Comments on: Would you, could you, vote McCain?

By: GOP sources: Romney to suspend campaign - Page 7 - Debate Politics Forums

GOP sources: Romney to suspend campaign - Page 7 - Debate Politics Forums — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 05:23:58 +0000

[...] Redstate Here is Dobson(R) Dobson says ‘no way’ to McCain candidacy Here is Michelle Malkin(R) Michelle Malkin Would you, could you, vote McCain? And our favorite : Limbaugh : Limbaugh on McCain: It’s Better to Be Right All the Time [...]

By: Sichiban

Sichiban — Wed, 30 Jan 2008 17:35:09 +0000

If McCain is the nominee, I won’t sit home. There are certainly issues I’ll want to vote for — but I will *never* vote for McCain. I’ll vote for the American Independent Party candidate. He won’t have the ghost of a chance, and the Democrat will certainly win the election, but if someone has to screw up the country, I’d rather it was a Democrat than somebody falsely labeled a Republican. Then, come the next Presidential election we *may* have a chance — especially if McCain isn’t on the ballot.

By: Michelle Malkin » The New Hampshire verdict; NBC, Fox calls it for McCain

Michelle Malkin » The New Hampshire verdict; NBC, Fox calls it for McCain — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 01:17:05 +0000

[...] Eastern update. NBC calls the GOP race for McCain. Fox calls for McCain. I asked the question once before. Time to ask it [...]

By: No McCain « PA Pundits

No McCain « PA Pundits — Mon, 07 Jan 2008 18:47:05 +0000

[...] I would rather be waterboarded than vote for McCain. [...]

By: No McCain : “7.62mm Justice” ™

No McCain : “7.62mm Justice” ™ — Mon, 07 Jan 2008 18:46:45 +0000

[...] I would rather be waterboarded than vote for McCain. [...]

By: car ford part used

car ford part used — Fri, 04 Jan 2008 07:02:21 +0000

car ford part used…

Unfortunately, they will also have very little body….

By: Hot Air » Blog Archive » New McCain ad: It’s the jihad, stupid

Hot Air » Blog Archive » New McCain ad: It’s the jihad, stupid — Tue, 01 Jan 2008 19:00:34 +0000

[...] night she was shocked to find that even among the anti-amnesty stalwarts of the Malkin readership, 57% are still willing to pull the lever for Maverick next year if it comes to that. Here, in 30 [...]

By: One Old Vet - It depends on the meaning of “never”

One Old Vet - It depends on the meaning of “never” — Mon, 31 Dec 2007 19:40:13 +0000

[...] If this is McCain’s strategy for winning over conservatives–lying to their faces– it’s not working. Would you, could you? [...]

By: Michelle Malkin » It depends on the meaning of “never”

Michelle Malkin » It depends on the meaning of “never” — Mon, 31 Dec 2007 16:01:00 +0000

[...] If this is McCain’s strategy for winning over conservatives–lying to their faces– it’s not working. Would you, could you? [...]

By: Mr_Conservative_Cat

Mr_Conservative_Cat — Mon, 31 Dec 2007 13:22:02 +0000

EWTHeckman,

Well shades of Flenser! Get past the endless hypothetical academic minutia, ask a straightforward question that gets to the point and you’re met with deafening silence.

Just for the record, I’ll repeat the question:

Now let me ask you a question for a change so we can put this to bed: What is your take? Will you or will you not sit out the general election if a conservative to your liking isn’t the candidate?

Please keep it simple. A yes or no would be good. In fact, a yes or no would be ideal.

By: SheetAnchor

SheetAnchor — Mon, 31 Dec 2007 00:01:45 +0000

Senator Thompson has released a video message to the people of Iowa about why he should be Commander-in-Chief. The link is below.

http://fredfile.fred08.com/blog/2007/video-freds-message-to-iowa-voters

By: Mr_Conservative_Cat

Mr_Conservative_Cat — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 14:10:53 +0000

Well, then just what is your point? I was pretty sure the general question posed was if you could vote for McCain under any circumstances, meaning in the general. Your three voting options I had forgotten beause they didn’t seem relevent. Vote not at all, for a conservative or a RINO. Fine, that’s great in the primaries. I thought I was abundantly clear that I wasn’t talking about primaries. I was talking about the general. What are your options then, if Mccain is the Repub and Hillary the dem’s choice? You also have three, but very differnt ones: vote for GHillary, not at all which is also voting for Hillary, or Mccain. I say vote McCain. You say no difference. i say you’re crazy, thre’s a huge difference. If you’re talking about primaries that’s great, vote for the conservative. i say vote for the Repub who can beat Hillary because anyone is better. But you know all this, so why am i wasting my time.

I only have one point here besides severely disliking McCain:

Anyone who sits out the election because things are’t prefect enough for them is a selfish, egotistical cry baby who puts their own sense of perfectionism before the good of the country. people like that stink. Sorry, but that’s my take, always will be my take and that’s where I am.

Now let me ask you a question for a change so we can put this to bed: What is your take? Will you or will you not sit out the general election if a conservative to your liking isn’t the candidate? i don;t need to respond because you know what I am on it. Where again exactly are you? I’m not interested, quite frankly, in anything other than an answer to that simple question. Then we can be done.

By: EWTHeckman

EWTHeckman — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 03:09:40 +0000

…you are trying to convince people to stay home on election day… You have said so.

Once again, you have provided proof that you haven’t actually read what I’ve written.

By: Mr_Conservative_Cat

Mr_Conservative_Cat — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 00:47:12 +0000

Let’s keep this simple, you poor imitation of an academician:

Exhibit B.2) Conflating two significantly different positions in order to use a strawman fallacy instead of dealing with the opponents actual position.

The only part of your actual position that matters is that you are trying to convince people to stay home on election day and let the democrats win. You have said so. In no uncertain terms. Let;s make this quick: it’s stupid, you’re a shill and this is tiresome. no one is listening anymore. Go settle down with your blue blanket.

By: EWTHeckman

EWTHeckman — Sat, 29 Dec 2007 23:33:13 +0000

BTW…

should be mocked and scorned when the philosophies they aspouse

It strikes me as really stupid to criticize a position which you admit that you haven't even read! And I quote:

I honestly have no idea what the hell you’re even talking about. What 3 options?