/president-bushs-year-in-review/comment-page-1/#comment-200225</link>
		<dc:creator>backwoods conservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 18:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/20/president-bushs-year-in-review/#comment-200225</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;On December 20th, 2007 at 12:13 pm, On-my-soap-box said: 

If I T F myself, do I get extra points?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I&#039;m still &lt;strong&gt;T&lt;/strong&gt;rying to &lt;strong&gt;F&lt;/strong&gt;igure out how you got to be a troll in the first place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>On December 20th, 2007 at 12:13 pm, On-my-soap-box said: </p>
<p>If I T F myself, do I get extra points?</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;m still <strong>T</strong>rying to <strong>F</strong>igure out how you got to be a troll in the first place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: On-my-soap-box</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/20/president-bushs-year-in-review/comment-page-1/#comment-200139</link>
		<dc:creator>On-my-soap-box</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 17:13:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/20/president-bushs-year-in-review/#comment-200139</guid>
		<description>If I &lt;strong&gt;T&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;strong&gt;F&lt;/strong&gt; myself, do I get extra points?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I <strong>T</strong> <strong>F</strong> myself, do I get extra points?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rablesk</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/20/president-bushs-year-in-review/comment-page-1/#comment-200101</link>
		<dc:creator>Rablesk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 16:43:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/20/president-bushs-year-in-review/#comment-200101</guid>
		<description>The good: Chief Justice Roberts
The bad:  Allowing patriots to be prosecuted...The Haditha Hoax,Border Guards in prison and not arresting propagandists for treason.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The good: Chief Justice Roberts<br />
The bad:  Allowing patriots to be prosecuted&#8230;The Haditha Hoax,Border Guards in prison and not arresting propagandists for treason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: On-my-soap-box</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/20/president-bushs-year-in-review/comment-page-1/#comment-200082</link>
		<dc:creator>On-my-soap-box</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 16:28:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/20/president-bushs-year-in-review/#comment-200082</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;10:30am Eastern. Talks up his global warming strategy and the Big Greenie energy bill.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Add to bad column.

soapbox troll - WHAAA?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>10:30am Eastern. Talks up his global warming strategy and the Big Greenie energy bill.</p></blockquote>
<p>Add to bad column.</p>
<p>soapbox troll &#8211; WHAAA?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grey Fox</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/20/president-bushs-year-in-review/comment-page-1/#comment-200076</link>
		<dc:creator>Grey Fox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 16:24:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/20/president-bushs-year-in-review/#comment-200076</guid>
		<description>A bit of speculation: I wonder if in college Bush was one of those people that screwed around until the paper was nearly due, then at the last minute worked his tail off to produce a reasonably good paper...He seems to function best in adversity.

As for his mistakes in the war, more and more people seems to think that the success of the Surge built upon trends already existing. I&#039;ll make a prediction: 25-50 years from now, when there is a lot more information available, some the passions have faded, and with the benefit of hindsight, Iraq will look no more mismanaged than any other war and Bush will come out looking pretty good. Thank about it - How many wars have we ever won that we didn&#039;t get our nose bloodied in the first part, but persevered, learned from our mistakes, and applied those leassons to win? The Revolutionary War (Washington made some MAJOR mistakes early on), the War of the Barbary Pirates, the War of 1812, the Civil War (Union side, obviously), WWII, most of our conflicts with the Indians, Korea...Exceptions might be the Mexican-American War (I don&#039;t know enough to comment there) and WWI (we got in very late. Nevertheless, we did have some early disasters, and learned from them, IIRC). Even in Vietnam we followed that pattern, we just didn&#039;t persevere long enough.

