About Contact Archives RSS Columns Photos

Fred Thompson withdraws

By Michelle Malkin  •  January 22, 2008 02:30 PM

It’s over:

McLean, VA - Senator Fred Thompson today issued the following statement about his campaign for President:

“Today I have withdrawn my candidacy for President of the United States. I hope that my country and my party have benefited from our having made this effort. Jeri and I will always be grateful for the encouragement and friendship of so many wonderful people.”

***

Yesterday, I noted the first of many defections. It’ll be interesting to see where the rest of the Fred operatives scatter.

Speaking of scattering, where will the 12 percent of voters favoring Thompson in Florida go?

Bob Krumm took heat for his post-mortem. Looks like he’s owed some apologies.

I’ll repeat what Fred said in South Carolina after his disappointing showing:

“…we need to deserve to lead. That’s what this is all about. Deserving to lead…We’ll always stand strong. Stand strong.”

***

For what it’s worth to you (not much to me), Thompson supporter Al D’Amato goes to McCain.

Posted in: Fred Thompson

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. BobKrumm.com » Pay to stay
  2. Fred Thompson drops out | The Anchoress
  3. Fred Thompson out! Keyboard related forehead trauma at all time high amongst bloggers. « Mr. Skulduggery
  4. Liberty Pundit
  5. UrbanGrounds » Blog Archive » Fred Thompson Drops out of Race
  6. The Radio Patriot
  7. This ain’t Hell, but you can see it from here » Fred’s out
  8. Neocon News » Better make that casket fit for a Fred
  9.   Fred! Withdraws. Who Do I Support Now? — Pirate’s Cove
  10. Sierra Faith
  11. Werner Patels - Ideas and Issues
  12. Plumb Bob Blog » Fred Bows Out
  13. House of Eratosthenes
  14. Neocon News » Thompson continues to light up blogosphere, even in exit
  15. Church and State
  16. bows
  17. Huckabee: The Most Reaganesqe « What Is Your Worldview?

Trackback URL

Comments

  1. #1
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 2:34 pm, StevenWm said:

    What?!

    I’m somewhat surprised…

  2. #2
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 2:35 pm, backwoods conservative said:

    This country has missed a great opportunity.

  3. #3
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 2:35 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    I’m not surprised, but I’m worried. I just hope he doesn’t support McCan’t.

    I would die.

  4. #4
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 2:36 pm, englishqueen01 said:

    That’s too bad.

    Perhaps he’ll show up as a VP candidate? A McCain/Thompson, Romney/Thompson or even Huckabee/Thomspon would be okay…

    I’m very sad he didn’t go as far as I thought he would. :(

  5. #5
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 2:36 pm, John Ansell said:

    Hope his mother recovers. And I hope he supports Romney.

  6. #6
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 2:38 pm, bperiwinkle said:

    Well, this truly makes me sick.

    There is no one else to vote for….

    May God have mercy on us…..

  7. #7
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 2:38 pm, John Ansell said:

    Man, he didn’t even put any effort into his withdrawl speech.

  8. #8
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 2:38 pm, Lan Astaslem said:

    Noooooo!! There goes the only true conservative in the race. *sigh* I’ll still hold out hope for a Romney/Thompson ticket, and I’ll continue to pray that his mother recovers soon.

  9. #9
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 2:38 pm, mlnicosia said:

    Is it at all possible to encourage Fred to back Mitt? What would be the best way to go about that? Is there an email or fax or some other way for us to get his attention?

  10. #10
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 2:40 pm, Archon said:

    People are over-emphasizing the role of the VP. Thompson as VP would do about as much as Dick Cheney does now….nada.

    Sad day for conservatisim, that’s for darned sure.

  11. #11
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 2:40 pm, thirteen28 said:

    I’m not surprised, but I’m worried. I just hope he doesn’t support McCan’t.

    I would die.

    According to Geraghty, Fred’s not endorsing anybody, which is good IMO (although I’d cut him slack for endorsing Mitt).

    It’s a damn shame, but Fred missed some opportunities early on (starting with his failure to jump in when anticipation of his campaign was at fever pitch), and he never recovered. And sad to say, voters want to be pandered to, which to his credit, he never did.

    I’ll pull for Mitt now as the bulwark against McVain or Huckabee. If one of the latter two end up as the nominee, I bet there’s going to be a lot of people wondering why they didn’t give Fred a longer look.

  12. #12
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 2:40 pm, Wes S. said:

    Well…crap.

    With Fred out of the race, this may be the first election in my life that I sit out. Particularly if the “Republican” choice is McVain or Huckabee…

    …because if we’re going to have a Democrat running the country, it might as well be a declared Democrat.

    And I simply can’t bring myself to vote for any Democrat, even the ones who call themselves Republicans.

  13. #13
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 2:40 pm, blues said:

    Much as I like Fred!,I think it was the right thing to do.Hopefully,whoever wins does take council from Fred;and yes,I think the country has benefited from his having been in the race.

  14. #14
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 2:41 pm, stevem said:

    Bummer.
    I just posted a blog notice myself about this and had these thoughts.
    Did he start too late? I don’t think so.
    Did he want it bad enough? Not sure, I kind of like the fact he has not planned the last 20 years of his life around running for president some day.
    Who will his support go to. I hope not McCain, but what if he does not officially support any candidate?
    My hope, I think our best hope, looks to be Romney at this time.

  15. #15
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 2:42 pm, William Amos said:

    Now we only have rinos in our primaries. I still plan on voting for Fred.

  16. #16
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 2:45 pm, greysheepdog said:

    mICHELLE, WHERE’D THE “STATEMENT” COME FROM?

  17. #17
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 2:45 pm, Katycue said:

    It’s frustrating because I feel he could have continued to gain momentum and possibly win the election… I don’t believe these primaries and caucuses are balanced enough to predict the eventual outcome…

  18. #18
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 2:45 pm, Sergeant Tim said:

    Thank you, Fred Thompson, for both having served our nation as a Senator and your reminding us what conservatives stand for.

  19. #19
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 2:47 pm, Katycue said:

    …or that he could have won the nomination at least.

  20. #20
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 2:47 pm, playblu said:

    Yeah, Fred was the perfect candidate, and had massive support - I have no idea why he dropped out.

    And we’d be better off with President Clinton II or President Obama than John McCain.

    What are you people smoking?

    The enemy… perfect… good… something. Whatever that saying is.

  21. #21
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 2:47 pm, maurelius said:

    #7 John Ansell hit it just right.

    I liked Fred but it just didn’t seem like he was even trying. He could stand up at the debates and his resolution in the face of the globaloney digital question was great, but ideology needs execution.

