<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Democrats&#8217; judge-bribing sugar daddy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/16/the-democrats-judge-bribing-sugar-daddy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/16/the-democrats-judge-bribing-sugar-daddy/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 01:41:44 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: More about Joseph (&#8221;Joey&#8221;) Langston, part II</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/16/the-democrats-judge-bribing-sugar-daddy/comment-page-1/#comment-325722</link>
		<dc:creator>More about Joseph (&#8221;Joey&#8221;) Langston, part II</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 23:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/16/the-democrats-judge-bribing-sugar-daddy/#comment-325722</guid>
		<description>[...] or DAGA &#8212; have acknowledged any connection between the timing of the donations (&amp; welcome Michelle Malkin, David Rossmiller, YallPolitics [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] or DAGA &#8212; have acknowledged any connection between the timing of the donations (&amp; welcome Michelle Malkin, David Rossmiller, YallPolitics [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: birds</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/16/the-democrats-judge-bribing-sugar-daddy/comment-page-1/#comment-239092</link>
		<dc:creator>birds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 00:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/16/the-democrats-judge-bribing-sugar-daddy/#comment-239092</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;birds...&lt;/strong&gt;

respect for your notice!!!...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>birds&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>respect for your notice!!!&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry F.</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/16/the-democrats-judge-bribing-sugar-daddy/comment-page-1/#comment-220356</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry F.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 17:12:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/16/the-democrats-judge-bribing-sugar-daddy/#comment-220356</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;“If ever a time should come, when vain and aspiring men shall possess the highest seats in Government, our country will stand in need of its experienced patriots to prevent its ruin.” - Samuel Adams&lt;/blockquote&gt; 


Is it just me or is the repeated references to Samuel Adams making anyone else want a cold malted beverage?  It&#039;s 12 o&#039;clock here!  ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>“If ever a time should come, when vain and aspiring men shall possess the highest seats in Government, our country will stand in need of its experienced patriots to prevent its ruin.” &#8211; Samuel Adams</p></blockquote>
<p>Is it just me or is the repeated references to Samuel Adams making anyone else want a cold malted beverage?  It&#8217;s 12 o&#8217;clock here!  <img src='http://michellemalkin.cachefly.net/michellemalkin.com/wp/wp-content/themes/mm/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tipper</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/16/the-democrats-judge-bribing-sugar-daddy/comment-page-1/#comment-220351</link>
		<dc:creator>Tipper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 17:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/16/the-democrats-judge-bribing-sugar-daddy/#comment-220351</guid>
		<description>Ah, yes. This is connected to the Scruggs prosecution that so many lefty blogs glommed onto. They were certain Trent Lott retired because of this and started pixelating like crazy until one of the bright bulbs actually looked up the bad actors political donations and discovered natural the trial lawyers give tons to Democrats.

&lt;strong&gt;They also found Dickie Scruggs was scheduled to host a fundraiser for....drum roll please...Hillary!&lt;/strong&gt; - she canceled last week.

So, on the lefty blogs now? C R I C K E T S</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, yes. This is connected to the Scruggs prosecution that so many lefty blogs glommed onto. They were certain Trent Lott retired because of this and started pixelating like crazy until one of the bright bulbs actually looked up the bad actors political donations and discovered natural the trial lawyers give tons to Democrats.</p>
<p><strong>They also found Dickie Scruggs was scheduled to host a fundraiser for&#8230;.drum roll please&#8230;Hillary!</strong> &#8211; she canceled last week.</p>
<p>So, on the lefty blogs now? C R I C K E T S</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry F.</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/16/the-democrats-judge-bribing-sugar-daddy/comment-page-1/#comment-220350</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry F.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 17:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/16/the-democrats-judge-bribing-sugar-daddy/#comment-220350</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;IMO term limit’s should be imposed on Congress just like they have imposed them on the Presidency, no more than 12 years, for both Senetor’s and Congressmen.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

You are too generous, BlindMule.  I think 6 years is more than ample for both the Senate and the House.

If I recall correctly, the lower house was intended by the Founding Fathers to be comprised from the average citizenry and was set at two-year terms, so a greater number of the average Americans could have a say in their government.  And, if I am recalling correctly, we are far from that with all the lawyers, etc. that are seated there now, that do not hail from the intended class.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>IMO term limit’s should be imposed on Congress just like they have imposed them on the Presidency, no more than 12 years, for both Senetor’s and Congressmen.</p></blockquote>
<p>You are too generous, BlindMule.  I think 6 years is more than ample for both the Senate and the House.</p>
<p>If I recall correctly, the lower house was intended by the Founding Fathers to be comprised from the average citizenry and was set at two-year terms, so a greater number of the average Americans could have a say in their government.  And, if I am recalling correctly, we are far from that with all the lawyers, etc. that are seated there now, that do not hail from the intended class.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry F.</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/16/the-democrats-judge-bribing-sugar-daddy/comment-page-1/#comment-220345</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry F.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 17:05:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/16/the-democrats-judge-bribing-sugar-daddy/#comment-220345</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Term Limits will need a Constitutional Amendment, but we don’t have to depend on Congress to pass it. Campaign for it at the state level.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Larry,

That would carry an implication that state legislatures should consider the same for themselves, if they are going to push for it on the national level.  

Politicians, whether on the local, state or federal level, are into the self-preservation mode, when it comes to maintaining their power.  What are the odds of ever really pressing it through this way?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Term Limits will need a Constitutional Amendment, but we don’t have to depend on Congress to pass it. Campaign for it at the state level.</p></blockquote>
<p>Larry,</p>
<p>That would carry an implication that state legislatures should consider the same for themselves, if they are going to push for it on the national level.  </p>
<p>Politicians, whether on the local, state or federal level, are into the self-preservation mode, when it comes to maintaining their power.  What are the odds of ever really pressing it through this way?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blind_Mule</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/16/the-democrats-judge-bribing-sugar-daddy/comment-page-1/#comment-220263</link>
		<dc:creator>Blind_Mule</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:52:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/16/the-democrats-judge-bribing-sugar-daddy/#comment-220263</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;atxcowgirl said: 

“If ever a time should come, when vain and aspiring men shall possess the highest seats in Government, our country will stand in need of its experienced patriots to prevent its ruin.” - Samuel Adams &lt;/blockquote&gt;

I agree with everything you have said in this post. Congress and the White House has been taken over by Elitist&#039;s, I think it&#039;s high time that the ordinary working Joe be able to run for office and win. IMO term limit&#039;s should be imposed on Congress just like they have imposed them on the Presidency, no more than 12 years, for both Senetor&#039;s and Congressmen. if you cant&#039;t get the people&#039;s business done in that amount of time then you should&#039;nt be in office in the first place. I also don&#039;t think that there is one Senator or Congressman that is worth $160,000 per year, I think that should be cut in half to $80,000 and you should have to serve a full 12 before you can draw a pention. If you are caught and found guilty of any kind of corruption your office and pention are automatically striped away. Felon&#039;s like Alcee Hasting&#039;s should not be allowed to run or hold any City,County,State or Federal position not even a janitorial position.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>atxcowgirl said: </p>
<p>“If ever a time should come, when vain and aspiring men shall possess the highest seats in Government, our country will stand in need of its experienced patriots to prevent its ruin.” &#8211; Samuel Adams </p></blockquote>
<p>I agree with everything you have said in this post. Congress and the White House has been taken over by Elitist&#8217;s, I think it&#8217;s high time that the ordinary working Joe be able to run for office and win. IMO term limit&#8217;s should be imposed on Congress just like they have imposed them on the Presidency, no more than 12 years, for both Senetor&#8217;s and Congressmen. if you cant&#8217;t get the people&#8217;s business done in that amount of time then you should&#8217;nt be in office in the first place. I also don&#8217;t think that there is one Senator or Congressman that is worth $160,000 per year, I think that should be cut in half to $80,000 and you should have to serve a full 12 before you can draw a pention. If you are caught and found guilty of any kind of corruption your office and pention are automatically striped away. Felon&#8217;s like Alcee Hasting&#8217;s should not be allowed to run or hold any City,County,State or Federal position not even a janitorial position.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LarryD</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/16/the-democrats-judge-bribing-sugar-daddy/comment-page-1/#comment-220144</link>
		<dc:creator>LarryD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 13:56:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/16/the-democrats-judge-bribing-sugar-daddy/#comment-220144</guid>
		<description>Term Limits will need a Constitutional Amendment, but we don&#039;t have to depend on Congress to pass it.  Campaign for it at the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.articlev.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;state level&lt;/a&gt;.

Article V
&lt;blockquote&gt;... or, on the application of the legislatures of two thirds of the several states, shall call a convention for proposing amendments ...&lt;/blockquote&gt;

That was used to pressure Congress into passing the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.amendmentxvii.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;17th Amendment&lt;/a&gt;.

As several people have pointed out, voters usually like &lt;em&gt;their&lt;/em&gt; MoCs, but think poorly of Congress as a whole.  Convincing them to support a general reform is a lot easier than convincing them to replace their own Congresscritters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Term Limits will need a Constitutional Amendment, but we don&#8217;t have to depend on Congress to pass it.  Campaign for it at the <a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.articlev.html" rel="nofollow">state level</a>.</p>
<p>Article V</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8230; or, on the application of the legislatures of two thirds of the several states, shall call a convention for proposing amendments &#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p>That was used to pressure Congress into passing the <a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.amendmentxvii.html" rel="nofollow">17th Amendment</a>.</p>
<p>As several people have pointed out, voters usually like <em>their</em> MoCs, but think poorly of Congress as a whole.  Convincing them to support a general reform is a lot easier than convincing them to replace their own Congresscritters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: misterbee241</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/16/the-democrats-judge-bribing-sugar-daddy/comment-page-1/#comment-220140</link>
		<dc:creator>misterbee241</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 13:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/16/the-democrats-judge-bribing-sugar-daddy/#comment-220140</guid>
		<description>Term limits aren&#039;t going to happen.  We have to enforce our own term limits by voting against the professional politicians.  But then we&#039;d have to have an alternative to vote for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Term limits aren&#8217;t going to happen.  We have to enforce our own term limits by voting against the professional politicians.  But then we&#8217;d have to have an alternative to vote for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JoAnn in VA</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/16/the-democrats-judge-bribing-sugar-daddy/comment-page-1/#comment-220088</link>
		<dc:creator>JoAnn in VA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 10:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/16/the-democrats-judge-bribing-sugar-daddy/#comment-220088</guid>
		<description>Term limits.  But how can the averege Joe- or in my case, JoAnn- help get term limits for the House in the first place?  Once they are in they don&#039;t want to leave, and it seems they are the ones who have the power to create the term limits, not us.  Anyone have an idea?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Term limits.  But how can the averege Joe- or in my case, JoAnn- help get term limits for the House in the first place?  Once they are in they don&#8217;t want to leave, and it seems they are the ones who have the power to create the term limits, not us.  Anyone have an idea?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coldfront</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/16/the-democrats-judge-bribing-sugar-daddy/comment-page-1/#comment-219994</link>
		<dc:creator>coldfront</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 03:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/16/the-democrats-judge-bribing-sugar-daddy/#comment-219994</guid>
		<description>more
&lt;blockquote&gt;Birds of a feather…&lt;/blockquote&gt;
only these two are dancin&#039;!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a0lXTGurqSE&amp;eurl=http://littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>more</p>
<blockquote><p>Birds of a feather…</p></blockquote>
<p>only these two are dancin&#8217;!<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a0lXTGurqSE&amp;eurl=http://littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a0lXTGurqSE&amp;eurl=http://littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blues</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/16/the-democrats-judge-bribing-sugar-daddy/comment-page-1/#comment-219993</link>
		<dc:creator>blues</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 03:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/16/the-democrats-judge-bribing-sugar-daddy/#comment-219993</guid>
		<description>Two cycles-no incumbents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two cycles-no incumbents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MrScribbler</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/16/the-democrats-judge-bribing-sugar-daddy/comment-page-1/#comment-219961</link>
		<dc:creator>MrScribbler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 01:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/16/the-democrats-judge-bribing-sugar-daddy/#comment-219961</guid>
		<description>atxcowgirl -- we need 535 patriots in Congress, and right now we&#039;re not even close.

We need a patriot in the White House, too,  after almost 16 years of bought-and-paid-for failures, and the pickings are pretty slim.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>atxcowgirl &#8212; we need 535 patriots in Congress, and right now we&#8217;re not even close.</p>
<p>We need a patriot in the White House, too,  after almost 16 years of bought-and-paid-for failures, and the pickings are pretty slim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: atxcowgirl</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/16/the-democrats-judge-bribing-sugar-daddy/comment-page-1/#comment-219935</link>
		<dc:creator>atxcowgirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/16/the-democrats-judge-bribing-sugar-daddy/#comment-219935</guid>
		<description>I hope this is on topic. I heard about this on a local radio program.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://goooh.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Get Out Of Our House&lt;/a&gt;
GOOOH stands for &#039;Get Out of Our House&#039; and is pronounced like the word &#039;go&#039;. It is a NON-PARTISAN plan to evict the 435 career politicians in the U.S. House of Representatives and replace them with everyday Americans just like you.

&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;If ever a time should come, when vain and aspiring men shall possess the highest seats in Government, our country will stand in need of its experienced patriots to prevent its ruin.&quot;  - Samuel Adams &lt;/blockquote&gt;

It sounds interesting for anyone aspiring for public service and a change of the status quo.


We need a few patriots in the house.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope this is on topic. I heard about this on a local radio program.</p>
<p><a href="http://goooh.com/" rel="nofollow">Get Out Of Our House</a><br />
GOOOH stands for &#8216;Get Out of Our House&#8217; and is pronounced like the word &#8216;go&#8217;. It is a NON-PARTISAN plan to evict the 435 career politicians in the U.S. House of Representatives and replace them with everyday Americans just like you.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;If ever a time should come, when vain and aspiring men shall possess the highest seats in Government, our country will stand in need of its experienced patriots to prevent its ruin.&#8221;  &#8211; Samuel Adams </p></blockquote>
<p>It sounds interesting for anyone aspiring for public service and a change of the status quo.</p>
<p>We need a few patriots in the house.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2008 Presidential Election &#187; The Democrats’ judge-bribing sugar daddy</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/16/the-democrats-judge-bribing-sugar-daddy/comment-page-1/#comment-219933</link>
		<dc:creator>2008 Presidential Election &#187; The Democrats’ judge-bribing sugar daddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/16/the-democrats-judge-bribing-sugar-daddy/#comment-219933</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Michelle Malkin added an interesting post today on The Democrats&acirc; judge-bribing sugar daddyHere&#8217;s a small reading [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- NEW -->
