<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The end of Mike Huckabee</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/19/the-end-of-mike-huckabee/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/19/the-end-of-mike-huckabee/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 18:23:15 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin &#187; Huckabee&#8217;s last play</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/19/the-end-of-mike-huckabee/comment-page-2/#comment-259811</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin &#187; Huckabee&#8217;s last play</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 02:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/19/the-end-of-mike-huckabee/#comment-259811</guid>
		<description>[...] himself on the back (again) for running his honorable campaign&#8230;.turn to a united party. Thanks his wife. She&#8217;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] himself on the back (again) for running his honorable campaign&#8230;.turn to a united party. Thanks his wife. She&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: canny</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/19/the-end-of-mike-huckabee/comment-page-2/#comment-239270</link>
		<dc:creator>canny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 05:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/19/the-end-of-mike-huckabee/#comment-239270</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;canny...&lt;/strong&gt;

Hi. I think you have a really nice blog....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>canny&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Hi. I think you have a really nice blog&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: md1964</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/19/the-end-of-mike-huckabee/comment-page-2/#comment-223200</link>
		<dc:creator>md1964</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 20:06:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/19/the-end-of-mike-huckabee/#comment-223200</guid>
		<description>Schmuckabee is and will always be a 100%, Grade A, total Fraud.

Huckabee is about as much a Conservative Rebublican, as I am a an Alien that wrote the Scientology express here with Zenu (Or who ever that freaking Alien is they claimed seeded the planet)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Schmuckabee is and will always be a 100%, Grade A, total Fraud.</p>
<p>Huckabee is about as much a Conservative Rebublican, as I am a an Alien that wrote the Scientology express here with Zenu (Or who ever that freaking Alien is they claimed seeded the planet)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BipolarNation.com &#187; Huckabee Deflates as the Race goes to Florida</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/19/the-end-of-mike-huckabee/comment-page-2/#comment-223123</link>
		<dc:creator>BipolarNation.com &#187; Huckabee Deflates as the Race goes to Florida</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 18:58:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/19/the-end-of-mike-huckabee/#comment-223123</guid>
		<description>[...] Michelle Malkin reacted to Huckleberry&#8217;s concession speech: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Michelle Malkin reacted to Huckleberry&#8217;s concession speech: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gridlock</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/19/the-end-of-mike-huckabee/comment-page-2/#comment-222859</link>
		<dc:creator>gridlock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 14:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/19/the-end-of-mike-huckabee/#comment-222859</guid>
		<description>If all Fred Thompson manages to do in his campaign is sink Mike Huckabee, it will all have been worth it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If all Fred Thompson manages to do in his campaign is sink Mike Huckabee, it will all have been worth it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rountry</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/19/the-end-of-mike-huckabee/comment-page-2/#comment-222845</link>
		<dc:creator>rountry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 14:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/19/the-end-of-mike-huckabee/#comment-222845</guid>
		<description>I know hindsight is 20/20, but it seems if Huckabee were to have won SC, McCain would have been severely wounded going into FL.  I don&#039;t think Huckabee would have carried the momentum of a win in the same way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know hindsight is 20/20, but it seems if Huckabee were to have won SC, McCain would have been severely wounded going into FL.  I don&#8217;t think Huckabee would have carried the momentum of a win in the same way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Plumb Bob Blog &#187; After South Carolina</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/19/the-end-of-mike-huckabee/comment-page-2/#comment-222806</link>
		<dc:creator>Plumb Bob Blog &#187; After South Carolina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 12:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/19/the-end-of-mike-huckabee/#comment-222806</guid>
		<description>[...] Michelle Malkin crows that Huckabee is out, but he&#8217;s not. South Carolina was disappointing for him, but he was a close second, and won among issues voters. Thompson&#8217;s surge took votes from Huckabee; if Thompson drops out, most of his votes will flow back to him. He still has a national following, and should garner delegates on Super Tuesday. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Michelle Malkin crows that Huckabee is out, but he&#8217;s not. South Carolina was disappointing for him, but he was a close second, and won among issues voters. Thompson&#8217;s surge took votes from Huckabee; if Thompson drops out, most of his votes will flow back to him. He still has a national following, and should garner delegates on Super Tuesday. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Church and State</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/19/the-end-of-mike-huckabee/comment-page-2/#comment-222765</link>
		<dc:creator>Church and State</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 06:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/19/the-end-of-mike-huckabee/#comment-222765</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Election Thoughts After South Carolina...&lt;/strong&gt;

When McCain&#039;s nomination becomes painfully clear to the conservative blogosphere, they&#039;ll realize Huckabee was far more conservative than what they&#039;ve been avowing since November......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Election Thoughts After South Carolina&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>When McCain&#8217;s nomination becomes painfully clear to the conservative blogosphere, they&#8217;ll realize Huckabee was far more conservative than what they&#8217;ve been avowing since November&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roscoe&#8217;s Public Notes &#187; Blog Archive &#187; links for 2008-01-21</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/19/the-end-of-mike-huckabee/comment-page-2/#comment-222762</link>
		<dc:creator>Roscoe&#8217;s Public Notes &#187; Blog Archive &#187; links for 2008-01-21</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 06:25:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/19/the-end-of-mike-huckabee/#comment-222762</guid>
		<description>[...] Michelle Malkin » The end of Mike Huckabee The sanctimony is oozing like a popped zit. Ick. (tags: Huckabee sanctimony Republican politics) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Michelle Malkin » The end of Mike Huckabee The sanctimony is oozing like a popped zit. Ick. (tags: Huckabee sanctimony Republican politics) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: derel3433</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/19/the-end-of-mike-huckabee/comment-page-2/#comment-222739</link>
		<dc:creator>derel3433</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 05:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/19/the-end-of-mike-huckabee/#comment-222739</guid>
		<description>OC: what&#039;s your point? And can you make it in fewer words? Seems like heavy accusations-and god only knows what you&#039;re talking about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OC: what&#8217;s your point? And can you make it in fewer words? Seems like heavy accusations-and god only knows what you&#8217;re talking about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ajmontana</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/19/the-end-of-mike-huckabee/comment-page-2/#comment-222638</link>
		<dc:creator>ajmontana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 23:27:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/19/the-end-of-mike-huckabee/#comment-222638</guid>
		<description>Hopefully this will be the last we hear of this, its been days and days and been brought up by you several times, please get over it. 
Go Fred!
 In it to Win it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hopefully this will be the last we hear of this, its been days and days and been brought up by you several times, please get over it.<br />
Go Fred!<br />
 In it to Win it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ordinary Coloradan</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/19/the-end-of-mike-huckabee/comment-page-2/#comment-222629</link>
		<dc:creator>Ordinary Coloradan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 23:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/19/the-end-of-mike-huckabee/#comment-222629</guid>
		<description>Congrats on your 30 years, I&#039;m approaching 25 myself, lasted through several deployments and tours of duty and a lot of hardships.  And my son has followed me in service and is prepping for Iraq, possibly in Balad where I was.

That being said, if you wish to continue fooling yourself, and ignoring the basic facts, cherry picking your way blithely to an ignorant position, well, feel free.  Its your life and if you want to live it in delusion, you are welcome to do so and I wish you comfort.

And true enough that MM does own this blog.  

However...

She tears into people for lying for political purposes (Huckabee and McCain for example, deservedly so), yet here she she is basically doing the same thing she tears into others about.

Can I not call her out on her hypocracy, in hopes that she will come around and do the right thing?  And is it not important at all that someone you apparently trust has shown herself to be capable of utterly callous behavior towards issues of integrity, and the truth?  Does it concern you that she is guilty of the same defects she accuses others of?  And given that, then one may ask what else is MM lying about that nobody else has called her on?  

Surely you can agree that posting a lie, one that HURTS someone materially, especially an anonymously sourced lie, and then failing to remedy the error - or at least apologise for it, is the mark of someone lacking integrity, someone with an ulterior motive or hidden agenda.  And the question you sshould ask yourself is: &lt;em&gt;Should you also be concerned about this issue with MM if you value the truth&lt;/em&gt;?  Or just let the lies lay...  Me, I challenge.

An honest person does not put false information out and then let it stand if they have the means to correct it.  

One must have the integrity and respect for the truth to go back and correct it, and one must have the basic courage to admit and apologize for one&#039;s mistake (i.e. &quot;take your lumps&quot;).  I know this from what Ive been taught and value - letting a material damaging lie stand is a huge mark against a person&#039;s integrity, and compounding it by furthering the lie, and then failing to correct one&#039;s own actions regarding the lie makes it even worse.  

As an intelligence analyst, we routinely had to point out mistakes that we had made - Military Intellience is an inexact science at best, as the public has learned since 9/11.  The penultimate basis for an intel analyst, other than pure analytical skills, is the integrity to correct himself or herself, and give a good accunting of why and how the error was made, and to do so in a timely manner.  

(&lt;em&gt;in case you are wondering what the ultimate basis is: the ultimate is the ability to &quot;get inside your opponents head&quot; and think about things from their side so as to be able to preempt them.&lt;/em&gt;)

Truth is terribly valuable due to its scarcity in politics.  And as I showed, its not a matter of opinion, its a matter of FACT that MM posted a lie and refused to remedy it.

So no matter how you try to slice it, this is a blot on Michelle Malkin as either a a hypocrite, or lacking in personal integrity &lt;em&gt;in this instance&lt;/em&gt;.  I do beleive MM has shown no propensity toward this behavior in other instances that I have seen, although my agreement with her viewpoints, especially on immigration/border, may shade me from finding her errors there.  That is why her behavior on this is jarring and has me holding onto it liek a pit bull.  I want to know why.

I&#039;d stake my solid rep from my years in military service and subsequent service in the Intelligence Community on my words here.  Truth is truth, and MM is guilty of furthering a lie, and is apparently lacking the integrity to do the right things regarding this issue.

I guess we agree to disagree.  But the facts stand, and in their light MM is not looking very good.  And I worry what else will unravel if she demonstrates this sort of lack of integrity in other areas.

And I think we all agree:

God help us if either McCain or Huckabee gain the nomination or presidency.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congrats on your 30 years, I&#8217;m approaching 25 myself, lasted through several deployments and tours of duty and a lot of hardships.  And my son has followed me in service and is prepping for Iraq, possibly in Balad where I was.</p>
<p>That being said, if you wish to continue fooling yourself, and ignoring the basic facts, cherry picking your way blithely to an ignorant position, well, feel free.  Its your life and if you want to live it in delusion, you are welcome to do so and I wish you comfort.</p>
<p>And true enough that MM does own this blog.  </p>
<p>However&#8230;</p>
<p>She tears into people for lying for political purposes (Huckabee and McCain for example, deservedly so), yet here she she is basically doing the same thing she tears into others about.</p>
<p>Can I not call her out on her hypocracy, in hopes that she will come around and do the right thing?  And is it not important at all that someone you apparently trust has shown herself to be capable of utterly callous behavior towards issues of integrity, and the truth?  Does it concern you that she is guilty of the same defects she accuses others of?  And given that, then one may ask what else is MM lying about that nobody else has called her on?  </p>
<p>Surely you can agree that posting a lie, one that HURTS someone materially, especially an anonymously sourced lie, and then failing to remedy the error &#8211; or at least apologise for it, is the mark of someone lacking integrity, someone with an ulterior motive or hidden agenda.  And the question you sshould ask yourself is: <em>Should you also be concerned about this issue with MM if you value the truth</em>?  Or just let the lies lay&#8230;  Me, I challenge.</p>
<p>An honest person does not put false information out and then let it stand if they have the means to correct it.  </p>
<p>One must have the integrity and respect for the truth to go back and correct it, and one must have the basic courage to admit and apologize for one&#8217;s mistake (i.e. &#8220;take your lumps&#8221;).  I know this from what Ive been taught and value &#8211; letting a material damaging lie stand is a huge mark against a person&#8217;s integrity, and compounding it by furthering the lie, and then failing to correct one&#8217;s own actions regarding the lie makes it even worse.  </p>
<p>As an intelligence analyst, we routinely had to point out mistakes that we had made &#8211; Military Intellience is an inexact science at best, as the public has learned since 9/11.  The penultimate basis for an intel analyst, other than pure analytical skills, is the integrity to correct himself or herself, and give a good accunting of why and how the error was made, and to do so in a timely manner.  </p>
<p>(<em>in case you are wondering what the ultimate basis is: the ultimate is the ability to &#8220;get inside your opponents head&#8221; and think about things from their side so as to be able to preempt them.</em>)</p>
<p>Truth is terribly valuable due to its scarcity in politics.  And as I showed, its not a matter of opinion, its a matter of FACT that MM posted a lie and refused to remedy it.</p>
<p>So no matter how you try to slice it, this is a blot on Michelle Malkin as either a a hypocrite, or lacking in personal integrity <em>in this instance</em>.  I do beleive MM has shown no propensity toward this behavior in other instances that I have seen, although my agreement with her viewpoints, especially on immigration/border, may shade me from finding her errors there.  That is why her behavior on this is jarring and has me holding onto it liek a pit bull.  I want to know why.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d stake my solid rep from my years in military service and subsequent service in the Intelligence Community on my words here.  Truth is truth, and MM is guilty of furthering a lie, and is apparently lacking the integrity to do the right things regarding this issue.</p>
<p>I guess we agree to disagree.  But the facts stand, and in their light MM is not looking very good.  And I worry what else will unravel if she demonstrates this sort of lack of integrity in other areas.</p>
<p>And I think we all agree:</p>
<p>God help us if either McCain or Huckabee gain the nomination or presidency.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pickle</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/19/the-end-of-mike-huckabee/comment-page-2/#comment-222625</link>
		<dc:creator>Pickle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 22:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/19/the-end-of-mike-huckabee/#comment-222625</guid>
		<description>Huckabee, Romney, McCain...  Whatever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huckabee, Romney, McCain&#8230;  Whatever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alamedaman</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/19/the-end-of-mike-huckabee/comment-page-2/#comment-222620</link>
		<dc:creator>alamedaman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 22:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/19/the-end-of-mike-huckabee/#comment-222620</guid>
		<description>what&#039;s this politico &quot;hit piece&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what&#8217;s this politico &#8220;hit piece&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: katieanne</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/19/the-end-of-mike-huckabee/comment-page-2/#comment-222615</link>
		<dc:creator>katieanne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 22:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/19/the-end-of-mike-huckabee/#comment-222615</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Two conservative words for you MM: Personal Integrity.

Two more: personal accountability.

You seem to be lacking BOTH lately WRT Thompson.

Michelle, by your own standards, you can be called gutless (do not have the courage to apologize for a very public error in the Politico posting) and dishonest (published a Politico lie and never retracted it). 

Combine those two attirbutes and you have someone that fails the “integrity” test.

Why Michelle, why?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Ordinary Coloradian, this is what I was protesting.  This is what I plainly responded to, accusing Michelle of not having integrity.  I strongly disagree with you.  As I stated, if you don&#039;t like Michelle, then go somewhere else, but attacking her personally shows no class on your part, IMO.

I have no problem with disagreeing with people, even Michelle.  However, it should be done in an appropriate manner and I took great offense at your insults.  Surely you can state your case without going to the lengths you did.

&lt;blockquote&gt;How do you explain MM’s refusal to retract the hitpiece from politico, or apologize for her error?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

As for whether or not Michelle responds to your comments, this is her place and she can do whatever she wants.  She doesn&#039;t owe you or anyone else an explanation, IMO.  Apparently, she doesn&#039;t feel the need to respond to your comments.  That&#039;s her right.

BTW, I plan to vote for Fred on Super Tuesday and I have taken no offense from Michelle in regards to Thompson.

&lt;blockquote&gt;Katieanne, stop being a sycophant, and address the issue.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I don&#039;t think I qualify as a sycophant.  I did address the issues I wanted to address. I say what I mean and mean what I say.  I was just responding to your post, that&#039;s all.  In all probability, I will never personally meet Michelle.  There is no reason for me to think I would personally benefit from her wealth or influence.  Actually, I am doing quite fine because of the hard work of my husband and myself for 30 plus years, thank you.  So, I believe you chose the wrong insult to sling at me.  Back to the dictionary for you, I guess.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Two conservative words for you MM: Personal Integrity.</p>
<p>Two more: personal accountability.</p>
<p>You seem to be lacking BOTH lately WRT Thompson.</p>
<p>Michelle, by your own standards, you can be called gutless (do not have the courage to apologize for a very public error in the Politico posting) and dishonest (published a Politico lie and never retracted it). </p>
<p>Combine those two attirbutes and you have someone that fails the “integrity” test.</p>
<p>Why Michelle, why?</p></blockquote>
<p>Ordinary Coloradian, this is what I was protesting.  This is what I plainly responded to, accusing Michelle of not having integrity.  I strongly disagree with you.  As I stated, if you don&#8217;t like Michelle, then go somewhere else, but attacking her personally shows no class on your part, IMO.</p>
<p>I have no problem with disagreeing with people, even Michelle.  However, it should be done in an appropriate manner and I took great offense at your insults.  Surely you can state your case without going to the lengths you did.</p>
<blockquote><p>How do you explain MM’s refusal to retract the hitpiece from politico, or apologize for her error?</p></blockquote>
<p>As for whether or not Michelle responds to your comments, this is her place and she can do whatever she wants.  She doesn&#8217;t owe you or anyone else an explanation, IMO.  Apparently, she doesn&#8217;t feel the need to respond to your comments.  That&#8217;s her right.</p>
<p>BTW, I plan to vote for Fred on Super Tuesday and I have taken no offense from Michelle in regards to Thompson.</p>
<blockquote><p>Katieanne, stop being a sycophant, and address the issue.</p></blockquote>
<p>I don&#8217;t think I qualify as a sycophant.  I did address the issues I wanted to address. I say what I mean and mean what I say.  I was just responding to your post, that&#8217;s all.  In all probability, I will never personally meet Michelle.  There is no reason for me to think I would personally benefit from her wealth or influence.  Actually, I am doing quite fine because of the hard work of my husband and myself for 30 plus years, thank you.  So, I believe you chose the wrong insult to sling at me.  Back to the dictionary for you, I guess.  <img src='http://michellemalkin.com/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- NEW -->
