Which GOP candidate do you support?

By Michelle Malkin  •  December 20, 2007 12:49 PM

Update 4:30pm Eastern. Poll closed. Final results…

1results.jpg

***

Ok, folks, I want to take your campaign temperatures. How are you feeling about the race?

Which GOP candidate do you support?
Giuliani
Huckabee
Hunter
McCain
Romney
Paul
Thompson
None of the above
God help us

  
Free polls from Pollhost.com

***

Related:

Jim Geraghty wonders if we are in the midst of the long-predicted conservative crack-up.

Posted in: GOP

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Blogs For Fred Thompson
  2. Hot Air » Blog Archive » Crater? Rudy fourth now nationally in Rasmussen
  3. Huckabee takes the high road: Others…not so much.
  4. Blogs For Fred Thompson
  5. OnePoliticalVoice Blogs » Blog Archive » Morning Briefing: 12.21.07
  6. Maryland for Fred Thompson » Blog Archive » Morning Briefing: 12.21.07
  7. Stop The ACLU » Blog Archive » Fred Thompson: The Choice of Most Conservative Bloggers
  8. Bloggers for Fred » An Ol’ Broad’s Ramblings
  9. Let Freedom Ring » Blog Archive » One Last Thing
  10. Hillery imploding, Huck ‘bunkers’ goof, Mitt misremembers, Paulbots found « Musings of a Political Wonk, Charity Ronin & Oracle Hack
  11. portland car show
  12. Support Fred Thompson
  13. Scott and Other Conservative Bloggers Support Fred Thompson ‘08 « BUUUUURRRRNING HOT

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #200433
    On December 20th, 2007 at 3:32 pm, franksalterego said:

    I was for Fred!, before it was popular to be for Fred!

    Welcome to the bandwagon

  2. #200437
    On December 20th, 2007 at 3:36 pm, backwoods conservative said:

    Starting to see a surge in Ron Paul votes. Here it comes. :roll:

  3. #200440
    On December 20th, 2007 at 3:38 pm, orlandocajun said:

    If we throw out the Paul votes, we have to wonder who the pollsters are polling! Maybe they’re polling in Vermont.

  4. #200442
    On December 20th, 2007 at 3:39 pm, RaisedRight said:

    30 pcs (#76)

    I haven’t seen any of his ads in Iowa City. But I would love to see more from him.

  5. #200452
    On December 20th, 2007 at 3:47 pm, taylork said:

    The Paulians are a joke. Do they think that crashing this poll is actually going to help them in any way?

  6. #200480
    On December 20th, 2007 at 4:03 pm, davenp35 said:

    Hahaha. The Paulbots have arrived. Let it be shown that Fred was #1 and Mitt was #2 before they arrived.

  7. #200487
    On December 20th, 2007 at 4:07 pm, orlandocajun said:

    The Paul Bots are “crashing to boards”. Once they get wind of an internet poll, it may as well shut down or remove Paul’s name.

  8. #200488
    On December 20th, 2007 at 4:08 pm, deepdiver said:

    I was in Fred’s camp back when he was still a senator. I didn’t agree with all of his votes, but unlike most pols he at least articulated a well-reasoned, understandable motivation for his decisions. I too would be happy with a Thompson/Hunter or Thompson/Tancredo ticket.

    I’d have to hold my nose really tightly to vote for Rudy and I’m afraid I would pass out before I got the stylus all the way through the paper. McCain is better but not by much. Romney, well, easier to vote for than Rudy or McCain, but still would be voting against the dems rather than for the GOP – and that has nothing to do with his religion as I don’t give a rip about that issue.

  9. #200490
    On December 20th, 2007 at 4:10 pm, taylork said:

    Ha! I wonder if MM knows that there’s a support Senator Gramnesty’s reecltion ad on the poll results?

  10. #200491
    On December 20th, 2007 at 4:10 pm, deepdiver said:

    Poll needs to be redone without Paul’s name. I would be really interested to know what the actual leanings are of MM readers. Stupid hijackers.

  11. #200505
    On December 20th, 2007 at 4:18 pm, John Ansell said:

    No dispute with Fred & Newt.

  12. #200508
    On December 20th, 2007 at 4:20 pm, taylork said:

    Poll needs to be redone without Paul’s name. I would be really interested to know what the actual leanings are of MM readers. Stupid hijackers.

    You could always just do the math youself.

  13. #200512
    On December 20th, 2007 at 4:25 pm, cwdancer said:

    Hey, JoAnne in Va, #26..I just cast a vote or Mitt but I sure like your idea..If I thought I really could get a good charge of T & T to blow the $&## out of Washington I’d recast my vote..

  14. #200513
    On December 20th, 2007 at 4:28 pm, Rogue said:

    Yep, the Paulians are a-coming…took them so long since they’re all scrambling to contain the excrement that has hit the fan since their Messiah refused to return the Neo-nazi/White Supremist money. The rock has been pulled back and the scum is scrambling to get out of the sunshine.

  15. #200518
    On December 20th, 2007 at 4:35 pm, navywife91 said:

    I like the term “Ronulans” and you’re all right, they are hijacking the poll. I just thought everyone was being a little paranoid.

    my bad.

  16. #200523
    On December 20th, 2007 at 4:41 pm, alamedaman said:

    just proves that Ghouliani is out of touch with Republicans.

  17. #200526
    On December 20th, 2007 at 4:42 pm, Rogue said:

    I just prefer relating the Ron Paul cult to the Raelian cult. I like Star Trek, I don’t want it sullied by any association with the slime that supports Paul. I almost started screaming at my comp screen when I watched the vid somewhere of the Paul-denburg and it had Star Wars music on it ;)

  18. #200528
    On December 20th, 2007 at 4:47 pm, Justacanuck said:

    Seeing as the Paulbots are now hitting their stride and laying waste to yet another Internet poll, I offer you this poll:

    Which candidate will the Paulbots support when Ron Paul drops out?

  19. #200531
    On December 20th, 2007 at 4:52 pm, ThackerAgency said:

    Let the record show that I voted for ‘God help us’.

  20. #200545
    On December 20th, 2007 at 5:01 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    Poor hunka, Huck is only doing half as well as “GOD Help us”

  21. #200547
    On December 20th, 2007 at 5:02 pm, Alaskan said:

    From a still disinterested viewpoint, I can see how Huckabee could attract some people. He seems charming, genial, even witty in a way, but as his record is broadcast, he also seems like another Arkansas politician, corrupt, silver tongued, and a liberal beneath a conservative coat. Why would I want another guy like Bill C in the White House?

  22. #200549
    On December 20th, 2007 at 5:05 pm, navywife91 said:

    Not Star Wars!!!!! That just sends me over the edge. I do not like that guy.

    Ughhhhh!

    I’ve been reading some articles about Ron Paul and it doesn’t sound too good. Some of his “supporters” are very shady characters. Racists, troofers, anti-Israel types. Scary.

  23. #200550
    On December 20th, 2007 at 5:05 pm, The Ugly American said:

    I see the PaulBots have finally shown up.

  24. #200553
    On December 20th, 2007 at 5:07 pm, Blaise said:

    I see that RRon Paul’s supports found out about this poll and gummed it up.

    Next time, maybe just leave his name off the list of options. Sure they’ll get upset, but so what? You could also have a separate box “Are you a Ron Paul Supporter? Yes___ Yes___” Then they can submit until their little fingers drop off.

  25. #200554
    On December 20th, 2007 at 5:11 pm, NBF said:

    From single digits to this. The Ron Paul spam machine got whiff. Desperate spam.

  26. #200557
    On December 20th, 2007 at 5:14 pm, RoyceB said:

    Hunter or Thompson

    But thankfully, not Hunter Thompson.

    RoyceB

  27. #200562
    On December 20th, 2007 at 5:17 pm, The Ugly American said:

    You could also have a separate box “Are you a Ron Paul Supporter? Yes___ Yes___” Then they can submit until their little fingers drop off.

    Heheh….I like it.

  28. #200567
    On December 20th, 2007 at 5:20 pm, steveegg said:

    We’re going to know, depending on your perspective, in a couple weeks to just over a month the answers to two big questions:

    - Do the conservative and Paul-Nuts wings of the blogosphere have any actual influence? If we and they do, it would be a horse race between Thompson and Paul.

    - Has conservatism as a whole run out of gas? I don’t want to have to revisit my answers, but I’ll submit that, if either Giuliani or Huckabee wins the nomination, it has.

  29. #200572
    On December 20th, 2007 at 5:29 pm, a crapweasel said:

    Time to close the poll because the Paul bots are working overtime to give Ru Paul the lead.

    Ru Paul ‘08

    Transvestites unite!

  30. #200575
    On December 20th, 2007 at 5:31 pm, a crapweasel said:

    On December 20th, 2007 at 4:47 pm, Justacanuck said:

    Seeing as the Paulbots are now hitting their stride and laying waste to yet another Internet poll, I offer you this poll:

    Which candidate will the Paulbots support when Ron Paul drops out?

    Robert “KKK” Byrd aka Sheets.

  31. #200578
    On December 20th, 2007 at 5:38 pm, steveegg said:

    On December 20th, 2007 at 4:47 pm, Justacanuck said:

    Seeing as the Paulbots are now hitting their stride and laying waste to yet another Internet poll, I offer you this poll:

    Which candidate will the Paulbots support when Ron Paul drops out?

    The DhimmiRAT, who they actually supported all along.

  32. #200579
    On December 20th, 2007 at 5:38 pm, Sergeant Tim said:

    HaHaHa!

    A few hours ago, I visited this post and checked the poll numbers but that was before RuPaul’s swarm stopped by.

    Hey, Paulites: Neither crashing online polls nor paying for your bloviating candidate’s blimp will win him an election.

  33. #200580
    On December 20th, 2007 at 5:40 pm, blacktygrrrr said:

    Between Ron Paul, John Paul, Sean Paul, and RuPaul, I broke down which one is the least coherent.

    The url is too long to fit in this box, but type in Ron, John, Sean and RuPaul to get the analysis regarding the various Pauls.

    As for his antisemitism, that is why may of his supporters are known as the Paulestinians.

    Respectfully,

    eric aka the Tygrrrr Express

  34. #200582
    On December 20th, 2007 at 5:44 pm, orlandocajun said:

    If we remove the Paul Bot votes, Thompson’s at roughly 50%. I’d still like to know who the pollsters are polling.

  35. #200589
    On December 20th, 2007 at 5:54 pm, vickisoup said:

    #127, Sergeant Tim writes,

    Hey, Paulites: Neither crashing online polls nor paying for your bloviating candidate’s blimp will win him an election.

    I think we better not get too arrogant about this guy. He will get the most votes in my crazy town, the People’s Republic of Santa Cruz. Good news is that Hillary won’t, but still…he’s earning money hand over fist.

  36. #200593
    On December 20th, 2007 at 5:58 pm, backwoods conservative said:

    The last time I looked before the Paulite surge, Thompson had 46% to Romney’s 16%. That’s a 3-1 margin.

    Go Fred!

  37. #200594
    On December 20th, 2007 at 6:00 pm, nevadageo said:

    good lord, every internet poll i’ve seen within an hour has been attacked by Ronulans. crazy crazy. I guess we’ll see what the actual votes are, cause every poll i read says something different.

  38. #200595
    On December 20th, 2007 at 6:01 pm, Sergeant Tim said:

    See comment # 125.

    The Paulbots will just pick another loser to support, perhaps Kucinich or maybe even this “slugger” who has tossed her hair into the ring.

  39. #200603
    On December 20th, 2007 at 6:08 pm, MuddlinThru said:

    Can you imagine the convention?? FredHeads vs paulbots!

  40. #200608
    On December 20th, 2007 at 6:11 pm, steveegg said:

    On December 20th, 2007 at 5:44 pm, orlandocajun said:

    If we remove the Paul Bot votes, Thompson’s at roughly 50%. I’d still like to know who the pollsters are polling

    Which goes to my first question above. Either the pollsters and conventional pundits are wrong, or we are. As much as I don’t want to admit it, I fear it’s the former.

  41. #200616
    On December 20th, 2007 at 6:19 pm, normsrevenge said:

    4,635 votes total so far

    Selection Votes
    Giuliani 7% 307
    Huckabee 3% 147
    Hunter 6% 256
    McCain 2% 100
    Romney 12% 558
    Paul 28% 1,276
    Thompson 37% 1,701
    None of the above 1% 30
    God help us 6% 260

    Cool.. not sure about the Paul aberration…anomaly.. power of the internet and email chains, I reckun

  42. #200621
    On December 20th, 2007 at 6:23 pm, Mark Jaquith said:

    If we remove the Paul Bot votes, Thompson’s at roughly 50%

    Internet polls as a measure of the width of support are nearly worthless, as evidenced as the improbably high numbers for Thompson and Paul. It can only be used to measure depth, and even then, it’s depth among Internet users, who are not an evenly-distributed slice of the population. Plus, you have the problem where voters from other parties are voting.

    Not to say that phone polling is perfect. Phone polling for instance is a horrible measure of depth of support. It’s basically a name recognition contest.

  43. #200626
    On December 20th, 2007 at 6:32 pm, coldfront said:

    Tried to vote but it wouldn’t take my vote.

    THOMPSON

    Charles @ LGF has some good ‘dope’ on Paul today.

