Former congressman indicted as part of terror fund-raising ring

By Michelle Malkin  •  January 16, 2008 02:42 PM

1mark.jpg

Update: He’s Debbie Schlussel’s former boss.

Update: Oops. There goes the book! (Hat tip – Kevin)

Former Michigan congressman Mark Siljander will recount his spiritual journey in which he “discovered commonalities between Islam and Christianity” in Reconcilable Differences: The True Story of the Quest to Bridge the Divide Between Islam and Christianity, slated for a summer 2008 publication by HarperSanFrancisco. Siljander also served as US ambassador to the United Nations.

Update: Here you go…he’s a Republican from Michigan who shilled for the Islamic American Relief Agency…

A former congressman and delegate to the United Nations was indicted Wednesday as part of a terrorist fundraising ring that allegedly sent more than $130,000 to an al-Qaida and Taliban supporter who has threatened U.S. and international troops in Afghanistan.

The former Republican congressman from Michigan, Mark Deli Siljander, was charged with money laundering, conspiracy and obstructing justice for allegedly lying about lobbying senators on behalf of an Islamic charity that authorities said was secretly sending funds to terrorists.

Bastard.

Background on the “charity” via the Kansas City Star:

A Kansas City grand jury has charged a defunct charity in Columbia with sending money to an Afghan terrorist with ties to al Qaida and the Taliban.

The indictment, returned early this afternoon, also accuses a former U.S. congressman of money laundering, conspiracy and obstruction of justice.

The new charges were added to an earlier indictment that charged the Islamic American Relief Agency and several of its officers with sending money to Iraq during Saddam Hussein’s reign in violation of U.S. sanctions.

According to the new charges, the charity sent about $130,000 in 2003 and 2004 to bank accounts in Pakistan, allegedly for an orphanage housed in buildings owned by Glubuddin Hekmatyar, an Afghan mujahideen leader.

The U.S. government designated Hekmatyar as a global terrorist in February 2003 because of his links to al Qaida and the Taliban.

The new charges also accuse Mark Deli Siljander, who represented Michigan in Congress from 1981-1987, of receiving $50,000 from the charity in 2004. Siljander, who operates a Washington D.C. public relations firm, was hired to lobby Congress to remove the charity from a U.S. Senate Finance Committee list of non-profit organizations suspected of being involved in supporting international terrorism.

Lawhawk is tracking down the 42-count indictment.

***
That’s what an AP alert is reporting at the moment. No word on the identity.

Who is it?

And bets on which political party and which state the former congressman belongs to? Keep in mind–both parties have flirted with jihadis.

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Hot Air » Blog Archive » Former GOP congressman indicted for aiding terrorism
  2. The Amboy Times
  3. The Jawa Report
  4. Suitably Flip
  5. Macsmind
  6. World Concerns at The Everlasting Phelps
  7. Former Congressman indicted on terrorist fundraising charges | Infidels Are Cool
  8. JammieWearingFool
  9. Balloon Juice
  10. Right Voices » Blog Archive » Former Michigan Congressman, And Lobbyist/Loyalist for Rev. Moon, Now Indicted As Shill for “Islamic charity”
  11. JABbering Stooge :: Another Stereotype Bites the Dust :: January :: 2008
  12. Former Republican Congressman Accused of Aiding Islamic Terrorists, and Receiving $50K in Return
  13. Radio Left
  14. Marginalized Action Dinosaur » Support diversity.
  15. EX-CONGRESSMAN INDICTED « Texas Hold ‘Em Blogger

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #219566
    On January 16th, 2008 at 2:46 pm, Barry F. said:

    Who is it?

    Anyone taking bets on names and party affiliation? ;-)

  2. #219567
    On January 16th, 2008 at 2:47 pm, Dave from Flint said:

    Whoever it is……..
    I wasn’t there.
    Nobody saw me
    You can’t prove a thing
    It’s all a right wing plot
    That’s my story & I’m sticking to it.

  3. #219568
    On January 16th, 2008 at 2:47 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    100% Dem…

  4. #219571
    On January 16th, 2008 at 2:48 pm, Michelle Malkin said:

    Don’t be so sure.

  5. #219572
    On January 16th, 2008 at 2:48 pm, Papa Louie said:

    Because they don’t mention the party in the alert, it must be the Democrat party.

  6. #219574
    On January 16th, 2008 at 2:48 pm, Barry F. said:

    WASHINGTON (AP) – A former congressman and delegate to the United Nations has been indicted as part of a terrorist fundraising ring.

    What an AP alert. You would think they could muster more than one sentence.

  7. #219575
    On January 16th, 2008 at 2:49 pm, MrC_5150 said:

    Mark Deli Siljander

  8. #219576
    On January 16th, 2008 at 2:49 pm, cpodug said:

    Check in the freezer!

  9. #219577
    On January 16th, 2008 at 2:49 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    Now that I think about it, if it is a Democrat, we probably won’t hear about it.

  10. #219579
    On January 16th, 2008 at 2:51 pm, The Raging Republican said:

    Who is it?

    Fund raising indictment….. I’ll give you three guesses as to who will be associated with this. But she will deny, deny, deny, and the “press” will ignore, ignore, ignore.

  11. #219581
    On January 16th, 2008 at 2:52 pm, Michelle Malkin said:

    See the update. It’s Michigan Republican Mark Deli Siljander.

  12. #219582
    On January 16th, 2008 at 2:52 pm, Barry F. said:

    Mark Deli Siljander

    Where did you get that, MrC_5150?

    He is a former Republican congressman from Illinois. Did you find an article somewhere implicating him?

  13. #219583
    On January 16th, 2008 at 2:53 pm, MrC_5150 said:
  14. #219584
    On January 16th, 2008 at 2:53 pm, uhangtight said:

    they name the congressman, but not the delegate to the UN.

    Surely, it is NOT Bolton? So maybe it is the one that they (the Dems) allowed in? Maybe why they were so adamant about fighting Bolton’s nomination?

    I give up, who?

  15. #219585
    On January 16th, 2008 at 2:54 pm, Barry F. said:

    See the update. It’s Michigan Republican Mark Deli Siljander.

    Ahhh! Got it! ;-)

    Bastard.

    I’m with you, Michelle. He’s a pretty worthless individual. He deserves the worst he can get from it, regardless of party affiliation, period!

  16. #219586
    On January 16th, 2008 at 2:55 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    OK, never heard of him, but Michigan makes sense. I’m sure now the NYT and the rest of the MSM (now that it’s a Republican) will be hyperventilating on this one ig time. As I said previously, if it was a Dem, it would probably be a footnote on page 48.

  17. #219587
    On January 16th, 2008 at 2:55 pm, 30 pcs of silver said:

    From Wikipedia…

    Siljander takes an especial interest in conflict resolution, particularly in Islamic countries, and in recent years has tried to publicize the common ground between Christianity and Islam, particularly in the Koran’s portrayal of Jesus. This is a turnaround from a previous position where he objected to the Koran being read at a prayer breakfast. He is widely traveled, having visited at least four continents, and is also one of the few American politicians to have visited Libya in recent years.

    On January 16, 2008 Siljander was indicted for his role in a terrorist fundraising ring that allegedly sent more than $130,000 to the Taliban and Al-Qaeda.[1]

    Sound the alarm.

  18. #219589
    On January 16th, 2008 at 2:55 pm, Barry F. said:

    they name the congressman, but not the delegate to the UN.

    Siljander was both a former-congressman and delegate to the UN, I believe, uhangtight.

  19. #219590
    On January 16th, 2008 at 2:55 pm, John Ansell said:

    What a complete loser. What would Washington do with traitors?

  20. #219593
    On January 16th, 2008 at 2:56 pm, nraendowment said:

    When are we finally going to see one of these lowlifes tried on treason charges? What will it take?

  21. #219595
    On January 16th, 2008 at 2:57 pm, Cadman said:

    Wow, suprised they didn’t wait until a month before presidential election to announce it.

    From Michigan….well go figure, a state who elects Granholm (Gov) and Kilpatrick (Detroit Mayor) for second terms.

  22. #219598
    On January 16th, 2008 at 2:58 pm, Eclectic said:

    How come they don’t hang traitors anymore??? That’s what I call securing the country.

  23. #219599
    On January 16th, 2008 at 2:58 pm, MrC_5150 said:

    On January 16th, 2008 at 2:52 pm, Michelle Malkin said:

    See the update. It’s Michigan Republican Mark Deli Siljander.

    You’re welcome.

  24. #219600
    On January 16th, 2008 at 2:59 pm, josetheguerilla said:

    They need to make an example out of this bastard and try him for treason!!!!!

  25. #219601
    On January 16th, 2008 at 3:00 pm, Vince said:

    It’s the money. It’s always about the money. Wonder what was in it for him?!

  26. #219602
    On January 16th, 2008 at 3:01 pm, Speakup said:

    A former congressman and delegate to the United Nations was indicted Wednesday

    If true, this goes to the extreme power that the ideology of Islam exerts over the every day lives of Muslims that seem ordinary in every other way.

  27. #219605
    On January 16th, 2008 at 3:01 pm, ThackerAgency said:

    This basically underlines the need for the 2nd amendment. What with the jihadis in the pentagon throwing their weight around and the UN always plotting against American interests and now this congressman earning money from giving favors to our enemies, basically with a government like this, who needs enemy governments?

    Eventually we are going to have to use our 2nd amendment rights (if we have any left) against our government. If this is a government ‘for the people, of the people, and by the people’, the only question is who are the people that the government is for, of, and by? Apparently not the taxpayers.

  28. #219607
    On January 16th, 2008 at 3:01 pm, Barry F. said:

    It’s the money. It’s always about the money. Wonder what was in it for him?!

    Money.

  29. #219608
    On January 16th, 2008 at 3:01 pm, uhangtight said:

    here is his bio

  30. #219612
    On January 16th, 2008 at 3:03 pm, The Raging Republican said:

    What the deuce!

  31. #219613
    On January 16th, 2008 at 3:03 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    Wow, suprised they didn’t wait until a month before presidential election to announce it.

    Oh no, just you wait. They’re holding out on that. We’ll have plenty of October surprises. Especially if the Clinton machine is working on it.

  32. #219615
    On January 16th, 2008 at 3:03 pm, The Raging Republican said:

    Bastard.

    Nice choice of words…… The word ‘treason’ also comes to mind.

  33. #219619
    On January 16th, 2008 at 3:04 pm, Barry F. said:

    here is his bio

    He was a “radio commentator”? Does Al Jazeera have a radion network for whom he was working or something?

    Who in the U.S. had him on their line-up?

  34. #219620
    On January 16th, 2008 at 3:05 pm, meatpieandtatters said:

    Get over the party affiliation crap folks. There are unmitigated bums everywhere.

    Taint knows no bounds regardless if you’re conservative or liberal.

  35. #219621
    On January 16th, 2008 at 3:05 pm, Barry F. said:

    Bastard.

    Nice choice of words…… The word ‘treason’ also comes to mind.

    Okay. How’s about “Treasonous Bastard”?

  36. #219623
    On January 16th, 2008 at 3:07 pm, The Raging Republican said:

    “Don’t indite me bro!”

  37. #219627
    On January 16th, 2008 at 3:09 pm, Boomer said:

    On January 16th, 2008 at 2:59 pm, josetheguerilla said:
    They need to make an example out of this bastard and try him for treason!!!!!

    I’m with you josetheguerilla and give the low life lying crapweasel the ultimate penalty he deserves for betraying this country and those that risk their lives to defend it.

  38. #219628
    On January 16th, 2008 at 3:09 pm, Bob69 said:

    Obviously no worse that Hanoi Jane Fonda.

  39. #219633
    On January 16th, 2008 at 3:13 pm, Lan Astaslem said:

    Let’s put him in a burqa and give him a one-way ticket to the next Taliban convention. Or would that be going too easy on him?

  40. #219638
    On January 16th, 2008 at 3:15 pm, granite said:

    #27 On January 16th, 2008 at 3:01 pm, ThackerAgency said:

    “This basically underlines the need for the 2nd amendment. What with the jihadis in the pentagon throwing their weight around and the UN always plotting against American interests and now this congressman earning money from giving favors to our enemies, basically with a government like this, who needs enemy governments?

    Eventually we are going to have to use our 2nd amendment rights (if we have any left) against our government. If this is a government ‘for the people, of the people, and by the people’, the only question is who are the people that the government is for, of, and by? Apparently not the taxpayers.”

    Exactly.

    This dovetails with the discussion at yesterday’s “liberalnomics” thread.

    It seems that we might be approaching the time when:
    1-We REALLY might not be able to trust “our” government (i.e., more than just a general comment during conversation), and;
    2-Nontaxpayers may become the voting majority…what do you think might happen then?

  41. #219641
    On January 16th, 2008 at 3:17 pm, Blind_Mule said:

    To bad I was’nt picked for this one cause I would vote to have him shot.
    Oh yeah I forgot we just send them to prison for 10 year’s.

  42. #219645
    On January 16th, 2008 at 3:19 pm, Right is right said:

    Nothing less than firing squad, and not the human resources type.

