About Contact Archives RSS Columns Photos

Hillary’s lips are sealed

By Michelle Malkin  •  December 28, 2007 11:54 AM

If she can’t have plants asking her questions, no one will ask her questions!

As she races through Iowa in the days before next week’s caucuses, Hillary Clinton is taking few chances. She tells crowds that it’s their turn to “pick a president,’’ but over the last two days she has not invited them to ask her any questions.

Before the brief Christmas break, the New York senator had been setting aside time after campaign speeches to hear from the audience. Now when she’s done speaking, her theme songs blare from loudspeakers, preventing any kind of public Q&A.

She was no more inviting when a television reporter approached her after a rally on Thursday and asked if she was “moved’’ by Benazir Bhutto’s assassination. Clinton turned away without answering.

Her daughter, Chelsea, had the same reaction when a reporter approached her with a question.

On the upside, she can’t lie if her lips aren’t moving. Can she?

Posted in: Hillary Clinton

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Michelle Malkin » The Democrat race in Iowa: Neck and neck…and neck
  2. The Dan Lee Report » Blog Archive » Chelsea Clinton obeys Hillary’s Gag Order.
  3. Mrs. Clinton makes her stand | BitsBlog

Trackback URL

Comments

  1. #1
    On December 28th, 2007 at 11:57 am, meatpieandtatters said:

    If only we count on them being sealed to avoid that infernal cackle!

  2. #2
    On December 28th, 2007 at 11:57 am, meatpieandtatters said:

    …It’s the sound of bad character leaving the body…

  3. #3
    On December 28th, 2007 at 11:59 am, zorro said:

    On the upside, she can’t lie if her lips aren’t moving. Can she?

    Verbally, yes. But her body language is another story!

  4. #4
    On December 28th, 2007 at 12:00 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    Phony. Staged. Scared. Poll driven. Orchestrated. Scripted.

    What can I say? Her silence is louder than her spoken word.

  5. #5
    On December 28th, 2007 at 12:05 pm, puhiawa said:

    “Only Republicans need answer questions.”
    MSM Manual

  6. #6
    On December 28th, 2007 at 12:11 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Hillary’s lips are sealed

    “Funny, that’s what Bill said!”
    Monica Lewinsky

    (kidding…)

  7. #7
    On December 28th, 2007 at 12:14 pm, Speakup said:

    On the upside, she can’t lie if her lips aren’t moving. Can she?

    Oh sure, its called Clintoneering.
    Just neglect to tell the truth.

  8. #8
    On December 28th, 2007 at 12:15 pm, katieanne said:

    On the upside, she can’t lie if her lips aren’t moving. Can she?

    With the polls showing a close race, they probably thought not speaking would up her chances of a win. She never was one to communitcate anyway. Arrogance does that to a person.

  9. #9
    On December 28th, 2007 at 12:22 pm, Seminole 6 said:

    Her silence affirms her entire socialist ideology. She can’t give an unscripted answer without exposing her true colors.

  10. #10
    On December 28th, 2007 at 12:25 pm, deepdiver said:

    On December 28th, 2007 at 12:11 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    You’re on a roll today … :lol:

  11. #11
    On December 28th, 2007 at 12:26 pm, MTNEER said:

    I’d rather listen to fingernails on a chalk board than to HRC speak. I cringe whenever she comes on TV(mute button…where’s the da@#$ mute button).

  12. #12
    On December 28th, 2007 at 12:26 pm, hatelibs said:

    Smart move on her part…typical Clinton shallow arrogance..but smart. She knows she is her own worst enemy so live by the myth and not have to actually explain anything.

    Then again, we are spared having to endure her sound bites while the “media” has their orgasm over her.

  13. #13
    On December 28th, 2007 at 12:27 pm, Mr_Conservative_Cat said:

    NOW is the time for Obama and Edwards and lower-rung candidates struggling to bear heard to immediately call out the Democrat frontrunner - Clinton - and rightfully accuse her of dodging questions in a cowardly and calculating manner unbefitting a President.

    NOW is the time for second and third rung democrat candidates to IMMEDIATELY arrange for a Fox News debate and dare the top-rung candidates to appear, then make your very strong cases to the American people and call out Clinton and the other top-rung candidates for being too cowardly to appear - and prove that you, and not Clinton and Obama and Edwards - are the real presidential material.

    NOW is your time guys. Hillary won’t answer and thing and will have her back against the wall, but the opportunity to get back into the run for the Presidency is fleeting. They’ll all look cowardly and not nearly as brave as you - no kidding - for not joining you on the Fox News television screens. Imagine what you can do with 3 million viewers seeing you suddenly emerge and the frontrunner hiding uinseen.

    If any of you advising the lower Democrat candidates are reading this, move now, FAST. Now is your opportunity. Don’t blow it!

  14. #14
    On December 28th, 2007 at 12:27 pm, TXRose said:

    She and her “people” are really starting to make missteps. She needs to keep her mouth shut because when the polls appear to be unfavorable to them, she
    and Slick tend to come unhinged. If she opens her mouth, her prospective
    voters just might be treated to something less than the Hillarylite they have been seeing and hearing lately. HRC tends to get really shrill when she’s
    “stressed.”

  15. #15
    On December 28th, 2007 at 12:27 pm, Blind_Mule said:

    More elitist crapola, I don’t have to answer any questions because I’m better than you people and I’m the only one that know’s what’s good for you so sit down and shut up.

  16. #16
    On December 28th, 2007 at 12:29 pm, hatelibs said:

    Maybe she has temporarily run out of plants. You know she is unable to function without a carefully structured script. Just remember Russert catching her off guard and she spent weeks pulling both feet out of her mouth.

  17. #17
    On December 28th, 2007 at 12:32 pm, deedledee said:

    She goes from the NY Senate “Listening Tour” to the Presidential “I’m Telling You But Taking No Questions” Tour…New Yorkers fell for it, will the nation?

  18. #18
    On December 28th, 2007 at 12:33 pm, formerwm said:

    I can not figure out why anyone supports this woman. If she is to good to answer questions now what would she be like as a president? Okay, I know the answer to that one. Anyway, the Clintons are like a bad horror movie that they keep making sequels to. If they would just go away I know I would be happy.

  19. #19
    On December 28th, 2007 at 12:33 pm, meatpieandtatters said:

    She’s an out-of-control control freak!

  20. #20
    On December 28th, 2007 at 12:34 pm, MTNEER said:

    The Iowa reported who was stiffed by Hillary should have taken a leaf out of the Sam Donaldson school of interviewing. Sam was noted for shouting “Mr. President, Mr. President after Ronald Reagan.
    To get Hilliary’s attention all she would have to do is shout “Your Majesty, Your Majesty! at Hillary and she would get all the time she wanted!

  21. #21
    On December 28th, 2007 at 12:35 pm, StephC said:

    I just don’t get how people (her supporters)don’t see how she is. Scary that she has the wool pulled over so many eyes.

  22. #22
    On December 28th, 2007 at 12:36 pm, MTNEER said:

    Reporter, sorry.

  23. #23
    On December 28th, 2007 at 12:37 pm, CharlieT said:

    On the upside, she can’t lie if her lips aren’t moving. Can she?

    Oh let me count the ways - facial expressions, hand gestures, posture, clothing, body movements, not to mention use of surrogates, sycophants, campaign literature - virtually everything she does verbally or non-verbally is a lie.

    But the “big lie theory” is really put to the test when she constantly refers to herself as “experienced.” She was a resident of the White House for 8 years (so was Socks the cat) and an official tourist in many foreign countries. Did she engage in any summits with foreign leaders, or negotiate any agreements of treaties, or broker any deals during any of her junkets? The only policy that was hers and hers alone was the catastrophic failure on health care. What has been her signature accomplishment of being the junior senator form her carpetbagged state? Only the less experienced (Obama and Edwards) can let her go unchallenged on this.

  24. #24
    On December 28th, 2007 at 12:39 pm, John Ansell said:

    Her lips are sealed? Must be bad botox.

  25. #25
    On December 28th, 2007 at 12:41 pm, ajmontana said:

    Challenge!
    Give me three good solid reasons why anyone should vote for this witch.
    Good ahead try…..

  26. #26
    On December 28th, 2007 at 12:41 pm, John Ansell said:

    Bill to the rescue in 5..4..3..2..1.

  27. #27
    On December 28th, 2007 at 12:42 pm, MTNEER said:

    #13 Mr. Conservative Cat, Chris Dodd appeared on O’reilly and got his head handed to him. He and the other lower tier of Dem candidates are even more shrilly leftist than Hillary and Obama.

    All these cockroaches can’t and won’t stand the light of day. They are scared spitless by the thought of having to answer hard questions period, much less any questions from non-lapdog media types.

  28. #28
    On December 28th, 2007 at 12:47 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    DeepDiver…
    :)

  29. #29
    On December 28th, 2007 at 12:50 pm, MTNEER said:

    If Hillary is not above using planted questioners in an audience, what makes anyone think she is not above using planted, or at least well researched media types. She most likely avoided that reporter in Iowa because she didn’t know whether the reporter was a lapdog or a real one.

    Real reporters are rare, but they DO exist. Hyper-controlling Hillary can’t take a chance that she MIGHT run into one. She MIGHT have to answer a real, hard question for once.

  30. #30
    On December 28th, 2007 at 12:51 pm, hatelibs said:

    aj:

    1. Free health care
    2. Baby Bonds
    3. She is a Clinton and we all need to understand they are the greatest humans ever to walk the earth.

    Sarcasm OFF!

    Truth is that is doesn’t matter to a liberal. Liberals have zero logic or common sense. Besides, her “base” is simply too ignorant and stupid to care. She just promises free everything like the tooth fairy and idiots figure they will actually get it. Extremely sad!

  31. #31
    On December 28th, 2007 at 12:52 pm, Dandapani said:

    She finally listened to Rush Limbaugh who says the best thing going for our side is for their side to keep talking and exposing their true nature.

  32. #32
    On December 28th, 2007 at 12:56 pm, MTNEER said:

    AJ:

    Reason #1: she’s a Clinton, so she’s entitled.

    Reason #2: she put up with Bill for so many years

    she’s enitled.

    Reason #3: she’s the smartest woman in

    the world, so she’s entitled.

  33. #33
    On December 28th, 2007 at 1:00 pm, John Ansell said:

    MTNEER, Careful, you’ll get LGM all in a snit fit. LOL. Great posts.

  34. #34
    On December 28th, 2007 at 1:01 pm, graysonret said:

    She can only promote the Marxist/socialism platform. And, she can do that well. But, when it comes to foreign affairs, it’s “Bhutto who? Oh yes, it is a tragedy.” Another Jimmy Carter, this time in a pants suit. If she is President, be prepared for a foreign affair disaster in the Middle East. She cannot compete with the experienced long-time diplomats/politicians there, just like Carter. No-one will fear the U.S..

  35. #35
    On December 28th, 2007 at 1:02 pm, MTNEER said:

    Thanks, John Ansell!

  36. #36
    On December 28th, 2007 at 1:03 pm, h-town said:

    “Ask me no questions, and I’ll tell you no fibs.”

    Oliver Goldsmith (1728 - 1774)

    Source: She Stoops to Conquer

    A story about a woman pretending to be something she is not in order to reach her goal. Where have I heard that before?

  37. #37
    On December 28th, 2007 at 1:04 pm, MTNEER said:

    BTW, none of us has to do anything to put lgm in a snit. It’s part of the pathology of the disease called Liberalism.

  38. #38
    On December 28th, 2007 at 1:07 pm, CarpiJugulum said:

    By not answering questions, she does not have to worry about double talk onher part. She does not have to clarify any of her so called chages and progressive plans. Its pretty smart actually. She can give all the platitudes and slogans that generate support from emmotion. This is done before people stop and think about how her socialist plans will be enacted, paid for, and how they will screw up the average persons life.

    Brillant move.

  39. #39
    On December 28th, 2007 at 1:12 pm, hatelibs said:

    Oh she will deal with foreign affairs….anything that doesn’t appear positive she will blame on Bush and anything that might look positive she will take credit for. The sickening thing is she would get away with it too.

    Now the fact is virtually nothing really changes instantly in world affairs (assignations notwithstanding) but the Clinton ego knows no bounds. Slick Willy is still trying to rewrite history…like absolving himself from blame for ingnoring the spread of Islamic terrorism.

    God help this country and the world if she gets in. It will be very very ugly!

  40. #40
    On December 28th, 2007 at 1:15 pm, secondsight said:

    This may have more to do with Bill’s flight attendent staff (think Matt Helm babes) than anything else. Good thing that he is on a separate itinerary. Gotta watch out though, she go into one of those spins and disappear in puff of smoke. And you can’t just dump a pail of water on her either.

  41. #41
    On December 28th, 2007 at 1:32 pm, jsr said:

    I just don’t get how people (her supporters)don’t see how she is.

    I think most of her supporters actually see her for what she is, like it and share her vision for this country. That is what is most disturbing about her candidacy. This country has sunk to the point were somebody like HRC has a very real chance of becoming president.

    aj - Three reasons (in the minds of Democrats):

    1. She’ll show those nasty Republicans
    2. Lots of cool, free stuff
    3. Party! No more talk of that personal responsibility thing

  42. #42
    On December 28th, 2007 at 1:59 pm, Cincinnatus said:

    Hillary is right not to answer the question about Bhutto’s assassination. It’s a vulgar question and strikes close to home, in her position. What’s the matter with you people!

  43. #43
    On December 28th, 2007 at 2:06 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    Oh let me count the ways - facial expressions, hand gestures, posture, clothing, body movements, not to mention use of surrogates, sycophants, campaign literature - virtually everything she does verbally or non-verbally is a lie.

    And that cackle! I have nightmares about that now.

  44. #44
    On December 28th, 2007 at 2:09 pm, jsr said:

    Hillary is right not to answer the question about Bhutto’s assassination.

    How is this question vulgar? It seems like a softball to me. And why should she not answer questions that strike close to home, if that is indeed why she didn’t answer the question? In any case she will have to answer questions much more challenging than that if she is elected president.

  45. #45
    On December 28th, 2007 at 2:16 pm, Blind_Mule said:

    Cincinnatus said:
    Hillary is right not to answer the question about Bhutto’s assassination. It’s a vulgar question and strikes close to home, in her position. What’s the matter with you people!

    The answer was an opportunity for her to shine with an eliquent answer since she claim’s she has known her for a dozen year’s and was a good friend. Something like:

    Yes, I was very moved by Benazir Bhutto’s death she was a beacon of hope for women in the middle east and a very good friend. Democracy, Pakistan and the world will suffer from her absent’s.

  46. #46
    On December 28th, 2007 at 2:22 pm, Watcherdownsouth said:

    Cincinnatus said:
    Hillary is right not to answer the question about Bhutto’s assassination. It’s a vulgar question and strikes close to home, in her position.

    Cincinnatus –

    Huh?? A “vulgar question”? A former leader of a country that is a very important, very complex piece of the puzzle comes back to that country to run for office again, throwing that country into turmoil, and gets assassinated. This has the ability to create further chaos in an already turbulent islamic country that has nuclear weapons.

    As a president, she damn sure would have to deal with this, and better be verrrry careful on how she tries to defuse this bomb. As a presidential candidate, she better be prepared to talk about important issues like this and show that she knows what she is talking about. For chistsakes, she wants to be President!

    Avoid the question??! Weak!
    Calling it a “vulgar question”? Weak minded.

    I expected better of you, Cincinnatus.

  47. #47
    On December 28th, 2007 at 2:27 pm, Cincinnatus said:

    In the 1976 Democratic primary season, there was speculation that Ted Kennedy might enter the race. When the press asked Jimmy Carter’s mother Lillian about this (!), she replied to the effect “I hope he will be all right” — an allusion to his dead brothers. The response of the press gallery was to boo and hiss her. The reason? — because it was (correctly) seen that raising the issue of assassination is tantamount to putting it on the agenda, and therefore increasing the chances of its happening.

    This is why it is a vulgar question to put to Hillary, because to pin the issue onto Hillary overlooks her own fear of assassination. True, we may say that the threat is remote for her, but it strikes close to home for her anyway, and who among us cannot sympathise with that?

  48. #48
    On December 28th, 2007 at 2:45 pm, John Ansell said:

    “and who among us cannot sympathise with that?”

    Vince Foster?

  49. #49
    On December 28th, 2007 at 2:47 pm, right_on said:

    Hillary’s lips are sealed

    Clinton turned away without answering.

    Need anymore proof that she really does talk out her a**?

  50. #50
    On December 28th, 2007 at 2:48 pm, jsr said:

    Cinncinnatus:

    You make a good point but I respectfully disagree. Every president and most major candidates live with this very real threat. It is, unfortunately, part of the job. In the case of Lillian Carter, she brought it up without prompting, thus “putting it on the table.” Being asked to comment on an assasination is not not the same. As president she will quite possibly be faced with the assasination of a foreign leader and asked numerous questions on the event. She missed an opportunity to look presidential and show all that experience to the world. (Not that it would change my opinion of her to be truthful.)

  51. #51
    On December 28th, 2007 at 2:49 pm, John Ansell said:

    You owe me a key board, Righton #49. LOL.

  52. #52
    On December 28th, 2007 at 2:51 pm, Cincinnatus said:

    I do agree, however, that Truman’s quote applies: “If you can’t stand the heat, get out of the kitchen.” Hillary has to front up to questions like these, since she’s running for President. But if the question is put too crassly, she is right not to respond. I don’t know how the question was put to her on this occasion, but you know how the Press is.

    The issue of Pakistan’s “70″ nuclear bombs is a reeeeeaall worry. Hillary can go jump. Who knows what to do about those bombs?!?

  53. #53
    On December 28th, 2007 at 2:52 pm, Blind_Mule said:

    If I were to run for POTUS I would know the real possibility of someone wanting to assasinate me I certainly would’nt live in fear of it. If Billary is’nt aware of this possibility and if she can’t answer question’s about world event’s then she should’nt be running for POTUS plain and simple.

  54. #54
    On December 28th, 2007 at 2:54 pm, docflash said:

    Maybe she is just having a Midol moment.

  55. #55
    On December 28th, 2007 at 2:58 pm, hatelibs said:

    For God’s sake….this woman is expecting to be elected PRESIDENT!! Suggesting that the assignation of a female leader hits close to home for Hitlary (vulgar) is a ridiculous and idiotic statement beyond words.

    The POTUS doesn’t have the luxury of being excused from a serious international situation and certainly not because of the gender of someone involved. For crying out loud there are dozens of simple phrases of sadness and or sympathy that can be non-political but appropriate. Even “I really shouldn’t comment at this time” would have been acceptable. However to ignore the question entirely speaks volumes!!!
    This woman is NOT ready to be the most powerful person in the world. Good lord!

  56. #56
    On December 28th, 2007 at 3:02 pm, deepdiver said:

    “She was no more inviting when a television reporter approached her after a rally on Thursday and asked if she was “moved’’ by Benazir Bhutto’s assassination. Clinton turned away without answering.”

    Well, I would actually give her a pass on this one. Was she “moved”? What a stupid question. That is one of those liberal retard questions. I guess Hillary had some choices for answers: “Yes” or
    “No” or
    “What the hell kind of retarded question is that? Did you graduate from journalism school? Did you even go to journalism school? Actually, did your parents have any children who lived?”

    I would have walked away too because otherwise I would have given a smart-aleck answer that would not have looked good played on the evening news.

  57. #57
    On December 28th, 2007 at 3:03 pm, right_on said:

    Sorry, John…I just couldn’t help myself!

  58. #58
    On December 28th, 2007 at 3:06 pm, hatelibs said:

    Righton:

    You nailed her. Interesting how humor really does resemble reality!

  59. #59
    On December 28th, 2007 at 3:17 pm, gandolphxx said:

    Hillary is:

    1. Terrified of an unscripted, un polled question.
    2. Cannot answer without the ‘bent one’ bside her.
    3. Under a three day ‘liar, liar’ curse - has to tell the truth - LOL.

    This thread needs the great photo that Drudge has.

  60. #60
    On December 28th, 2007 at 3:33 pm, John Ansell said:

    Her lips are sealed tighter than her healthcare records. I guess she doesn’t want to get Hsu’d?

  61. #61
    On December 28th, 2007 at 3:41 pm, Blind_Mule said:

    Oh and by the way I’ve heard the MSM’s ask Bush thousand’s of stupid question’s, even the same stupid question over and over. Should he look at them and say “That is the stupidest question I’ve every heard David sit down and be quiet till you can come up with something more intelligent.”

    I actually wish he would, but that’s not how it’s done you have to answer stupid question’s as POTUS.

  62. #62
    On December 28th, 2007 at 3:42 pm, DirkBelig said:

    Mr_Conservative_Cat said: NOW is the time for Obama and Edwards and lower-rung candidates struggling to bear heard to immediately call out the Democrat frontrunner - Clinton - and rightfully accuse her of dodging questions in a cowardly and calculating manner unbefitting a President.

    What? And risk their shot at being Empress Hillary’s veep? Funny!

  63. #63
    On December 28th, 2007 at 3:57 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    “That is the stupidest question I’ve every heard David sit down and be quiet till you can come up with something more intelligent.”

    I wish he would just once. Maybe Cheney, that would really rile the MSM.

  64. #64
    On December 28th, 2007 at 3:59 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    What? And risk their shot at being Empress Hillary’s veep? Funny!

    Dirk I think Bill wants to be Veep! Nothing to do, gets his own office, and the very best thing possible for him - his own residence!

  65. #65
    On December 28th, 2007 at 4:01 pm, cwdancer said:

    With Hillary’s numbers falling she knows she cannot afford to open her mouth and end up in a position of actually having to state an opinion/give an answer (or three different in as many minutes). She is also aware that not all the MSM are willing to carry her water (though until she loses Iowa/NH most will at least pretend)…On that topic, I wish I had the cartoonist talent…I have a mental pic that I would love to see in print.

    Picture….

    Hind end and tail of a cat stepping out of the litter box (Hillary written across visible hindquarter). One newly laid pile residing in the otherwise pristine box. From other side of the frame members of the MSM with scoopers in hand rushing/falling over each other to get to the box and cover the crap….

  66. #66
    On December 28th, 2007 at 4:23 pm, deepdiver said:

    On December 28th, 2007 at 4:01 pm, cwdancer said:
    She is also aware that not all the MSM are willing to carry her water

    Judging by how bloated and bad she looked in the last picture I saw of her, I think she is carrying plenty of water on her own …

  67. #67
    On December 28th, 2007 at 4:25 pm, DirkBelig said:

    AlohaGuy said: Dirk I think Bill wants to be Veep! Nothing to do, gets his own office, and the very best thing possible for him - his own residence!

    He’s got that now. He gets to go around playing humanitarian and not be in the same time zone as the fat-ankled harridan. He’ll be Ambassador to the UN or appointed to the Supreme Court. I don’t think he can be veep anyway due to nepotism laws passed in the wake of the Kennedys antics.

    The odd thing is that even if he could run, the Stupid Party’s candidate couldn’t accuse him of trying to backdoor into a third term because people think that he created the prosperity of the Nineties (instead of a real conservative Stupid Party Congress) and that returning him to the throne would make everything all better.

  68. #68
    On December 28th, 2007 at 4:34 pm, hatelibs said:

    Slick Willy could end up at the UN but not on the Supreme Court. Being convicted of perjury and being disbarred would prevent too many from confirming him.

    Just a comment.

  69. #69
    On December 28th, 2007 at 4:53 pm, nbarry said:

    Let’s not overlook a foreign policy venture (of sorts) of Hillary. In 1995, she keynoted the Beijing Women’s Conference. How much she had to do with drafting the “Platform of Action” I am unable to determine. We may think of that gathering as a historical footnote, as her attendance there give her hubby the opportunity to fool around with a certain intern named Monica, but feminists have treated that “Platform” as their “Communist Manifesto” ever since.

  70. #70
    On December 28th, 2007 at 6:04 pm, DirkBelig said:

    hatelibs said: Slick Willy could end up at the UN but not on the Supreme Court. Being convicted of perjury and being disbarred would prevent too many from confirming him.

    You’re thinking like a rational person, which means you don’t fathom the stupidity and cravenness of politicians.

    The Dems view Bubba as their Sun King, so that’s an automatic 51 votes and a win for a Supreme Court seat. Other than Lieberman, who would vote against him? The Stupid Party could try to filibuster, but the Treason Media will just spin it and bash them until they elevate Bubba to the Highest Authority in the land.

    The fascist Dems know that with Bubba on the bench, their schemes will be enacted as he fabricates “rights” and removes our freedoms using his influence to lead our Republic off a cliff as a member of the Men In Black. Who needs to control Congress when the Supremes can create law with only five votes?

  71. #71
    On December 28th, 2007 at 8:38 pm, Papa Louie said:

    It’s too little, too late, but it seems that Hillary has finally discovered the Bible:

    Even a fool, when he holdeth his peace, is counted wise: and he that shutteth his lips is esteemed a man of understanding. — Proverbs 17:28.

  72. #72
    On December 28th, 2007 at 8:45 pm, fourstringfuror said:

    Can she?

    If she’s breathing, she’s lying - it’s really that simple.

  73. #73
    On December 29th, 2007 at 3:31 am, blues said:

    The Hilldebeast’s lips sealed-Chelsea’s reaction the same?Way too easy.Nothing more to say on this one.

  74. #74
    On December 29th, 2007 at 7:51 am, Mr_Conservative_Cat said:

    MICHELLE, THIS THREAD IS FANTASTIC! WITHOUT A DOUBT THE BEST GENERAL ANALYSIS OF HILLARY, HER METHODS AND HER THOUGHT PROCESSES I’VE EVER READ FROM ANYONE. YOU NEED TO KEEP THIS VISABLE THROUGHOUT THE CAUCUSES AT LEAST. PLEASE KEEP A LINK SOMEWHERE NEAR THE TOP OF THE MAIN PAGE SO IT CAN BE EASILY REFERENCED. THIS, IN THE AGGREGATE, IS NOTHING LESS THAN BRILLIANT. CONGRADULATIONS TO EVERYONE.

  75. #75
    On December 29th, 2007 at 7:53 am, Mr_Conservative_Cat said:

    On December 28th, 2007 at 12:42 pm, MTNEER said:
    #13 Mr. Conservative Cat, Chris Dodd appeared on O’reilly and got his head handed to him. He and the other lower tier of Dem candidates are even more shrilly leftist than Hillary and Obama.

    All these cockroaches can’t and won’t stand the light of day. They are scared spitless by the thought of having to answer hard questions period, much less any questions from non-lapdog media types.

    Yes, but, “Shhhhhhh!” there is a method to the madness!

  76. #76
    On December 29th, 2007 at 7:56 am, Mr_Conservative_Cat said:

    He gets to go around playing humanitarian and not be in the same time zone as the fat-ankled harridan.

    LOL!!!

  77. #77
    On December 29th, 2007 at 12:19 pm, Lars said:

    Fox News Channel reported during Brit’s show that she WAS taking two or three questions at each event and that the reporting is WRONG. I’d like to hear her responses now that the day is near….could be some good ammo for later.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Hill’s convention message to delegates: Go Your Own Way

August 25, 2008 01:13 PM by Michelle Malkin

58 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

Noncommittal.

Hillary releases her hounds; Update: RNC hosts Hillary Happy Hour

August 24, 2008 11:37 PM by Michelle Malkin

105 Comments | 5 Trackbacks

PUMA party.

Adviser urged Hillary to paint Obama as “Fundamentally Foreign”

August 13, 2008 10:49 AM by see-dubya

79 Comments | 1 Trackback

Everybody’s un-American!

Hillary Clinton: Mrs. Lonely

July 29, 2008 03:01 PM by Michelle Malkin

69 Comments | 1 Trackback

Slumming it.

Obama: Now with more open-borders flavor

June 16, 2008 02:43 PM by Michelle Malkin

48 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

Yes, she can.

Hillary exits, the PUMAs roar

June 7, 2008 10:56 AM by Michelle Malkin

99 Comments | 12 Trackbacks

“PUMA.”

Barack + Hillary = (fill-in-the-blank)

June 6, 2008 06:01 AM by Michelle Malkin

61 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

Marriage from hell.

Vote for your favorite Hillary campaign moment

June 3, 2008 08:47 PM by Michelle Malkin

43 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

Memories.


Categories: Hillary Clinton


Little Miss Attila

» Okay, Ladies.

Belmont Club

» Both sides now

Power Line

» 40 Million?!