  22. #22
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 2:48 pm, CarpiJugulum said:

    Well then it is official. We will have a democrat in the white house now. McCan’t, Rommney, Guilliani are all socialists to a large degree.

    I am totally sick now. What is left of conservatism seems to be disapearing.
    :(

  23. #23
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 2:51 pm, thegreatbeast said:

    It’s getting scary. There are two major candidates I can’t vote for and the third I have trouble mustering any enthusiasm for. It could be write-in time again.

  24. #24
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 2:51 pm, its vintage duh said:

    let’s hope that he can be a goldwater figure, inspiring other conservatives.

  25. #25
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 2:52 pm, zorro said:

    Thank you Senator Thompson. I was pulling for you.

    Now I am back to “none of the above” again.

  26. #26
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 2:53 pm, fred5676 said:

    With Tancredo, Hunter, and now Thompson out of the race, Mitt is the ONLY chance to defeat Shamnesty ‘09. We have all got to get behind Mitt because of this single issue.

    Tax policy and government programs can always be reversed by the next Congress or administration, but if and when up to 30 million illegal aliens are awarded PERMANENT residency and a ‘pathway’ to citizenship, it will be the single biggest transformational mistake this century.

    In a single business day, Z visa applicants gain permanent residency with no time for a background check nor health check. And if you think that will ’solve’ the problem, look out for the NEXT 30 million, packing their duffel bags and starting the hike north, to take their places. No fence, no matter how high and wide, will ever stop the flood if we keep offering enticements, rewards, and benefits.

    Attrition by enforcement is working; we must let it continue to work before Sahmnesty.

    McCain, Huck, or Rudy will give us more of this.

  27. #27
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 2:53 pm, thegreatbeast said:

    Oh, I forgot Huckabee! That’s a no-go showboat too.

  28. #28
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 2:53 pm, Go_Fish said:

    Nuts. I was really looking forward to voting for Sen Thompson in the upcoming primary here in Missouri. None of the candidates are perfect but he was darn close.

    I heard somewhere that his mother is ill. That would be hard to deal with on it’s own without a grueling campaign thrown in. I wish him well.

  29. #29
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 2:53 pm, swj719AWG said:

    Well, it’s official. I don’t like ANY of the canidates. I could stomache ROmney, but not by much.

    Looks like I’ll be voting a Bauer/MacLean ticket this year…

  30. #30
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 2:53 pm, Brent said:

    I’m bummed. He was the only guy in the race I cared for. I think I’m sitting out the rest of this BS.

  31. #31
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 2:54 pm, katieanne said:

    Truly disappointed. I had really hoped that Fred would do better. It seemed to me the fire was never really there, except for that debate where he creamed the Huckster.

    I am hoping he will get the VP position. I have no clue who I will vote for now, just who I won’t…McCain or the Huckster.

  32. #32
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 2:54 pm, Dr. Lead Based Paint said:

    Fred Thompson turned out to be the biggest disappointment of the 2008 race. Although was there a resounding groundswell of support before he entered the race, he entered the race late and took all the way up to the SC debate before he acted like a real candidate.

    Yes, Fred proved to be a DUD. The only thing he really had going for him was an extremely HOT wife. If he trotted her out more often, he would have gotten at least a 10 percentage point boost.

    Too bad. We desperately need a conservative in this race.

  33. #33
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 2:55 pm, backwoods conservative said:

    As of today, I will no longer identify myself as a Republican. I am a conservative. It appears the Republican Party has strayed too far from the conservative principles which attracted me in the first place.

    Republican candidates may or may not get my vote, depending on how well they demonstrate allegiance to sound conservative principles. If I find another party which is as conservative as the Republican Party is supposed to be, I will join it.

    I am not inclined to cast a vote for anyone on the basis of “at least they’re not a Democrat.”

  34. #34
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 2:55 pm, OneofThem said:

    Well, it didn’t seem like he had much of a chance anyway.

    Michelle, you should put up a new poll so we can see what your site’s visitors’ distribution of votes across candidates is now. :)

    Who am I gonna go for now? I think I’m gonna have to reluctantly say Romney. Rudy’s not too bad, but he’s obviously got no chance. Huckabee’s a no. Paul’s a big no. McCain’s a huge no.

  35. #35
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 2:55 pm, Dr. Lead Based Paint said:

    Hey, that reminds me… doesn’t McCain’s wife look like and act like a freaking “rhymes-with-witch?”

  36. #36
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 2:56 pm, swj719AWG said:

    The only thing he really had going for him was an extremely HOT wife. If he trotted her out more often, he would have gotten at least a 10 percentage point boost.

    Your name suits you. Apparently you’ve never heard his wife speak, because she’s probably the most intelligent of the canidate-spouses.

  37. #37
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 2:59 pm, NavyMom said:

    Wow, this makes me sick. I am so disappointed. My son (a Navy officer currently deployed in the War on Terror) says most of his buddies on his ship are disappointed, too. Let’s see…I don’t like the Huckster or McCain…Ron Paul is downright scary…Rudy would probably do okay, but his momentum is tanking (and there’s that pesky matter of his pro-abort/pro-gay marriage thing)…that leaves Romney? I’m going to need some convincing.

  38. #38
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 3:01 pm, meatpieandtatters said:

    Fear not Fred-heads. You are still loved.

  39. #39
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 3:01 pm, fred5676 said:

    On January 22nd, 2008 at 2:38 pm, mlnicosia said:
    Is it at all possible to encourage Fred to back Mitt? What would be the best way to go about that? Is there an email or fax or some other way for us to get his attention?

    I just called a campaign “operative” in SC to do just that. If I hear back and get info, I will post.

    Otherwise, watch out for Shamnesty ‘09.

  40. #40
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 3:02 pm, tre said:

    Well, that’s too bad. The only real conservative left in the race has dropped out. Makes me wonder about the Republican party and the Conservative movement nowadays. Seems as though it isn’t really the party of Ronald Reagan anylonger. About all that’s left now are RINO’s

    I suppose I’ll just have to hold my nose and vote for Romney now.

  41. #41
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 3:04 pm, rightisright said:

    none of us conservatives can sit on our butts and whine come Nov. 2008. Write in who you want…yourself maybe…does not matter, but we do have to vote for local, state and fed rep’s. It is most important we regain control of congress.
    Now that’s a scary thought losing congress and the WH which we are awfully close to now with Bush…so think before getting all pissy and sitting out the election next yr.

  42. #42
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 3:05 pm, trainwife1962 said:

    The last conservative has left the race.

  43. #43
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 3:06 pm, William Amos said:

    I dont know why Fred would back Mitt ? Mitt’s WOT policy is almost the same as Kucinich’s

    http://www.mittromney.com/Issues/confronting-radical-jihad

    Launch A New Type Of Marshall Plan Unifying Nonmilitary Sources Of Power To Support Moderate Muslims. As President, Governor Romney will call together our Middle East allies and the major nations of the developed world to establish a “Partnership for Progress and Prosperity.”

    GOVERNOR ROMNEY: “And further, if I were fortunate enough to be elected your President, I’d call for a National Summit of Nations to create a new partnership – a Partnership for [Progress] and Prosperity.”

    “This Partnership would assemble the resources of all the nations of the world to work to assure that Islamic states that are threatened with violent Jihad have public schools that are not Wahhabi madrasas; that they have micro-credit and banking, the rule of law, human rights, basic health care, and competitive economic practices.” (Governor Mitt Romney, Remarks At Yeshiva University, 4/26/07)

  44. #44
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 3:07 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Look for the media to rev up the McCain engines…

  45. #45
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 3:08 pm, qbeam008 said:

    The one candidate that both the media and the democrats were truly afraid of in a head to head debate. congrats to the media for not even acknowledging his candidacy because he didn’t enter the foray on their terms. congrats to the democratic party because they now will have a president elected from their party. think the economy is sinking now? wait till socialism 101 goes into effect.

  46. #46
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 3:08 pm, Speakup said:

    Sadly, this is the culmination of a half hearted, poorly run campaign.

    Many people were excited to have Fred join the race myself included he added Federalism to a Federalism lacking GOP field.

    There’s just more to running for Pres. than Fedspeak, its a helluva lot of work, organizing and no missed opportunities.

    As much as I wanted Fred to come on and get it done, it just wasn’t to be.

    Perhaps now Mitt will gain Fred’s votes and zoom to the kind of lead he should have.
    Mitt is the hard working, excellent CEO we desperately need to get our fiscal issues in hand, I hope, I believe he’s honest and forthright in the policies he will institute regarding our many other serious issues.

    Huckabee and McCain are unacceptable.

    Go Mitt!

  47. #47
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 3:11 pm, meatpieandtatters said:

    #44 I wouldn’t look for too much revving from McCain’s engine. Remember he’s a hybrid (RINO)!

    Bwahahahahaha.

    :-)

  48. #48
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 3:12 pm, SirKnob said:

    Well, I’m disappointed. I thought he should have stayed in the race until Super Tuesday. That would have been the first indication of how the Republican Party voted.

    I understand he wanted go with money in the bank so his campaign staff would not have to go without pay. It says a lot about the man, caring for his people where others may not.

    So, life goes on. Who is left. Lets see, the ex-governor of taxichussetts, hmmmm.. maybe, the ex-mayor of New Pork… hmmmm.. possible.. the Clinton relief pitcher from Arkwhitewater.. hmmm.. naahhh.. and of course the Republican impersonator from open boarders… blah.

    On the flip side, I could toss my support behind the Goebals twins.. wonder what type of VP Bubba will make?

    Then there is always the brother of a guy, who knows a guy, that is trying to take over Kenya.

    And those are our (laughing) conservative choices. Will one be any worse than the other?

    The only choice comes down to defense. It is the only dividing issue.

    Who will protect this great nation. We know the Dims will not. We think Romney, McCain, and Giuliani will be strong on defense. Their records suggest they will be liberal on many other issues.

    If defense of this nation is the only defining issue. I have to support/vote for whoever is nominated.

    Today we lost the talent of a great conservative. Hopefully, there will a spot for him in the next administration. For now, conservatives will have to wait another four years.

  49. #49
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 3:12 pm, rightisright said:

    Tancredo, Hunter and Thompson the 3 I could vote for and not be voting for the least damaging to the country.

  50. #50
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 3:12 pm, fred5676 said:

    Originally there were four candidates that stood for border security and no form of amnesty/rewards of residency: Tancredo, Hunter, Thompson, and Romney, in descending order. We shut down the Capitol switchboard last year on this issue. A Zogby poll, the first to offer all three choices, was overwhelmingly in favor of attrition through enforcement by both Republicans AND Democrats!

    It was a winning issue in the general election. This is a giant failure of the candidates to frame this issue in terms of “rewards and benefits” for illegal aliens versus the rule of law.

  51. #51
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 3:15 pm, meatpieandtatters said:

    Defense? Have you checked out the defense budget lately? Have you seen the number of defense facilities we have domestically here and abroad? Have you counted the number of nuclear-tipped missiles we have in North Dakota alone? FYI: over 150 missiles each with a 370 kiloton warhead. Hmmm? I don’t think you need to worry about our Military.

  52. #52
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 3:17 pm, Mookie said:
  53. #53
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 3:19 pm, mngirl said:

    Speaking of scattering, where will the 12 percent of voters favoring Thompson in Florida go?

    They’ll go to Romney. The idiot Al D’Amato notwithstanding, your basic Florida Republican is smarter than old Al, Romney is the only one left with a smidgen of conservatism in him. So, pray for a Guiliani or Romney win in Fla so that the media finally “shuts up” about McCain being the frontrunner. Its getting nauseating.

  54. #54
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 3:22 pm, swj719AWG said:

    If you want them to shut up about McCain, Romeny is the one you want to win FL, since it’s Rudy’s goto state. If Romney wins, both of the other two are in for some hurt.

  55. #55
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 3:22 pm, fred5676 said:

    Tuesday, Jan 22, 2008
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
    CONTACT: Romney Press Shop (857) 288-6390

    Boston, MA – Today, U.S. Congressman Dana Rohrabacher (R-CA) announced that he is endorsing Governor Mitt Romney and his campaign for President of the United States. Congressman Rohrabacher joins a strong Romney for President California team that includes Congressmen Howard “Buck” McKeon, John Campbell and Wally Herger.

    Making today’s announcement, Congressman Dana Rohrabacher issued the following statement: “Our country is facing great challenges. Among the most ominous is illegal immigration, which has been permitted to spin out of control for the last decade and a half. The safety of our country and the prosperity of our people are at great risk because of the magnitude of this problem. Mitt Romney is the candidate I trust most to take the steps necessary to secure our borders and protect the American people….

  56. #56
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 3:24 pm, Boomer said:

    Sorry to see Fred leave the race he will be missed. I guess it will be time to hold my nose and vote for Romney come supper Tuesday. McCain and the Huckster will be disasters as the RINO nominee and Rudy doesn’t stand a chance.

  57. #57
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 3:24 pm, liberty3 said:

    Fred was my conservative choice, and, had he remained in the race, I would have voted for him, but it is time to have a “youthful” presidential AND vice-presidential candidate—a pair we can promote in the 2012/16 elections. I’d prefer a Romney/Hunter or Romney/Tancredo. I agree with many others who would be severely disappointed if Fred supports McCain.

  58. #58
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 3:26 pm, rbb said:

    Now it looks like my only option in Nov 2008 is to hold my nose while I cast my vote for the chosen Republican…

    Come back Fred. Fred come back…

  59. #59
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 3:31 pm, ajmontana said:

    Glad I didnt fill my ballot out yet and just received a letter in the mail for some defective ballots going out to us here in Ca. mine was one of them if you fold it it breaks at the seam. I have no idea what happens to the ones that were already mailed seeing that I got it a week ago.
    Sorry Fred didnt get enough support, I liked his Ideas and principals.
    :(

  60. #60
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 3:32 pm, Lindsay said:

    I totally agree with #53. As I said in another post, I already voted today (in Florida) for Romney.

    I want to see McCain squashed by real Republicans without his cushion of Independent voters. I want the media to shut up the facade of support for McCain or Huckabee—no Republican paying attention last summer/fall would vote for McCain–no way. I believe that McCain is the Trojan Horse of the GOP–as all RINOs are.

    Still hoping for Romney/Thompson in November!

    Thank you, Fred Thompson.

  61. #61
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 3:33 pm, jrlingreenbay said:

    I had been a Thompson supporter from the beginning - but Fred was “The Candidate That Wasn’t”.

    He never truly acted ( pardon the pun ) as if he really wanted it. He waited too long to enter, and once in, he was a non-factor for a long, long time.

    While other candidates were out there on a daily basis - you could go for days without seeing him campaign.

    While his ideals were more in line than the other candidates with what I wanted to support - he seemingly lacked the internal motivation to really take this country back and move us forward.

    Too bad. Perhaps a daily regimen of Red Bull would have helped….

  62. #62
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 3:37 pm, sfcmac said:

    Damn! That really sucks. I just hope that whomever gets the GOP nod, has enough smarts to pick him as a running mate.

  63. #63
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 3:37 pm, Mark Jaquith said:

    Speaking of scattering, where will the 12 percent of voters favoring Thompson in Florida go?

    I’m split between (a) to the polls, to vote for Fred anyway (he’ll still be on the ballot) and (b) to therapy.

    With Fred officially out, it seems that there is no chance I’ll be voting for a Republican in November. Write-in time!

  64. #64
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 3:41 pm, walterc said:

    Instead of VP Fred I think I would prefer DHS Sec Fred in a Romney Administration.

  65. #65
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 3:42 pm, Mark Jaquith said:

    Re: #7

    Man, he didn’t even put any effort into his withdrawl speech.

    That’s the most I’ve laughed at a misspelling in a long time. Classic. Own it and say it was intentional. ;-)

  66. #66
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 3:44 pm, ajmontana said:

    fox just had a responce from Romney but they’re flippin audio was somehow nothing but blips….perfect, but Romney did say he would make a fine VP.. HMMMM???? FOX GET YOU’RE S___ TOGETHER!

  67. #67
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 3:44 pm, Lindsay said:

    Just read on the Corner National Review that Thompson will not be making any endorsements.

  68. #68
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 3:45 pm, arclight said:

    “Speaking of scattering, where will the 12 percent of voters favoring Thompson in Florida go?”

    a quick skim thru this thread is showing alot of Fredheads going to Romney. He’s been my 4th choice, now my first. Let’s get behind Mitt folks. He is our last hope.
    Go Mitt! (gawd that was hard to say)

  69. #69
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 3:46 pm, bk425 said:

    Sorry to hear this, i think it’s a real mistake. IMHO the msm has driven this drumbeat that he was to late getting into the race when the reality is that (with our new improved and absurdly early primaries) every one else was in far to early. The voters aren’t interested in a year of presidential campaign (as much as the wonks and politicos can’t hear that) and I think Thompson would have been a -great- general candidate. The only other acceptable candidate from a 2a perspective is very far back in the pack.

  70. #70
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 3:47 pm, Lindsay said:

    Hey AJ, from your lips to God’s ears regarding a VP slot for Thompson.

    I am sad he is dropping out but trying to be realistic in my vote and support now for Mitt Romney.

  71. #71
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 3:47 pm, Marshall Russ said:

    This is a good read over at “Townhall.com”
    The Case for Rudy Giuliani
    By Dennis Prager
    Tuesday, January 22, 2008
    Fred will be sorely missed in the campaign. Hope his mother will be OK.

  72. #72
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 3:51 pm, Lindsay said:

    Grab your anti-nausea meds, folks:
    This quote from the Corner at National Review that Katheryn Lopez posted at 2:52:

    Anonymous sources say that John McCain will appoint Al Gore to be either UN Ambassador or Energy Secretary if elected president. Says McCain feels that global warming demands that the world’s foremost global warming activist be given whatever he needs to not only confront global warming, but to assure the world that the US takes its role as world leader on this issue seriously.

  73. #73
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 3:51 pm, mileslibertatis said:

    I just wrote a note on facebook about this very topic, and I even used the same title!

    “Fred Thompson Withdraws: A Disclaimer”

    People do not support political candidates because they have something to gain.

    Let me start over.

    Conservatives do not support political candidates because they have something to gain. A substantial amount of Democrat votes come from precisely such people.

    That said, I do not support Mitt Romney because I am getting something out of it. At least not in the normal sense.

    Believe me when I tell you, though: If you supported Fred Thompson, Mitt Romney is now your best choice. He is closest to Fred Thompson not only in public and foreign policy matters, but also in ideology, his opinion on the Constitutional order, and the role of faith in the American polity.

    This is not a long note. That is all. If you think Mike Huckabee is your man now that Fred Thompson has left the field, you are sadly mistaken and you and I will both regret your decision if your lack of investigation, or thought, leads to either a Huckabee nomination, or a weakening of the field so that McCain is nominated. Neither candidate is an acceptable Republican nominee.

    So before you get all excited and cast your lot with “the other evangelical”, remember that Jimmy Carter was an evangelical.

  74. #74
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 3:55 pm, backwoods conservative said:

    On January 22nd, 2008 at 2:38 pm, John Ansell said:

    …his withdrawl speech.

    Maybe that’s why the media kept saying he was going to quit. Every speech he made was with drawl.

  75. #75
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 4:01 pm, Mookie said:

    Anonymous sources say that John McCain will appoint Al Gore to be either UN Ambassador or Energy Secretary if elected president. Says McCain feels that global warming demands that the world’s foremost global warming activist be given whatever he needs to not only confront global warming, but to assure the world that the US takes its role as world leader on this issue seriously.

    Pure BS.

  76. #76
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 4:04 pm, uhangtight said:

    aj, i heard the same thing and was on the phone with someone saying they saw and heard the same thing from Mitt.

    This is my dream ticket and has been ever since July or earlier Mitt POTUS and Thompson VPOTUS.

    I think that was the beginning of Mitt’s overture to Thompson. Hopefully, we will hear in the next few weeks something like Thompson backs Mitt or something even better.

  77. #77
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 4:06 pm, Lindsay said:

    Dear Mookie, I don’t think Katheryn Jean Lopez often posts information of excrement. Are you a McCainst fan?

  78. #78
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 4:11 pm, ajmontana said:

    I’m hoping the same Romney/Thompson but we will see. To bad the people who already have voted have been McCained in the head and Hucked in the rump. Uniformed and mislead, they fell right into their BS. idiots.

  79. #79
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 4:15 pm, nraendowment said:

    I’m going to write Fred in for both the California primary and general elections. To hell with the RINOS, we need to force the Republican Party to get with our program. If it takes pain and loss, then so be it… better than the Hobson’s choice being crammed down our throats.

  80. #80
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 4:20 pm, Mookie said:

    On January 22nd, 2008 at 4:06 pm, Lindsay said:

    Dear Mookie, I don’t think Katheryn Jean Lopez often posts information of excrement. Are you a McCainst fan?

    I haven’t decided who I’m supporting yet. Regardless, the idea is so far-fetched that it’s laughable. I’m sure we’ll hear any moment now that “anonymous sources” reveal that John McCain will nominate Bill Clinton to be Secretary of State and Karl Rove as his Chief of Staff.

  81. #81
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 4:27 pm, fred5676 said:

    Romney will be on Hannity this hour.

  82. #82
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 4:31 pm, fred5676 said:

    If Mitt would announce intention to offer Fred and Hunter VP and SecDef slots, in either order, Huck and McCain can be had - easily.

    And Shanesty ‘09 can be stopped - the only way to do it.

  83. #83
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 4:32 pm, meatpieandtatters said:

    Where’s the stamina?

  84. #84
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 4:38 pm, fred5676 said:

    On January 22nd, 2008 at 4:15 pm, nraendowment said:
    I’m going to write Fred in for both the California primary and general elections. To hell with the RINOS, we need to force the Republican Party to get with our program. If it takes pain and loss, then so be it… better than the Hobson’s choice being crammed down our throats.

    I feel your pain. I donated to Tancredo, Hunter, and Thompson, and I’m a declared Hunter delegate.

    But if you stand on that principle alone, here is what you get - in the whole country. The pain of Shamnesty ‘09 is permanent. Mitt is the only anti-amnesty candidate still standing.

    He is on Hannity NOW.

  85. #85
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 4:39 pm, graysonret said:

    Sigh…oh, well, there is alway 2012 to look forward to, and maybe a lasting candidate I can get excited about.

  86. #86
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 4:40 pm, ajmontana said:

    whats a hannity…..lol.

  87. #87
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 4:40 pm, mattymatt10 said:

    Disappointing.

    Special thanks to South Carolina for showing us they are a “conservative” state in the same way that Hooters is a “family” restaurant.

  88. #88
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 4:40 pm, John Ansell said:

    Mitt & Fred, enough said.

  89. #89
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 4:42 pm, shimauma2 said:

    Damn you Fred….*sigh*

  90. #90
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 4:44 pm, John Ansell said:

    Fred #83, thanks for that video.

  91. #91
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 4:57 pm, fred5676 said:

    On January 22nd, 2008 at 4:44 pm, John Ansell said:
    Fred #83, thanks for that video.

    More good news on how attrition by enforcement is working just fine in four states so far. Only 46 to go before Shamnesty ‘09.

    And this poll shows why the issue of illegal immigration should be a winner in the general election. This is the only poll I’ve ever seen that doesn’t offer just the tired old false dichotomy of “We can’t deport 12 million illegals, THEREFORE we have to make them citizens.”

  92. #92
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 5:09 pm, spidgy said:

    Hey you Fredheads, buck up! He was way behind in the polls, got in too late, didn’t have enough cash and didn’t show enough outward resolve. He may have been a true conservative, but POTUS needs to be more than just that.

    Mitt is my man because I know there’ll be no surprises. He won’t embarrass us on the world stage and he won’t doink any interns. He has the energy and the dignity to do the job.

    People are going to get tired (if they haven’t already) with HuckaNorris. Amnesty will eventually sink McCain. Rudy is to hedonistic.

  93. #93
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 5:16 pm, RobM1981 said:

    POTUS doesn’t have to be “more than just conservative.” That’s all we’ve ever needed.

    We just haven’t had one since, oh… probably Ike. Reagan was close enough.

    There’s not a remaining candidate who holds a candle to Thompson.

    Right now I would withold my vote, even if that means letting the Evil Empire run things for awhile.

    Give the people what they want, right?

  94. #94
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 5:20 pm, jamesgreenidge said:

    To Those Who Plan To Sit Out November: Please Be a MAN/WOMAN and Sincere To Your Principals and Vote Democrat!

    No If, Ands or Buts. If you want to chew sour grapes because your man or pol philosophy didn’t get nominated, at least prove that you’re not crippled or too damn lazy to vote by voting for Hill and make your apathy HONEST instead of hiding your temper tantrum in the tall grass! Make your animus official and vote Hill unless you don’t believe it’s not cowardly to shoot your party in the back by staying home!

    Tired of fair weather idealistic Repub/ Conservatives!

    James Greenidge
    Queens NY

  95. #95
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 5:20 pm, John Ansell said:

    Many thanks Fred. I agree, the amnesty issue is going to be a major player in the election. I post over on Newt Gingrich’s site all the time about the illegals and I’ve had 1 person post that they are pro illegal (or really anti me). I like Newt’s Fed Ex Vs. Government video. Cracks me up everytime.

  96. #96
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 5:20 pm, SilverCat said:

    The remaining 4 candidates are either openly liberal (McCain, Gulliani) or closeted liberal (Romney, Huckabee). Romney is a panderer and major flip flopper. Huckabee is on the lunatic religious fringe. As a moderate Republican, I will sit this one out or consider Obama if he makes it that far.

  97. #97
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 5:23 pm, Grey Fox said:

    I knew it was coming, but it is still sad. Bah. Yeah, Romney is probably second choice.

  98. #98
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 5:28 pm, Ordinary Coloradan said:

    Well, Michelle, you and AP got what you wanted. You undercut him constantly. Which conservative are goung to snark about now? Oh thats right, THERE ARENT ANY LEFT!

    What kind of conservative are you MM?

    Thanks MM, for ALL the support you gave Fred. /sarc

    You get the McCain you so richly worked for by cutting into Fred every chance you got and by never supporting either him or Hunter.

    Get ready for 30 million illegals MM and company - you bought them with your negativity towards conservative candidates.

  99. #99
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 5:31 pm, RobM1981 said:

    Who ever said that the “party” was what it’s all about? The party is a means to an end, not an end in and of itself.

    “My party, right or wrong” is the kind of thinking that brought us great leaders like LBJ, Dubya, and Bubba.

    We are on the brink of an economic fiasco here. The Fed has lowered interest rates that are already too low, driving the dollar even lower than it already is against foreign currencies. Dubya is announcing to the whole world that we will essentially print money, putting “rebates” in everybodies pocket to “restart the engine.”

    How do you think money is printed, anyway? Bucks’R'Us? This is how it’s done… the fed gives it away, the Executive gives it away. Nice.

    But I’m supposed to support this party? That’s the price of loyalty, aligning with the likes of this madness?

    I’m supposed to put someone like Huckabee or McCain into the midst of this? Huckabee never met an angle he didn’t want to play. He’s Hillary, ordained and with a Y chromosome. He has shown himself to be a man of whatever principles are handy.

    Open Borders McCain? Please. He’s a man of great physical bravery and courage, but very limited personal intellect and wisdom.

    His version of “clear thinking” is essentially what we have in the White House now. Eight years of that is more than enough, thanks.

    You think either one of these people have the guts to do what Reagan and Volker did in 81/82? You think either one of them would tolerate the pain of tight money, firm in their conviction that it’s what was needed to fix things?

    Reagan was a fiscal mediocrity - it’s his one major flaw - and he’s still a giant compared to the people running today.

    Thompson had what it took. These wannabes and shaman most decidedly don’t.

    Sour grapes, or well-reasoned argument?

  100. #100
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 5:34 pm, swj719AWG said:

    Gonna have to give Ordinary at #98 an amen…

  101. #101
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 5:40 pm, Ordinary Coloradan said:

    Before anyone asks. Romney. But no entusiaism. No money (usually $2000) nor any of my volunteer time that the GOP usually gets.

    If its any of the others, someone tell me why a conservative vote for a liberal, no matter the (R) or (D) by the name? Why shoudl I betray my beliefs once again?

  102. #102
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 5:41 pm, mngirl said:

    Boston, MA – Today, U.S. Congressman Dana Rohrabacher (R-CA) announced that he is endorsing Governor Mitt Romney and his campaign for President of the United States.

    This is great news for Romney. Nice to see Rohrbacher has a little more integrity than Duncan Hunter. Hunter was on Cavuto yesterday, remaining ominously silent on endorsement and the only candidate he chose to trash was Romney on some Bain Capital deal in China. Meanwhile, McCain is running around saying “I didn’t reverse my position on immigration.”

    Let’s see Duncan, in 2002 Romney saved the Winter Olympics. That same year he was elected Governor of MA and served for 4 years. That takes him to early 2007 at which time he started running for President. He hasn’t been involved with Bain since sometime before Jan. 2002. He’s not making management decisions there you clown.

  103. #103
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 5:45 pm, POTUS said:

    Speaking of scattering, where will the 12 percent of voters favoring Thompson in Florida go?

    Well, some of us have already voted for Thompson thanks to early voting here in Florida. But I would suppose many of those that haven’t will go Romney.

  104. #104
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 5:47 pm, The Raging Republican said:

    He had it all on a silver platter, but could not run an effective enough campaign or make worthwhile appearances in the debates. I like what he stands for and I’d like to see him get back into congress, but a president he will never be.

  105. #105
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 5:48 pm, Sean.Hackbarth said:

    Think any of the remaining candidates will be looking for a darn good weblogger? ;-)

    [Disclaimer: I used to work for Friends of Fred Thompson.]

  106. #106
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 5:49 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Thompson had what it took.

    Except he took it with him.

  107. #107
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 5:53 pm, katieanne said:

    Thanks MM, for ALL the support you gave Fred. /sarc

    Maybe she just didn’t like Fred.

    I think that all of us have to go to numerous sources to find the information we want. I don’t make up my mind about anyone from what one person or site has to say. And, IMO, that’s not bad. I had no problem finding positive information about Fred on the internet.

    I supported Fred from the getgo. Really hoped he would go all the way. However, I feel his organization really wasn’t up to a presidential campaign. And too, how much responsibility of that lies with Fred himself?

    I don’t know who I am going to support, but at the moment, am leaning towards Romney. Not because I think he’s the best; but only because he’s the best that’s left. I am hoping we get a Romney/Thompson ticket.

  108. #108
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 6:00 pm, katieanne said:
  109. #109
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 6:01 pm, mattymatt10 said:

    No If, Ands or Buts. If you want to chew sour grapes because your man or pol philosophy didn’t get nominated, at least prove that you’re not crippled or too damn lazy to vote by voting for Hill and make your apathy HONEST instead of hiding your temper tantrum in the tall grass! Make your animus official and vote Hill unless you don’t believe it’s not cowardly to shoot your party in the back by staying home!

    What if Obama is the nominee? :)

    Seriously, though, how is voting on principle being a “fair-weather Republican/Conservative”? As Rush says, I’m a conservative first. I’m a Republican only insomuch as that party reflects what I believe in. Now that Fred’s out, if Mitt is not the nominee, I’m voting Constitution party.

    There’s nothing honorable or principled in supporting a party simply because it’s the party. If the candidate doesn’t reflect my ideals, they’re not getting my vote, regardless of which party he/she belong to.

  110. #110
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 6:02 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    This article has a bit on what Hunter may have been talking about. I don’t know these guys, can’t vouch for any of it. I hardly think he’s a clown though, mngirl.

    Here’s a bit from that article:
    “BOB DROGIN: OK. AmPad was basically one of the deals that came back and really caused a problem for Romney back in 1994, when he ran against Ted Kennedy, when he made his first bid for elected office. He ran for the US Senate seat for Massachusetts. AmPad was a company they bought in 1992, and—Bain Capital, sorry—made a big investment and essentially bought the company. And after they bought it, the new management team that went in closed factories, fired a lot of people and really slashed the operations. And when he ran for Senate, some of these striking workers came and picketed him and really dogged his campaign, and it created a pretty ugly labor dispute. I think Kennedy described, you know, Romney at the time as putting profits over people.

    And after the campaign was over, they took AmPad public—and he lost—they took AmPad public, and it prospered for about a year, and then it crashed into bankruptcy, and by then Bain—and laid off, you know, several thousand people. By then, Bain Capital had taken out, I was able to document, $102 million. And that was a model that we saw in a number of places. I found about at least a half-a-dozen companies, where Bain Capital essentially bought in; laid people off; stripped it down; took out, in some cases, tens of millions of dollars or hundreds of millions; and then the company crashed into bankruptcy.”

  111. #111
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 6:04 pm, GaijinBob said:

    playblu said:

    The enemy… perfect… good… something. Whatever that saying is.

    The perfect is the enemy of the good.

    Though a good lesson for Fred is:

    Eighty percent of success is showing up.
    - Woody Allen
    and
    Never confuse movement with action.
    - Ernest Hemingway

    An important lesson for us who supported him is:
    Benford’s law of controversy: Passion is inversely proportional to the amount of real information available.
    and
    Demagoguery beats data.
    -former House Majority Leader Dick Armey

  112. #112
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 6:13 pm, longbow said:

    OK, I guess it’s Plan B…Go Mitt!

    At least I shouldn’t have to send Romney any money like I did Fred…

  113. #113
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 6:15 pm, mngirl said:

    Alohaguy:

    Nope not the deal. Something more recent in China. The deal you’re describing is -like it or not- Private Equity. Except that Bain started a lot of companies from the ground up - Staples, Sports Authority, etc. Typically though -net- they create more jobs than they cut, which is true of Romney’s career.

    I stand my new estimation of Duncan Hunter, based on his whitless performance on Neil Cavuto - CLOWN. Not understanding that if you haven’t been on the management team for over 7 years you’re not making a huge impact on what the company is doing, and if the company is doing anything illegal, that’s the current government’s fault.

  114. #114
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 6:18 pm, Dandapani said:

    Too bad. Fred was wanted, needed, early on, but arrived too late, arrived DOA. Looks like Ann Coulter and I will both be voting for Romney.

  115. #115
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 6:23 pm, greysheepdog said:

    The news is deafly silent about Fred withdrawing. A lot about the death of Heath Ledger though. He was probably a FredHead.

  116. #116
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 6:25 pm, Archon said:

    #94

    No If, Ands or Buts. If you want to chew sour grapes because your man or pol philosophy didn’t get nominated, at least prove that you’re not crippled or too damn lazy to vote by voting for Hill and make your apathy HONEST instead of hiding your temper tantrum in the tall grass! Make your animus official and vote Hill unless you don’t believe it’s not cowardly to shoot your party in the back by staying home!

    Tired of fair weather idealistic Repub/ Conservatives!

    Voting for Hillary (or anyone on the Democrat side) would violate my principles as much as voting for any of the Republicans left in the field. You may call it throwing away my vote, but at least my conscience will be clear that I voted based on what I think is best for America. And yes, I will be voting for a third party.

    I’m thinking that retirement is looking pretty good about now. I’ll vote for a third party of my choice, take my retirement money, horses, and guns, and sit out the next four years on my 43 acres in the Rockies.

    I’m starting to feel like a Rhodesian, circa 1978

  117. #117
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 6:25 pm, GaijinBob said:

    jamesgreenidge said:

    Make your animus official and vote Hill unless you don’t believe it’s not cowardly to shoot your party in the back by staying home!

    Tired of fair weather idealistic Repub/ Conservatives!

    If my party is hurrying to run away from me to the left, the back is the only target it provides. :)

    mattymatt10 said:

    Now that Fred’s out, if Mitt is not the nominee, I’m voting Constitution party.

    Or Libertarian. (It seems I favor them anyway.)

  118. #118
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 6:30 pm, graysonret said:

    http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/years/2008/0122081miniclip1.html?45

    If you want to take potshots at the candidates and relieve the tension. :)

  119. #119
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 6:34 pm, greysheepdog said:

    I think I will donate to John McCains campaign.

    It seems every time I throw money at a candiate, they drop out.

  120. #120
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 6:36 pm, NBF said:

    I guess I’ll be looking at third party candidates for the first time in my life.

    Gad, the dems were offering up big fat juicy losers, and we had to out-loser them. Talk about snatching defeat from the jaws of victory.

  121. #121
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 6:36 pm, Regulus said:

    On January 22nd, 2008 at 2:38 pm, John Ansell said:

    Man, he didn’t even put any effort into his withdrawl speech.

    Most descriptive post in so few words. Sums up the entire Thompson candidacy; I wanted to get behind him, but couldn’t commit because he didn’t seem committed himself.

    Thompson’s candidacy was the perfect embodiment of the saying, If you won’t be for yourself, then why should anybody else be for you?

  122. #122
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 6:39 pm, RoyceB said:

    I’m really disappointed in his withdrawal, although I understand his position. Now I have to decide whether to vote by write-in or reluctantly back the Republican nominee. Probably the latter, though, because I don’t want to experience another November 1992.

  123. #123
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 6:40 pm, meatpieandtatters said:

    Michelle! It’s your fault Fred dropped out! The forces of the Malklingons over-powered the Fredulons!

  124. #124
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 6:45 pm, old trooper said:

    A sad day for me.
    We are in for a very ugly time here.
    Ronald Reagan values are lost for another 4 long dangerous years here!

  125. #125
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 6:49 pm, Ordinary Coloradan said:

    Archon, need a ranch hand? I’ll bring my own guns and ammo from Centennial.

    Colorado GOP is deader than a doornail - it took the “Moderate” path to self destruction years ago under Owens (Pete Coors ring a bell re: Mitt Romney?).

    The national GOP is only now starting to blow up the same way - firs the legislature, then the executive. McCain is a disaster, Bob Beauprez writ large.

  126. #126
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 6:52 pm, Lindsay said:

    Sorry, folks, but this is starting to sound like the whiners on Daily Kos.

    I hope people who stay home in a pout this November, and effectively elect a Democrat, are prepared to live with their actions.

    Perhaps you should write in “Ross Perot” for president while shooting yourself in the foot.

  127. #127
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 7:01 pm, alamedaman said:

    former Fredheads- go to the Ron Paul side! small government and the Constitution FTW

  128. #128
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 7:02 pm, greysheepdog said:

    Ron Paul is a loon.

  129. #129
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 7:10 pm, Ordinary Coloradan said:

    Lindsay you can kiss my conservative rear.

    Why should I care to vote for a liberal? Tell me that. Why should I give my consent to somone who sill violate my trust, and govern opposite to my beleif?

    (i.e. Huckbaee, McCain and Guiliani).

    It does not matter if there is a D or an R beside the name. A liberal is a liberal, and no conservative should vote for one.

    People like you are what got us into this mess. Voting for the cover of the book, and not bothering to read the contents.

    Maybe this is what it takes to shake the Country Club up and make them listen to us grass roots, steer the party back to strong positions based on core conservative values.

    And on the bright side if the country goes to h*ll in a handbasket, a D will clearly be seen holding the handle like in 1980.

  130. #130
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 7:10 pm, katieanne said:

    http://ace.mu.nu/archives/252730.php

    Poll for Fredheads…who are you going to vote for now?

  131. #131
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 7:13 pm, Durangodarlin said:

    It’s too bad. Fred may not be running for President anymore, but he can still communicate the conservative message.

  132. #132
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 7:13 pm, NBF said:

    The scary part is that the remaining RINOs talk more conservative during the primaries than they are.

    Even then, Romney still ignores the 2nd Amendment, and talks of rewarding illegal immigrants with citizenship, and sending BBBillion$ in subsidies to Detroit. Don’t get me started on his democrat judicial appointment history.

    Will someone please explain how Romney is the least bit conservative? I’m not seeing it.

  133. #133
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 7:13 pm, realitycheck said:

    I hope people who stay home in a pout this November, and effectively elect a Democrat, are prepared to live with their actions.

    Without a doubt. I voted twice for a “compassionate conservative”, who ended up trying to sell our country to South America. I won’t make that mistake again with McCan’t, regardless of the consequences for POTUS. Besides, he’s a Dem in RINO clothing anyway. At least if he loses, he’ll probably be too old and feeble to try to run again in four years. And losing would be a handy payback for his part in shamnesty and campaign finance reform. I’ll write in Tancredo. I’ll take honor over selling out any day.

  134. #134
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 7:14 pm, katieanne said:

    Will someone please explain how Romney is the least bit conservative? I’m not seeing it.

    I think Romney is a moderate more than a conservative. He’ll probably get my vote because he’s the best of a bad lot but any Republican is better than socialists Hillary or Obama, IMO.

  135. #135
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 7:22 pm, Lindsay said:

    Ditto, katieanne. Amen.

    Won’t stoop to the Colorado guy’s level in this “discussion.”

    I really think some of these people are from Daily Kos or the Democratic Underground. I know they are enjoying your dissension and tantrums.

    I liked Fred,too. He was my first choice before Romney; yet, realistically I voted for Romney today.

    Let me ask you this…do you think Fred Thompson wants you to stay home and let Democrats win? I kinda doubt he would.

  136. #136
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 7:23 pm, hadsil said:

    Sigh.

    Back to Giuliani. He was an excellent mayor of New York, even if there were some issues of which I disagreed with him then, or now.

  137. #137
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 7:26 pm, Artbyruth said:

    #107 said:

    “Maybe she just didn’t like Fred.”

    Who does MM like?? Have you ever read anything remotely positive about the candidates here at all? I thought maybe she would get behind Fred because of his positions on immigration but noooooo she balked about him and criticized him too.

    No one is Mr. Right for MM….

    I wish Fred had stayed in the race until the results of super Tuesday….I know a lot of people who were going to vote for him.

    Sigh….no one for me to vote for now.

  138. #138
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 7:29 pm, Barry F. said:

    Duncan Hunter dropped out and, now, Fred Thompson. Conservatives are dropping like flies from this presidential campaign. What is a conservative to do this go around?

    From the remaining field, the best I can fathom voting on Super Tuesday is Mitt Romney. I can’t bring myself to vote for the MSM’s “Maverick”. Huckabee has made too many dramatic flip-flops for me to believe he is sincere. Rudy Giuliani calls himself a conservative but hold positions opposed to the conservative platform. Ron Paul….well….I think he is a loon. Sorry, Paul supporters. I have to say I agree with a couple of things on his platform. But, he is just to unhinged in his thinking on some and articulation of, basically, everything.

    Woo hoo. What a presidential election year. :-(

  139. #139
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 7:37 pm, Just Plain Bill said:

    Lindsay said:

    “Sorry, folks, but this is starting to sound like the whiners on Daily Kos.

    I hope people who stay home in a pout this November, and effectively elect a Democrat, are prepared to live with their actions.”

    I would rather have a declared opponent in office, doing what they said they would do than a “friend” doing the same thing. At least you know that you have a fight on your hands.

    JP

  140. #140
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 7:45 pm, katieanne said:

    artbyruth, I know more people who don’t like any of the candidates than people who support someone. Sadly, that’s the way it is this year.

    It fills one with dismay that the crop of candidates of Republicans aren’t any better than they are. Don’t we have any good conservatives in politics anymore?

    As much as it might be my inclination to stay home and not vote because I really don’t support anyone, I will vote because I can’t stand the thought of Hillary or Obama running the country. We have to keep Republicans in Congress or our country will become more socialistic than it already is.

    Hell of a note to vote for the lesser of two evils, but that is what seems to be on the plate for voters this Fall.

  141. #141
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 7:52 pm, Barry F. said:

    Hell of a note to vote for the lesser of two evils, but that is what seems to be on the plate for voters this Fall.

    Sad but true, KatieAnne. Sad but true. :-(

  142. #142
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 7:52 pm, greenfairie said:

    Okay, when you get three Ruth Bader Ginsburg clones on the SCOTUS or when the military is ground into dust, tell me which conservative King Arthur is going to come riding to the rescue to undo the damage in a short time? I’m not enthused at all by the idea of McCain holding the banner and there are times when I think of switching my registration to Libertarian out of disgust, but you really, REALLY don’t want Empress Hillary or B. Hussein Obama in charge.

    The fact of the matter is no conservative standard bearer had the name recognition or the organization to make it as a frontrunner. Fred Thompson had the name recognition, but waited too long to jump in. Duncan Hunter wasn’t well-known on a national level. Tom Tancredo was a one-note candidate, even though I pretty much agree with his take on illegal immigration.

    Without the right conservative in the race, running it the right way, you’re going to get moderates and the guys from the country club branch of the party at the forefront. Sorry, but it’s true.

  143. #143
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 8:05 pm, radio relay said:

    Sorry to see Fred drop out. He was the only true conservative.

    This country is rapidly running toward the abyss… Liberal lemmings happily bouncing toward the cliff and jumping off.

  144. #144
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 8:15 pm, davenp35 said:

    Go Mitt!

  145. #145
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 8:28 pm, dukebedevilment said:

    Apparently, top aides have told reporters that Thompson isn’t endorsing anyone.

    Folks, cheer up! Romney-Thompson 2008 is actually a possibility now!

  146. #146
    On January 22nd, 2008 at 8:36 pm, Blind_Mule said: