Comments on: The New Hampshire verdict; NBC, Fox calls it for McCain; Romney: “Another silver, I’d rather have a gold;” “Mac is back!;” Update: AP calls race for Hillary, Fox projects Hillary the winner; Obama concedes

By: president ford child

president ford child — Wed, 30 Jan 2008 08:02:10 +0000

president ford child…

They dont preserve very much of the original sound, and they distort it quite a bit in the name of increasing the bass power….

By: The Christ Follower Blog

The Christ Follower Blog — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 15:55:41 +0000

The Day After New Hampshire…

The GOP race continues to baffle pundits who fail to connect with the base of the Party. Mitt Romney’s second place showing in NH behind John McCain caught many of the establishment conservatives by surprise. They couldn’t understand how …

By: Charles B. Simpson

Charles B. Simpson — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 14:54:43 +0000

Rush Limbaugh detests McCain. Rush also knows Huckabee is a RINO. Rudy is a one-trick pony. That leaves Mitt and Fred. Rush will decide who is the nominee. I think he will go with Mitt. As Rush goes, so goes the Republicans. McCain has zero chance to be nominated, thank God!

By: NH Results! » Freedom Folks

NH Results! » Freedom Folks — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 06:18:00 +0000

[...] Malkin [...]

By: deepdiver

deepdiver — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 05:47:07 +0000

Keep in mind that a typical northeast conservative Republican=typical Heartland (sans PRI – Peoples Republik of Illinois and Michigan) moderate Democrat. There is a VAST difference between the northeast and west coast and the America most of us know, love and would fight to the death to maintain. Iowa is marginally representative of the Heartland the same way that NH is marginally representative of the northeast. Both are more closely representative of the national democrat voter than the national conservative voter. This explains the MSM’s fascination and over-emphasis on these two primaries. Both states more closely represent MSM bigotry and bias than the people of the vast majority of America’s land mass.

If the GOP and it’s candidates can do something right for a change and wait until Super Tuesday to hear from the majority of the Heartland, and if Heartland voters can avoid an anal-cranial inversion brought on by MSM propaganda, we will soon know the true mood of the Republican base.

By: Floyd R. Turbo

Floyd R. Turbo — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 05:04:30 +0000

Yes! What will it take to get rid of the Clintons? GAAAAAAAAAA! Why are they still here? How stupid can the public get? Apparently, quite…!

By: Michelle Malkin » New Hampshire verdict: Hillary exults

Michelle Malkin » New Hampshire verdict: Hillary exults — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 04:21:51 +0000

[...] Previous New Hampshire verdict liveblogging. Posted in: 2008 campaign, Hillary Clinton Send to a Friend Printer Friendly comments [...]

By: jsr

jsr — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 04:18:16 +0000

As I sit here, discouraged, listening to Hillary give her victory speech, watching Bill and Chelsea climb onto the stage with those big phony smiles I can only think “What will it take to get rid of these people?”

Now she breaks into her typical strident divisivness BS and how she is going to fight, fight, fight etc.. I see people cheering wildly after each hollow, phony remark. What do they see? What am I missing that drives them wild? This country nearly rid itself of this curse and now it is back, worse that ever.

By: chsw

chsw — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 04:18:04 +0000

Having worked for Dem machines in both MD and Chicago, I was immediately suspicious when I heard that polling stations had run out of ballots by late morning. Perhaps the stock of ballots had been previously filled in. Or, perhaps some people were taking advantage of NH’s permissive motor-voter law.

Does anyone know whether there are chads on NH ballots?

chsw (would have posted earlier but just got home)

By: Floyd R. Turbo

Floyd R. Turbo — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 04:18:01 +0000

Alphonse #106: Re: your pilot comment, ouch! Nasty. Still, you have points about his policies effects. Still again, do they and other things make him worse than BO or HC? Are they worth trashing him and trashing the Whitehouse putting it in the hands of either Democrat candidates? Y’all can’t be that serious. I hope. Again, that would be pulling a whine-out/tantrum we despise the Dems for. No, I DON’T want McCain as candidate, but should stupider heads prevail (gad…) do we stick OUR heads in the sand? I think NOT.

By: Jacob Hammond

Jacob Hammond — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 04:17:33 +0000

In 2012 NH and Iowa should vote last any states that pick Huck and McCain should not get to decide next time.

By: crashemt

crashemt — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 04:11:03 +0000

Um, just heard the “Yes we can” preacher speech by Barack. Is there anyone who can tell me what, if anything, he stands for, other than his election to the White House? If he’s the candidate for “change”, what’s the change? Is it really better for all Americans? Or are we just electing another leader on charisma alone?

By: Michelle Malkin » New Hampshire youth vote: Will it come down to college towns?

Wed, 09 Jan 2008 04:04:53 +0000

[...] Update 10:51pm Eastern. Obama concedes. [...]

By: rjd27

rjd27 — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 04:02:34 +0000

Obama can give a speech. Even a poorly written one, he delivered it well. Republicans need to be careful what they ask for: Hillary or Obama in the general.
R.J.

By: meatpieandtatters

meatpieandtatters — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 03:59:22 +0000

BO isn’t about change. He’s spawn of the establishment and status quo. His DNA is exactly the same as every other big government bureaucrat: it has the tax and spend double-helix dominant chromosome. He’s a mouth-breathing booger eater…one of my favorite Calvin & Hobbes zingers!