Hillary is my “sista”

By Michelle Malkin  •  December 26, 2007 02:08 PM

In case you thought no one fell for Hillary’s bogus Selma accent, think again. Rep. Stephanie Tubbs Jones, a black Democrat from Ohio, is down with her “sista:”

I am supporting Hillary Clinton for President of the United States because, simply put, she is the best qualified for the job. She has been consistent in her support of issues that are important to my constituency and is not afraid to take a stand on an issue, be it popular or unpopular.

I have known her since 1992, when she came to Cleveland after the Democratic Convention. Since then we have forged a strong friendship and I fondly call her my ’sista’.

This coveted endorsement comes on the heels of Andrew Young’s approval of the Clintons’ blackness.

Surreal.

Guess the “white boys” among “Hillaryland” know what they’re doing…

Posted in: Hillary Clinton

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Michelle Malkin » When is lynching rhetoric acceptable?

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #203364
    On December 26th, 2007 at 2:11 pm, puhiawa said:

    Silly twit. Queen Hillary considers you her maid.

  2. #203366
    On December 26th, 2007 at 2:12 pm, katieanne said:

    I find this so offensive. I thought the color of one’s skin wasn’t supposed to make a difference? Why are the Dems always cramming race down our throats?

  3. #203367
    On December 26th, 2007 at 2:12 pm, James Felix said:

    Even by the standards of politics, where some pandering is expected, that’s just appalling.

  4. #203371
    On December 26th, 2007 at 2:23 pm, TXRose said:

    Pandering is par for the course among dimms. We shouldn’t be surprised at anything that happens in the pres race on this side of the fence.
    Thank you MM. I probably would have missed this on my own.

  5. #203372
    On December 26th, 2007 at 2:24 pm, zorro said:

    Surreal indeed. If elected, will they attempt to rename the “White House”???

  6. #203374
    On December 26th, 2007 at 2:28 pm, Armigerous said:

    Rodham is her ’sistah’??…does this mean that negro women in Congress can’t spell correctly due to an inferior inner city public school education,or does it simply mean she is suffering from a case of ‘ebonic plague’?

  7. #203375
    On December 26th, 2007 at 2:29 pm, ajmontana said:

    well, my guess is she has more than one sista, usually a litter has at least 3 females in it.

  8. #203380
    On December 26th, 2007 at 2:34 pm, Ditkaca said:

    She has been consistent in her support of issues that are important to my constituency and is not afraid to take a stand on an issue, be it popular or unpopular.

    She has to be joking.

    Has anybody out there put together a list of the voting record of the candidates? I seem to remember that not many even bother to show up to do their job.

  9. #203382
    On December 26th, 2007 at 2:40 pm, fourstringfuror said:

    As a “white boy,” I am thoroughly sick of the constant race baiting going on in the Democrat Party (or is that Par-tay? Holla!). Isn’t it enough to say “I support HRC because she agrees with me on the important issues,” and leave it at that? Why does Jones drag race into this by dubbing HRC her “sista?”

    Would this make HRC the second “black” president?

    Disgusting liberals.

  10. #203383
    On December 26th, 2007 at 2:40 pm, CarpiJugulum said:

    Rep. Stephanie Tubbs is a prime example of what is wrong with elected race baiters. Not a single elected official has a complete constituancy of one race . There fore she is not representing the inorities in her district at all. This is WRONG!

    Itg is time to call these care baiters to task and expose them for the bigots that they are.

  11. #203391
    On December 26th, 2007 at 2:47 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    And Hillary’s going to be the first black woman president!

  12. #203396
    On December 26th, 2007 at 2:55 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    *puts on the worn out broken record

    And yet, she may get the nod for the nomination and the race for POTUS would be close.

    .oO if I keep that up, I will have to “TF” myself again

  13. #203397
    On December 26th, 2007 at 2:55 pm, meatpieandtatters said:

    You know, if I didn’t know any better, with all these Hillary bits, it would seem like someone is secretly pulling for the grand Dame?