  43. #219651
    On January 16th, 2008 at 3:22 pm, hatelibs said:

    He should and will pay a very high price. Useless garbage.

    I’m sorry but you have to know the Lame Stream Media will blast his party affiliation loud and clear. Funny how that is left out when a Democrap is in trouble but it’s mentioned quite often when it’s the other way around. But there’s no bias in the media.

  44. #219657
    On January 16th, 2008 at 3:26 pm, Jim M. said:

    Waterboard the bastard in boiling oil.

    10 years for “support of terrorism”? How about trying him for treason? It would seem that he has indeed committed treason for providing aid and comfort to the enemy in a time of war. He is being treated, however, with kid gloves. Perhaps his buddies in DC put in a good word.

  45. #219662
    On January 16th, 2008 at 3:27 pm, granite said:

    #43 On January 16th, 2008 at 3:22 pm, hatelibs said:

    “But there’s no bias in the media.”

    ‘Course there isn’t.

    What WERE you thinking?!

  46. #219668
    On January 16th, 2008 at 3:28 pm, Sunshein said:

    Sure he’s a former comgressman from Michigan, and which majority in Michigan do you think elected him to office? And, Obama did not run in the primary in Michigan most likely because he didn’t want everyone to see the degree of support coming from the same folks who elected Siljander. Pieces are coming together.

  47. #219669
    On January 16th, 2008 at 3:29 pm, Barry F. said:

    ‘Course there isn’t.

    What WERE you thinking?!

    ROFLMAO

  48. #219670
    On January 16th, 2008 at 3:31 pm, J S Ragman said:

    Here’s a suggestion. Should he be found guilty, I recommend he be sentenced to serve as a tackling dummy at the Marine Corps Basic School in Quantico.

  49. #219678
    On January 16th, 2008 at 3:34 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    Wow, Just WOW.

  50. #219688
    On January 16th, 2008 at 3:39 pm, Miss Ladybug said:

    Two things:

    1 ~ We need to see some people (like this guy) up on treason charges where the penalty is death.

    2 ~ After reading this and the thread about the Mexican lawmakers lobbying to have that AZ law repealed, I think we need a law (or enforce it if it already exists) to outlaw the ability of non-citizens to petition any lawmaker anywhere – federal, state or local…

  51. #219692
    On January 16th, 2008 at 3:41 pm, madchef said:

    If we send him to Gitmo the libs will protest ON his behalf. The Traitorous Scum.

  52. #219693
    On January 16th, 2008 at 3:42 pm, Miss Ladybug said:

    Sunshein~

    Then why did most all the other Dems withdraw from that meaningless primary, since the DNC stripped the state of all it’s delegates to the nominating convention. Sounds too tinfoil hat for me…

  53. #219698
    On January 16th, 2008 at 3:46 pm, madchef said:

    #50
    On January 16th, 2008 at 3:39 pm, Miss Ladybug said:
    Two things:

    1 ~ We need to see some people (like this guy) up on treason charges where the penalty is death.

    Use a firing squad and televise it.

  54. #219704
    On January 16th, 2008 at 3:48 pm, hatelibs said:

    Sorry gang, I forgot to use the “sarcasm” tag in mentioning no media bias.

    Then again, I know you knew I was being sarcastic and just using it to have some fun of your own.

  55. #219707
    On January 16th, 2008 at 3:50 pm, Barry F. said:

    Use a firing squad and televise it.

    There is something to be said for reducing the rate of recidivism with public executions, madchef. LOL

  56. #219708
    On January 16th, 2008 at 3:52 pm, JWS said:

    He deserves a fair trial and then a hanging in front of a firing squad.

  57. #219709
    On January 16th, 2008 at 3:54 pm, hatelibs said:

    He deserves the same fate a Bill Keller at the NY Slimes.

  58. #219710
    On January 16th, 2008 at 3:54 pm, Sunshein said:

    Well, Miss Ladybug, Sen. Clinton ran and did receive approbations from the MSM for the votes she received. Had Sen. Obama run, with his supporters there, he would have most likely won, regardless of whether it was a meaningless primary or not.

  59. #219711
    On January 16th, 2008 at 3:54 pm, Barry F. said:

    He deserves a fair trial and then a hanging in front of a firing squad.

    With a lethal injection in one arm and current running through a nice headpiece too? ;-)

  60. #219721
    On January 16th, 2008 at 4:04 pm, Miss Ladybug said:

    Sunshein~

    That still doesn’t answer why most all other Dem candidates also withdrew from that contest. I don’t want any of the Dems in office (they are all socialists), but I think you are seeing some conspiracy where there isn’t one…

  61. #219788
    On January 16th, 2008 at 4:47 pm, graysonret said:

    We don’t try people for treason anymore around here. It might offend someone. Nah, we just smack em on the hand, say “bad boy” and send him home…on probation, of course. Or, get him sentenced to 10-20 years, and let him out in 30 days…on good behavior.

  62. #219823
    On January 16th, 2008 at 5:05 pm, sunshinerbray said:

    My own list of “Commonalities between Islam and Christianity”…

    1. Christians and Muslims both have human DNA.
    2.
    3.
    4.
    5.

    Okay, that’s all I’ve got.

  63. #219839
    On January 16th, 2008 at 5:18 pm, Rusty said:

    Also, he endorsed Duncan Hunter for the presidency. Not saying he is Rep. Hunter’s responsibility, but surprising considering he’s held in such high esteem here.

  64. #219858
    On January 16th, 2008 at 5:53 pm, Peejz said:

    Siljander’s Reverend Moon connections

    How then to account for Siljander’s involvement in political fronts of the ever-controversial Rev. Moon? Siljander spoke at conferences sponsored by CAUSA, a Moon political unit, in 1985 and 1986. These meetings promote the Moon doctrine of “Godism” or “CAUSA ideology.”

    “Democracy arose out of the lack of absolute values, absolute power, and absolute being,” wrote top Moon evangelist Rev. Chung Hwan Kwak in 1983. “When there are no absolutes, the majority opinion is considered the best idea. Godism however, has not been the majority idea…Therefore through democratic elections, people have not selected God’s will, goodness, True Parents, or the Messiah. Our goal and purpose is to follow Godism.”

    The “True Parents,” according to Unification Church theology, are Rev. and Mrs. Moon. The Unification Church is the “True Family.” Moon himself desires the “subjugation of the American population and government,” and “an automatic theocracy to rule the world.”

    Siljander told the Times of Springfield, Virginia, that he returned his speaking fees when he found out that CAUSA was a Moon group. This knowledge did not, however, prevent his joining the national policy board of the American Freedom Coalition (AFC) in 1987. AFC is another Moon front, formed by the political marriage of CAUSA and Christian Voice. Christian Voice is a political network and lobbying group, on whose advisory board Siljander has also sat.

  65. #219877
    On January 16th, 2008 at 6:12 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    After reading this and the thread about the Mexican lawmakers lobbying to have that AZ law repealed, I think we need a law (or enforce it if it already exists) to outlaw the ability of non-citizens to petition any lawmaker anywhere – federal, state or local…

    Exactly Ladybug, but the piglets always want to make sure the sow has enough teats to go around. They’ll never shut off a source of funding.

  66. #219890
    On January 16th, 2008 at 6:41 pm, RetFireman said:

    Ever notice that “Islamic Charity” is always synonymous with “Islamic Terrorist”?

    Ever notice that when ou get invovled with Islam, you come out stinking of terrorism?

    Why is it, that no one ever comes away from dealing with Islam stinking of Moderation? Why is it, that they never come away stinking of Liberalism? Why would such a small “Miority Faction” of such a large religion hold such a large influence?

    Why, the mind boggles at these questions. And…why is it, every time I have repeatedly posed these and similar questions to the Liberal Peanut Gallery, they not only go unanswered, the Liberal Peanut Gallery clears out faster than a Tiajuana Whore House when the lights go on and the money and tequila run out?

    Yup…truly mind boggling…even here in Kentucky…

  67. #219892
    On January 16th, 2008 at 6:43 pm, zorro said:

    The traitor is a…

    Bastard.

    As Bryan said, throw the book at him. And I’ll add, make that literally.

  68. #219902
    On January 16th, 2008 at 7:07 pm, brooklyn red said:

    And the story breaks right after the primary… hmmmm.

  69. #219927
    On January 16th, 2008 at 7:45 pm, Peejz said:

    On January 16th, 2008 at 7:07 pm, brooklyn red said:

    What difference would it have made? 10 out of 10 Michigan residents wouldn’t have been able to tell you who he was yesterday…Now they know who he is!

  70. #219937
    On January 16th, 2008 at 7:59 pm, JohnHolliday said:

    Bag ‘em and tag ‘em, then dye ‘em and fry ‘em.

    Hope they hand him his balls in a bag.

  71. #219948
    On January 16th, 2008 at 8:18 pm, brooklyn red said:

    Peejz, I question the timing, but I guess you are right… it would have made no difference.

  72. #219955
    On January 16th, 2008 at 8:36 pm, beenthere said:

    Should Mr. Mark Deli Siljander be found guilty of treason in a time of war, he should be reminded on his hide that our imaginative ancestors knew what to do with traitors. Going medieval, or Mohammedan as might be more to his liking, on a white-male Republican should summon forth few protests and the execution could serve as a pointed warning to others.

    And before anyone complains about the prohibition against “cruel and unusual punishment,” let me state that drawing-and-quartering, as an example only, was hardly unusual in those days. Moreover, no-one pays any attention to what the Constitution says on any other matter these days, so why fret about that one?

  73. #219974
    On January 16th, 2008 at 9:14 pm, Peejz said:

    On January 16th, 2008 at 8:18 pm, brooklyn red said:

    I wasn’t being flip when I responded, I was being serious..I’d have questioned it had it come out as an October surprise…

  74. #219977
    On January 16th, 2008 at 9:22 pm, Peejz said:

    On January 16th, 2008 at 3:28 pm, Sunshein said:

    And, Obama did not run in the primary in Michigan most likely because he didn’t want everyone to see the degree of support coming from the same folks who elected Siljander. Pieces are coming together.

    I am sure that both Obama and Edwards would have loved to have run in MI, but they adhered to the rules of the DNC..big shocker that Sir Hillary didn’t..Michigan Democrats, led by the Governor, moved the primary up in violation of party rules. Michigan was given ample opportunity to go back to the “Super Tuesday” date but refused..DNC stripped the delegates, but rumor is that they will come back into play in the event of this race being in a tie situation..Candidates asked to skip Michigan, all agreed including Hillary, but then she changed her mind..

    So unless those are the pieces that are coming together for you, I would hope this makes it more clear..

  75. #219997
    On January 16th, 2008 at 10:24 pm, blues said:

    He’ll probably get sentenced to 2,000 hours of community service and forfeiture of his broadcast license(if there is such a thing).Sort of like that other traitorous bastard.

  76. #220046
    On January 17th, 2008 at 12:55 am, RetFireman said:

    Found guilty of treason? heck, he was just executing his First Ammendment Rights. Just put him in some Birkenstocks, give him a puppet and a sign and let him march with all the other supporters and apologists of the “Religion of Peace”, Republican or not. Why is what he doing and done any different that anything else any other Liberal or apologist or supporter of Islam doing or done, hmmm? Why is it different than what CAIR is doing or has done?

    Why are you guys being so Islamophobic?

  77. #220067
    On January 17th, 2008 at 3:01 am, umair01 said:

    What happened to ‘Innocent until proven guilty’? Shouldn’t we wait until he’s been convicted before hating him? He has no history of helping terrorists or working against U.S interests.

  78. #220114
    On January 17th, 2008 at 8:03 am, SpeakEasy said:

    I heard a comedian on Sirius Radio the other day remarking on the term “cruel and unusual punishment” that should apply here; If you shot all traitors, it wouldn’t be considered “unusual.”

  79. #220428
    On January 17th, 2008 at 1:07 pm, RetFireman said:

    Methinks my witty banter and comedy was a bit lost on Umair.

  80. #220769
    On January 17th, 2008 at 6:56 pm, corona said:

    “This card must be surrendered immediately upon termination of employment.”

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Homegrown jihad in Detroit: “America must fall”

October 29, 2009 07:49 AM by Michelle Malkin

70 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

Tinker Bell coopted by U.N. eco-zealots

October 27, 2009 10:55 AM by Michelle Malkin

71 Comments | 1 Trackback

President condemns jihadi recruiting in Minnesota

October 4, 2009 10:47 PM by Michelle Malkin

30 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

No, not The One.

Ho-hum: Just another illegal alien jihadi suspect

September 24, 2009 08:42 PM by Michelle Malkin

90 Comments | 7 Trackbacks

Still handling homeland security with a 9/10 attitude

September 23, 2009 09:44 AM by Michelle Malkin

42 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

“The deciding factor is overtime, not security.”

Where in the world is Moammar Gadhafi?

September 22, 2009 06:11 PM by Michelle Malkin

25 Comments | 0 Trackbacks


Categories: Homeland Security, United Nations



The Other McCain

» Paralysis by analysis

Legal Insurrection

» NY Times Names Names

HotAir GreenRoom