About Contact Archives RSS Columns Photos

Jerk of the year nominee

By Michelle Malkin  •  December 31, 2007 01:05 PM

A late entrant for the Jerk of the Year contest via Blackfive: “Anti-Military Lawyer Damages Marine’s Car on Eve of Deployment.”

Eugene Volokh looks at the legal issues involved in the case.

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. » Jay Grodner: Chicago Lawyer and Anti-American Hennessy’s View: the conservative prescription
  2. Anti-war Lawyer Keys Deploying Marine’s Car « Reformed Musings
  3. Michelle Malkin » Jerk update: Lawyer accused of keying Marine’s car in court today

Trackback URL

Comments

  1. #1
    On December 31st, 2007 at 1:07 pm, meatpieandtatters said:

    I nominate Harry Reid and Pelosi to share the prize.

  2. #2
    On December 31st, 2007 at 1:12 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Must be Murtha’s personal attorney.

    How about if the prosecutors actually do their job?

  3. #3
    On December 31st, 2007 at 1:13 pm, malkin_fan said:

    Al Sharpton gets this award with a close second going to upchuck schumer.

  4. #4
    On December 31st, 2007 at 1:14 pm, Boomer said:

    The slimy lawyer who thinks himself above the laws of man and common decency is a great runner up, but I have to agree Queen Pelosi and “Dirty Harry” Reid win hands down as jerks of the year for 2007 in my book.

  5. #5
    On December 31st, 2007 at 1:15 pm, zorro said:

    Caught red-handed, Chicago lawyer Jay R. Grodner, should have his licence to practice law revoked. Malicious idiot. What sort of lawyer is this punk? The slip and fall type?

  6. #6
    On December 31st, 2007 at 1:17 pm, meatpieandtatters said:

    As they like to say in the Internet world: FLAME ON!

    Law Offices of Jay R. Grodner
    Principal Office-Deerfield
    Phone: (847) 444-1500
    Fax: (847) 444-0663

    Downtown Chicago
    Phone: (312) 236-1142
    Fax: (312) 236-6036

    Email: jayrg8@aol.com
    Web: http://www.jaygrodner.com

  7. #7
    On December 31st, 2007 at 1:25 pm, TXRose said:

    I came across this last night through instapundit and was absolutely disgusted.
    The chutzpah of this lawyer!! He should be sent to Saudi Arabia wearing a
    shirt that say I Love Jesus, Mohammed Sucks!!!

  8. #8
    On December 31st, 2007 at 1:28 pm, katieanne said:

    My blood boils. And the arrogance of that attorney only reinforces what most people think of lawyers. And for the law to want the victim to drop it is astounding. Is there no justice for victims anymore? Is it all about the perpetrator? There are so many issues here to get furious about.

    Oh, how I hope this lawyer gets it back in spades.

  9. #9
    On December 31st, 2007 at 1:30 pm, katieanne said:

    This should certainly qualify as a hate crime. Where is the ACLU? Where are the lawyers coming to this soldier’s defense? Where is the outrage in the MSM? I hope it makes it on FOX News.

  10. #10
    On December 31st, 2007 at 1:33 pm, see-dubya said:

    I’m sure those major law firms that were representing the Gitmo detainees pro bono (or “pro bono”) will be rushing to send over top men to represent the Marine, gratis.

  11. #11
    On December 31st, 2007 at 1:33 pm, brooklyn red said:

    This story was on the talk radio last nite & I am still outraged today.

    Thank you Madame Hostess for posting it, pls update as appropropriate.

    Seeing as this turd was caught red handed I can think on none better to make an example of…

    Happy New Year to all.

  12. #12
    On December 31st, 2007 at 1:37 pm, Larraby said:

    Christine Amanpour and Jon Klein at CNN have everybody whipped in this category. Her three part series about how Muslims are inately peaceful and Israelis and Christians was far worse than anything Olbermann even dreamed of. Jon Klein crowed about the Amanpour garbage and Klein seem to be getting a cheap thrill about angering religious Christians and Jews. For CNN, angering religious folks who are Christian or Jewish is something that they do every day. With Muslims, it is something Amanpour and Klein do everything to avoid, even having the studio green every now and then.

  13. #13
    On December 31st, 2007 at 1:39 pm, Larraby said:

    left out part of sentence. should have said Amanpour’s series about “how Muslims are inately peaceful and Israelis and Christians promote sectarian violence….”

  14. #14
    On December 31st, 2007 at 1:40 pm, HarryStar said:

    Maybe Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi can present the “Jerk of the Year” Award to him at a special ceremony held in San Francisco.

    Although late to the game, I do think we have a potential winner here.

  15. #15
    On December 31st, 2007 at 1:42 pm, shimauma2 said:

    LOL! meatpieandtatters, I think you killed their web page; it don’t come up. Wish we could do THAT to congress.

  16. #16
    On December 31st, 2007 at 1:43 pm, ajmontana said:

    Due to large amount of nominees for “Jerk of the Year” award how can we pick just one? I mean seriously all are so deserving and this dipstick ranks right up there.

  17. #17
    On December 31st, 2007 at 1:46 pm, Christian Soldier said:

    The late Sgt. Jeffers stated within his profound letters to his family that;
    “The enemy is…Americans.” That America’s military is fighting this war but not some Americans. He is correct.
    The lawyer who damaged the Marine’s car to the tune of $2,000 is a prime example to what Sgt. Jeffers was referring.
    Are we going to sit back and allow perverts to vandalize our military as America sat back during Vietnam? I say NO!

  18. #18
    On December 31st, 2007 at 1:48 pm, walterc said:

    ajmontana said:
    Due to large amount of nominees for “Jerk of the Year” award how can we pick just one? I mean seriously all are so deserving and this dipstick ranks right up there.

    I’m thinking we need a top 50 or maybe top 100 (leaving aside the fact that there are many more than that in Congress alone.)

  19. #19
    On December 31st, 2007 at 1:54 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    I agree with AJ. There are sooooo many great Jerks of the Year we need to have categories!

    This guy would take it for Lawyers.
    Tie for Race Baters: Al and Je$$ie
    Treasonous Person:
    Sociopaths:
    Politician (R):
    Politician (D):

    I know, some of these categories overlap. That just means some will come away with multiple awards!

  20. #20
    On December 31st, 2007 at 1:56 pm, katieanne said:

    One nomination for Jerks of the Year - those lying anti-war people who say they support the troops. Right. Here is a prime example of how they support the troops.

  21. #21
    On December 31st, 2007 at 1:56 pm, puhiawa said:

    The prosecutors are trying to cover for this ‘lawyer’. He broke the law. He lied to law enforcement. Disbar him.

  22. #22
    On December 31st, 2007 at 1:56 pm, meatpieandtatters said:

    Here’s a screen grab picture of the cretinous twit’s Web dating site: http://img232.imageshack.us/img232/8053/jaygrodneradev6.jpg

  23. #23
    On December 31st, 2007 at 1:58 pm, meatpieandtatters said:

    Actually, I withdraw my Reid/Pelosi nomination and will offer them an honorary award. This guy takes the cake.

  24. #24
    On December 31st, 2007 at 2:02 pm, Christian Soldier said:

    TZRose-I love your idea for punishment for the slime lawyer-Jay Grodner.

  25. #25
    On December 31st, 2007 at 2:11 pm, blues said:

    Jerk of the year?This one gets my vote.Sorry excuse for human being.I wonder what Atlas would have to say about this asshat,claiming to be as a Jew?

  26. #26
    On December 31st, 2007 at 2:14 pm, blues said:

    It is a sad day,indeed,. when an atheist is more concerned with the plight of Isreal than a so-called American Jew is.

  27. #27
    On December 31st, 2007 at 2:16 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    I’ve been slimed. Thanks meatpie - ugh!

  28. #28
    On December 31st, 2007 at 2:16 pm, Christian Soldier said:

    That would be TX Rose (-:

  29. #29
    On December 31st, 2007 at 2:17 pm, tony the tiger said:

    #6 meatpieandtatters said:

    Email: @aol.com
    Web: http://www.xygrodner.com

    Sounds like a malicious attack, posting someone’s personal email.
    Has this site changed its policy in this regard?

  30. #30
    On December 31st, 2007 at 2:28 pm, brooklyn red said:

    meatpieandtatters, Ew!

    thanks for sharing, I think…

    If there is any justice, urgh… If the system works, murgh… If the authorities do their jobs, if, if, awww crap! his next date should be in lock-down.

  31. #31
    On December 31st, 2007 at 2:34 pm, TXRose said:

    Thank you, Christian Soldier. Everyone is entitled to his/her opinion, but
    no one is entitled to damage another person or that person’s property
    when there is a difference of opinion. This lawyer reverted to type instead
    of admitting what he did and paying for the damage. In other words, being an adult instead of a liberal infant.
    I wish we could have skipped the mid to late 60s when liberalism and
    radicalism somehow got mixed together and we are now seeing what that
    evolved into…hate. Pure and simple. Not rational thought but outright
    hate for whatever you disagree with.

  32. #32
    On December 31st, 2007 at 2:37 pm, Surveyor said:

    Jerk of the year? Well, it’s a close race between quite a few folks….several hundred probably…but this guy does get my “Smacker-Head of the Month” award.

  33. #33
    On December 31st, 2007 at 2:41 pm, WarTip said:

    American Justice — Great for anyone who can afford it and is not Christian or Patriotic now?

    Just when I think it cannot become any more blatantly obvious or appalling, it does!

    If this is how they show their support for the troops along with trying to cut off their funding and actively interfering with supply lines …

    Just disgusting on so many levels!

  34. #34
    On December 31st, 2007 at 2:41 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    Fecal matter has more integrity than this crapweasel.

  35. #35
    On December 31st, 2007 at 2:42 pm, josetheguerilla said:

    This guy takes the cake for jerk of the year, by a long shot. What a jerk!!!!!!!!!!!!

  36. #36
    On December 31st, 2007 at 2:50 pm, katieanne said:

    Check out this site:

    http://web.archive.org/web/20011215211815/http://www.clr.org/Grodner-Jay.html

    Apparently Mr. Grodner has been in trouble before.

  37. #37
    On December 31st, 2007 at 2:57 pm, Christian Soldier said:

    TX Rose-the 60’s will no longer be the bench-mark for the treatment of our troops. (My post # 17) I vowed that if I ever saw a military person being spit upon as they were in the 60’s and 70’s -I would perform a citizen’s arrest.

    Perhaps our law enforcement and lawyer friends on this site could inform me how best to actuate a citizen’s arrest.

  38. #38
    On December 31st, 2007 at 2:57 pm, TXRose said:

    Sounds like a democrat fundraiser to me. Thanks katieanne.

  39. #39
    On December 31st, 2007 at 2:58 pm, Surveyor said:

    I rank the stars of “The Nancy & Harry Show” of 2007 as tied for Jerk of the Year”. The lawyer here is definately in the top ten on my list now….but…I tend to reserve the top 5 for those folks who can actually due millions of us harm by the stroke of a pen. Murtha is a close second and for third I have Mr. Grahmnesty. I mean….who can forget the “tell all the bigots to shut up!” comment? I’m still bent from hearing that one!

  40. #40
    On December 31st, 2007 at 2:59 pm, katieanne said:

    TXRose, google this guy. I read where his office phones have been disconnected. I do believe he has found out that Marine has alot of people on his side.

  41. #41
    On December 31st, 2007 at 3:07 pm, TXRose said:

    I agree, Christian Soldier. My brother was spat upon several times when he returned from Viet Nam. I swore that no one would ever spit on any one of our
    military in my presence and several people wound up with burning ears for trying
    just such a thing! One was someone from my high school class that never had
    been known for his brain power ( and he injured himself to escape the draft) and
    probably did our military a favor by not serving because he probably would have
    gotten Americans killed.
    I wasn’t talking about the late 60s in connection with military, but the comingling
    of liberal thinking and radical thinking that forms the basis for liberal thinking
    (in general) today. Liberalism was not quite as bad, at one time as it is today.

  42. #42
    On December 31st, 2007 at 3:10 pm, TXRose said:

    Katieanne, apparently he is also one of those that specializes in paternity
    tests and paternity suits. May even advertise on tv. It’s pretty bad when he
    comes across worse that the TX Hammer and the TX Strongarm ( don’t get
    me started on them!).

  43. #43
    On December 31st, 2007 at 3:43 pm, tony the tiger said:

    #43 Good point!
    WA State has recently passed a law prohibiting discrimination against military…

    BTW - asshat of the year is 1LT Watada.

  44. #44
    On December 31st, 2007 at 3:43 pm, Christian Soldier said:

    TX Rose - my brother - too was denigrated. I’m glad you were able to give a verbal lashing to those who assaulted your brother.

    To be a liberal used to be a good thing. It was liberal thinking and action that formed the Declaration of Independence - getting us away from the nonsense of believing that a human was “born” to rule (aristocracy).
    It was very liberal of our Founders to inform the King of England that they would have no king but King Jesus.

    As with everything the left does-a good word has been turned “up side down”.

  45. #45
    On December 31st, 2007 at 3:52 pm, katieanne said:

    On December 31st, 2007 at 3:14 pm, PAUL TROMMER said:
    This is a hate crime, isn’t it? How about a Federal investigation?

    What would have happened if this had been Jessie Jackson’s car?

    Exactly. Apparently there are two kinds of justice in the US.

  46. #46
    On December 31st, 2007 at 3:57 pm, brooklyn red said:

    katieanne #36, Well done!

  47. #47
    On December 31st, 2007 at 4:00 pm, amigoneus said:

    #29 - it’s public information, not malicious in any way.

  48. #48
    On December 31st, 2007 at 4:02 pm, TeutonicNomad said:

    Can’t Mike use the Soldier Sailor Relief Act to push the court date back until after he returns? Seems to me if I remember right; this act was for cases like this. Just because you are shipping out shouldn’t mean that you can’t get your day in court.

    It disgusts me that this little lawyer sh!t knows he can use a broke and degenerate judicial system to cover his slimy a$$. You should also realize by the actions of the court; that these liberal judges in Chicago are part of the problem. I could care less about their workload; if they just did their job properly, it would be less since they would actually send criminals to prison for the crimes they have committed.

  49. #49
    On December 31st, 2007 at 4:05 pm, TXRose said:

    Speaking of hate…I have just been catching up on the Rebecca Aguilar mess here in
    TX. She’s the reporter that was suspended from our local Fox station for reducing
    a 70 year old (white) man to tears after his second shooting of a second burglar.
    Now, the race card is being played. She was only suspended because she is
    hispanic and he is white. Never mind that her body language says so much more
    than her words or the words of her “victim” during the interview. There are
    hispanic groups demanding her reinstatement and both sides have hired lawyers.
    If all else fails, yell racism.

  50. #50
    On December 31st, 2007 at 4:11 pm, J S Ragman said:

    The fact is that attorney Grodner wouldn’t make a pimple on a good Marine’s derriere, and he knows it.

    Anybody got a problem with that?

    I didn’t think so.

  51. #51
    On December 31st, 2007 at 4:19 pm, Chuck said:

    they accused him of scratching the car because he is Jewish

    And how the heck would they have known he was Jewish? Was he wearing the mandatory yellow Star of David? Oh wait, that was another place and time.

    This country’s treatment of its military people for the last 40 years has been bad to disgraceful.

  52. #52
    On December 31st, 2007 at 4:30 pm, Christian Soldier said:

    The constant ranting of “I’m a victim” is getting OLD!

  53. #53
    On December 31st, 2007 at 4:31 pm, TeutonicNomad said:

    Here is the e-mail I just sent to our intrepid Chicago lawyer:

    Jay,

    We know who the real professional is in regards to your mental fit on Sgt McNulty’s private property; I’m sure he could have had you crying in a hurry, I’m not sure if he would have even had to raise a hand against you. I’m sure by the location you live, the profession you are in and the Judaic (your claim for the confrontation) background; you must be a liberal Socialist (short-term for Communist). Your kind is what has turned this country upside down; we in the military (I’m retired USAF) have provided you with the life style that you enjoy. If you were in the same circumstances anywhere else in the world except Europe (Socialism isn’t working there, why would you think it would work here?); you would have been killed outright or jailed and tortured (and it wouldn’t be water-boarding) for months.

    I would never ask that you support any or all wars that we may engage in; I would expect you to respect military personnel for the professionalism that they exhibit on the battlefield, at this time, no army that has ever been fielded has had such an exemplary record of standards of conduct. Criminal activity happens in all aspects of daily life; the fact that Iraq has less crime then your city of Chicago speaks volumes about our troops conduct of this war. It doesn’t speak well for you; you have committed a crime for which you should pay, being a lawyer should not exempt you from criminal prosecution.

    You should try to be a man; pay for the repairs of Sgt McNulty’s car and apologize for your childish behavior.

  54. #54
    On December 31st, 2007 at 4:36 pm, publiuswarmac9999 said:

    The New York Times without any question qualifies as the jerk of the year.

  55. #55
    On December 31st, 2007 at 4:38 pm, Rip Ford said:

    Here’s a screen grab picture of the cretinous twit’s Web dating site: http://img232.imageshack.us/img232/8053/jaygrodneradev6.jpg

    It’s petty, I know, but seeing as that site has a rating feature it’s almost tempting to sign up just to rate this idiot as “Urghh”.

  56. #56
    On December 31st, 2007 at 4:45 pm, nyc123me said:

    Use him as bait in Iraq or Afghanistan.

  57. #57
    On December 31st, 2007 at 4:59 pm, Blind_Mule said:

    This guy definitley qualifies and Democrat________________insert name

  58. #58
    On December 31st, 2007 at 5:22 pm, Alphonse said:

    After sending the car to the body shop, it was determined there is $2400 in damage, making this a felony.

    Seems a bit inflated.

  59. #59
    On December 31st, 2007 at 5:29 pm, docflash said:

    Soap is right,On December 31st, 2007 at 1:54 pm, On-my-soap-box said:
    “I agree with AJ. There are sooooo many great Jerks of the Year we need to have categories!”

    We need a slot for the Moveons,Kos and a special award for lawyers,including Silky.It looks like that jerks web site is down.Must be a real brave sort.A 3 year old can do that kind of damage.

  60. #60
    On December 31st, 2007 at 5:34 pm, deepdiver said:

    On December 31st, 2007 at 1:12 pm, AlohaGuy said:
    How about if the prosecutors actually do their job?

    It’s Illinois and the jerk is a liberal attorney - as far as the prosecutor is concerned, letting him off somehow is their job.

  61. #61
    On December 31st, 2007 at 6:30 pm, ProudGulfWarVet65 said:

    Soldiers’ and Sailors’ Civil Relief Act of 1940.

    This is from a revision/update from ‘03:

    Delay of Court and Administrative Proceedings

    A major change provided by the SCRA is that it permits active duty servicemembers, who are unable to appear in a court or administrative proceeding due to their military duties, to postpone the proceeding for a mandatory minimum of ninety days upon the servicemember’s request. The request must:

    * Be in writing;
    * Explain why the current military duty materially effects the servicemembers ability to appear;
    * Provide a date when the servicemember can appear; and
    * Include a letter from the commander stating that the servicemember’s duties preclude his or her appearance and that he is not authorized leave at the time of the hearing. This letter or request to the court will not constitute a legal appearance in court. Further delays may be granted at the discretion of the court, and if the court denies additional delays, an attorney must be appointed to represent the servicemember. (See Section 202, SCRA)

    Source

    I guess this might technically apply, but 90 days doesn’t do him much good.

  62. #62
    On December 31st, 2007 at 6:48 pm, ProudGulfWarVet65 said:

    Speaking of Kos cooties, docflash, I nominate “DavefromQueens

    There’s a pic here.

  63. #63
    On December 31st, 2007 at 6:55 pm, TXRose said:

    It may be petty, Rip but I did give him an ugh!!
    I cannot believe this jerk played the “you’re picking on me because I’m Jewish” card.

  64. #64
    On December 31st, 2007 at 7:05 pm, ammo john said:

    Must be ACLU:

    All Commies Love Us

  65. #65
    On December 31st, 2007 at 7:24 pm, greenfairie said:

    What a douche. I don’t think it’s so much moonbattery at work as it is a guy with an ego the size of the cosmos. There are plenty of schmucks like him in the legal profession.

  66. #66
    On December 31st, 2007 at 9:37 pm, vsatt said:

    According to his dating site he’s 5′6″. Sounds like someone’s got a case of Napoleon syndrome.

    I also noticed from a comment on Blackfive that he handles paternity testing in Chicago. This douchebag’s probably providing all the ‘gotcha’ services for the “who’s your daddy?” episodes on Springer.

  67. #67
    On December 31st, 2007 at 10:10 pm, zorro said:

    On December 31st, 2007 at 1:56 pm, meatpieandtatters said:
    Here’s a screen grab picture of the cretinous twit’s Web dating site: http://img232.imageshack.us/img232/8053/jaygrodneradev6.jpg

    Wow, I’ve seen better heads on an iodine bottle.

  68. #68
    On December 31st, 2007 at 11:33 pm, puhiawa said:

    He is worse than your ordinary America hater. This is a Jew who knows that only America saves all Jews from extinction. The wave of anti-Semitism is spreading throughout the world again. And Jay Grodner still hates all of us and the men who protect America and indirectly Israel. There are many Jews who do not believe in hell, I hope this one is wrong.

  69. #69
    On December 31st, 2007 at 11:34 pm, Blind_Mule said:

    zorro said: Wow, I’ve seen better heads on an iodine bottle.

    LMAO

  70. #70
    On January 1st, 2008 at 11:36 am, Kathianne said:

    Matt posted an update last night:

    Update 12-31-07 2000 CST: A Blackfive reader sends this update about the hearing today…

    Attn: Black Five

    I am writing to produce an update of the results of Sgt McNulty’s case against Jay R Grodner. I was present in support of Mike and thought you may be interested in an update for this story.

    Sgt McNulty was called forward by the State’s Attorney in order to discuss the case. I am not sure what transpired behind the closed doors, however, I overheard the State’s Attorney expressing her intent to prosecute this guy to the fullest extent. It seems as if BlackFive is the sole catalyst to this story getting out and I am sure Sgt McNulty has probably heard the effect of yours and other blogs from the results of today’s proceedings to include several Marines and civilians who showed up in his support.

    Jay R Grodner was called before court and in his absence, the Judge issued a warrant for his arrest effective immediately. Sgt McNulty was departing the court when Grodner rolled in to the courtroom more pathetic than anyone I had ever seen. The Judge had questioned him on his tardiness and he explained that traffic had been busy and he ‘made a wrong turn’. The Judge chastised him for his tardiness, pathetic excuses, and that he was lucky the warrant had not been executed prior to his arrival.

    It seems the blogosphere has put the ball in Sgt McNulty’s court. Furthermore, it is also apparent that the State’s Attorney’s Office has decided to take this matter on a much more serious level. A new and very aggressive State’s Attorney seems to have a genuine interest in pursuing this case to the extent that it warrants.

    A lot of good people deserve our thanks today. Thousands responded with emails and phone calls and some even went to support Mike at the hearing. Thank you. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again - Blackfive and military blogs have the best readers on the planet - we really are a true community.

    And, long time regular TB, sends this link to a Free Republic reader who also attended the hearing and provides a report.

    Now, if you’ll excuse me, I’m going to ring in the New Year. Twelve years ago, Mrs. Blackfive (before the “Mrs.”) and I had our first date, and our first kiss was at midnight. We have a tradition to maintain.

    Thank you! And have a Happy New Year!

  71. #71
    On January 1st, 2008 at 12:00 pm, maine yankee said:

    Can we find the name and E-mail address of the state’s Attorney handling this case? Keeping a light on this case will help it from fading away after the Marine is deployed.

  72. #72
    On January 1st, 2008 at 12:44 pm, katieanne said:

    Wonderful news Kathianne. I have no doubt the outrage from the Internet and people finding out how the State’s attorney was originally going to handle the case is what made the difference. I truly hope this attorney pays for his dirty deeds. To have done such a thing only shows what a sick mind this moron has.

  73. #73
    On January 1st, 2008 at 12:51 pm, pdigaudio said:

    I saw his picture on that dating site. If my dog looked like that I’d shave his butt and teach him to walk backwards.

  74. #74
    On January 1st, 2008 at 1:32 pm, TXRose said:

    Love it #73! I agree. When he said that he liked sex all I could think of was
    who would want to?

  75. #75
    On January 2nd, 2008 at 12:47 am, Jim M. said:

    Rose,

    He said he liked sex - that does not necessarily include scenarios with more than one participant in the act.

    Bet he’s got a bad case of carpal tunnel.

  76. #76
    On January 2nd, 2008 at 10:09 am, Mister P said:

    Jerk of the year has to be Geraldo
    Rivera and his race baiting, sex baiting, attack on Michele. Second has to be O’Reilly for saying NOTHING about it. What jerks.

  77. #77
    On January 2nd, 2008 at 11:30 am, tony the tiger said:

    #47 amigoneus

    That’s what I thought too, but when I put this in a different thread it got bounced…

    ehren.watada@us.army.mil

    as meatpieandtaters said:

    FLAME ON!

  78. #78
    On January 2nd, 2008 at 3:28 pm, SicSemperTyrannus said:

    Calling this shyster a crapweasel is an insult both to crap and to weasels.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Saving JROTC in San Francisco

July 8, 2008 01:48 PM by Michelle Malkin

28 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

Scenes from the counterinsurgency.

Sliming the greatest generation on PBS?

June 30, 2008 05:07 PM by Michelle Malkin

124 Comments | 8 Trackbacks

Your tax dollars at work.

Save JROTC in San Francisco

June 8, 2008 11:01 AM by Michelle Malkin

36 Comments | 1 Trackback

Counterinsurgency in the Bay Area public schools.

Beltway jerks harass uniformed military personnel Update: Bob Owens vets the memo

May 21, 2008 09:44 AM by Michelle Malkin

114 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

They don’t support our troops.

Michael Moore vs. Michael Yon

May 20, 2008 07:27 AM by Michelle Malkin

46 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

War.

The return of an unhinged IVAW member

April 1, 2008 07:36 PM by Michelle Malkin

54 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

Er, um, well, uh, oh, hell, no

March 27, 2008 12:01 PM by Michelle Malkin

42 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

A proper welcome for the Vets for Freedom in the Twin Cities

March 25, 2008 04:47 PM by Michelle Malkin

16 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

Counterinsurgency alert!

All they are saying is give Mercedes Benz a chance

March 25, 2008 12:09 PM by Michelle Malkin

43 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

D’oh-d’ohs in the Bay Area.


Categories: They don't support the troops


Little Miss Attila

» Okay, Ladies.

Power Line

» 40 Million?!