There are many Dr Who references which apply to the Democrats. How many can you count?

I have read some good things about Pelosi -

I’ve met Pelosi once. She ain’t nice! I asked one of the Capitol Police that was traveling with her what they thought about her. The response I got was “Please don’t ask me that” (he then looked over his shoulder as if she might turn him into a newt or something and said) “Isn’t it obvious?” The whole time she stood there with a sour look on her face looking like she just ate a bug. She had the personality of a Dalek. I kept expecting to hear her to start screaming “EX-TER-MI-NATE!” “EX-TER-MI-NATE!”

lgm said:
You cannot deny that but for the Bush decision to invade Iraq (which Pelosi, alas, did not oppose), the kid would still be alive, in all likelihood.

lgm said:
The difference between Bush and Pelosi is that Bush got the kid killed and Pelosi tried to stop it.

Did you forget Afhganistan he could have just as easily been KIA there.
You can blame Bush all you want, we went to war with the permission of Democrat’s as well as Republican’s. So tell me lgm which one of the Democrat’s are you willing to blame for his death.

December 30th, 2007 at 8:46 pm, Rick Moran said:
It is difficult sometimes to seperate someone’s politics from the kind of person they are.

Absolutely right, but every situation is different, and when dealing with extremes, like you find with Pelosi, the grey area begins to shrink. I think her politics, as strongly held as they are, absolutely represent the kind of person she is: calculating, anti-military, pro-socialist in the extreme, and it’s the extremes that matter. otherwise, I’d be happy to sail along with your notable magnanominity .

I have read some good things about Pelosi -

In the unconscionable MSM world we live in I’d just say three words: “consider the source”. According to press reports Hillary – in a fine moment of domestic bliss – made eggs for her daughter even though she herself vowed not to stay home and bake cookies, etc etc etc.

the way she treats her kids and grandkids, her charity work, the fact that she has been married to the same man for 43 years –

Another quote: “even Hitler had a girlfriend.” Not sure I know anything about her charity work, but once again, the words of the woman herself and the words said about her appear to be at odds regarding her character.

I worry sometimes that we demonize the opposition too readily, not recognizing that they are people too.

In our MSM world, this sounds like a quote liberals should be saying about conservatives. Sure there are good democrats out there, like Lieberman, for example, who, while still way left, nevertheless appears driven by belief and conscience more than raw political motivation. Thanks to people like Pelosi herself, politics has gotten very dirty indeed, though politics have always been dirty. Yes, Pelosi is a person, too. the question is what kind of person? Not one who by virture of the character displayed in her political speeches and posturing could be considered a nice one, stories about her character or no.

God knows why they believe the things they do but ascribing evil intent to their beliefs is just plain wrong.

Once again, that depends on the person. Each situation is different. There have been plentyof famous evil politicians. They hung one in iraq this year. I won’t go so far as to say I believe Pelosi is evil, but she sure has hell hasn’t been honest about well-meaning traditional conservatives, no matter how many times she kisses her Grandkids. However, if she works hard for a good few years to reverse her former positions and proved by virtue of that hard work that she’s turned over a new leaf, I’ll be the first to support her in all her endeavors – and any belated calls she makes to the families of fallen soldiers.

From what I’ve read of Pelosi, her call to this guy was perfectly in keeping with the kind of person she is and I believe it was sincere. I think it serves as a reminder of the fact that despite our radical differences, we are still, at bottom, all Americans.

Once again, what did you read and more specifically where did you read it? (a rhetorical question, unless you want to pick upon it)

One thing I’ll say Rick: from this post of yours here, no one can say you aren’t generous of spirit to what assumes are those you consider political adversaries. With all due respect I’m not sure I concur with the wisdom, but the generosity is there to a fault.

Happy New Year.

Bush got the kid killed

Sorry. Is this better? Is that all? I said more and you take issue with a misquote which did not change the substance of your post?

lgm did not say this, but that’s what you read no matter what he/she writes.

You do not even know your gender? Even I know you are a male. Bush got the kid killed (great grammar from a teacher BTW) vs. Bush killed this kid. Same – same.

You cannot deny that but for the Bush decision to invade Iraq (which Pelosi, alas, did not oppose), the kid would still be alive, in all likelihood.

ROFL – I don’t have to call you stupid (and I said what you said was stupid). You want me to deny something that “in all likelihood” might or might not have happened? ROFLMHO.

This young man may or may not be alive today for many reasons. You still have not made mention of the GREAT sacrifice this young man made for his country or the fact that he is an American Hero! Why is that bothersome for you? Would it mean you have to agree with Pelosi’s position? Clintons? The majority of Democrat Congresspersons who knew more and know more than you or I about the information they had at the time?

One more time because I know it is hard for you to comprehend.

1. Bush DID not make the decision alone. The Congress voted OVERWHELMINGLY to go into Iraq.

2. This fine young man gave his life for a cause he believed in – he sacrificed his life for others (no greater love).

3. What you are saying is hurtful. Would you walk up to this HERO’S parents and say this? If so, well…

It’s the comprehension that gives you fits, eh?

“Bush killed this kid” was stupid…

lgm did not say this, but that’s what you read no matter what he/she writes. You cannot deny that but for the Bush decision to invade Iraq (which Pelosi, alas, did not oppose), the kid would still be alive, in all likelihood.

You can call me stupid all day, but at least I can read.

Hollow words from a shallow, petty person (Pelosi). David Jeffers should be commended for being so civil.

Thanks for the pic. I copied it and tried using it to scare away the Blue Jays. Unfortunately, they loved it. Apparently, like the fiberals, they really are all mouth and *ss like my old DI in basic training used to say.

BTW: I agree with not dropping lgm on his/her/its head to keep from commenting. That would make us as bad as the worms he represents. (Sorry ’bout the insult worms, but I had to make some kind of comparison.)

Happy New Year to All. I hope it’s the best ever for everyone.

Theresa, MSgt (ret), USAF

On December 30th, 2007 at 12:05 pm, lgm said:
If Bush would call, he would be a hero in your book. The difference between Bush and Pelosi is that Bush got the kid killed and Pelosi tried to stop it.

Oh, maybe that’s because Bush genuinely supports the troops. As for Pelosi and her gang of idiots ‘trying to stop it’: Yeah lets give the bitch and her minions credit where it’s due: being pro-terrorist asshats, a mouthpiece for Bin Laden, and a good mention in his videos.
GFY, sweetpea.

Point taken I agree he does snipe much of the time and I rarley if ever agree with him on anything but he is giving all of us insight into the mind set of the left’s twisted thought processes. Like you and I’ve said before liberal’s can’t rap there mind’s around logical thought when it come’s to most thing’s they listen to the MSM’s,lefty source’s and regurgitate it every time they open their mouth’s not looking at all aspect’s of an issue I on the other hand make an effort to look at all side’s all opinion’s before I logically come up with my own opinion on a subject.