<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It depends on the meaning of &#8220;never&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/31/it-depends-on-the-meaning-of-never/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/31/it-depends-on-the-meaning-of-never/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:59:43 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ombre Rose</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/31/it-depends-on-the-meaning-of-never/comment-page-1/#comment-214167</link>
		<dc:creator>Ombre Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 09:46:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/31/it-depends-on-the-meaning-of-never/#comment-214167</guid>
		<description>Hold your nose and vote?

I&#039;ll vote, no matter what.

But I will NOT vote McCain, Fred, Rudi, or Huckleberry - NO MATTER WHAT, and remember before you fuss at me OR ANY OTHER CONSERVATIVE about it - Gerald Ford and Robert Dole. 
Not to mention Arnold Schwartzeneggar!!!

Some of YOU may be able to hold your nose - way way way too many Conservatives CANNOT.

And WHY SHOULD WE - the PREMISE is that the RINOS would still be &quot;AT LEAST REPUBLICANS&quot;. And &quot;PRESUMED&quot; to be better than DIMS.

I give you Arnold Schwartzeneggar.
Who has done even more of the Dim agenda THAN EVEN I THOUGHT HE WOULD EVEN DREAM OF ATTEMPTING! And certainly has proven my point well, for me.

So to those of you who say that ANY GOP Candidate is better than ANY Dim candidate, I say &quot;KISS MY GRITS!&quot;

Too many of them ARE THE SAME OR WORSE!

Who&#039;s the Carrot - Who&#039;s the Stick???

I.E., Hillary wouldn&#039;t be a Senator much less a Presidential candidate if NOT FOR THE ENABLEMENT OF FRED THOMPSON/McCain&#039;s butt buddy.
JUST A FACT!
*Fred&#039;s vote for NOT GUILTY of Perjury for Bill
*Fred&#039;s diversion of the purpose of the Senate Committee HE CHAIRED which had been ASSIGNED to investigate CHINESE DONATIONS to the Clinton Campaign Funds.
results of THAT Committee &quot;investigation&quot;??? hear the cricketts chirping??? Seems ol&#039; Good Ol&#039; Boy Fred didn&#039;t want to EMBARRASS THE DIMS by exposing their DIRTY LAUNDRY before America! 
So he instead dragged in all the GOP dirty laundry that he could find to make it a &quot;MATCH GAME&quot;, instead!
Otherwise the Clinton&#039;s would BOTH BE IN JAIL.

Makes it SOOOOOOOOOOO amusing to hear Fred on Fox News denouncing the activities of the Clintons!

So barfing!

What else can you expect of McCain&#039;s Presidential Campaign Manager and Howard Baker protege???

Hurt America by letting a Dim in office instead of a RINO?

As John Wayne said to John Russell in Rio Bravo, about the question of it being &quot;MURDER&quot; if the murderer in jail awaiting trial - if his brother tried to break him out of jail before the trial - were to get &quot;ACCIDENTALLY DEAD&quot; before the brother could get to the murderer - 
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&quot;Hell, we&#039;d all be dead by then, anyway!&quot;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hold your nose and vote?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll vote, no matter what.</p>
<p>But I will NOT vote McCain, Fred, Rudi, or Huckleberry &#8211; NO MATTER WHAT, and remember before you fuss at me OR ANY OTHER CONSERVATIVE about it &#8211; Gerald Ford and Robert Dole.<br />
Not to mention Arnold Schwartzeneggar!!!</p>
<p>Some of YOU may be able to hold your nose &#8211; way way way too many Conservatives CANNOT.</p>
<p>And WHY SHOULD WE &#8211; the PREMISE is that the RINOS would still be &#8220;AT LEAST REPUBLICANS&#8221;. And &#8220;PRESUMED&#8221; to be better than DIMS.</p>
<p>I give you Arnold Schwartzeneggar.<br />
Who has done even more of the Dim agenda THAN EVEN I THOUGHT HE WOULD EVEN DREAM OF ATTEMPTING! And certainly has proven my point well, for me.</p>
<p>So to those of you who say that ANY GOP Candidate is better than ANY Dim candidate, I say &#8220;KISS MY GRITS!&#8221;</p>
<p>Too many of them ARE THE SAME OR WORSE!</p>
<p>Who&#8217;s the Carrot &#8211; Who&#8217;s the Stick???</p>
<p>I.E., Hillary wouldn&#8217;t be a Senator much less a Presidential candidate if NOT FOR THE ENABLEMENT OF FRED THOMPSON/McCain&#8217;s butt buddy.<br />
JUST A FACT!<br />
*Fred&#8217;s vote for NOT GUILTY of Perjury for Bill<br />
*Fred&#8217;s diversion of the purpose of the Senate Committee HE CHAIRED which had been ASSIGNED to investigate CHINESE DONATIONS to the Clinton Campaign Funds.<br />
results of THAT Committee &#8220;investigation&#8221;??? hear the cricketts chirping??? Seems ol&#8217; Good Ol&#8217; Boy Fred didn&#8217;t want to EMBARRASS THE DIMS by exposing their DIRTY LAUNDRY before America!<br />
So he instead dragged in all the GOP dirty laundry that he could find to make it a &#8220;MATCH GAME&#8221;, instead!<br />
Otherwise the Clinton&#8217;s would BOTH BE IN JAIL.</p>
<p>Makes it SOOOOOOOOOOO amusing to hear Fred on Fox News denouncing the activities of the Clintons!</p>
<p>So barfing!</p>
<p>What else can you expect of McCain&#8217;s Presidential Campaign Manager and Howard Baker protege???</p>
<p>Hurt America by letting a Dim in office instead of a RINO?</p>
<p>As John Wayne said to John Russell in Rio Bravo, about the question of it being &#8220;MURDER&#8221; if the murderer in jail awaiting trial &#8211; if his brother tried to break him out of jail before the trial &#8211; were to get &#8220;ACCIDENTALLY DEAD&#8221; before the brother could get to the murderer &#8211; </p>
<blockquote><p><strong>&#8220;Hell, we&#8217;d all be dead by then, anyway!&#8221;</strong></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ombre Rose</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/31/it-depends-on-the-meaning-of-never/comment-page-1/#comment-214157</link>
		<dc:creator>Ombre Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 09:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/31/it-depends-on-the-meaning-of-never/#comment-214157</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;On December 31st, 2007 at 11:04 am, coldfront said: 
Didn’t Bryan point out John McCain’s strong support for John Bolton? I suppose it is something.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

It was expedient, meaningless (&lt;em&gt;given the real Congressional numbers - those handful of Senators who broke for the Dims so very often always knew when their support of a Dim issue was not going to carry the day for the Dims anyway, and was a meaningless and self-damaging empty gesture they could afford to forego for the sake of the reputations&lt;/em&gt;), and merely a drop in the ocean (sorry, no where NEAR just a bucket), &lt;strong&gt;and expedient&lt;/strong&gt;.

And self-serving.

You think with all his many different colusions with Toady Chapaqquiddick that he couldn&#039;t have twisted Kenney&#039;s arm of this one small thing and gotten it, if he WANTED to?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>On December 31st, 2007 at 11:04 am, coldfront said:<br />
Didn’t Bryan point out John McCain’s strong support for John Bolton? I suppose it is something.</p></blockquote>
<p>It was expedient, meaningless (<em>given the real Congressional numbers &#8211; those handful of Senators who broke for the Dims so very often always knew when their support of a Dim issue was not going to carry the day for the Dims anyway, and was a meaningless and self-damaging empty gesture they could afford to forego for the sake of the reputations</em>), and merely a drop in the ocean (sorry, no where NEAR just a bucket), <strong>and expedient</strong>.</p>
<p>And self-serving.</p>
<p>You think with all his many different colusions with Toady Chapaqquiddick that he couldn&#8217;t have twisted Kenney&#8217;s arm of this one small thing and gotten it, if he WANTED to?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin &#187; Sunday night roundtable: The Fox News/GOP debate</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/31/it-depends-on-the-meaning-of-never/comment-page-1/#comment-210755</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin &#187; Sunday night roundtable: The Fox News/GOP debate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 02:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/31/it-depends-on-the-meaning-of-never/#comment-210755</guid>
		<description>[...] have never, ever supported amnesty and never will.&#8221; (It depends on the meaning of &#8220;never.&#8221;) Wallace is letting him filibuster with his &#8220;I will secure the borders&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] have never, ever supported amnesty and never will.&#8221; (It depends on the meaning of &#8220;never.&#8221;) Wallace is letting him filibuster with his &#8220;I will secure the borders&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blind_Mule</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/31/it-depends-on-the-meaning-of-never/comment-page-1/#comment-206443</link>
		<dc:creator>Blind_Mule</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 22:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/31/it-depends-on-the-meaning-of-never/#comment-206443</guid>
		<description>is: is the Internet country code top-level domain for Iceland. 
So that&#039;s what Slick Willy was talking about Iceland. 

So what is McCain talking about when he say&#039;s never: Not at all; in no way; absolutely not. Ooop&#039;s sorry John can&#039;t find another definition for ya Slick Willies gonna flunk you in BS 101.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>is: is the Internet country code top-level domain for Iceland.<br />
So that&#8217;s what Slick Willy was talking about Iceland. </p>
<p>So what is McCain talking about when he say&#8217;s never: Not at all; in no way; absolutely not. Ooop&#8217;s sorry John can&#8217;t find another definition for ya Slick Willies gonna flunk you in BS 101.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ProudGulfWarVet65</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/31/it-depends-on-the-meaning-of-never/comment-page-1/#comment-206413</link>
		<dc:creator>ProudGulfWarVet65</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 22:05:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/31/it-depends-on-the-meaning-of-never/#comment-206413</guid>
		<description>And happy boo-hoo year to you too, gayle. Cripes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And happy boo-hoo year to you too, gayle. Cripes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gayle</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/31/it-depends-on-the-meaning-of-never/comment-page-1/#comment-206376</link>
		<dc:creator>gayle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 21:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/31/it-depends-on-the-meaning-of-never/#comment-206376</guid>
		<description>I have almost come to the conclusion that we do not need a president.

Heck, the illegals are taking over anyway.  There are NO political candidates that I trust to follow the rule of LAW.

We are doomed - my friends.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have almost come to the conclusion that we do not need a president.</p>
<p>Heck, the illegals are taking over anyway.  There are NO political candidates that I trust to follow the rule of LAW.</p>
<p>We are doomed &#8211; my friends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CC</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/31/it-depends-on-the-meaning-of-never/comment-page-1/#comment-206329</link>
		<dc:creator>CC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 20:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/31/it-depends-on-the-meaning-of-never/#comment-206329</guid>
		<description>#9 beenthere: &quot;But McCain, like his good buddy Theodore Kennedy, could NOT care less&quot;.

Thank you, thank you.  For the first time in ages I&#039;ve seen this phrase written correctly, with the &quot;not&quot; in it, instead of &quot;could care less&quot; which is incorrect.  

Saying one could NOT care less, is the least amount of caring.  Saying one could care less, suggests that one could care some more, but doesn&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#9 beenthere: &#8220;But McCain, like his good buddy Theodore Kennedy, could NOT care less&#8221;.</p>
<p>Thank you, thank you.  For the first time in ages I&#8217;ve seen this phrase written correctly, with the &#8220;not&#8221; in it, instead of &#8220;could care less&#8221; which is incorrect.  </p>
<p>Saying one could NOT care less, is the least amount of caring.  Saying one could care less, suggests that one could care some more, but doesn&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blues</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/31/it-depends-on-the-meaning-of-never/comment-page-1/#comment-206297</link>
		<dc:creator>blues</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 19:29:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/31/it-depends-on-the-meaning-of-never/#comment-206297</guid>
		<description>OOps,my bad,isn&#039;t &#039;BRAT&#039;,ITS&#039;RAT&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OOps,my bad,isn&#8217;t &#8216;BRAT&#8217;,ITS&#8217;RAT&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blues</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/31/it-depends-on-the-meaning-of-never/comment-page-1/#comment-206295</link>
		<dc:creator>blues</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 19:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/31/it-depends-on-the-meaning-of-never/#comment-206295</guid>
		<description>Papa-I thought &quot;brat&quot; was the root word in celebraty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Papa-I thought &#8220;brat&#8221; was the root word in celebraty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Papa Louie</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/31/it-depends-on-the-meaning-of-never/comment-page-1/#comment-206289</link>
		<dc:creator>Papa Louie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 19:16:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/31/it-depends-on-the-meaning-of-never/#comment-206289</guid>
		<description>Yes, Blues, all the MSM &quot;news&quot; coverage of Anna Nicole, Paris, and other victimized celeBRATies has indeed been torture.  That&#039;s why I gave up my cable TV and now rely on Michelle for my news addiction. 

I, too, wish Hunter would get more attention.  I&#039;m still waiting for his negatives to be exposed.  That doesn&#039;t seem to happen until someone takes a jump in the polls. But he seems to have the best conservative platform of all the candidates.

What?  There&#039;s no &quot;brat&quot; in celebrity?  Next, you&#039;ll be telling me there&#039;s no &quot;ham&quot; in Mohammed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Blues, all the MSM &#8220;news&#8221; coverage of Anna Nicole, Paris, and other victimized celeBRATies has indeed been torture.  That&#8217;s why I gave up my cable TV and now rely on Michelle for my news addiction. </p>
<p>I, too, wish Hunter would get more attention.  I&#8217;m still waiting for his negatives to be exposed.  That doesn&#8217;t seem to happen until someone takes a jump in the polls. But he seems to have the best conservative platform of all the candidates.</p>
<p>What?  There&#8217;s no &#8220;brat&#8221; in celebrity?  Next, you&#8217;ll be telling me there&#8217;s no &#8220;ham&#8221; in Mohammed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ArmoredCAV</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/31/it-depends-on-the-meaning-of-never/comment-page-1/#comment-206285</link>
		<dc:creator>ArmoredCAV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 19:14:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/31/it-depends-on-the-meaning-of-never/#comment-206285</guid>
		<description>Would I vote for him in the primary?  No.  Would he get my vote in the general election?  Yes, and not a question about it.  I am not going to sulk and not vote because &quot;my guy&quot; didn&#039;t get the nod.  ANYBODY with an R is better than ANYBODY with a D.  Who says otherwise?  You had all better be on board with that next NOV, or it could get bad. I don&#039;t want to wait four years more years for people to clue in. A lot of damage can be done in four years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would I vote for him in the primary?  No.  Would he get my vote in the general election?  Yes, and not a question about it.  I am not going to sulk and not vote because &#8220;my guy&#8221; didn&#8217;t get the nod.  ANYBODY with an R is better than ANYBODY with a D.  Who says otherwise?  You had all better be on board with that next NOV, or it could get bad. I don&#8217;t want to wait four years more years for people to clue in. A lot of damage can be done in four years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Papa Louie</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/31/it-depends-on-the-meaning-of-never/comment-page-1/#comment-206266</link>
		<dc:creator>Papa Louie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 18:56:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/31/it-depends-on-the-meaning-of-never/#comment-206266</guid>
		<description>To come to Sen. McCain&#039;s defense here, I have to admit that he does have a valid excuse for lying. He has always claimed that harsh interrogation is torture and that torture never results in reliable information.  Those who are tortured only lie to give the interrogator what they want to hear. So, if McCain lies while being harshly interrogated by the press, he is simply a tortured soul saying what he thinks we want to hear, and by doing so is proving himself correct.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To come to Sen. McCain&#8217;s defense here, I have to admit that he does have a valid excuse for lying. He has always claimed that harsh interrogation is torture and that torture never results in reliable information.  Those who are tortured only lie to give the interrogator what they want to hear. So, if McCain lies while being harshly interrogated by the press, he is simply a tortured soul saying what he thinks we want to hear, and by doing so is proving himself correct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blues</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/31/it-depends-on-the-meaning-of-never/comment-page-1/#comment-206255</link>
		<dc:creator>blues</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 18:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/31/it-depends-on-the-meaning-of-never/#comment-206255</guid>
		<description>Papa Louie,according to McMain&#039;s defintion of torture,we should all be able to sue the MSM for subjecting us to Paris Hilton stories,although the photos aren&#039;t all that bad.sarc off.
      Seriously,I can&#039;t see anyone other than Hunter,at this point,who would stand up for the values of conservatives.Of course the reason no one has brought up anything negative about him is because he is so far behind.Frankly,they all SUCK,but any Republican is better than the alternative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Papa Louie,according to McMain&#8217;s defintion of torture,we should all be able to sue the MSM for subjecting us to Paris Hilton stories,although the photos aren&#8217;t all that bad.sarc off.<br />
      Seriously,I can&#8217;t see anyone other than Hunter,at this point,who would stand up for the values of conservatives.Of course the reason no one has brought up anything negative about him is because he is so far behind.Frankly,they all SUCK,but any Republican is better than the alternative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nbarry</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/31/it-depends-on-the-meaning-of-never/comment-page-1/#comment-206239</link>
		<dc:creator>nbarry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 18:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/31/it-depends-on-the-meaning-of-never/#comment-206239</guid>
		<description>As of now, I still give my bipartisan support to None of the Above.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As of now, I still give my bipartisan support to None of the Above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Papa Louie</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/31/it-depends-on-the-meaning-of-never/comment-page-1/#comment-206224</link>
		<dc:creator>Papa Louie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 18:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/31/it-depends-on-the-meaning-of-never/#comment-206224</guid>
		<description>Using McCain&#039;s definition of torture, Paris Hilton could sue the government for torture.  After all, wasn&#039;t she humiliated by having to wear prison garb?  Wasn&#039;t she degraded by having to eat prison food?  To me, just being put behind bars would be humiliating and degrading.  

I think McCain should sue the press for the &quot;harsh interrogation&quot; that forced him to lie about his past support for amnesty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Using McCain&#8217;s definition of torture, Paris Hilton could sue the government for torture.  After all, wasn&#8217;t she humiliated by having to wear prison garb?  Wasn&#8217;t she degraded by having to eat prison food?  To me, just being put behind bars would be humiliating and degrading.  </p>
<p>I think McCain should sue the press for the &#8220;harsh interrogation&#8221; that forced him to lie about his past support for amnesty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- NEW -->