Incidentally, the British also tend to lose the first battles, but win the war. Maybe it a cultural or government thing? Dunno...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A bit of speculation: I wonder if in college Bush was one of those people that screwed around until the paper was nearly due, then at the last minute worked his tail off to produce a reasonably good paper&#8230;He seems to function best in adversity.</p>
<p>As for his mistakes in the war, more and more people seems to think that the success of the Surge built upon trends already existing. I&#8217;ll make a prediction: 25-50 years from now, when there is a lot more information available, some the passions have faded, and with the benefit of hindsight, Iraq will look no more mismanaged than any other war and Bush will come out looking pretty good. Thank about it &#8211; How many wars have we ever won that we didn&#8217;t get our nose bloodied in the first part, but persevered, learned from our mistakes, and applied those leassons to win? The Revolutionary War (Washington made some MAJOR mistakes early on), the War of the Barbary Pirates, the War of 1812, the Civil War (Union side, obviously), WWII, most of our conflicts with the Indians, Korea&#8230;Exceptions might be the Mexican-American War (I don&#8217;t know enough to comment there) and WWI (we got in very late. Nevertheless, we did have some early disasters, and learned from them, IIRC). Even in Vietnam we followed that pattern, we just didn&#8217;t persevere long enough.</p>
<p>Incidentally, the British also tend to lose the first battles, but win the war. Maybe it a cultural or government thing? Dunno&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BOB</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/20/president-bushs-year-in-review/comment-page-1/#comment-200074</link>
		<dc:creator>BOB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 16:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/20/president-bushs-year-in-review/#comment-200074</guid>
		<description>I was glad to here him support nuclear power. Of course I&#039;m a little biased, since I retired from a nuclear power plant after 30 years in operations and as an instructor. It&#039;s nuts to ignore nuclear power. It will be used to a much greater extent IMO, the only question is how bad we have to need it before we get off our duffs and start building new plants. I think it&#039;s called &quot;crisis management.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was glad to here him support nuclear power. Of course I&#8217;m a little biased, since I retired from a nuclear power plant after 30 years in operations and as an instructor. It&#8217;s nuts to ignore nuclear power. It will be used to a much greater extent IMO, the only question is how bad we have to need it before we get off our duffs and start building new plants. I think it&#8217;s called &#8220;crisis management.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tony the tiger</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/20/president-bushs-year-in-review/comment-page-1/#comment-200070</link>
		<dc:creator>tony the tiger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 16:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/20/president-bushs-year-in-review/#comment-200070</guid>
		<description>QUESTION:
I heard W say something to the effect of &quot;The ultimate weapon against terrorism... is Freedom.&quot;
Can&#039;t find anything from today&#039;s press conference - so I googled it.
Turns out he&#039;s said that a lot.

So anyways, even if it&#039;s cliche... I&#039;d say &lt;em&gt;that&lt;/em&gt; was the good.

The bad?  Well, he wasn&#039;t hard &lt;strong&gt;enough&lt;/strong&gt; on this Congress.  Hope he makes some good recess appointments while they&#039;re out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>QUESTION:<br />
I heard W say something to the effect of &#8220;The ultimate weapon against terrorism&#8230; is Freedom.&#8221;<br />
Can&#8217;t find anything from today&#8217;s press conference &#8211; so I googled it.<br />
Turns out he&#8217;s said that a lot.</p>
<p>So anyways, even if it&#8217;s cliche&#8230; I&#8217;d say <em>that</em> was the good.</p>
<p>The bad?  Well, he wasn&#8217;t hard <strong>enough</strong> on this Congress.  Hope he makes some good recess appointments while they&#8217;re out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rinoalert</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/20/president-bushs-year-in-review/comment-page-1/#comment-200066</link>
		<dc:creator>Rinoalert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 16:18:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/20/president-bushs-year-in-review/#comment-200066</guid>
		<description>From a conservative perspective, Bush is one of the worst presidents in American history.

He is a quarterback who knowingly turns over the ball on almost every play to hurt the team.

Redefining conservatism may be his lasting legacy and the ruin of the country because we have no party left to support.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From a conservative perspective, Bush is one of the worst presidents in American history.</p>
<p>He is a quarterback who knowingly turns over the ball on almost every play to hurt the team.</p>
<p>Redefining conservatism may be his lasting legacy and the ruin of the country because we have no party left to support.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- NEW -->