  44. #200628
    On December 20th, 2007 at 6:34 pm, coldfront said:

    We’re sorry, votes are not being accepted for this poll at this time! Your vote was not included in these results.

    yup, tried again…guess the PaulBots have arrived!!!

  45. #200632
    On December 20th, 2007 at 6:39 pm, backwoods conservative said:

    For anybody who hasn’t noticed, the poll was closed at 4:30.

  46. #200651
    On December 20th, 2007 at 7:30 pm, shooter said:

    Can we do this again, with out Paul and his bots?

  47. #200653
    On December 20th, 2007 at 7:36 pm, AmericaFirst said:

    I’d vote for Thompson if the poll was working

  48. #200664
    On December 20th, 2007 at 8:01 pm, Surak said:

    #47: Condi for VP????? That could be enough to get me to vote for Hillary.

    Go to http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/ and search on Condi. Unless you love Ahmadinejad, Condi has been a disaster.

    At the Annapolis conference, Condi accommodated the Saudi dhimmi demand that the Israeli delegation had to enter through the service entrance. The conference statement said that Israel must end terrorism and incitement.

    She has negotiated with Iran, a country that has been at war with us for 28 years, killed 241 of our servicepeople in Beirut, and is killing our servicepeople today in Iraq. I should mention that Iran’s uranium enrichment and ballistic missile programs continue despite the State Dept. influenced NIE denying that there is a nuclear weapons program (whose goal Ahmadinejad has already told us).

    Condi is a disaster and so is her boss. Bush should fire her today. Thank God for the Republican Congressional delegation and presidential candidates (other than R.P.).

  49. #200674
    On December 20th, 2007 at 8:23 pm, ritalou said:

    I support Ron Paul. I am not crazy. He has immigration views closest to what Michelle and crew would support. Close the border, end the birth citizenship and discontinue all benefits to non-citizens.

    If not Paul then Thompson.

    PS – I am not a Nazi either. Attack his policies, not his supporters.

  50. #200675
    On December 20th, 2007 at 8:39 pm, Dandapani said:

    The Ronulans came and stacked the poll for their LIBERALatarian candidate.

  51. #200698
    On December 20th, 2007 at 9:33 pm, BadIdeaGuy said:

    I know of three LIBERAL friends who have no intention of voting R with Ron Paul bumper stickers. His candidacy is a liberal joke.

  52. #200708
    On December 20th, 2007 at 10:11 pm, gollumclone said:

    Perhaps it would be more illuminating if we voted on the dudes that we would NOT vote for in any case?
    Nix on Paul and Huckabee.

    Someone mentioned Condi Rice for GOP slate. She went to hell in a handbasket when she was made sec. of state and fell into the state dept. arabist mindset. Pity the poor palis whom the Israelis treat like Alabama whites abused blacks in mid-sixties (that’s why she implied anyway). They need a state? Hahaha- what a joke. Let’s send them more tax dollars.

  53. #200714
    On December 20th, 2007 at 10:31 pm, greenLibertarian said:

    Dear Michelle,

    you might consider leaving these polls open until those not allowed external web access while working can vote when they get home.

  54. #200756
    On December 21st, 2007 at 1:15 am, Mr_Conservative_Cat said:

    On December 20th, 2007 at 2:55 pm, blacktygrrrr said:
    1) Giuliani
    2) McCain
    3) Thompson
    4) Romney

    Nobody else.

    Giuliani and McCain can beat Hillary. Thompson and Romney would have a tougher time.

    Huckabee is being built up because the left thinks he will go down in flames in a general election. They are right.

    Giuliani is the guy.

    Words worth repeating, except I’m not so sure that McCain could do it. As Eric says, Huckabee in a general election is Hillary’s afternoon snack.

    Keeping it real, Hillary will get the nod and then it’s the Hillarymonster or whomever else. Take you real-life-scenario pick based on whomever beats Hillary, not whomever most fits your personal views. Unless you want Hillary rubber stamping everything Reid and Pelosi send her with total and absolute impunity – an exceptionally real possibility, and think about it – pick according to whomever beats her in national head-to-head polling data. Anything else gets us the United Socialist States of America for the first time in history. Won’t that be swell.

    We all joke and make idealistic statements, but this is actually extraordinarily serious. And Obama is almost as bad, if not worse. Left to him we would not have gone on the offensive against terrorists overseas. Imagine the devistation here at home in 2007 if he had been President after 9/11.

    CHOOSE WISELY.

  55. #200780
    On December 21st, 2007 at 3:11 am, RetFireman said:

    Sorry kids, but as much as I hate to admit it, we have too much at stake here to be bickering about, “Who is the bigger, most awesome Conservative”. We need to be thinking Big Picture here, and we need to be thinking November 08 and who can beat whoever the knuckledragger it is they get to represent them. These yahoos are going to be running a campaign full fo blasphemy (not about religion) and lies concerning the war and the Republican record on the economy, employment and everything else. We have had just stellar numbers economically, record low unemployment, yet everytime you get someone on TV off the street, the first words out of their moths has something to do with how they are scared because the economy is in the crapper and unemployment is so high.

    The Left has been telling so many lies for so long, the American public has taken it as the gospel truth. We need someone that is going to come out with all guns firing and will not stop to change barrels until the war is over the Wednesday after the election. THAT should be the guy we all back. THAT should be the guy that gets us going and THAT should be what each of these candidates should be trying to do.

    It is a crying shame that the Republican Party has not figured any of this out…that they are acting like the school bully is cruising the playground looking for them and they are doing their best not to be noticed. We have the biggest bicepts and the best looking pecs on the playground, and all the chicks dig us and we have all the fans. Why the hell we are ducking the school bully is just plain nuts. Would someone please tell the party to stop ducking and finally let them drop so that the people who fund this party can actually be proud to call themselves Republicans again and get excited about our candidates?

  56. #200782
    On December 21st, 2007 at 3:16 am, RetFireman said:

    And we don’t have a shot in Hell as long as idiots like the Ron Paul jokers go around screwing things like this up. Come on, does anyone really think there are 1200 Paul supporters ANYWHERE?

    You guys are the worst. Just go and get your Liberal shirts and stay over at the Liberal sites where you belong. he is an embarrassment to this party and has no business being associated with it let alone running as a GOP’er. All you guys are are a bunch of confused hippies who got a bad toke of hippie lettuce with nothing to munch on, and no direction in life. You are supporting a racist and an isolationist who wants to abandon the troops in the desert to the point where they would even need o find their own way home. Get a life AND a job you losers.

  57. #200796
    On December 21st, 2007 at 4:27 am, gayle said:

    Newt may be in line for VP….I believe.

    Perhaps that is why he didn’t enter the campaign – knowing he wouldn’t get the endorsement. What an asset he’d be for any candidate.

    With him on the ticket, WOW!

    This is my prediction…..let’s see if I am correct.

    Then he could be the next Prez.

  58. #200810
    On December 21st, 2007 at 6:01 am, tonyinmaine said:

    Michelle, please keep the Ron Paul people from spamming your poll like they do every other internet poll, ok?

  59. #200839
    On December 21st, 2007 at 7:44 am, AuntiEm said:

    Why is it that the polls do not include all the candidates? How can the bottom candidates rise if they are not included? I like Hunter.

  60. #200955
    On December 21st, 2007 at 10:08 am, secondsight said:

    My favorite remains John Bolton.

    Let’s draft him.

  61. #200971
    On December 21st, 2007 at 10:30 am, Mister P said:

    Paul. Eliminate Income tax (and all broad based tases). He is the only guy who I see realizes the US can not be the policemen of the World. He will get us out of the UN, and OUT OF KOREA (put there by the UN).

  62. #200990
    On December 21st, 2007 at 10:54 am, TacitEagle said:

    The Paulians have put their stink on the poll.

  63. #201487
    On December 21st, 2007 at 7:48 pm, Mr_Conservative_Cat said:

    The Paul people obviously think that they can influence the election by overwhelming polls like this one, and in so doing convince us that our friends and neighbors support him, trying to influence voters to do the same. They don’t realize that caucus followers are politically savvy and not essentially stupid. We know where Paul is in the Rasmussen and other legit polls. According to that data he’s essentially invisible.

    But by playing these games they mirror the simplisitc thinking of the person they follow, and in so doing remind us of what a truly terrible President Ron Paul would be.

  64. #201845
    On December 22nd, 2007 at 1:44 pm, RetFireman said:

    Liberal tools in Republican clothing. That is all they are. They are playing like Liberals. These are Liberal games they play, and everytime you talk to one or one of them goes on a Conservative site they behave exactly like a Liberal. I really do not understand a single one of them. Even their signs are little hippie love notes with the “LOVE” spelled backwards in “REVOLUTION”. This election is one of the most ridiculous elections in recent history. I blame the California recall election for people not taking these things seriously anymore. that, and the fact that Liberals are idiots.

You must be logged in to post a comment.



Mudville Gazette

» The five-year plan

Pundit & Pundette

» How much did that "tent" cost?
Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook