On January 23rd, 2008 at 3:26 pm, KaosKlerik said:
On January 23rd, 2008 at 9:36 am, said:

It was “Gulf of Tonkin. Google it.”

Don’t misquote the loons or they’ll…uh…get…uh…loonier.

That’s why I didn’t “quote” anything. I was being sarcastic.

I’m pickin’ up what you’re puttin’ down, though.

“…and as an unreliable… .”

Should read: “…and label them as an unreliable… .”

Sorry -

On January 23rd, 2008 at 9:36 am, PBoilermaker said:

Remember, fire can’t melt steel. Google it.

It was “Gulf of Tonkin. Google it.”

Don’t misquote the loons or they’ll…uh…get…uh…loonier.

This fear-mongering crap has got to stop!

Fishwrap? Michelle, you’re way too kind.

New York Times=Fishcrap…”If it smells we’ll cover it”

meatpieandtatters, you really need to give a little warning, before you make me spew my coffee across my desk like that! ROFL

On January 23rd, 2008 at 9:31 am, lgm said:
You nit pick the NYTimes while giving conservatives a pass. Do you want to read about lies from the Bush administration, which were exaggerated and amplified by Fox & co?

Like these “lies” printed by the WAPO and the BBC, two of the most liberal media on the planet?:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/3872201.stm

and:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/08/13/AR2005081300530.html

WMDs were not the only reason to erradicate Hussein, but it emphasized the necessity. As an Iraq war vet, I’m damned glad the weapons were found and destroyed before Hussein could use any of them.

To not realize that Iraq is just one of the many battelgrounds against Islamofascism in the Middle East, takes a pretty heavy set of cerebral blinders; or worse, someone who’s “stuck on stupid”.

You leftwing nutburgers are pathetic.

Or is the lead story that you think Bush has lied? Because Bush lying is also not an Iraq story.

So, you admit that it is more important that Iraq create domestic trouble for a sitting U.S. president? Or are you simply confused about what is important in Iraq?

On January 23rd, 2008 at 9:31 am, lgm said:
You nit pick the NYTimes while giving conservatives a pass. Do you want to read about lies from the Bush administration, which were exaggerated and amplified by Fox & co?

I read the AP (we know their accuracy track record) article – a study by 2 “two nonprofit journalism organizations” that says, typically, President Bush lied 231 times about Iraq having weapons of mass destruction out of 259 total lies told by him. Assuming WMD was a “lie” does saying it constitute 231 lies? Or one lie told 231 times? Even in your world you must have some standards of integrity.

Of course, the real problem for you (and AP, and the 2 “two nonprofit journalism organizations” is that, while WMD in the form we generally expected (e.g., nuclear) did not exist every EVERY intelligence service in the world and apparently even Saddam himself beleived he had WMD. In other words, being wrong doesn’t mean you are lying. But repeating known lies, as you are doing, is lying.

On January 23rd, 2008 at 9:31 am, lgm said:
You nit pick the NYTimes while giving conservatives a pass. Do you want to read about lies from the Bush administration, which were exaggerated and amplified by Fox & co?

Seen any UFO’s lately?

Remember, fire can’t melt steel. Google it.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RG31

http://www.defense-update.com/products/r/RG-31.htm

CATEGORY II and CATEGORY III MRAPS are the ones receiving all the attention in the MSM.

I dont know how many of the CAT II and CAT III MRAPS are in Iraq/Afghanistan service at this time.

New York Times=Fishcrap…”If it smells we’ll cover it”

Fishcrap is correct.

The NYT is not suitable for fishwrap, it’s only suitable for wrapping the fish crap that’s left over after you clean a fish.