See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments

1. #1
   On January 15th, 2008 at 6:20 pm, John Ansell said:

   I still like Newt’s Fed Ex plan the best.

2. #2
   On January 15th, 2008 at 6:22 pm, graysonret said:

   Very familiar. A whole lot of talk. Nothing will get done.

3. #3
   On January 15th, 2008 at 6:25 pm, coffee said:

   Color me jaded, but that needs parsing…

   I say we ought to put a hiatus on people who come here and give them permits if they come from countries that sponsor and harbor terrorists.

   That really means open the southern border wider to any and all comers since we don’t consider them terrorists.

   My take is that the US government can’t tell the difference between someone from “countries that sponsor and harbor terrorists” when they attempt to look like those from countries to our south.

   That zebra hasn’t changed his strips.

4. #4
   On January 15th, 2008 at 6:26 pm, coffee said:

   strips -> stripes.

5. #5
   On January 15th, 2008 at 6:26 pm, Lifeofthemind said:

   The candidates have to keep coupling the call for enforcement and border security with a parallel call for welcoming legal immigrants who have the skills and drive that thrive in America. We need to keep the image that represents us to the public as one of high achieving immigrants and descendants of immigrants.

6. #6
   On January 15th, 2008 at 6:27 pm, John Ansell said:

   Is MS 13 a terrorist organization? If not, they should be.

7. #7
   On January 15th, 2008 at 6:27 pm, SHoward said:

   Sounds like maybe he had a staffer read your excellent tome and give him the bullet points, then he liked them and slid them into a speach hoping no one would notice where they may have come from.

   Just sayin…..

8. #8
   On January 15th, 2008 at 6:37 pm, right_on said:

   Unless they are coming here in some official capacity, NO ONE from an ISLAMIC country should be allowed into our country until they are vetted completely, show cause to be here, and are video-taped condemning anti-American fatwas from radical Islamic Imams, and/or leaders. No exceptions!

   Since “we” are such a vile, corrupt country, I don’t think they need to expose themselves to our depravity…

9. #9
   On January 15th, 2008 at 6:38 pm, CarpiJugulum said:

   I interpret the candidates stance on ILEGALS as follows.

   We need to close and secure the boarder. Yet we will keep it open and not slow the invasion from Mexico and other Latin American countries if it might offend them.

10. #10
    On January 15th, 2008 at 6:42 pm, a crapweasel said:

    That’s pretty funny considering how Gomer thinks there’s still an INS.

11. #11
    On January 15th, 2008 at 6:45 pm, gandolphxx said:

    Given the crimes and theft by our southern invaders I sure consider them terrorists – i bet the blacks in LA think the MS13 invaders are terrorizing as they are getting killed.

12. #12
    On January 15th, 2008 at 6:48 pm, J S Ragman said:

    The problem hasn’t been with state sponsors of terrorism. It has been with our “alleged” allies, the Egyptians, who receive a huge chunk of military aid annually, compliments of Jimmah Carter, and the Saudis.

    And even though a large number of jihadis have come here legally, they have overstayed their visas and then dropped out of sight, because of sanctuary policies that did not allow any state or local authority to check their immigration status with a federal authority. All of this fertilizer compliments of the ACLU, cloaked under privacy issues.

    Now there are legal challenges to the NSA listening into overseas phonecalls from known jihadis, also cloaked under privacy issues. Am I the only one that feels as though we’re fighting terror with one hand tied behind our backs? For the record, the NSA can listen in on any and all of my phone conversations. I’ve got nothing to hide.

    /rant off.

13. #13
    On January 15th, 2008 at 7:06 pm, zorro said:

    The next ya know, the Huckster will photoshop the cover of your book “Invasion” with his name appearing in place of yours!

    He is the ultimate featherweight. I can’t believe he has the support he appears to have.

14. #14
    On January 15th, 2008 at 7:14 pm, Babs said:

    Your mention of “Saudi Pilot Training” put me in mind of something my son who is in Navy flight training in Pensacola told me about a year ago.
    There is an event Navy wide known as dining in (or out) I always get confused… where everyone shows up in their most formal uniforms and proceeds to have a rolicking good time. “Grog” is liberally distributed and things really go crazy! Last year, two officers from KSA sat at my son’s table.
    They were not amused with the antics, which is putting it mildly…

15. #15
    On January 15th, 2008 at 7:14 pm, meatpieandtatters said:

    Must we suffer this insipid candidate?

16. #16
    On January 15th, 2008 at 7:31 pm, genso said:

    #8 right_on

    Right on!

17. #17
    On January 15th, 2008 at 7:32 pm, mnmike said:

    Ah shucks huck, aren’t we all God’s little children. Or, jus you.

18. #18
    On January 15th, 2008 at 7:45 pm, Lifeofthemind said:

    Babs There is an event Navy wide known as dining in (or out) I always get confused…

    Dining In = Stag
    Dining Out = Spouses

    Guess which is more fun?

    The whole thing is a blast, very formal, cummerbunds, parade the beef, Mr. Vice recording fines for violations of the Rules of the Mess. It’s a party! Hope this tradition lasts a long time.

19. #19
    On January 15th, 2008 at 8:25 pm, DesertLover said:

    Hmmmm … was that Oh Yeah quote close enough to be plagiarism?

20. #20
    On January 15th, 2008 at 9:04 pm, Boomer said:

    Babs
    The Air Force conducts the ritual too and they are a hoot. The wild ones were the combat dining-in where we wore flight suits with cummerbunds, white shirts, and bow ties. The grog bowels are normally a pair of commodes and one is filled with a wicked mixture of alcoholic beverages while the other is filled with non-alcoholic punch for those who are designated drivers.

    It appears the Huckster has suddenly seen the light and joined the ranks of the born again border enforcers. Everybody get out the hip waders it is starting to get awfully deep out there.

21. #21
    On January 15th, 2008 at 9:27 pm, nbarry said:

    I noticed in today’s Newsday that Jim Pinkerton has taken leave of his column to work on Huckabee’s campaign. Pinkerton has taken as hard a line on illegal immigration as Michelle.

22. #22
    On January 15th, 2008 at 9:57 pm, uhangtight said:

    huck’s position on immigration in November was, does anyone remember? providing financial breaks to illegals. after his win in Iowa he quickly plagarized National Review’s Nine Point plan printed a year and a half or two ago. With just two slightly different nuances. Now he is copying another conservative mag. Does this guy have an original thought? No, he is the huckster.

    his fruit is rotten. hopefully, this shyster will be gone in a few weeks and he can go back to the rock he crawled out from under there in Arkansas.

    hopefully, now too, the McPain will be gone.

23. #23
    On January 15th, 2008 at 10:38 pm, jenmom said:

    I still just don’t see what is so difficult about enforcing the laws we have and doing what we must to protect and secure our borders from illegals.

24. #24
    On January 17th, 2008 at 11:19 am, max said:

    Michelle you should run for office…