Did You Know...

   

Hey, NYT: 99.98 percent of all discharged Iraq and Afghanistan vets have not committed or been charged with homicide.

Share
By Michelle Malkin  •  January 15, 2008 06:08 AM

John J. Dilulio Jr. busts the NYT’s wacko-vet myth, which the paper peddled in a Sunday story purporting to show that a disproportionate number of veterans were committing homicide. Writes Dilulio:

The Times “found 121 cases in which veterans of Iraq and Afghanistan committed a killing in this country, or were charged with one, after their return from war.” All but one case involved male veterans. They speculated that their research “most likely uncovered only the minimum number of such cases, given that not all killings” were “reported publicly or in detail,” and because “it was often not possible to determine the deployment history of other service members arrested on homicide charges.”

…The Veterans of Foreign Wars (VFW) and other veterans’ advocacy groups are absolutely correct that not merely “many” but the vast majority of veterans not only remain completely law-abiding but go on to lead stable and productive personal, professional, and civic lives. Assuming 121 homicide cases in relation to 749,932 total discharges through 2007, 99.98 percent of all discharged Iraq and Afghanistan veterans have not committed or been charged with homicide.

And assuming 121 cases and 749,932 total discharges, the homicide offending rate for the discharged veterans would be 16.1 per 100,000. The U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) has demographic data aplenty on homicide offending rates. For instance, in 2005, for white males aged 18-24, the rate was about 20 per 100,000. The Times opined that 121 was the “minimum” number, even as it counted veterans charged but not convicted with veterans tried and found guilty. Doubling the number to 242 would double the rate to 32.2 per 100,000.

Such crude but contextualizing calculations aside, the right question to ask is whether the veterans, other things being equal (controlling for age, race, gender,
education, income, prior criminal history, and other variables), offend at rates that are significantly different from otherwise comparable groups (including groups that have an extreme PTSD incidence). Without doing the relevant statistical (multiple-regression) analyses with all the requisite empirical data, it is impossible to say.

But that wouldn’t fit the standard NYT narrative, would it?

***

More here and here.

blog comments powered by Disqus
~ For the latest breaking news, be sure to join Michelle's Email List:
Posted in: New York Times

Nothing on Terry Bean

December 3, 2014 07:27 AM by Michelle Malkin

The New York Times’ war on gun-owning rape victims

October 31, 2014 08:28 AM by Michelle Malkin

New York Times Magazine makes Hillary a planet

January 23, 2014 01:59 PM by Doug Powers

hillaryhead

What the…?

Another: WaPo report contradicts NYT ‘no terrorist group connection to Benghazi attack’ story

January 8, 2014 12:31 PM by Doug Powers

hillary

Difference

Dueling Headlines; ‘Al Qaeda, other terror orgs not involved in Benghazi attack’ edition

January 5, 2014 04:00 PM by Doug Powers

hillaryalqaeda

Conflicting stories


Categories: Al Qaeda, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Media Bias, New York Times

Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook