See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments

1. #1
   On January 9th, 2008 at 3:03 pm, PBoilermaker said:

   Hillary isn’t the problem. The idiots who support and believe her, however, are.

2. #2
   On January 9th, 2008 at 3:05 pm, meatpieandtatters said:

   With nothing to whine about, Democrats wouldn’t have anything to say. The Sourpuss party.

3. #3
   On January 9th, 2008 at 3:08 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

   They’re now officially the party of ninnies.

   Give me a break.

   What would happen if one of these fools was in office and we had a nuke hit our country by some rogue country?

   Are they going to just stand there and cry?

4. #4
   On January 9th, 2008 at 3:09 pm, realitycheck said:

   Hillary’s tears = acid rain.

5. #5
   On January 9th, 2008 at 3:10 pm, PBoilermaker said:

   Are they going to just stand there and cry?

   Only if, during the course of said nuke hit, they find their inner voice.

6. #6
   On January 9th, 2008 at 3:16 pm, BrianNY said:

   Crocodile tears are just the latest prop. If Hillary could bend down between her legs and kiss her own rump, her sycophantic drones would still clap like wind-up monkeys.

7. #7
   On January 9th, 2008 at 3:18 pm, RaisedRight said:

   Aw geez! Warn a person before you link them to Rosie’s website. I was eating!

8. #8
   On January 9th, 2008 at 3:20 pm, Fco said:

   How could they possibly they know if Hillary cried or not over Katrina? Are they angry she didn’t on camera? I hope it doesn’t come to people demanding their candidates/leaders get on TV and weep over disasters and tragedies.

9. #9
   On January 9th, 2008 at 3:21 pm, PBoilermaker said:

   I hope it doesn’t come to people demanding their candidates/leaders get on TV and weep over disasters and tragedies.

   Based on the clip above, it has already come to that.

10. #10
    On January 9th, 2008 at 3:23 pm, Salt said:

    We’re moving in a very sad direction if voters really want a sensitive President. How does breaking into tears demonstrate an ability to lead? If anything doesn’t it underscore a concern about how such a person might act in a crisis?

    Maybe I am insensitive, but I would prefer not to have our leader, who has to deal with the likes of Iran and North Korea, to be considered sensitive. Call me old-fashioned, but the leader of the free world should have more moral strength than to cry about the hardships of people picking on them.

11. #11
    On January 9th, 2008 at 3:27 pm, Peejz said:

    Now I’m confused..is this racism or sexism?

12. #12
    On January 9th, 2008 at 3:29 pm, hatelibs said:

    This is getting way out of hand. But my take is still that Hitlary can’t use the tears bit again…it won’t work anymore. And now that the left is using her alleged crying against her, I think I’m right. Of course we have to endure all this “emotion” crap in the mean time.

    Liberals “feel” and conservatives think. I can be emotional too but I make sure my head makes the decisions and using ones head is necessary to lead!

13. #13
    On January 9th, 2008 at 3:31 pm, DocattheAutopsy said:

    It’s the party of “Private Practice”. Everyone weeps 50 minutes into the episode.

14. #14
    On January 9th, 2008 at 3:32 pm, max said:

    Hey Rosie, it wasn’t just men who “sneered weak”…. plenty of strong women (like our hostess?)were appaled at the display as well…(not just for weakness, though, also mostly for its deliberate pandering, artifice, etc.)

15. #15
    On January 9th, 2008 at 3:33 pm, Mister P said:

    Interestingly enough, on the day of our Iowa caususes, the public channel had a documentary on the founder of the Democratic Party, Andrew Jackson. They were the party of the bigots and rabble rousers. Nothing has changed.

16. #16
    On January 9th, 2008 at 3:41 pm, jsr said:

    My four month old son cries alot, usually when hungry or tired. Like my son, I’d say the libs just need their bottle and be put to bed.

17. #17
    On January 9th, 2008 at 3:51 pm, ajmontana said:

    All of the campaign-driven sniveling getting on my nerves. Am I the only one?

    Is this a trick question? No, you’re not alone and I have witnesses.

18. #18
    On January 9th, 2008 at 3:54 pm, CS said:

    Professional victims always defends their own.

19. #19
    On January 9th, 2008 at 4:04 pm, uhangtight said:

    i’m sorry, i have seen that so called crying piece over and over again on the news yesterday, but still don’t see that she was crying.

    as i heard it on the radio today without the visual, there was one section where she went totally out of the crying character to ‘herself’ and then back. as a former study of the theatrical arts, i know an actress when i see one. i also know when one slips in and out of the ‘character’ they are portraying. if you listen to the soundbite without visual. it is apparent it was an act (IMHO). the visual, still does not show any tears that i could see. and i can’t stand looking at her that intently so maybe i am missing the tear drops.??

20. #20
    On January 9th, 2008 at 4:29 pm, mike volpe said:

    Going negative is risky for Obama because it is counter to his image as being able to rise above it. I personally think he should just continue with his campaign theme. That seems to work. We will see if going negative works.

    I also recently wrote this that is a bit outdated because yesterday at this time the race was his to lose. That said, here is how I think the Reps should take on Obama if he is the nominee.

21. #21
    On January 9th, 2008 at 4:32 pm, shooter said:

    If indeed the Shill did cry, or tear up for real, it was solely because of her elephantine & psychotic selfish EGO.
    She thought “oh no I might not win, might not get what I want” and that hurt her like…like a kid that did not get his BB gun for Christmas would’ve cried.
    She doesn’t give a damn about anything or anybody else.
    That is the ONLY reason for the ‘theatrical choke-up’, pure selfish narcissistic close-minded whataboutme clintonian horsesh*t.

22. #22
    On January 9th, 2008 at 4:32 pm, Blind_Mule said:

    There were no tear’s. I don’t know if I’m the only one that hear’s these little Freudian slip’s, well I take that back some time’s Rush does like Billary in crocidile mode saying that “I have so many oportunities for this country” instead of We. Terry Mcdipwad was on Fox last night and when asked how Billary pulled this one out went thru what I believe was there strategy and right in the middle of his list was “She showed emotion” he went thru it so fast that I think some may have missed it, but he had just revealed that it was all planned.

23. #23
    On January 9th, 2008 at 4:47 pm, mike volpe said:

    Everyone should read Dick Morris’ latest column here because I think he nails why she cried.

24. #24
    On January 9th, 2008 at 5:33 pm, neo-connette said:

    On January 9th, 2008 at 4:47 pm, mike volpe said:
    Everyone should read Dick Morris’ latest column here because I think he nails why she cried.

    I agree with you that he nailed the reason but he totally missed on the consequence.

25. #25
    On January 9th, 2008 at 5:37 pm, Salt said:

    mike volpe said:

    Everyone should read Dick Morris’ latest column here because I think he nails why she cried.

    An interesting read, but with the fact that she won in NH, is the last sentence still accurate?

    However, I would hope that only democrats could be fooled by such measures and that independents would not be.

26. #26
    On January 9th, 2008 at 5:46 pm, Alphonse said:

    In Chicago politics we know the best way to show your emotion is to pull out some nasal hairs.
    
    Why do your eyes water when you pull out a nose hair?

27. #27
    On January 9th, 2008 at 6:03 pm, Bhishma said:

    And Hillary wants to wiht the election “for our future for our kids”? Here is what Slick willy, Hill’s strongest supporter did “for our future, for our kids”: http://www.blessedcause.org/proof/Clinton%20Embracing%20Islam%20selling%20out%20children.htm

    “For our future, for our kids” Yea! Sell them!

28. #28
    On January 9th, 2008 at 6:11 pm, TexasTiger said:

    LMAO

    Watch JJ Jr. at the 1:22 mark of the video where he says he’s “super sensitive”!

    Reminds me of Big Gay Al on South Park.
    

29. #29
    On January 9th, 2008 at 6:25 pm, JWS said:

    Katrina? How the hell do they fit that in HERE? It truly never ends. I think White conservatives should refill New Orleans, then rush in and save it before anyone else does. At least that way we’d have that done with.

30. #30
    On January 9th, 2008 at 6:32 pm, DelosWorld said:

    “I come from Chicago politics. We’re accustomed to rough and tumble.”

    Well it is true that that Al Sharpton started to get heat from the FBI only days after threatening to shake down Mayor Daley by making noises to block the 2012 Olympics from being sited in Chicago. So yes, you don’t want to mess with “Da Machine.”

31. #31
    On January 9th, 2008 at 6:35 pm, huggybear said:

    Ugh… YES I’m sick of it. Who isn’t?

    As a liberal, I can assure you: I hate the Clintons way more than you do. Trust me. Nothing would make me happier than flushing these two turds from American politics once and for all.

    But here’s the tricky part: Conservatives are of no help whatsoever in accomplishing this. In fact the more you pick on her, the more you galvanize the idiots who actually buy into the “right wing conspiracy” BS.

    So if you want to help us get rid of Hillary, drop the “breakdown,” please. You’re making her seem almost…. “human.”

32. #32
    On January 9th, 2008 at 6:36 pm, JWS said:

    “Rough and tumble”? Obama’s about as rough and tumble as one of those inflatable bounce-back clowns.

33. #33
    On January 9th, 2008 at 6:55 pm, CS said:

    On January 9th, 2008 at 6:35 pm, huggybear said:

    Ugh… YES I’m sick of it. Who isn’t?

    As a liberal, I can assure you: I hate the Clintons way more than you do. Trust me. Nothing would make me happier than flushing these two turds from American politics once and for all.

    But here’s the tricky part: Conservatives are of no help whatsoever in accomplishing this. In fact the more you pick on her, the more you galvanize the idiots who actually buy into the “right wing conspiracy” BS.

    So if you want to help us get rid of Hillary, drop the “breakdown,” please. You’re making her seem almost…. “human.”

    Sorry huggybear, but ignoring the problem doesn’t make it go away.
    Hillary’s fellow Marxists are going to vote for her no mater what.

    Join us in telling the truth about her in case a few useful idiots out there rise above expectations.

34. #34
    On January 9th, 2008 at 7:08 pm, bear1909 said:

    Control freaks can’t cope with negative outcomes. Dick Morris nailed that one.

    Thanks for the link, Volpe.

35. #35
    On January 9th, 2008 at 7:28 pm, RetFireman said:

    All of the campaign-driven sniveling getting on my nerves. Am I the only one?

    COme on, Michelle. Have you not read any of my posts on that subject? My feelings are crushed.

    I have never seen a more pathetic bunch of whiners running for office in my short 40 years. ANY office. And these people are running for President of the United States, Leader of the Free World at a time of war while we face an enemy as dangerous if not more so than the enemy we faced over 60 years ago. Both were bent on world domination, both wished to wipe all Jews off the face of the earth, however the ones we face now actually do so with Liberal blessing and the blessing of Political Correctness, Multi-Culturalism, and hiding behind the lies that they are a peaceful religion and if you question their motives or anything they say or do you will be labelled a biggot, a racist and “Islamophobic”, instantly shutting down any and all debate, conversation, or questioning. This has lead them to run rough-shod all across the globe, with murders, hi-jackings and global attacks reaching new records daily, unopposed save for one man…George Bush…for which he is daily lambasted for it.

    Yup, these whiners and cry-babies are so busy showing how sensitive they are that they have failed to show the country the thing tht matters most:

    How in the heck are they going to protect us and be tough when the war…you know, the war that we have been fighting for over 6 years that the Dems have been denying and trying to sabotage and surrender to for just as long…heats up as soon as they take office.

    You can be sure that as soon as any new President takes office, the “Religion of Peace” will do something to test their mettle. Is this new guy going to be tough and not put up with their noise the way President Bush did? Or are they going to be allowed to get away with murder and mayhem for the next 4-8 years, strengthening their hold on the world and increasing their territories, weakening the Free Nations of the earth in the process, making it more and more likely that the new Caliphate will come to pas and the United States will see nuclear attacs in the very near future the way President Clinton did?

    The way these Democrats are camaigning, it is obvious to everyone paying attention the way they will react. Anyone who cries and “FEELS” the way they are and do will obviously not react with strength and power to any feeling out of the wire by the enemy. They will want to “talk” and treat it like it is a crime, not an overt act of war. Well, that attitude killed over 3000 Americans in under 45 minutes. But don’t tell them that…it was Bush’s fault.

    Tears get you nowhere. Reagan did not win by crying every time someone hurt his feelings. Kennedy did not cry, neither did Ike, FDR, Teddy R., or any of the great, strong Presidents that was ever worth a damn. Tears may win you votes from other weak willed emotional small minded individuals who feel that Soap Opera stars actually live those type of lives, and that we should all feel sorry for Brittney and MJ, and the only news worth watching is ET and comes on E!, but it will not actually work in the real world where there are real enemies with real guns and real bombs and real swords and real chemicals and really, really want to kill you just because you are an American and live as an American and not with a turban in a desert and face East 5 times a day.

    Unfortunately, they will never get it through their heads…not even after it will be too late, and also, most unfortunately our side is too angry and too disorganized that these are the people who will run the country for at least the next 4 years. That’s why I am loading up my ammo, and moving to the sticks.

36. #36
    On January 9th, 2008 at 7:45 pm, JohnnyNJ said:

    Michelle, I love the Johnson & Johnson Baby Shampoo slogan request, can’t agree with you more. It’s brilliant…..now, can we float(superimpose) a bottle behind Hillary at her next campaign stop?

    BTW as to the crying, isn’t that after all what liberals are or supposed to be; touchy/feely, emotion, fairness, yahda,yahda, yahda.

37. #37
    On January 9th, 2008 at 7:49 pm, brooklyn red said:

    Well, Obama does need to overcome his wimp image… maybe beating up some on Hillary will help. lol

    Can anyone imagine him trying to stand up to Putin?

38. #38
    On January 9th, 2008 at 8:03 pm, zorro said:

    No more tears! No more BS about Katrina!

39. #39
    On January 9th, 2008 at 8:13 pm, CC said:

    Obama’s speech to solve all our problems and the world’s in general, which makes Matthews and other libs weep. (This is my version of course, which is only a very slight variation of Obama’s).

    “We will join hands and march across the snow-capped mountains, the prairies and deserts. From sea to shining sea. We will increase in numbers on our way. We will heal. We will weep with happiness. We will heal. We will …”

    Matthews: “the best speech he ever heard?” Go to Martin Luther King, o weepy one.

    What did Obama actually say? Please post here if anybody knows.

40. #40
    On January 9th, 2008 at 9:34 pm, beenthere said:

    Is America turning into a nation of cry babies? This blubbery rubbish has gone on long enough.

    The Seventies called — they want their sensitivity back.

    And in answer to the question posed above: none of these clowns are a match for Putin, or Mad Dr. A, or any of a myriad of lunatic enemies this country has out there. For heaven’s sake, when are these people going to turn off the waterworks and become adults?

    I think we need to scrap the entire slate for both parties and start over. This is so gay (I hope I can say that, but I won’t cry about it if I can’t).

41. #41
    On January 9th, 2008 at 9:46 pm, almeehan said:

    Wellesly’s wonder woman has done it again. Think how great a president she would make if she can control her tear ducts? Or the quiver muscle in the lower jaw? Not only that she’s able to levitate a lamp and project it in the direction of her husband or staffers who cross this sensitive, seductive, shillyshalier.

42. #42
    On January 9th, 2008 at 10:27 pm, huggybear said:

    CS @33-

    Here’s the deal: you know how you guys like to invoke Bush Derangement Syndrome when someone on the left attacks Bush, as though there’s no rational reason whatsoever to dislike him? Well, when someone on the right attacks the Clintons repeatedly, it comes across like…. you guessed it – Clinton Derangement Syndrome!

    Simply put – you allow them to perpetuate the idea that people hate them just for being who they are, not what they do, and that Hillary’s paranoid delusions of a “right wing conspiracy” have some grounding in reality. We all know this is complete BS. But it’s a big plus for them, and a giant minus for the entire country, as far as I’m concerned.

    Well here’s hoping we can sweep them off the national stage in ’08! I think we might actually pull it off! GO ANYONE-BUT-HILLARY!

43. #43
    On January 9th, 2008 at 10:30 pm, RetFireman said:

    EXACTLY!!!! As these wimpy little cry-babies continue to have this cavalcade of tears across the television sets and the Internet, the world leaders are watching and thinking to themselves, “WTF??? This is the country that we are looking to for our salvation when the Islamic Jihadists come to cut off the heads of our people and subjugate our women and turn our cities into bastions of Shri’ah Law? These are the ‘leaders’ that will take it to the enemies of freedom and liberty?” While the Islamic leaders, the Ghadans, and the Zawahiri’s and the Bin Ladens and the wannabe’s in training, and all the little cell leaders are watching what is happening in this country very very closely, thinking to themselves that they have indeed won. They are thinking that they have taken the victory clean from our hands, stolen it from us right when they were on the ropes much the same as Ho Chi Minh did when he told the delegates that he did not like the table at which the talks were to be held. They are laughing at these tears. they are dancing in the blood of those they behead, rubbing it on their bodies, dancing around the rooms with the heads they just decapitated in their hands, chanting and singing, showing no emotion or only bravado…and the would be leaders of this supposed “Super Power”, the country that is “Standing Up To Islamic Terrorism”, that “has Terrorism on the Run” are crying and weeping like little babies every time they turn on the television.

    And they are PROUD of their tears, because it shows how tender and understanding and…well whatever it is it supposedly shows, while once again, the Democrats continue to give our enemies more ammunition, more will, and more reason to kill our men and women serving in this war.

    Congrats Libs. You guys never miss an opportunity to kill our soldiers and embarrass this Nation on the World Stage.

44. #44
    On January 9th, 2008 at 11:07 pm, countrybumpkin said:

    I was starting to hope that our 40 years, ’68-’08, of wandering in the wilderness led by the Woodstock Generation was at an end.
    The end of “Make love, not war” and the Trinity “Sex,Drugs and Rock and Roll” would no longer be heard.
    I’d hoped that the nation would be in the hands of adults once again.
    Must I still wait?

45. #45
    On January 9th, 2008 at 11:45 pm, scooter56 said:

    On January 9th, 2008 at 7:28 pm, RetFireman said:#35
    Tears get you nowhere. Reagan did not win by crying every time someone hurt his feelings.

    From tonites Glenn Beck Show:
    Michael Reagan “But let me tell you something. You know, let me look at and talk to you about Hillary Clinton from the other side. You`ve got to understand, I`ve been down this road. Nobody else in this room has been down the same road I`ve been in going to campaigns, losing them in `76, winning them in 1980, in 1984. And the pressure that`s put on you. Eighteen-hour days, door-knock campaigning.

    She`s worked her whole life to be president of the United States of America. And on that day, the pollsters were also telling her, she was going to lose the next day in New Hampshire. Did she well up? Absolutely she did. It was the right question at the right time. I don`t think it was phony, because I`ve seen the Reagan family cry, too, when we`re about ready to lose.

46. #46
    On January 10th, 2008 at 12:34 am, RetFireman said:

    Did you guys hear something?