Floating cross alert!

By Michelle Malkin  •  January 18, 2008 12:09 PM

Behold: Hillary the Messiah!

1float004.jpg

***

Bonus video via RedLasso: Hillary playing the Wronged Woman on Tyra Banks…”How did you persevere during the darkest moment of your life?”

Posted in: Hillary Clinton

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #221164
    On January 18th, 2008 at 12:14 pm, meatpieandtatters said:

    Somebody was obviously trying to do an exorcism…

    I don’t think it took.

  2. #221169
    On January 18th, 2008 at 12:19 pm, meatpieandtatters said:

    Perhaps she’s trying to ward off the demon right-wing slime machine? (which is based on the Clinton’s well-proven 1st generation slime machine but which hasn’t quite achieved the same breadth and depth of effect)…

    :)

  3. #221171
    On January 18th, 2008 at 12:20 pm, dan708 said:

    LOL, meatpie!

    I’m surprised that the cross didn’t flip upside-down and turn black!

  4. #221172
    On January 18th, 2008 at 12:20 pm, John Ansell said:

    It’s a book shelf and you know it.

  5. #221174
    On January 18th, 2008 at 12:21 pm, meatpieandtatters said:

    Today’s media-contrived political effects overshadow what is true spirituality. Now all one needs to do is hold a bible, be photographed within a church and get an endorsement from some preacher, priest or other anointed-type. Yikes!

    :(

  6. #221176
    On January 18th, 2008 at 12:23 pm, meatpieandtatters said:

    Of course, we all know that the evil Reuters’ photo journalists are simply trying to “Huck” Hillary….

    :0

  7. #221177
    On January 18th, 2008 at 12:24 pm, TexasTiger said:

    Does she use the name Tyra because her head must be inflated to 35 psi?

    So Hillary prayed when Bill was cheating on her? I suppose it’s possible…“Dear Jeebus, smite down Ken Starr and Linda Tripp and Matt Drudge and…”

  8. #221178
    On January 18th, 2008 at 12:25 pm, babbledabble said:

    Why is it that Hillary always looks away when she is talking to someone? It seems she rarely looks anyone in the eye when answering questions.

  9. #221182
    On January 18th, 2008 at 12:26 pm, meatpieandtatters said:

    To “Huck”: portrayed as exhibiting overt and extreme religiosity….

  10. #221184
    On January 18th, 2008 at 12:29 pm, John Ansell said:

    I thought I saw Ken Starr on one of those crosses.

  11. #221187
    On January 18th, 2008 at 12:31 pm, 30 pcs of silver said:

    I was kinda hoping it was a stake.

  12. #221188
    On January 18th, 2008 at 12:32 pm, Blind_Mule said:

    babbledabble said:
    Why is it that Hillary always looks away when she is talking to someone? It seems she rarely looks anyone in the eye when answering questions.

    It’s classic behavior of someone lying.

  13. #221192
    On January 18th, 2008 at 12:37 pm, uhangtight said:

    blind_mule… exactly! watch politicians closely, the ones that can’t look a person in the eye when they talk are so full of deception. they have to hide their eyes (the window to the soul), lest that someone diserns they are lying. also, it shows they have the ability to lie to themselves about their true intent.

    really scary!

  14. #221194
    On January 18th, 2008 at 12:40 pm, secondsight said:

    Isn’t Hill an atheist?

  15. #221200
    On January 18th, 2008 at 12:44 pm, 30 pcs of silver said:

    She’s a United Methodist

  16. #221201
    On January 18th, 2008 at 12:45 pm, Boomer said:

    On January 18th, 2008 at 12:31 pm, 30 pcs of silver said:
    I was kinda hoping it was a stake.

    Same here! We need a Buffy the Vampire Slayer to drive it right through the black heart of this modern Nosferatu.

  17. #221202
    On January 18th, 2008 at 12:45 pm, Eclectic said:

    I never doubted Bill’s love for me.

    I’m sure glad my husband doesn’t love me the way Bill loves Hillary!

    Be true to yourself…Make the decision that is best for you.

    Translation: “I need to stay with this slimeball because otherwise there’s no way I’ll ever get any real power of my own.”

    Nice.

  18. #221203
    On January 18th, 2008 at 12:46 pm, zorro said:

    Gosh, I hope we won’t to watch her getting struck by lightning! What a phony.

  19. #221205
    On January 18th, 2008 at 12:47 pm, in_awe said:

    I guess that the Dems object to mixing politics and religion as long as it is the Republicans we’re talking about, and it isn’t an election year with a Dem candidate in a black church seeking the endorsement of the BDS afflicted minister.

    Whatever happened to the IRS reg regarding loss of tax exempt status for a religious organization playing an overt political role?

  20. #221206
    On January 18th, 2008 at 12:47 pm, sunshinerbray said:

    I almost always agree with almost everyone here, but I don’t care for this string at all.

    First, I’m unsure of the point Michelle is trying to make with the cross photo. I didn’t like the correlations made with Huckabee, and I don’t like it here, either.

    Also, there are plenty of things to attack Hillary on without going after her over Bill’s inability to control himself. Regardless of your opinion of her, Bill was the one in the wrong in that scenario, she was not. Remember the “Leaves of Grass” incident?

    Unless someone in here is omniscient, you don’t know how she felt during those days. We always say conservatives are the compassionate ones. Let’s prove it.

  21. #221208
    On January 18th, 2008 at 12:47 pm, secondsight said:

    …”How did you persevere during the darkest moment of your life?”

    An ordinary politician, elected by the people, representing the people, and once a member of those people, probably would have thought hard about whether 3000 of those citizens killed by Muslim terrorists wasn’t in fact the darkest day of her life.

    But we all know, she is not and was not ever a New Yorker and she didn’t and doesn’t give those people any respect at all…

    Elect her and take odds on the next city to fall under the knife. The real problem is second guessing the order of magnitude more dead. 10x? 100x? 10000x?

  22. #221209
    On January 18th, 2008 at 12:48 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    Isn’t Hill an atheist?

    You must have missed her Sunday school teacher plant who asked if she was Christian. Of course she said “yes”. Makes me wish I were not a Christian if I have to be associated with the likes of her.

  23. #221210
    On January 18th, 2008 at 12:48 pm, Frank Siegler said:

    #15
    United against who or what?
    “Lord please protect me from your followers.”

  24. #221219
    On January 18th, 2008 at 12:55 pm, Barry F. said:

    Of course, we all know that the evil Reuters’ photo journalists are simply trying to “Huck” Hillary….

    I don’t think the Clintons need any help “Hucking” things up. ;-)

  25. #221222
    On January 18th, 2008 at 1:02 pm, Barry F. said:

    We always say conservatives are the compassionate ones. Let’s prove it.

    I always say I am a realist.

    Hillary’s ascendency to where she is now has always been from calculation. And, if she is half as smart as she portrays herself to be, she wouldn’t have stayed with Bill Clinton all the times he was busted in straying from her side, unless she had a need for him. It is obvious from watching them that they are not love birds. Partners in crime. Hmmmm? Maybe.

  26. #221231
    On January 18th, 2008 at 1:10 pm, Salt said:

    sunshinerbray said:

    First, I’m unsure of the point Michelle is trying to make with the cross photo. I didn’t like the correlations made with Huckabee, and I don’t like it here, either.

    The point, I believe, is that the media is deliberately framing photos of Hillary to include the cross in the background as a means to “show” how Christian she is.

    Also, there are plenty of things to attack Hillary on without going after her over Bill’s inability to control himself. Regardless of your opinion of her, Bill was the one in the wrong in that scenario, she was not.

    We may not know what she was thinking, but we can reasonably guess that she was not terribly surprised given his history.

    The ‘attack’ on Hillary as you mention it has been commented on here because she is clearly using that moment in her life to her own political advantage now. Or do you believe that Hillary did not know that Tyra would ask that question? It’s not as though we just brought it up again in a vacuum. She brought it up.

    In my opinion, you’re no longer a victim once you use said status for personal gain. (Not that I ever thought she was much of a victim before, I see her marriage as one of convenience for her at this point, but that’s just my opinion.)

  27. #221232
    On January 18th, 2008 at 1:11 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    It’s classic behavior of someone lying.

    It’s also a classic sign that you really don’t have respect for that person.

  28. #221238
    On January 18th, 2008 at 1:18 pm, diggafromdover said:

    Hail Hillary, full of grace … blessed is the fruit of thy womb Chelsea…

  29. #221245
    On January 18th, 2008 at 1:27 pm, PowWow said:

    Aha! Just as I thought. That floating cross proves my theory that Chucklebee is a Clintonista.
    And it also proves that my campaign fatigue is worsening to the point that I may soon be living in a rubber room somewhere.

  30. #221246
    On January 18th, 2008 at 1:28 pm, max said:

    Fierce! /sarc off

  31. #221249
    On January 18th, 2008 at 1:30 pm, max said:

    “I can’t possibly substitute my judgement for yours.”

    uh huh, except of course when it comes to where you should spend your money, whether you should or should not buy health insurance… etc. etc. etc.

  32. #221267
    On January 18th, 2008 at 1:43 pm, TexasTiger said:

    In my opinion, you’re no longer a victim once you use said status for personal gain.

    Very well put.

    Salt 1, sunshinerbray 0.

  33. #221276
    On January 18th, 2008 at 1:51 pm, its vintage duh said:

    Hillary playing the Wronged Woman on Tyra Banks…”How did you persevere during the darkest moment of your life?”

    how was this time darker than any of the other times he cheated on her? at least she got a senate career out of this one…

  34. #221279
    On January 18th, 2008 at 1:54 pm, loob said:

    Hillary the Messiah!

    Simply repulsive. Please, oh please, post Hillary/Messiah items AFTER lunch. Blech.

  35. #221282
    On January 18th, 2008 at 1:58 pm, graysonret said:

    This woman is simply obsessed with power and with the hope of undoing the US and making it a socialist nation, with her at the head, of course. Hardly a Methodist, more like she sold her soul.

  36. #221283
    On January 18th, 2008 at 1:58 pm, dakine said:

    box, you might want to run the sentiment you so eloquently expressed in your comment #22 by your spiritual adviser. Guessing he or she would find it wanting. Don’t just talk it…walk the walk brah.

  37. #221296
    On January 18th, 2008 at 2:08 pm, angryoldfatman said:

    The ACLU have seen this and should be expressing outrage about the lack of separation between church right about now…

    Wha? Okay, how about now…

    Now?

    What abouuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuut… NOW!

    No? Not now?

    :-(

  38. #221298
    On January 18th, 2008 at 2:09 pm, angryoldfatman said:

    “separation between church and state”, sorry.

  39. #221304
    On January 18th, 2008 at 2:12 pm, dakine said:

    And the “state action” would be where fatman? I understand you’re trying to be clever, but…

  40. #221332
    On January 18th, 2008 at 2:30 pm, gayle said:

    Just because someone belongs to a church doesn’t mean they are a Christian.

    Christian is defined by actions not words.

    In Hill’s case, she lies both ways.

  41. #221343
    On January 18th, 2008 at 2:38 pm, meatpieandtatters said:

    Regarding #6, I do believe these media contrivances of people, place and contextual juxtaposition directly support their role as “chief inciters of conflict.” It also plays into their labeling systems: Evangelical Right, Religious Right, Extremist Right or whatever else ax the media likes to grind.

    It’s all stereotype created by, for and of the lame stream media slime machine.

  42. #221346
    On January 18th, 2008 at 2:40 pm, blues said:

    Even as a non-believer.seeing the Beast in the presence of the symbol of Christianity makes me sick.I wonder why she didn’t have the curch elders decorate the crucfix like the Clinton’s White H.ouse CRISTmas tree.Can this woman sink any lower?

  43. #221364
    On January 18th, 2008 at 2:55 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    Hillary gets religion.

    Yeah, riiiiiiiiiiiiiight.

  44. #221373
    On January 18th, 2008 at 3:06 pm, meatpieandtatters said:

    #42 as I recall, Hillary favored colored condoms for one of their trees…I believe this was at the urging of the Surgeon General, Ms. Elders?

  45. #221393
    On January 18th, 2008 at 3:22 pm, angryoldfatman said:

    On January 18th, 2008 at 2:12 pm, dakine said:

    And the “state action” would be where fatman? I understand you’re trying to be clever, but…

    :rolleyes:

    Try Google.

  46. #221423
    On January 18th, 2008 at 4:00 pm, Anton said:

    I enjoy bashing Hillary as much as any of my fellow minions in the VRWC, but please — get your facts straight, people.

    Hillary Clinton has been a lifelong active member of the United Methodist Church. This is the same denomination that President and Laura Bush belong to. It has an ultra-liberal wing (like most all of the mainline Protestant churches), but also a growing and influential conservative renewal movement. One guess as to which branch the Bush family’s congregation back in Texas belongs to.

    My point is that Hillary is no stranger to the inside of a church. She may or may not be sincere in her faith. If she takes her faith seriously (and I think she does), then she is certainly ultra-liberal when it comes to theology.

    Here’s a link for her 1996 speech in front of the Methodist General Conference, which is the most important gathering in the denomination.

    http://gbgm-umc.org/mission/news/hillary2.html

    Know your enemy. Hillary is a liberal hypocrite, but calling her an atheist or non-Christian is simply innacurate.

  47. #221433
    On January 18th, 2008 at 4:10 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    On January 18th, 2008 at 1:58 pm, dakine said:
    box, you might want to run the sentiment you so eloquently expressed in your comment #22 by your spiritual adviser. Guessing he or she would find it wanting. Don’t just talk it…walk the walk brah.

    1. I thought I requested that you leave me out of your future posts bra.

    2. I do not have a spiritual advisor. I have a GOD and I happen to believe the Bible is HIS infallible Word. So, agreeing with killing babies (or to put it in terms even you can understand – abortion) is contrary to being a Christian. “ian” is a suffix meaning belonging to, i.e. Bostonian… Christian = belonging to Christ. Now, if you can sit there and tell me Christ is pro-abortion well…

    So, IMHO, she can call herself a “Christian” but she and I are NOT of the same ilk.

    One more thing bra. I walk the walk which means not giving a care what you think of me.

  48. #221453
    On January 18th, 2008 at 4:38 pm, blues said:

    Membership in a Christian church,or calling yourself Christian doesn’t mean squat.Living the Christian faith is what makes one Chritian.
    dakine-if you took the time to get your facts straight,you would know that soap does “walk the walk”.

  49. #221456
    On January 18th, 2008 at 4:44 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    Thanks blues. That is the nicest thing anybody has ever said to me on this blog – “LOL”.

  50. #221464
    On January 18th, 2008 at 4:53 pm, sunshinerbray said:

    Irony:

    Getting bent out of shape when Dakine calls attention to your Christian walk. Because you’re calling attention to someone else’s Christian walk.

  51. #221474
    On January 18th, 2008 at 5:09 pm, sunshinerbray said:

    #26:

    Funny, I don’t ever remember using the word “victim” to describe Mrs. Clinton. That wasn’t my point.

    And if she is using it for political gain what’s the problem with that? She wants to win, like everyone else. How is that different than Huckabee’s push polls or Obama pulling the race card?

    Oh, and #32:

    Didn’t realize it was a “burn” contest.

  52. #221475
    On January 18th, 2008 at 5:14 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    Violation of terms:

    Posting off topic.

    Troll:

    Posting to get an emotional response or attacking someone without provocation.

    Id10t:

    Someone who defends dakine

    P.S. Who is bent out of shape? Seems you are pal. I do not let people like you and dakine get to me but I also do not let your attacks go without comment. Oh, BTW, dakine has a problem and I have asked him to keep me far from them. Go back and see if I addressed him first.

    On topic: Shill should expect to get ridiculed by those of us who can see through her. I expect it as I am transparent.

  53. #221497
    On January 18th, 2008 at 5:55 pm, dakine said:

    box, just so I have this straight, your God would be okay with the tone and content of your original comment in this thread? And that same God has endowed you with some sort of supernatural ability to determine whether or not someone, specifically Sen. Clinton, is a “true” Christian? Wow, that’s pretty impressive.

    fatman, may I suggest you review the content of the various articles uncovered by your Google search and get back to me on the “state action” issue as it relates to the subject matter of this thread.

  54. #221502
    On January 18th, 2008 at 5:59 pm, sunshinerbray said:

    One more post, Soapbox, and I’m finished.

    If a troll is someone posting something to get an emotional response, I don’t see how your calling me an idiot wouldn’t qualify under your own definition.

    All I’m saying is, I don’t see anything different in what she’s doing and what tons of other politicians do, which is use personal experiences for political gain. I’m also tired of the “yeah, but there was a whole sex scandal…” line. There are plenty – PLENTY – of things to be said about her and myriad reasons she’d be a terrible choice for president.

    And as a postscript, my personal definition of hell is Hillary Clinton as president. But let’s debate her on the merits, and not on this.

  55. #221505
    On January 18th, 2008 at 6:11 pm, dakine said:

    Bingo sunshinerbray.

  56. #221523
    On January 18th, 2008 at 6:49 pm, brooklyn red said:

    On January 18th, 2008 at 12:29 pm, John Ansell said:
    I thought I saw Ken Starr on one of those crosses.

    No, I think that was Scooter Libby.

  57. #221541
    On January 18th, 2008 at 7:38 pm, Tennessee Dave said:

    On January 18th, 2008 at 4:00 pm, Anton said:
    Know your enemy. Hillary is a liberal hypocrite, but calling her an atheist or non-Christian is simply innacurate.

    That still doesn’t stop statements like this:

    On January 18th, 2008 at 12:14 pm, meatpieandtatters said:
    Somebody was obviously trying to do an exorcism…

    I don’t think it took.

    And personally, I want to know when her head is going to start spinning.

    Another thing I don’t get – Huckabee does a Christmas commercial with a book case that looks like a cross and gets all kinds of grief about it.
    This is definitly a cross above the Hildabeast and nothing.
    I guess that’s par for the course.

  58. #221575
    On January 18th, 2008 at 8:44 pm, Lars said:

    Hillary and her impeached, disbarred, louse of a husband are both disgusting pigs and I can’t wait for all of their underhanded schemes to implode on them!

  59. #221606
    On January 18th, 2008 at 9:43 pm, cf said:

    the audience was even worse –

  60. #221635
    On January 18th, 2008 at 10:42 pm, Blind_Mule said:

    dakine said:
    box, just so I have this straight, your God would be okay with the tone and content of your original comment in this thread? And that same God has endowed you with some sort of supernatural ability to determine whether or not someone, specifically Sen. Clinton, is a “true” Christian? Wow, that’s pretty impressive.

    Tell me did Jesus walk into the temple and say to the money changer’s and dove seller’s. Look guy’s I know your just trying to make a buck, but I wished you would’nt do it in the temple.
    No he did’nt he went and turned the table’s over in anger and called them out, “you have made it a den of thieves” (Jeremiah 7:11) The reference to den of thieves may be a reference to inflated pricing or more sinister forms of using religion to exploit the poor.

    Soap is calling her faith into question as Jesus did the money changer’s and dove seller’s was Jesus wrong for doing so?

  61. #221874
    On January 19th, 2008 at 11:42 am, Salt said:

    sunshinerbray said:

    #26:

    Funny, I don’t ever remember using the word “victim” to describe Mrs. Clinton. That wasn’t my point.

    sunshinerbray, I was merely continuing a thought, not putting words in your mouth. The point I inferred from your previous post was that we shouldn’t attack her on the sex scandal. My point was that if she’s using it to garner sympathy from women, it cannot then be off-limits to us to comment on it.

    And if she is using it for political gain what’s the problem with that?

    The problem comes when it becomes something in people’s minds that cannot be discussed or contested because she was an alleged victim in that scenario.

    If she can use it for political gain, it can be used to counter that gain. To suggest that it’s off-limits is wrong-minded, in my opinion.

    She wants to win, like everyone else. How is that different than Huckabee’s push polls or Obama pulling the race card?

    It’s not different, but that comparison wasn’t the topic of this thread. We can dislike all three (and do).

    Oh, and #32:

    Didn’t realize it was a “burn” contest.

    I know this wasn’t directed to me, but I just wanted to clarify that the purpose of my response wasn’t to flame. I was merely responding with my opinion.

  62. #221940
    On January 19th, 2008 at 1:58 pm, dakine said:

    Mule, Jesus making the call on who’s a “true” Christian and who’s not makes sense to me. Soapbox making that call? Not so much.

  63. #222043
    On January 19th, 2008 at 4:58 pm, Blind_Mule said:

    dakine said:
    Mule, Jesus making the call on who’s a “true” Christian and who’s not makes sense to me. Soapbox making that call? Not so much.

    Just to clarify there was not Christianity until Jesus was crucified it was a Jewish temple.

    IMO anyone that would stand on a pulpit in a Christian Church should have there Christianity questioned and I mean anybody, National politic’s do not belong in the church period.

  64. #222141
    On January 19th, 2008 at 7:51 pm, angryoldfatman said:

    On January 18th, 2008 at 5:55 pm, dakine said:

    fatman, may I suggest you review the content of the various articles uncovered by your Google search and get back to me on the “state action” issue as it relates to the subject matter of this thread.

    May I suggest you learn how to read, lefty troll.

    Here, let me make this as simple as possible for you.

    If you are a campaigning politician, speaking in a church can now somehow endanger that church’s tax-exempt status.

    The “state action” in question is a campaigning politician speaking in a church.

    Hillary is a campaigning politician.

    The blog post is about Hillary speaking in a church.

    The joke is that there are no legal complaints when Hillary speaks in a church, but there are when anyone else does.

    Here’s a excerpt from a link from the first Google page:

    A June 23 appearance by Democratic presidential candidate Senator Barack Obama at the General Synod of the United Church of Christ is now the subject of a formal complaint filed with the Internal Revenue Service on August 2.

    Portions of the redacted documents obtained by the website UCC Truths, a growing online gathering for dissenters from the church leadership’s rigid left-wing political orthodoxy, were published August 27. Those redacted documents have now been obtained by The American Spectator.

    The complaint, addressed to Lois Lerner, the Director of the Exempt Organizations Division of the Internal Revenue Service, formally asks the IRS to “investigate the United Church of Christ,” identified in the complaint as “a 501 (3) (c) non-profit religious entity” for violating “federal tax law banning political campaign intervention.” The redaction has blacked out the name of the filer.

    The complaint alleges the UCC “violated every single point outlined in the IRS guidelines,” in sponsoring the Illinois Senator’s appearance at the church’s bi-annual national gathering, which this year was held in the Hartford Civic Center in the Connecticut capital. It charges:

    * “The United Church of Christ selectively provided the convention facilities for Sen. Obama to speak in support of his campaign.”

    * “The United Church of Christ and Sen. Obama referenced his candidacy before and during the speech.”

    * “Clear and deliberate campaign activity occurred in connection with the [sic] Sen. Obama’s attendance and speech.”

    Specifically the complaint references guidelines that an individual addressing the church does so “only in a non-candidate capacity,” that the individual makes no “mention of his or her candidacy or the election,” and that “no campaign activity occurs in connection with the candidate’s attendance.” The complaint also cites a guideline that prohibits a church from mentioning an individual’s political candidacy or the upcoming election in “the communications announcing the candidate’s attendance at the event.” Both a video and a transcript of Obama’s speech are available on the UCC website and apparently will be present throughout the election.

    Now go leave troll droppings elsewhere.

  65. #222453
    On January 20th, 2008 at 5:00 am, Prime Director said:

    Who would Jesus abort?

  66. #223017
    On January 21st, 2008 at 12:30 pm, dakine said:

    fatman, you implied in your original comment that Sen. Clinton’s campaign appearance in a church triggered a violation of the establishment clause of the 1st amendment (”separation of church and state”). The tax issue to which you subsequently referred is a separate issue genius.

    I’m far from a “lefty troll” you pompous buffoon. Traditioinal/old school conservative who has no time for Christian right wing extremists like you.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Why is Hillary laughing?

April 9, 2009 03:02 PM by Doug Powers

98 Comments | 17 Trackbacks

North Korea to put American journalists on trial

March 30, 2009 03:17 PM by Michelle Malkin

57 Comments | 5 Trackbacks

“Botchmen”

March 10, 2009 11:05 AM by Michelle Malkin

37 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

Global cooling moment of the day

January 20, 2009 06:03 PM by Michelle Malkin

44 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

Chilly.

A bittersweet Hillary/Jawn Kerry moment Updated

January 13, 2009 10:58 AM by Michelle Malkin

14 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

Oh, what might have been.

Hillary’s pay-for-play troubles, continued

January 13, 2009 09:33 AM by Michelle Malkin

48 Comments | 14 Trackbacks


Categories: Hillary Clinton



Weekly Standard

» Obama's Talking Points

HotAir GreenRoom