The dorks at MSNBC

By Michelle Malkin  •  January 19, 2008 08:19 PM

I switched to MSNBC when Fox cut away from Fred’s pep talk in Columbia, SC. They all cackled after Thompson finished speaking.

I should have switched it off right there, but I decided to stay with the left-wing channel for Mitt Romney’s appearance.

The dorks at MSNBC grilled him over his hair, his unbuttoned collar, and his rolled-up sleeves.

Romney pointed out he was in Florida and it’s Saturday night and yes, so what, he hasn’t thrown away his three-piece suits. Big deal.

The dorks weren’t buying it.

After the interview, if you can call it that, ended, Brian Williams praised Chris Matthews for “being on to something.”

A mob of Sherlock Holmeses, aren’t they?

***

Commenter d1carter: “Are you sure Brian Williams did not say Chris was on something[?]”

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Michelle Malkin » Nevada and South Carolina go to the polls; AP/Fox: Romney nabs gold in Nev.; Update: Voting problems in SC; Update: Hispanics in Nevada boost Hill to victory; Update: Obama wins Nev. delegate vote?
  2. Sister Toldjah
  3. That’s Pretty Objective Journalism… « Tai-Chi Policy

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #222179
    On January 19th, 2008 at 8:21 pm, zorro said:

    Like a pack of mangy hyenas

  2. #222180
    On January 19th, 2008 at 8:22 pm, katieanne said:

    The dorks at MSNBC grilled him over his hair, his unbuttoned collar, and his rolled-up sleeves.

    So Williams gets excited about this as being “on to something”? What about issues? These idiots are just too pathetic. I never watch NBC or MSNBC. Apparently, I have made a good choice.

  3. #222181
    On January 19th, 2008 at 8:23 pm, brooklyn red said:

    “these too shall have there reward”

  4. #222187
    On January 19th, 2008 at 8:26 pm, LifeTrek said:

    Wow, your brave! I haven’t turned MSNBC on for years. I tired of Joe “Beaker” Scarborough claiming the mantle of, “real conservatism,” all the while attacking every republican in an attempt to boost his ratings in the either of the left Tucker moved times and that was all.
    DKK

  5. #222188
    On January 19th, 2008 at 8:26 pm, ajmontana said:

    three words for msnbc… KMA

  6. #222193
    On January 19th, 2008 at 8:31 pm, Jeddite said:

    Perhaps if MSNBC replaced their casting heads with the original cast of “Friends”…

  7. #222194
    On January 19th, 2008 at 8:31 pm, Boomer said:

    We have blocked MSNBC in our living room and the only time I watched it in the bedroom was during the last debate. I doubt I will venture there again. They continue to lose market share and don’t appear to know why. I will be glad when they finally tank.

  8. #222197
    On January 19th, 2008 at 8:33 pm, josetheguerilla said:

    I thought Osama Bin Ladin still worked for MSNBC. Que Pasa? Mitt must think Florida is a little hot, isn’t it a 30 degree temp difference?

  9. #222199
    On January 19th, 2008 at 8:33 pm, ajmontana said:

    Same here boomer.

  10. #222205
    On January 19th, 2008 at 8:38 pm, d1carter said:

    Are you sure Brian Williams did not say Chris was on something.

  11. #222206
    On January 19th, 2008 at 8:39 pm, 29Victor said:

    Morons… your bus is leaving.

    Bill Murray – Groundhog Day

  12. #222208
    On January 19th, 2008 at 8:41 pm, Marshall Russ said:

    They don’t even try to be impartial. They are so in the tank for the Democratic candidates and other liberal causes it’s not even defensible. Their reasoning is that Fox is partial to conservatives so they have to balance it out. But, to liberals facts don’t matter.

  13. #222212
    On January 19th, 2008 at 8:47 pm, twiggman said:

    I’m with AJ on this one for sure.

  14. #222216
    On January 19th, 2008 at 8:56 pm, gayle said:

    bunch of gloating pigs……

  15. #222218
    On January 19th, 2008 at 9:00 pm, DanME said:

    I’ve never seen more Dorks in one place..
    Keith + Chris….what a pair. The good news….almost no one watches that network

  16. #222219
    On January 19th, 2008 at 9:02 pm, DagneyT said:

    Michelle, thank you for watching that channel. It sends my blood pressure into outer space, and I just cannot tune in. Do you have “staff”, a al Rush, who are tasked to watch the Clintonista News Network? If it weren’t for Dr. Bennett on CNN, or Glenn Beck on Headline, I would not even have memorized the channel numbers.

  17. #222254
    On January 19th, 2008 at 9:45 pm, Ron said:

    PMSNBC, I think Rush calls it. It is just me, or are they making fewer and fewer efforts to even appear objective? They even headlined their broadcast the Nevada causes — no mention of the Republican South Carolina primary. Anyone want to guess what next Saturday’s Main Event will be? Why, of course, Hillary Clinton Coronation Part Deux.

  18. #222309
    On January 19th, 2008 at 10:40 pm, CC said:

    I stopped watched any kind of news on either NBC or MSNBC years ago because of their bias which was evident even back then.

    Now, I don’t watch them at all, not for any programming whatsoever, because I refuse to support them in any manner. Same goes for CBS, ABC, CNN, PBS and any local affiliates.

  19. #222315
    On January 19th, 2008 at 10:50 pm, vickisoup said:

    A plague on all their houses.

  20. #222336
    On January 19th, 2008 at 11:27 pm, shooter said:

    But, but… there is NO bias at MSNBC or NBC…
    s

  21. #222348
    On January 19th, 2008 at 11:47 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    Anyone actually watch MSNBC? Don’t they have something like 300,000 viewers?

  22. #222389
    On January 20th, 2008 at 1:18 am, CarpiJugulum said:

    Yes they have 300,000 viewers. This includes staff, staff families, extended families, and then they count them twice to boost the numbers.

  23. #222391
    On January 20th, 2008 at 1:22 am, BrianNY said:

    You’re saying that MSNBC preempted another repeat prison-show with Williams, Matthews and Olbergong tonight?

    Talk about rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic.

  24. #222496
    On January 20th, 2008 at 9:39 am, Blind_Mule said:

    I do watch segment’s (channel flipping) of PMSNBC, Tucker, Chris Malignant and never Olbergong. The practice of Sun Tzu (The Art Of War) keep your friend’s close and your enemies even closer, I want to see what the other side’s opinion is as biased and wrong as it is, plus it’s pretty much comic relief. Malignant apoligised to Billary for his comment’s on Morning Joe, probably cause the Clinton’s threatened to put a hit out on him. Chris Malignant is nothing more than a egotistical growth on America’a hind end. I hardly ever see Brian William’s but when I do he’s alway’s towin the party line and for Olbergong he is proof of the Liberal hate factor and I have to turn the channel. I can’t even watch NFL Sunday Night I wonder if the NFL has noticed that the number’s fall way off when he’s there, people did’nt like him at ESPN and they don’t like him on PMSNBC what a tool. I understand why Michelle did’nt turn the channel, it’s like watching a train wreck.

  25. #222550
    On January 20th, 2008 at 12:25 pm, DBNinKY said:

    “…Brian Williams praised Chris Matthews for “being on to something.”

    Oh Mr. Matthews was on to something all right!

    He was on to the truth when he said Hillary’s claim to fame and rise in the political arena was due to her husband’s infidelities – a statement the old “Hardball” couldn’t back away from quick enough when the pressure came down!

    I don’t know which is lamer: the fact Matthews so easily folded and backed off a statement he obviously believes is true, or the idea that a supposedly major cable news channel like MSNBC would allow itself to succumb to “pressure” from Steinem, Gandy, and Smeal – three irrelevant has-beens who couldn’t apply enough collective pressure to crack the hull of a peanut.

    Mr. Matthews, in displaying the same lack of conviction and commitment you so often accuse those on the right of showing, you have renounced the moral high-ground from which you judge the masses, along with your credibility!

  26. #222557
    On January 20th, 2008 at 1:01 pm, nbarry said:

    Caving in to Steinem, Gandy and Smeal – no wonder the network is named Ms.NBC.

  27. #222649
    On January 20th, 2008 at 6:50 pm, DBNinKY said:

    You know, that Olbermann guy has a lot of attitude for someone who use to shill chicken for Boston Market just a few years ago. It seems with that on his resume he’d show a little more humility.

  28. #222678
    On January 20th, 2008 at 9:15 pm, Pickle said:

    A mob of Sherlock Holmeses, aren’t they?

    You’re half on to something.

  29. #222687
    On January 20th, 2008 at 9:28 pm, maisy said:

    I only watch that channel for Pat Buchanan ….Chris Matthews never shuts up.. whenever he talks he removes all doubt that he is a complete idiot. I still remember his exchange with Michelle years ago when he wouldn’t let her get a word in edgewise. Amazing that such a clueless perosn has his own show,

  30. #222755
    On January 21st, 2008 at 1:01 am, BrianNY said:

    Let’s be honest, if an average of 500,000 Fox viewers didn’t keep flipping over to MSNBC during O’Reilly commercial breaks to snicker at Olbergong’s sanctimony, Keith wouldn’t have any viewers to begin with.

    And call me shallow, but I can’t even get past the mismatch of Olbergong’s rather rotund face and those swiss-precision lesbian frames that he wears.

    Not that there’s anything wrong with that.

  31. #223850
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 2:22 am, Mr_Conservative_Cat said:

    Every city has a sewer. It’s really as simple as that.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

The indelible whiteness of MSNBC

November 23, 2009 05:07 AM by Michelle Malkin

107 Comments | 9 Trackbacks

Palin-bashers of pallor.

Culture of corruption: Newspaper edition

November 17, 2009 02:25 PM by Michelle Malkin

26 Comments | 1 Trackback

Journo-rage: Fist fight in the Washington Post newsroom

November 2, 2009 05:56 PM by Michelle Malkin

43 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

Oh, the incivility!

“They are reporters, not trivia experts. And the buzzer is complicated.”

October 26, 2009 03:55 PM by Michelle Malkin

70 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

Final Jeopardy.

The bootlicker media

October 22, 2009 11:04 AM by Michelle Malkin

64 Comments | 1 Trackback

MoveOn demands that Democrats stay off Fox News

October 20, 2009 02:36 PM by Michelle Malkin

138 Comments | 3 Trackbacks


Categories: Chris Matthews, Media, Mitt Romney



Mudville Gazette

» The five-year plan
Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook