Hey, NYT: 99.98 percent of all discharged Iraq and Afghanistan vets have not committed or been charged with homicide.
The Times “found 121 cases in which veterans of Iraq and Afghanistan committed a killing in this country, or were charged with one, after their return from war.” All but one case involved male veterans. They speculated that their research “most likely uncovered only the minimum number of such cases, given that not all killings” were “reported publicly or in detail,” and because “it was often not possible to determine the deployment history of other service members arrested on homicide charges.”
…The Veterans of Foreign Wars (VFW) and other veterans’ advocacy groups are absolutely correct that not merely “many” but the vast majority of veterans not only remain completely law-abiding but go on to lead stable and productive personal, professional, and civic lives. Assuming 121 homicide cases in relation to 749,932 total discharges through 2007, 99.98 percent of all discharged Iraq and Afghanistan veterans have not committed or been charged with homicide.
And assuming 121 cases and 749,932 total discharges, the homicide offending rate for the discharged veterans would be 16.1 per 100,000. The U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) has demographic data aplenty on homicide offending rates. For instance, in 2005, for white males aged 18-24, the rate was about 20 per 100,000. The Times opined that 121 was the “minimum” number, even as it counted veterans charged but not convicted with veterans tried and found guilty. Doubling the number to 242 would double the rate to 32.2 per 100,000.
Such crude but contextualizing calculations aside, the right question to ask is whether the veterans, other things being equal (controlling for age, race, gender,
education, income, prior criminal history, and other variables), offend at rates that are significantly different from otherwise comparable groups (including groups that have an extreme PTSD incidence). Without doing the relevant statistical (multiple-regression) analyses with all the requisite empirical data, it is impossible to say.
But that wouldn’t fit the standard NYT narrative, would it?
***blog comments powered by Disqus
December 7, 2012 11:14 AM by Michelle Malkin
January 3, 2013 11:21 AM by Doug Powers
Suggested first question from VP debate moderator: Joe, can you ask Barack if he had a good time at my wedding?
October 10, 2012 11:41 AM by Doug Powers
April 26, 2013 01:53 PM by Doug Powers
July 11, 2012 01:16 AM by Michelle Malkin
Daily Caller» Bret Baier: Justice Department targeted James Rosen’s parents as well
Daily Caller» Gowdy: ‘Finally … The New York Times figured out how to spell Benghazi’ [VIDEO]
Daily Caller» Climate change caused early humans to flourish
Green Room» Howard Dean: “Benghazi is a laughable joke”
Gay Patriot» Let’s Help The Dogs of Oklahoma City!
Green Room» Time for a team huddle: Lefty bloggers/journos head to the White House
Gay Patriot» Clint Eastwood Vindicated!
Green Room» Re: Team huddle (AKA wagon-circling)