Ok done….

I don’t care about voting records, quite frankly; the Presidency isn’t a legislative job, it’s an executive job, which is why senatorial candidates should be the last ones in line for the job unless they have prior experience before the senate of relevent experience for the job of President. We’re hiring a candidate for a job, and I don’t care if his resume says he spend 5 years on the high school chess club, I want to see what he’s accomplished in tangible ways.

Now, we’ll try this again slowy and carefully shall we, and if you don’t want to respond directly to the question fine, but then don’t respond at all because nobody needs the bullsh*t and the question wasn’t posed as a bullsh*t magnet, thanks, so respect the rules of the game:

Find me one candidate and cite his or her record of only manifest, tangible accomplishment and compare it to Rudy Giuliani’s. I’ll be fair and open minded. Always. I want to vote for the best candidate also. Convince me and you win. I’ll change my vote. Promise. Now go at it squarely or – pardon my own straight-talk express – shut the f*** up; this country is in a critical time and there is no room for idealistic posturing, wishful thinking on what the next president – an executive job - can do and bullsh*t/spin. Fair? Fair.

Remember, respect the rules of the posed question. Now be my quest. Have at it.

You can keep things honest by looking at his record for yourself. It ain’t cute, not one bit.

You can also look up the voting records of Thompson and Hunter. Much cuter than Rudy’s, in my opinion of course.

I can’t find anyone running with more manifestly tangible accomplishments as a liberal than Rudy, unless it’s Huckabee.

Since you got cute, I’ll repeat the question directly, and keep it straight and honest, okay?

Find a single candidate – just one – drop that candidate’s rhetorical posturing and give us his record of manifest tangible accomplishment, things you can see – not just talk; no citing that candidate saying rhetorical postures such as “working for” this and “I’ve always supported that”. Stick to the record of tangible accomplishment and put him or her up against Rudy.

I’m looking forward to your serious, no-kidding answer, since experience comes first – anyone can talk a good game.

I can’t find anyone running with more manifestly tangible accomplishments as a liberal than Rudy, unless it’s Huckabee.

BTW, what is the deal with Mr.Tough on Crime and Bernard Kerik?

Yes, he has issues on a couple of conservative issues, opposing abortion ethically for instance, without demanding to outlaw it, but what amazes me is how his record as an executive leader appropriate to the President doesn’t get more play among conservatives. He presided over the 3rd largest economy in the US (NYC is more than just “a city”), much than that of Mass or Arakansas, continually lowered taxes (in Liberal NY) and wound up with a budgetary surplus while turning the city’s blighted areas around physically. That’s an almost miraculous combination of circumstances and accomplishment. Don’t think so? Well, then answer this: who else that you can think of who has done something of that magnitude? He prosecuted like mad much to the anger of the NYC media. Drove the mafia out of decades-old strongholds – something no one else wanted to tangle with (need a guy to get tough with Iran?) He used clever rules and regulations to start small and eventually drive virtually all the the crazies off the street and get rid of the drug-infested and disease-spreading (and immoral) blight that were the porno-houses, again in constant defiance of the media which continually villified him for his “assult against the first amendment ( a guy who doesn’t bow to media pressure – hugely important), which seems to be how he’s palnning to go after illegal immigration: start small by immediately deporting the criminals and move forward from there (to those who have followed him continually that’s a pattern he’s used his entire career, and, unfortuanately for campaigning, a plan that is much more difficult to put into practice if you advertise your full intentions in advance)

I’ve posed the question now a few times on this board: find a single candidate – just one – drop that candidate’s rhetorical posturing and give us his record of manifest tangible accomplishment, things you can see – not just talk; no citing that candidate saying rhetorical postures such as “working for” this and “I’ve always supported that”. Stick to the record of tangible accomplishment and put him or her up against Rudy. No one has done it, and in my opinion, no one can. If you can find me someone running with a better record of tangible accomplishment, I’ll change my vote. That’s a promise. For real.

1968/while Hippies were tearing up American values, this was in the MidEast!!! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eKmwj29zH_8

There I prayed for him and all the other’s too.

Giuliani is a gun grabber, a liberal who has the backing of every pro abortion group, homosexual group and a large percentage of media types.
He has had more wives than most people have had dogs, a real dependable family values type is Ol Rudy.

Yeah, yeah, sure, sure, he did 9/11 real good. Why the man had so much foresight he put the city’s command center in the largest target for attack. You know, the one that had been bombed before, the supposed symbol of America’s wealth and power. Real stroke of brilliant leadership there.

I suppose next he will march in a gay pride parade…wait…did that already. Maybe he will remove hand guns from the city so only criminals will…nope, did that too. Ahh… I know, he can pretend that he is Uncle Milty…darn, is there no limit to his accomplishments?

I guess there is nothing left for Rudy to accomplish, except be president.

If anyone wants more info on Rudy’s “accomplishments” then have a look here

Rudy: “I’m asking for your prayers”

He’s going to need a lot more than just prayers.

If you want government to move further away from the people, have the nomination process start in a larger state. I think it is dumb to have all the primaries on the same day (Feb 5.) as I think every state should have its own day. If you did one primary every three days, you could be finished by April if you started in January.

Each state should be a separate battlefield, and the small states should start because money doesn’t matter so much in smaller states. MESSAGE MATTERS in small states. If you have a good message that resonates, you will do good.

And I really hope that the media figures out that polling ‘evangelical’ people is about the same as polling ‘American’ people. It is not descriptive and does not tell you anything.