  14. #203398
    On December 26th, 2007 at 2:55 pm, meatpieandtatters said:

    Holy cow, I just had an involuntary puke reflex when I thought about Hillary.

  15. #203424
    On December 26th, 2007 at 3:46 pm, Marshall Russ said:

    Uugghh, to painful to even discuss, sorry.

  16. #203425
    On December 26th, 2007 at 3:48 pm, aunursa said:

    She has been consistent in her support of issues that are important to my constituency

    Her constituents all agree on which issues are important? And which side? Much be the most homgeneous district in the nation.

  17. #203428
    On December 26th, 2007 at 3:52 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    seem like someone is secretly pulling for the grand Dame?

    He can say that and call ME a troll with a straight face???

    Too Funny

  18. #203431
    On December 26th, 2007 at 3:56 pm, walterc said:

    Slightly OT, but I heard somehting on Fox and Friends this morning about the NYSlimes doing a story on Hillary’s “experience” or rather lack thereof.

    Something about her not having a security clearence as first lady, so she didn’t get to sit in on the meetings that would have given her experience on national security issues.

    Actually, I think it was Doocy, that said her experience in the White House was only enough for her to know which toilets need the handle jiggled and where the kitchen is for late night snacks.

  19. #203432
    On December 26th, 2007 at 3:58 pm, ajmontana said:

    Walter, there were knives in the kitchen it was off limits for her…..

  20. #203434
    On December 26th, 2007 at 3:59 pm, ajmontana said:

    in other words people who belong in cracker factories arent allowed around sharp objects.

  21. #203437
    On December 26th, 2007 at 4:04 pm, Alphonse said:

    While their skin colors differ, yet may their souls both be black.

  22. #203451
    On December 26th, 2007 at 4:25 pm, graysonret said:

    Don’t you just love those people who remind us constantly of race, slavery, racism and reparations; yet, support the Party who fought for slavery and when that failed, passed Jim Crow laws, black codes, and helped the KKK? The same Party that, nowadays, promises again and again to help the black population, but fail to do so, time and time again…to keep them down and get their votes.

  23. #203467
    On December 26th, 2007 at 4:53 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    Something about her not having a security clearence as first lady, so she didn’t get to sit in on the meetings that would have given her experience on national security issues.

    Yes, it was front page news actually. I read the story yesterday. Basically she went to all these countries as first lady and now she’s touting her “experience” whereas, in reality, she didn’t really do much. Not exactly managing anything, nor making decisions for the country. She claims she was important because she was a “sounding” board for Billy Boy. Please.

    I guess she was the co-president by osmosis.

    Wow, then I must be a surgeon, hanging out with my Dad all those years.

  24. #203468
    On December 26th, 2007 at 4:55 pm, DesertLover said:

    Someone needs to constantly remind all members of minorities for the next year that the Dems don’t really want to help them but rather keep them down …

    Dems have been promising things to minorities to get their votes since the 1950s … that’s better than 50 years of unfilfilled promises …

    Someone tell me all the changes the Dems have made for the betterment of minorities and others overall in the last 50 years …

    What … you can’t give me a list? … Then why should a member of a minority vote to continue the status quo? …

    A vote for a Dem is a vote for food stamps, welfare, public housing, single parent families, and more of the same for the next 50 years …

    It is time that minority citizens wake up and realize they have been voting against themselves by voting for Dems all these years … time to stand up and vote for themselves for a change …

  25. #203475
    On December 26th, 2007 at 4:59 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    Someone tell me all the changes the Dems have made for the betterment of minorities and others overall in the last 50 years …

    I’ve been asking that for a long time. But the Dems don’t ever want them to succeed for fear of them coming to the “right” side. The need to keep them down. For as long as possible, until they can get all the illegals turned into legal voters. In some cases, they don’t even wait for that!

