<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quoted in the NYTimes, but&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/07/quoted-in-the-nytimes-but/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/07/quoted-in-the-nytimes-but/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:59:09 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: In defense of intelligent debate &#171; tangents and digressions</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/07/quoted-in-the-nytimes-but/comment-page-1/#comment-656520</link>
		<dc:creator>In defense of intelligent debate &#171; tangents and digressions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 19:21:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/07/quoted-in-the-nytimes-but/#comment-656520</guid>
		<description>[...] Obama was in pews to hear Jeremiah Wright, or he wasn&#8217;t. Either Michelle Malkin said it, or she didn&#8217;t. These are basic rules that you can teach a 14-year old. And Kristol got them wrong. Often. He was, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Obama was in pews to hear Jeremiah Wright, or he wasn&#8217;t. Either Michelle Malkin said it, or she didn&#8217;t. These are basic rules that you can teach a 14-year old. And Kristol got them wrong. Often. He was, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin &#187; Selective moral outrage at the NYTimes</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/07/quoted-in-the-nytimes-but/comment-page-1/#comment-217508</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin &#187; Selective moral outrage at the NYTimes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 15:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/07/quoted-in-the-nytimes-but/#comment-217508</guid>
		<description>[...] week, I joked about Bill Kristol&#8217;s honest error in misattributing a Michael Medved quote about Huckabee to me. The unhinged Left treated the mistake like the next [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] week, I joked about Bill Kristol&#8217;s honest error in misattributing a Michael Medved quote about Huckabee to me. The unhinged Left treated the mistake like the next [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fed Up</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/07/quoted-in-the-nytimes-but/comment-page-1/#comment-212491</link>
		<dc:creator>Fed Up</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 17:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/07/quoted-in-the-nytimes-but/#comment-212491</guid>
		<description>Should have said &quot;privacy&quot; there Gaijin Bob...I stand corrected...

May I ask what you don&#039;t like about Ron Paul (since you are considering voting Libertarian)?

Fed Up</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should have said &#8220;privacy&#8221; there Gaijin Bob&#8230;I stand corrected&#8230;</p>
<p>May I ask what you don&#8217;t like about Ron Paul (since you are considering voting Libertarian)?</p>
<p>Fed Up</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GaijinBob</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/07/quoted-in-the-nytimes-but/comment-page-1/#comment-212454</link>
		<dc:creator>GaijinBob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 17:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/07/quoted-in-the-nytimes-but/#comment-212454</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Fed Up&lt;/em&gt; said:
&lt;blockquote&gt;Patirot (sic) Act - taking away our freedoms&lt;/blockquote&gt;The &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USA_PATRIOT_Act&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Patriot Act&lt;/a&gt; did not take away any of my freedoms to do anything, only my expectation of privacy for what I do.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=4342&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;McCain-Feingold&lt;/a&gt; stripped our fundamental freedoms as McCain helped establish an unassailable incumbent aristocracy, which is why, if McCain gets the nomination, I&#039;ll be voting Libertarian this year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Fed Up</em> said:</p>
<blockquote><p>Patirot (sic) Act &#8211; taking away our freedoms</p></blockquote>
<p>The <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USA_PATRIOT_Act" rel="nofollow">Patriot Act</a> did not take away any of my freedoms to do anything, only my expectation of privacy for what I do.  <a href="http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=4342" rel="nofollow">McCain-Feingold</a> stripped our fundamental freedoms as McCain helped establish an unassailable incumbent aristocracy, which is why, if McCain gets the nomination, I&#8217;ll be voting Libertarian this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fed Up</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/07/quoted-in-the-nytimes-but/comment-page-1/#comment-212423</link>
		<dc:creator>Fed Up</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 16:37:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/07/quoted-in-the-nytimes-but/#comment-212423</guid>
		<description>and this one Soap....

http://www.takimag.com/site/article/the_real_american_right_part_i/

Fed Up</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and this one Soap&#8230;.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.takimag.com/site/article/the_real_american_right_part_i/" rel="nofollow">http://www.takimag.com/site/article/the_real_american_right_part_i/</a></p>
<p>Fed Up</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fed Up</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/07/quoted-in-the-nytimes-but/comment-page-1/#comment-212408</link>
		<dc:creator>Fed Up</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 16:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/07/quoted-in-the-nytimes-but/#comment-212408</guid>
		<description>Soap,

You could just read this (but I still recommend the book):

http://www.lewrockwell.com/french/french70.html

Fed Up</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Soap,</p>
<p>You could just read this (but I still recommend the book):</p>
<p><a href="http://www.lewrockwell.com/french/french70.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.lewrockwell.com/french/french70.html</a></p>
<p>Fed Up</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fed Up</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/07/quoted-in-the-nytimes-but/comment-page-1/#comment-212405</link>
		<dc:creator>Fed Up</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 16:24:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/07/quoted-in-the-nytimes-but/#comment-212405</guid>
		<description>Soap,

I suggest you read Rothbard&#039;s &quot;Betrayal of the American Right&quot; before you claim to know what a conservative is and isn&#039;t.  

Ron Paul is more of what the Old Republican Party stood for than any other candidate.  Even GW ran on a humble foreign policy in 2000.  

Contrast that to the &quot;New&quot; Republican party with its Islamofacism, warmongering battle cry, uncontrolable spending, Patirot Act - taking away our freedoms and 2006 losses to the liberals of both the house and the senate and you can see where they have gone wrong.

You don&#039;t deny this do you Soap?

(and don&#039;t run away from answering this question by attacking Ron Paul, the issue here is what is a conservative.

The Republican Party changed.  Ron Paul didn&#039;t.

Fed Up</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Soap,</p>
<p>I suggest you read Rothbard&#8217;s &#8220;Betrayal of the American Right&#8221; before you claim to know what a conservative is and isn&#8217;t.  </p>
<p>Ron Paul is more of what the Old Republican Party stood for than any other candidate.  Even GW ran on a humble foreign policy in 2000.  </p>
<p>Contrast that to the &#8220;New&#8221; Republican party with its Islamofacism, warmongering battle cry, uncontrolable spending, Patirot Act &#8211; taking away our freedoms and 2006 losses to the liberals of both the house and the senate and you can see where they have gone wrong.</p>
<p>You don&#8217;t deny this do you Soap?</p>
<p>(and don&#8217;t run away from answering this question by attacking Ron Paul, the issue here is what is a conservative.</p>
<p>The Republican Party changed.  Ron Paul didn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Fed Up</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristol Clear &#171; The Grand Panjandrum</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/07/quoted-in-the-nytimes-but/comment-page-1/#comment-212127</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristol Clear &#171; The Grand Panjandrum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 05:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/07/quoted-in-the-nytimes-but/#comment-212127</guid>
		<description>[...] William Kristol NY Times Op-Ed piece garnered a lot of attention and much of it because of the MM mix up. James Fallows didn’t bother to mention it, but he did take this shot at Kristol’s abilities on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] William Kristol NY Times Op-Ed piece garnered a lot of attention and much of it because of the MM mix up. James Fallows didn’t bother to mention it, but he did take this shot at Kristol’s abilities on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: On-my-soap-box</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/07/quoted-in-the-nytimes-but/comment-page-1/#comment-211987</link>
		<dc:creator>On-my-soap-box</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 03:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/07/quoted-in-the-nytimes-but/#comment-211987</guid>
		<description>On January 7th, 2008 at 5:27 pm, GaijinBob said: 

Point taken and I did gather what he meant.  I just get tired of Dr. Paul being touted as a serious candidate at all.  Bad for defense and full of bull claiming he can fix the tax system the latter of which is just old fashioned pandering - PERIOD.

Dr. Paul is sucking people in who the old &quot;the income tax was never ratified&quot; crowd and are just tired of the IRS.  Next he tries to align himself with the anti-war crowd by claiming we were not attacked by terrorists but we were because we occupy their country (talk about covering your bases). 
Finally, he is running as a Republican (and he is not).  He is not a conservative he may be green party at best.

News flash for those of you who are Ron Paul fans:

Most of the conservative base wants a conservative – duh.  That leaves out “Rudy-I-am the-only-one-who-has-had-a-terrorist-attack” (ummm it was against us all Rudy) and “Huck-I-have-no-clue-what-immigration-is” as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On January 7th, 2008 at 5:27 pm, GaijinBob said: </p>
<p>Point taken and I did gather what he meant.  I just get tired of Dr. Paul being touted as a serious candidate at all.  Bad for defense and full of bull claiming he can fix the tax system the latter of which is just old fashioned pandering &#8211; PERIOD.</p>
<p>Dr. Paul is sucking people in who the old &#8220;the income tax was never ratified&#8221; crowd and are just tired of the IRS.  Next he tries to align himself with the anti-war crowd by claiming we were not attacked by terrorists but we were because we occupy their country (talk about covering your bases).<br />
Finally, he is running as a Republican (and he is not).  He is not a conservative he may be green party at best.</p>
<p>News flash for those of you who are Ron Paul fans:</p>
<p>Most of the conservative base wants a conservative – duh.  That leaves out “Rudy-I-am the-only-one-who-has-had-a-terrorist-attack” (ummm it was against us all Rudy) and “Huck-I-have-no-clue-what-immigration-is” as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Big 2008 Sigh &#171; Obi&#8217;s Sister</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/07/quoted-in-the-nytimes-but/comment-page-1/#comment-211931</link>
		<dc:creator>The Big 2008 Sigh &#171; Obi&#8217;s Sister</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 01:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/07/quoted-in-the-nytimes-but/#comment-211931</guid>
		<description>[...] running the show. Speaking of media, the NYT gave Michelle Malkin credit for a quote. Trouble is, she didn&#8217;t say it. Fact-checking? What fact-checking? At least I try to make sure what I write/cite is true. But [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] running the show. Speaking of media, the NYT gave Michelle Malkin credit for a quote. Trouble is, she didn&#8217;t say it. Fact-checking? What fact-checking? At least I try to make sure what I write/cite is true. But [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/07/quoted-in-the-nytimes-but/comment-page-1/#comment-211890</link>
		<dc:creator>Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 01:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/07/quoted-in-the-nytimes-but/#comment-211890</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Huckabee&#039;s History of Political Antics
...&lt;/strong&gt;

Mike Huckabee&#039;s offbeat antics _ what some would call stunts _ helped propel him to the front of the...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Huckabee&#8217;s History of Political Antics<br />
&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Mike Huckabee&#8217;s offbeat antics _ what some would call stunts _ helped propel him to the front of the&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Radio Left</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/07/quoted-in-the-nytimes-but/comment-page-1/#comment-211828</link>
		<dc:creator>Radio Left</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 00:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/07/quoted-in-the-nytimes-but/#comment-211828</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Kristol misattributes quote in first NYT column....&lt;/strong&gt;

Think Progress

In his first column for the New York Times today, Weekly Standard editor William Kristol attributes a quote about the &#8220;obvious, powerful points of identification&#8221; GOP voters may have with Mike Huckabee to Michelle Malkin. Bu...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Kristol misattributes quote in first NYT column&#8230;.</strong></p>
<p>Think Progress</p>
<p>In his first column for the New York Times today, Weekly Standard editor William Kristol attributes a quote about the &#8220;obvious, powerful points of identification&#8221; GOP voters may have with Mike Huckabee to Michelle Malkin. Bu&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obis_Sister</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/07/quoted-in-the-nytimes-but/comment-page-1/#comment-211812</link>
		<dc:creator>Obis_Sister</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 23:37:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/07/quoted-in-the-nytimes-but/#comment-211812</guid>
		<description>Yeah... more of that NYT stellar fact-checking...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah&#8230; more of that NYT stellar fact-checking&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GaijinBob</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/07/quoted-in-the-nytimes-but/comment-page-1/#comment-211759</link>
		<dc:creator>GaijinBob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 22:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/07/quoted-in-the-nytimes-but/#comment-211759</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;On-my-soap-box&lt;/em&gt; said:&lt;blockquote&gt;The only decent guy, who at least &lt;strong&gt;had&lt;/strong&gt; a real job helping other, is Dr. Paul.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;You mean his treasonous statements like 19 thugs hit the WTC and Pentagon and they attacked us up because we invaded their countries...Who is Dr. Paul helping there?&lt;/blockquote&gt;I think he meant helping others in that he was a &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ron_Paul&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;practicing physician&lt;/a&gt; in his prior career.  The Republican party and the country in general would benefit with him returning to his previous occupation as a healer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>On-my-soap-box</em> said:<br />
<blockquote>The only decent guy, who at least <strong>had</strong> a real job helping other, is Dr. Paul.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>You mean his treasonous statements like 19 thugs hit the WTC and Pentagon and they attacked us up because we invaded their countries&#8230;Who is Dr. Paul helping there?</p></blockquote>
<p>I think he meant helping others in that he was a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ron_Paul" rel="nofollow">practicing physician</a> in his prior career.  The Republican party and the country in general would benefit with him returning to his previous occupation as a healer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fed Up</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/07/quoted-in-the-nytimes-but/comment-page-1/#comment-211606</link>
		<dc:creator>Fed Up</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 20:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/07/quoted-in-the-nytimes-but/#comment-211606</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;On January 7th, 2008 at 3:22 pm, Papa Louie said: 
Fed Up, I watched the first 10 min. video but I was too fed-up to watch the rest. So some Muslim came to our country and didn’t like our music, our dances, and the way we spend too much time cutting our lawns. Does that make us responsible for 911? 

The only sure way to prevent a permissive culture is to limit freedom and to use Moral Police like they do in Iran. Is that what Ron Paul is for? I don’t get why you provided the link to an hour’s worth of videos. Maybe you could summarize the main points for us if they’re that important to you.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

You can read my book when it comes out called &quot;Fed Up!&quot;

In the meantime, you can find a review of the 3 hour documenatary here: http://www.thenation.com/doc/20050620/bergen

I do recommend you watch the entire film before jumping to conclusions and asking questions that have nothing to do with the message of the film.

Fed Up</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>On January 7th, 2008 at 3:22 pm, Papa Louie said:<br />
Fed Up, I watched the first 10 min. video but I was too fed-up to watch the rest. So some Muslim came to our country and didn’t like our music, our dances, and the way we spend too much time cutting our lawns. Does that make us responsible for 911? </p>
<p>The only sure way to prevent a permissive culture is to limit freedom and to use Moral Police like they do in Iran. Is that what Ron Paul is for? I don’t get why you provided the link to an hour’s worth of videos. Maybe you could summarize the main points for us if they’re that important to you.</p></blockquote>
<p>You can read my book when it comes out called &#8220;Fed Up!&#8221;</p>
<p>In the meantime, you can find a review of the 3 hour documenatary here: <a href="http://www.thenation.com/doc/20050620/bergen" rel="nofollow">http://www.thenation.com/doc/20050620/bergen</a></p>
<p>I do recommend you watch the entire film before jumping to conclusions and asking questions that have nothing to do with the message of the film.</p>
<p>Fed Up</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- NEW -->