  26. #203488
    On December 26th, 2007 at 5:15 pm, Papa Louie said:

    #20, ajmontana said:
    in other words people who belong in cracker factories arent allowed around sharp objects.

    Sorry AJ, but that doesn’t work, either. You can’t just put sista Hillary in a cracker factory. A lot of money would be lost when the abortion rate for crackers goes up.

  27. #203497
    On December 26th, 2007 at 5:43 pm, John Ansell said:

    #2, probablly guild for startin the KKK, the entitlement programs to keep the blacks down, and fighting again Abe Lincoln who ran for the blacks equality. That’s just a few reasons.

  28. #203498
    On December 26th, 2007 at 5:44 pm, John Ansell said:

    Guilt. ahhh

  29. #203509
    On December 26th, 2007 at 6:23 pm, Florida Unclaimed Money said:

    She has been consistent in her support of issues that are important to my constituency and is not afraid to take a stand on an issue, be it popular or unpopular.

    Really? Unpopular position taking should be the LAST reason anyone supports Hillary… the woman who has taken more sides on Iraq than anyone thought was possible. Her “any way the (political) wind blows” act makes John Kerry look like someone firm in his beliefs. WTF? I don’t care how stupid a person is, this can not be your reason for supporting Hillary. We’re left to conclude that whoever this woman is, is one of the most dishonest people alive (which I suppose is implied when one joins the Democrat Party these days… Perhaps that “D” next to their names meant stood for “dishonest” all along… who knew?)

  30. #203531
    On December 26th, 2007 at 7:27 pm, fourstringfuror said:

    3:56 pm

    Considering Ms. Lewinsky has had more, shall we say, contact, with Slick Willie, than HRC ever has, does that make her qualified to lead the country, too?!

    SECOND LOOK AT “STAINED BLUE DRESS” LEWINSKY.

  31. #203549
    On December 26th, 2007 at 8:01 pm, brooklyn red said:

    Ummm, I never got the standing up for the unpopular thing… the representatives are supposed to represent, no?

  32. #203559
    On December 26th, 2007 at 8:36 pm, geminicontender said:

    The discouraging possibility is that Hillary may have been with more black women than Bill.

  33. #203561
    On December 26th, 2007 at 8:37 pm, almeehan said:

    The most pathetic thing about all this is that there are millions of people ready to turn over the leadership of this great country to a cow like Hillary Klingon. Boy will the wars begin when her “race” wins

  34. #203586
    On December 26th, 2007 at 10:18 pm, George said:

    I fondly call her my ’sista’.

    Something to do with Hiilary’s big booty?

  35. #203587
    On December 26th, 2007 at 10:19 pm, George said:

    I fondly call her my ’sista’.

    Something to do with Hillary’s big booty?

  36. #203593
    On December 26th, 2007 at 10:56 pm, traveler49 said:

    I fondly call her my ’sista’.

    Ho Ho Ho

  37. #203628
    On December 27th, 2007 at 1:15 am, blues said:

    As much as I respect our liberal friend KP,I have to wonder just how STUPID one has to be to support Hillary.The Clintons both have stabbed their supporters in the back,lied consistantly to the public,and betrayed their country.What can’t people like this dingbat see?Does anyone actually believe they can trust the Beast?

  38. #203633
    On December 27th, 2007 at 1:35 am, RetFireman said:

    Like I said in that earlier post about the welfare queen, Liberals are the biggest racists on the planet and are not only allowed to be but encouraged to be so by the so called “leaders” of the black community.

    This is just offensive and disgusting on so many levels I don’t even know where to begin.

  39. #203780
    On December 27th, 2007 at 9:30 am, TommyBoy1 said:

    Who cares about Stephanie Tubbs Jones? In her campaign speeches she refers to her congressional seat as being owned by Black people. Never mind that a significant portion of her district is white. She is also the same former prosecutor who married a convicted murderer (since deceased). Ask the family of her husband’s ex wife what they think of that. She has alienated her county party bosses by going to a floor of Congress to claim that the 2004 presidential elections were fixed in Cuyahoga County. News flash to Stephanie, your people and party control the board of elections. Bottom line is that you have a racist, opportunist party hack with demonstrated poor judgment endorsing her “sistah”.

    Cuyahoga County Ohio is home to two of the biggest nut jobs in Congress. Dennis “tilting at UFOs” Kucinich and Stephanie “murderers need Love” Tubbs Jones.

  40. #204073
    On December 27th, 2007 at 1:25 pm, deepdiver said:

    On December 26th, 2007 at 4:04 pm, Alphonse said:

    While their skin colors differ, yet may their souls both be black.

    I laughed. I laughed because I read the above post with a pirate accent – something about the wording (or maybe something about watching the Pirate of the Caribbean trilogy over Christmas)and it sounds really profound read that way.

    On December 26th, 2007 at 8:01 pm, brooklyn red said:
    Ummm, I never got the standing up for the unpopular thing… the representatives are supposed to represent, no yo ? !!

    (sorry – given the topic had to tweak the quote) I agree Brooklyn red. It is dems, who operate on group-think knee-jerking, who find dissenting from the majority opinion to be automatically unpopular and being unpopular to be somehow noble or profound. Yet let a conservative dissent and state an unpopular position, such as for example pointing out that it requires a cranial-rectal inversion to believe in man-made global warming, and see how fast the dems tear apart that person for ignoring the truth or whatever talking point specious charge is next on their nationally distributed list.

    Anyway, it’s really a moot issue as Hillary doesn’t take stands on issues. She takes leanings on issue with a windsock in one hand and a barometer in the other and as soon as the weather starts to change, so does her position. The woman has no personal values or personal morality. She is an empty vessel, much like a freshly pumped septic tank.

  41. #204170
    On December 27th, 2007 at 3:35 pm, Larraby said:

    Stefanie Tubbs Jones can only be understood in the context of the Cuyahoga Democratic party patronage machine. She is a product of the bosses from the Democratic Party in Cuyahoga County and a beneficiary of the ward politics in Cleveland that view public sector jobs as the reward for slavish devotion to the local Democrat party machine in Cuyahoga County and Cleveland. Tubbs Jones got her start and her promotions in the states attorneys office there strictly on the basis of patronage. In Cleveland, just about all public sector jobs including teachers are the product of loyalty to the Democratic party machine. There is no such thing as merit selection in Cleveland hiring or in promotions or even discharges. That explains why Tubbs would support the party hacks choice of Hillary.

  42. #204491
    On December 28th, 2007 at 12:56 am, Dimsdale said:

    She claims she was important because she was a “sounding” board for Billy Boy. Please.

    If she was a “sounding board,” then Monica must have been a tongue depressor!

  43. #204493
    On December 28th, 2007 at 1:03 am, traveler49 said:

    I think you mean Bill was the tongue depressor.

  44. #204503
    On December 28th, 2007 at 1:31 am, Dimsdale said:

    Man, it is way too late to be trying to be witty!

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Why is Hillary laughing?

April 9, 2009 03:02 PM by Doug Powers

98 Comments | 17 Trackbacks

North Korea to put American journalists on trial

March 30, 2009 03:17 PM by Michelle Malkin

57 Comments | 5 Trackbacks

“Botchmen”

March 10, 2009 11:05 AM by Michelle Malkin

37 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

Global cooling moment of the day

January 20, 2009 06:03 PM by Michelle Malkin

44 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

Chilly.

A bittersweet Hillary/Jawn Kerry moment Updated

January 13, 2009 10:58 AM by Michelle Malkin

14 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

Oh, what might have been.

Hillary’s pay-for-play troubles, continued

January 13, 2009 09:33 AM by Michelle Malkin

48 Comments | 14 Trackbacks


Categories: Hillary Clinton



Mudville Gazette

» The five-year plan

Gay Patriot

» The O So Hip Obama
Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook