About Contact Archives RSS Columns Photos

Hunter endorses Huck…heads explode

By Michelle Malkin  •  January 23, 2008 03:35 PM

1hh.jpg
Strange bedfellows

I need an Advil:

California Rep. Duncan Hunter, a former presidential candidate, announced Wednesday he is endorsing Mike Huckabee’s White House bid.

“I got to know Governor Huckabee well on the campaign trail,” Huckabee said in a statement. “Of the remaining candidates I feel that he is strongly committed to strengthening national defense, constructing the border fence and meeting the challenge of China’s emergence as a military superpower that is taking large portions of America’s industrial base.

“Along with these issues of national security, border enforcement and protecting the U.S. industrial base, I see another quality of Mike Huckabee’s candidacy that compels my endorsement,” he added. “Mike Huckabee is a man of outstanding character and integrity. I saw that character over the last year of campaigning and was greatly impressed. The other Republican candidates have many strengths and I wish them all well.”

Maybe Huck promised him a Cabinet position. Nothing else makes sense.

Disbelief at the Free Republic. This reaction sums it up: “Is this from the Onion?”

***

Let’s review:

Duncan Hunter - Keep Guantanamo Bay open
Mike Huckabee - Close Gitmo

Duncan Hunter - Staunch border security advocate
Mike Huckabee - Open-borders ethno-panderer

***

Allah: “Mr. Border Fence is backing a guy who accused opponents of Bush’s immigration plan of nativism? Two days after Fred drops out because he can’t pull enough conservatives to beat John McCain? Dude?”

Byron York: “The endorsement of Huckabee just doesn’t seem to fit, given Hunter’s national-security orientation, concern about China, all that. I thought it seemed so odd that, when I got the email a few minutes ago, I called Hunter’s spokesman to make sure it was right. It’s not huge news – Hunter got all of 1,048 votes in the South Carolina – but a number of conservatives who paid close attention to the race liked Hunter, and they usually weren’t the sort to support Huckabee.”

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Conservative247
  2. discarded lies - hyperlinkopotamus
  3. The Whole Bird
  4. No Runny Eggs » Blog Archive » Wacky endorsements continue unabated
  5. Balloon Juice
  6. The Daily Conservative
  7. Stop The ACLU
  8. No Thanks, Duncan « Countenance Blog
  9. Appalachian Scribe » Hunter Endorses Huckabee
  10. The Radio Patriot
  11. Duncan Hunter waiting to Endorse any of the other Candidates (UPDATE 1/23/07 - Hunter Endorses Huckabee)
  12. Hunter’s Behind Huckabee « Axis of Right
  13. Hunter’s Endorsement…? (UPDATE 1/23/07 - Hunter Endorses Huckabee)
  14. monoblogue » Blog Archive » Hunter shocks with Huckabee endorsement
  15. Duncan Hunter Endorses Mike Huckabee
  16. Brutally Honest
  17. Duncan Hunter Endorses Mike Huckabee for President
  18. Bear Creek Ledger » Electile Dysfunction
  19. This is fun at Speedkill
  20. The Dan Lee Report » Blog Archive » Was Dennis Kucinich right about UFOs after all? The real Duncan Hunter was abducted!
  21. Sierra Faith
  22. why do earthquakes happens

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: « 1 [2]

  1. #101
    On January 23rd, 2008 at 6:26 pm, steveegg said:

    I think I can imagine that, twotips. Here in Wisconsin, the fact that we will continue to be a tax hell with no relief in sight can be at least somewhat-fairly laid on the head of one RINO, then-Senate Majority “Leader” Mary Panzer, who refused to bring the first version of TABOR for a vote in the Senate in 2004. That move was so egregious, she drew a primary challenger in 10 days (fortunately, she was also too stupid to wait until after the filing period had expired to table TABOR), and was ousted by a 80%-20% margin in the primary.

    Of course, there are also a few other RINOs I have to keep on “thanking” for no significant action on the renamed Taxpayer Protection Amendment in the succeeding session of the Legislature (Dale Schultz and John Gard come immediately to mind), but even if there had been a consensus action then, the seizure of the State Senate by the ‘Rats in 2006 would have doomed the second consideration required to send the amendment to us voters for constitutional ratification.

  2. #102
    On January 23rd, 2008 at 6:30 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    I would have expected Hunter to endorse Romney who’s as close to conservative of the remaining candidates.

    As Michelle herself occasionally says, “You’ve got to keep up.”

    Look this isn’t meant for you personally, but would everyone who thinks he would support Romney please Google “Romney+Bain+3Com”? Or Romney and Huawei Technology?

    He should have probably endorsed no one, but he has reasons for not wanting Romney.

  3. #103
    On January 23rd, 2008 at 6:36 pm, flenser said:

    mngirl

    Via Wikipedia;

    In June 2005, Bain teamed up with Haier Group, China’s largest appliance maker, and private equity firm Blackstone Group in an attempt to acquire Maytag for over $1 billion. The bid was dropped a month later.

    On September 28, 2007, Bain and the Chinese networking company Huawei Technologies acquired 3Com for $2.2 billion in cash.

    I don’t see anything here.
    Romney was not involved in the 3Com deal, surely.

  4. #104
    On January 23rd, 2008 at 6:37 pm, flenser said:

    Look this isn’t meant for you personally, but would everyone who thinks he would support Romney please Google “Romney+Bain+3Com”? Or Romney and Huawei Technology?

    I did. What does this have to do with Romney? He no longer runs Bain.

  5. #105
    On January 23rd, 2008 at 6:45 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    I did. What does this have to do with Romney? He no longer runs Bain.

    He gets a reported $7-15 million a year from his stock in Bain. Some of that money came from selling 3Com to a Chinese company that helped build missile defense systems for Saddam and the Taliban. Not a problem? I can see someone’s judgement vis-a-vis China being influenced by $7 million dollars, but maybe he’s above all that.

  6. #106
    On January 23rd, 2008 at 6:55 pm, Mr_Conservative_Cat said:

    Well, well, if it isn’t my old pal Flenser, who still hasn’t kept his promise to answer a question from 4 months ago after leading me down a merry road first.

    For the record, everyone, the only one Flenser has supported while basing all the Republican front runners is Hillary Clinton, the other day when he said he’d vote for Hillary over McCain (McCain would be terrible, but who but a liberal shill would make such a remark?). Now there’s a real conservative for you, eh?

    You’ve been bashing front runners for 6 months now, Flenser, so let me ask you this: for all the negative conservative bashing you’ve done here, just who do you support, Flenser?

  7. #107
    On January 23rd, 2008 at 6:56 pm, fred5676 said:

    On January 23rd, 2008 at 6:45 pm, AlohaGuy said:
    …a Chinese company that helped build missile defense systems for Saddam and the Taliban. Not a problem? I can see someone’s judgement vis-a-vis China being influenced by $7 million dollars, but maybe he’s above all that.

    Saw your previous reference to Tiger Song and found this report.

    We apparently part of the technology to China before they sold it to Iraq!!

    How many traitors do we have in this country??? LOTS!

    From the report, one is Prof. John Lewis from my alma mater. In addition to Perry, Clinton, et al.

  8. #108
    On January 23rd, 2008 at 7:05 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Thanks Fred, I hadn’t found that link. (You Stanford guys are good reseachers :) )

    Yes, unfortunately many in this country put a buck ahead of national security. The 3Com equipment that is supposed to keep hackers out of our national defense computer networks could easily be modified by their new Chinese owners so that our defense secrets are relayed to China. Hunter asked Romney to use his influence to try and prevent that deal and Romney refused. And then Romney profited financially from the deal.

  9. #109
    On January 23rd, 2008 at 7:11 pm, fred5676 said:

    Forgetting Romney for just a second, how is this stuff getting past our supposed WOT-oriented administration??

    What the hell is going on here??

    “As business becomes ever more global, companies need to enhance their technology infrastructure to compete more effectively in the broader economy,” said Jonathan Zhu, a Bain Capital Managing Director, based in Hong Kong.

  10. #110
    On January 23rd, 2008 at 7:12 pm, mngirl said:

    Alohaguy:

    I’m with you on the whole Huawei deal looking ugly. But I think you are placing blame on the wrong head. Where is the DoD, the Commerce Secretary and the appropriate committees in Congress, as well as individual Congress(wo)men, the President? Whomever is the appropriate watchdog group.

    Romney is apparently still a stockholder in Bain. The Wa Po reported that the Romney family received between $7 and $15 million dollars from Bain (2006 or 7, not sure). To me this is a big deal. He has now personally profited from investments that involved selling a maker of national defense technology to a Chinese company that supported Saddam and the Taliban.

    How do you know that Duncan Hunter doesn’t have a good portion of his government pension fund invested in a mutual fund that owns stock in 3Com? Should the media have gone to him to ask for a statement on the Bain deal? Or isn’t invested in mutual funds that own stock in companies that do business with Huawei? Gasp! Shock? Horror! Oh no, what will we do? Shall we fire all of Congress? (well, yes, but that’s another topic)

    Do we look at the investors, or do we look to the Government to DO THEIR (insert expletive) JOB, and not allow our technology to be given away like it was during the Clinton years?

    This deal is a tiny component of what generates Romney’s income from Bain and he doesn’t have decision making authority over Bain’s decisions. Its not Romney’s job to make the people in Washington DO THEIR JOB.

  11. #111
    On January 23rd, 2008 at 7:14 pm, Common Sense said:

    Welcome to the Twilight Zone.

    Things are NOT looking up for the general election. Unfortunately, unlike the lefties, we have nowhere to go while they mess up the country for the next 4 years.

    It reminds me of The Matrix. Are most people so content with government handouts that they’ll stay in their little cocoons and live in a virtual world while the few free and brave battle for the freedom to live their own lives?

    I didn’t want much from a candidate, just the desire to win against our enemies, a secure border, and government hands OUT of my pocket.

    Even my parent are pessimistic about the future for their grandchildren, and they’ve seen quite a few presidents come and go.

  12. #112
    On January 23rd, 2008 at 7:20 pm, mlnicosia said:

    AlohaGuy you are so full of crap! You did all that research but very conveniently leave out that Romney’s interest in Bain is held in a blind trust. He has no influence and in fact if he were to have tried to influence the deal that would have been illegal. You also very conveniently forget to mention that the U.S. government approved the deal. Go blow smoke up someone else’s rearend buddy.

  13. #113
    On January 23rd, 2008 at 7:23 pm, twotips said:

    On January 23rd, 2008 at 6:26 pm, steveegg said:
    I think I can imagine that, twotips. Here in Wisconsin, the fact that we will continue to be a tax hell with no relief in sight

    I guess that I really am concerned about “settling” for the closest thing to a conservative with my vote. I think that is just what they want us sheep to do. They (GOP) know they have us over a barrel. Either stay home or vote for next best. We deserve better than that. Why don’t we have anyone to vote for that REALLY represents us? Maybe a “conservative” party will evolve from this mess were in. I sure hope it happens before we lose all of our voting power to the hispanics. We are there now in Texas.

  14. #114
    On January 23rd, 2008 at 7:24 pm, Barry F. said:

    Maybe Huck promised him a Cabinet position. Nothing else makes sense.

    Hmmmm? Smells of a possible appointment to me.

    Nothing else makes sense, considering how diametrically opposed they seemed to be on issues.

  15. #115
    On January 23rd, 2008 at 7:24 pm, Radiopatriot said:

    I’ll be meeting with Hunter this Friday at an event in the Palm Beach area. I’ll be asking him some hard questions, you can count on that. And if you have any questions you’d like me to ask him, leave me a comment at The Radio Patriot. I’ll have his ear. You can bet I’ll be chewing on it.

    Just last week in a radio interview with Col. Buzz Patterson, he told me he thinks Duncan Hunter “hangs the moon”. I contacted Buzz just now to get his reaction to Hunter’s endorsement of Huckabee…

  16. #116
    On January 23rd, 2008 at 7:26 pm, taylork said:

    Remember when we all though Tancredo was insane for endorsing Mitt? Well this takes the cake. In fact, this makes Tancredo look like a man on a mountain.

  17. #117
    On January 23rd, 2008 at 7:32 pm, DarkKnight said:

    On January 23rd, 2008 at 7:23 pm, twotips said:

    I guess that I really am concerned about “settling” for the closest thing to a conservative with my vote. I think that is just what they want us sheep to do. They (GOP) know they have us over a barrel. Either stay home or vote for next best. We deserve better than that. Why don’t we have anyone to vote for that REALLY represents us?

    Who is “they?”

    -The RNC?
    -The moderate GOP blogs?
    -The talking heads?

    None of these entities can cast votes for the GOP nominee in the caucuses and primaries. They can only provide polling, projections and analysis. It’s not any of the above people’e fault that most of the folks on here, who think the best “conservative choice” was Thompson, Hunter, or Tancredo, didn’t get the money or the votes that they needed to win the nomination.

    Are you saying that all of the GOP voters in the caucuses and whittled the field are forcing you to settle?!?!?!

  18. #118
    On January 23rd, 2008 at 7:32 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    AlohaGuy you are so full of crap! You did all that research but very conveniently leave out that Romney’s interest in Bain is held in a blind trust.

    Blind as in “See no evil?” Sorry to dis your boy, but I’m interested in what all the candidates are about. Yes, the government approved the deal, and no, I don’t think they should have.
    And yes, I think his financial interests might influence his decisions.
    And no, I’m not blowing smoke up your butt, I’m stating my case, and providing links and Google suggestions so that everyone can look and decide for themselves.
    If you are a conservative - you’re here are on this blog - please explain to me why we should be selling our defense technology to China, and how that is part of the conservative agenda.
    Your boy also believes in mandatory health care, and please explain how mandatory government anything is part of the conservative agenda.

  19. #119
    On January 23rd, 2008 at 7:34 pm, Boomer said:

    Well the circuit breakers in my little pointed brain need to be reset now. All that keeps going through my mind is “Whiskey Tango Foxtrot” over and over. My wife keeps saying “what the hell!”

    We are really disgusted and rapidly approaching down right pissed!

  20. #120
    On January 23rd, 2008 at 7:35 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    And no, I’m not trying to hijack the thread. I’m puzzled over Hunter’s endorsement too, but understand why he didn’t give it to Romney.

  21. #121
    On January 23rd, 2008 at 7:36 pm, Barry F. said:

    Electile Dysfunction : the inability to become aroused over any of the choices for president put forth by either party in the 2008 election year.

    I like that. But, why limit it to just 2008? It rings so true most election years. :-(

  22. #122
    On January 23rd, 2008 at 7:40 pm, Jim M. said:

    You did all that research but very conveniently leave out that Romney’s interest in Bain is held in a blind trust. He has no influence and in fact if he were to have tried to influence the deal that would have been illegal.

    And Hunter knew or should have known this when he attempted to get Romney to commit an illegal act. Does not say much about Hunter’s ethics. And perhaps that explains Hunter’s attraction to Huckabee.

  23. #123
    On January 23rd, 2008 at 7:54 pm, mlnicosia said:

    AlohaGuy - Lets put your smear tactics to bed.

    From the WSJ: the part of 3Com that does business with the U.S. government is called TippingPoint Technologies. It is a maker of network security gear 3Com picked up in a roughly $400 million deal in 2005. Before it agreed to be bought by the Bain crowd, 3Com indicated it would split off TippingPoint in an initial public offering.

    A person familiar with the matter said that after 3Com shareholders vote on the LBO, likely in January, a formal process to sell TippingPoint or conduct an IPO will begin, and that should go a long way toward calming any national-security fears.

    End of story? Romney’s interest in Bain is in a blind trust and he has nothing to do with it. The deal must still be approved by the treasury and us intelligence.

  24. #124
    On January 23rd, 2008 at 8:02 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    AlohaGuy - Lets put your smear tactics to bed.

    Smear tactics?

  25. #125
    On January 23rd, 2008 at 8:10 pm, twotips said:

    Who is “they?”

    -The RNC?
    -The moderate GOP blogs?
    -The talking heads?

    None of these entities can cast votes for the GOP nominee in the caucuses and primaries. They can only provide polling, projections and analysis. It’s not any of the above people’e fault that most of the folks on here, who think the best “conservative choice” was Thompson, Hunter, or Tancredo, didn’t get the money or the votes that they needed to win the nomination.

    Are you saying that all of the GOP voters in the caucuses and whittled the field are forcing you to settle?!?!?!

    Guess that you haven’t read my previous comments. Just expressing my grief at the choice of remaining GOP candidates. As a matter of fact, I did support Tancredo, then Thompson. I don’t believe that I can trust any of the remaining candidates. That’s all. I must be way out in Right Field.

  26. #126
    On January 23rd, 2008 at 8:12 pm, 24Klady said:

    I am sickened by Hunter’s endorsement of The Huckster. This surely points to not taking endorsements seriously. We think we know these candidates, but yet we don’t. I’m convinced there are deals, side-deals, and promises for later reward we’d not ever condone. I’ve worked on committees and knew that some of the people running the show had secrets or something they were just not going to share with us lowly ones. The next person I hear claim to have any legacy to Ronald Reagan, I’ll personally throw up in his rubber chicken dinner! Wake me when this madness is over. Honesty is a lame duck in these times.

  27. #127
    On January 23rd, 2008 at 8:13 pm, mlnicosia said:

    When you claim to have done the research and post partial facts thats a smear. When you say Romney “personally profited from investments that involved selling a maker of national defense technology to a Chinese company that supported Saddam and the Taliban.” that is an outright lie.

    Here is the link mentioned in my earlier post: http://blogs.wsj.com/deals/2007/12/03/some-soothing-words-for-3com-arbs/

    You are a fool to think you could come to a site like MM and put one over on the smart well informed people here.

  28. #128
    On January 23rd, 2008 at 8:28 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    “The blind trust is an age-old ruse. You give a blind trust rules. You can say to a blind trust, ‘Don’t invest in properties which might be in conflict of interest…”

    (Yeah, partial quote.)

    Who said that? Romney when he was attacking Kennedy. Romney can tell his trustee to stay away from investments in China, since as President he might have to make some very tough decisions on China.

  29. #129
    On January 23rd, 2008 at 8:33 pm, TexasTiger said:

    Since no one has said it yet…

    Duncabee!

  30. #130
    On January 23rd, 2008 at 8:43 pm, Michael said:

    I was a Hunter supporter as well. While I don’t agree with the endorsement, I can see a little logic behind what may be for him as it is like the rest of us, a decision based on the least of all evils.

    Where Hunter says “character” I read it to mean social issues, a place he and Huckabee have quite a bit in common. And regardless of the facts in the case, the Bain Capital/3Com deal seems to be a major stumbling block between Duncan Hunter and Mitt Romney on a personal level.

    Just because Hunter may have went against type in his endorsement doesn’t mean his positions on other issues or those things he works for in Congress aren’t valid. I’m not throwing the baby out with the bathwater.

    Judging by this reaction though, if Fred Thompson endorses John McCain (as he did in 2000) we may have full-scale mutiny on our hands.

    Michael Swartz
    http://www.monoblogue.us

  31. #131
    On January 23rd, 2008 at 8:54 pm, mlnicosia said:

    One Last Time for AlohaGuy:
    One would think that by knowing what’s in his blind trust, through newspaper reports or other means, any public official would be able to steer contracts to those companies.

    Buddy, it’s a blind trust. The whole point is that Romney doesn’t know where his money is being invested. If you want to hold him responsible for investments set up in a manner specifically so he has no control over them, you might as well blame him for the weather, too.

    Romney’s spokesman, Kevin Madden, confirms that all investment decisions were made by the trustee and the appropriate investment professional, and that Romney has been prohibited from discussing what to invest in with that trustee.

    http://time-blog.com/real_clear_politics/2007/08/romneys_blind_trust.html

  32. #132
    On January 23rd, 2008 at 9:03 pm, navywife91 said:

    Since no one has said it yet…

    Duncabee

    !

    I like it. :)

  33. #133
    On January 23rd, 2008 at 9:24 pm, TexasTiger said:

    Take it and make it yours. ;)

  34. #134
    On January 23rd, 2008 at 9:47 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Since he has asked his advisers to bring his investments into line with his beliefs - as in stem-cell research - that’s fine. Nevertheless, I am not so naive that I think his trustee will unload all of his Bain stock, nor do I think Romney himself will think he no longer owns any.
    I still see it as a problem, and I think everyone here needs to decide for themselves.
    Thank you for calling me a liar, you say more about yourself in so doing than you do about me.

  35. #135
    On January 23rd, 2008 at 10:04 pm, davenp35 said:

    Dana Rohrbacher endorsed Mitt Romney.

  36. #136
    On January 23rd, 2008 at 10:07 pm, derel3433 said:

    who do we expect him to have supported?

    i don’t understand the shock.

  37. #137
    On January 24th, 2008 at 12:57 am, THIRDWAVEDAVE said:

    Don’t forget, Hunter’s kid is running for congress this cycle. I wonder if this will damage him too?

  38. #138
    On January 24th, 2008 at 1:25 am, Ombre Rose said:

    Duncan Hunter said something in October ‘07 that threw me for a loop - that I absolutely thought, I CANNOT VOTE FOR THIS MAN over this ONE SINGLE ISSUE! HOW can that be? Border Security, Military supporter, endorsed by Chuck Yeager…???

    I was so stunned, I didn’t have the heart to cut and paste it and put it in my file on him.

    Two weeks later, I couldn’t find it ANYWHERE AT ALL on the internet! As if it NEVER HAPPENED - AND I DO NOT REMEBMER WHAT IT WAS!
    But it sure stunned me! - like when I saw Newt laughing at Sean Hannity in the Fall of ‘06 over the PRAGMATISM of open borders as he sat in TOTAL AGREEMENT with Alan Colmes, to Alan’s total befuddlement!!!

    NOW THIS!

    PURE BALDERDASH!

    Huckleberry is as screwed on Biblical theology as if The Good Samaritan had gone and left the robbery victim DYING IN THE ROAD and gone chasing after the entire ROBBER DEN to bless them with prosperity FOR THE REST OF THEIR LIVES AND MANY GENERATIONS TO COME - as a fine example of “CHRISTIAN CHARITY”.

    I’ll never support Duncan Hunter for ANYTHING ever again - EVER!

    I live too close to the Mexico border, where one of our main stories today is how the border bandit coyotes are now using small children as HUMAN SHIELDS.

    I’m fed up with these guys who think they can give us their best HALF the time and do any excremental thing to us they want to the rest of the time.

    Like if they spend HALF their time drilling holes in the hull of the ship in the middle of the Atlantic - and one quarter of their time pushing CORKS into the holes they drilled, and another part of their time throwing all the cork they can find overboard.

    God save us from the like!

  39. #139
    On January 24th, 2008 at 1:34 am, Ombre Rose said:

    Some of these candidates who have dropped out - it does NOT mark the death of the political philosophy they waved their own flags for - but rather that they were not believeable supporters and proponents of those values.

    I.e., I’d love to have a Christian Conservative to support - I HAVE NOT FOUND ONE IN THE GOP RACE.

    Straight-talker McCain? Biggest liar in the GOP party.

    Huckabee-former Baptist Preacher, Christian? Reminds us of those guys who hang a Christian fish outside their business and the folks discover that he is a CROOK. OPEN BORDERS out of TAXPAYERS’ POCKETS?????? Stuff him!!!

    Etc., etc., etc.

    Mitt is the only one left I’ll CONSIDER voting for, now, since Duncan pulled this - was thinking of voting for Duncan as a Write-In. SHELVE THAT STUPID IDEA, RIGHT NOW!

    I’ll have to see what Mitt does between now and November, but I have a nice list of Write-In’s ready - Michelle, Malkin, Ann Coulter, Oliver North, Franklin Graham…. etc etc, etc - they will not fail me!

    They’ll sure get my message across!

  40. #140
    On January 24th, 2008 at 1:39 am, Ombre Rose said:

    On January 23rd, 2008 at 3:48 pm, gayle said:
    Temptation huh?

    Kinda like the Devil tempting Jesus?

    What would Jesus do?

    ………………..

    This just keeps getting worse.

    We already KNOW what Jesus would do - the devil did offer Jesus ALL the nations of the entire world, and Jesus did NOT sell himself, even to the highest bidder. Jesus always stood by His Word, and His integrity, and His Covenant.

    Huckabee has sold out his own nation to the Illegal Aliens - and for what!

    And telling folks they cannot have medical attention if they smoke or eat more than HE says they can, or things HE says they cannot have?

    I have an idea what George Washington and Paul Revere would have done to him, if they could get to him before Patrick Henry and Nathan Hale, and a few others.

  41. #141
    On January 24th, 2008 at 1:49 am, Ombre Rose said:

    On January 23rd, 2008 at 4:20 pm, greysheepdog said:
    I swear we’re living in Bizarro World.

    I agree and I hope it is NOT partly my fault - with so many GOP candidates, I have been praying fervently for God to SHOW US THE “TARES” (wheat-imitating WEEDS) and REMOVE THEM before we have to decide.

    Huckabee, McCain, Fred, and Duncan are sure showing us something they don’t want us to know about THEM.

    YES, FRED HEADS! The man who managed McCain’s 2000 Presidential Campaign and kept Bill and Hillary out of JAIL when HE chaired the Senate Committee to investigate Chinese donations to their campaign funds, ETC ETC ETC ETC - appointed to the position BECAUSE HE WAS A FORMER WATERGATE PROSECUTOR who should have done a good job of it!

    INSTEAD, Fred had OTHER goals in mind - showing America the GOP was JUST AS BAD, deflecting and destroying the work of the committee towards their ASSIGNMENT.

  42. #142
    On January 24th, 2008 at 2:00 am, Ombre Rose said:

    On January 23rd, 2008 at 4:08 pm, Marshall Russ said:
    What will the Fredheads do when F.T. supports McCain?

    THAT will be a very very sad thing to watch. So many of them think Fred is NOT McCain! Just because he plays a decent fellow on TV.

    You think they would let Dr. Marcus Welby, MD operate on their brains???

  43. #143
    On January 24th, 2008 at 2:01 am, Alphonse said:

    Maybe Huckabee has been born again to Jesus, maybe to Satan, maybe back again to Jesus. Candidates have to have many faces today.

  44. #144
    On January 24th, 2008 at 2:03 am, Ombre Rose said:

    (Should have said, “Fred McCain, Deux”)

    :)

  45. #145
    On January 24th, 2008 at 2:08 am, Ombre Rose said:

    On January 24th, 2008 at 2:01 am, Alphonse said:

    Yeah, I for one would LOVE to know to whom Huckleberry was “born again” unto.

    If he THINKS it was Jesus, he skipped the part about Jesus telling Tax gatherers to RESTORE TO THE CITIZENS WHAT THEY STOLE FROM THEM with the ABUSE of their authority - FOUR TO SEVEN, even 100 FOLD.
    Huckleberry seems to have let THAT bit of Scripture, straight from Jesus’ mouth, slide right by him!

    I don’t think he got any tenets about being a powermongering micromanager from Jesus, either.

  46. #146
    On January 24th, 2008 at 9:04 am, AuntiEm said:

    I got polled last night. Democrat poll only asking if I would vote for John McCain against Hillary or Obama. Very suspicious limitation of choices.

  47. #147
    On January 24th, 2008 at 9:15 am, notanexpert said:

    Hunter endorses Huck…heads explode

    It’s always a good day when narrow minds are pried open by the unpredictable course of human events.

  48. #148
    On January 24th, 2008 at 9:25 am, erbarker said:

    To quote Barack Obama ” Ronald Reagan set America on a fundamentally different course. That is not conservatisms. Conservatism is maintaining the status quo i.e. President Eisenhower. Huck’s fair-tax plan is possibly the most revolutionary idea since the Boston Tea Party. The others are all just alike I guess you could them them either twiddle-dem or twiddle-neocon.

  49. #149
    On January 24th, 2008 at 9:41 am, AuntiEm said:

    What’s up ith Jeff Sessins? Fox cut him short. He has a questionaire for candidates on illegal immigration. I may move to Alabama.(I’ll get over it when the four inches of ice in my yard disappear).

  50. #150
    On January 24th, 2008 at 11:27 am, NewOrleansLady said:

    First thing that crossed my mind was… “Hmmmmm…. HuckPuck HAD to entice him with something!!! V.P.???”

  51. #151
    On January 24th, 2008 at 12:45 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    OT - one more since I’ve been called a liar for saying Romney still makes money off Bain. He has a severance package that runs into 2009. He knows what that package is, and there is nothing “blind” about it. He no longer controls Bain, but he does get money from them.

    From the Washington Post August 14, 2007:

    “The documents released yesterday, which require candidates to disclose only ranges of assets and earnings, show that Romney retained a lucrative “passive” investor relationship with Bain after he left the firm. Under a severance deal that runs through Feb. 11, 2009, Romney must abide by various “non-compete, non-hire and confidentiality obligations,” and in return he retains a “passive profit share as a retired partner,” the documents state.

    The arrangement allowed Romney to collect between $7.1 million and $15.5 million in dividends, interest and capital gains from Bain entities in 2006 and early 2007 alone. Advisers sought to distance Romney from his investments in Bain and other entities — such as numerous foreign companies and funds — by emphasizing that the candidate has had no control over his financial assets since he placed them in the blind trust on Jan. 1, 2003.”

  52. #152
    On January 24th, 2008 at 1:08 pm, Al in St. Lou said:

    On January 23rd, 2008 at 4:02 pm, mngirl said:

    Romney’s the only thing resembling sanity left.

    You mean: Rudy’s the only thing resembling sanity left.

    Rudy is the only one who hasn’t flip-flopped on an important issue. I started off wanting Hunter, then Fred, and they’re both gone. Rudy was my number 3 because McCain is totally unacceptable, and Romney is unelectable. He has been losing in all the head-to-head polls against either Hillary or Obama from day one.

  53. #153
    On January 24th, 2008 at 2:12 pm, Joshua P. Allem said:

    I’ve taken all the Advil the label says I can take without killing myself. I’m onto Tylenol now, but it’s not working either.

  54. #154
    On January 24th, 2008 at 4:02 pm, AuntiEm said:

    Sessions 15 questions for the candidates can be found at:http://sessions.senate.gov/forms/Real_Immigration_Reform_Roadmap.pdf

  55. #155
    On January 24th, 2008 at 6:01 pm, Mr_Conservative_Cat said:

    On January 24th, 2008 at 1:08 pm, Al in St. Lou said:
    On January 23rd, 2008 at 4:02 pm,

    You mean: Rudy’s the only thing resembling sanity left.

    Rudy is the only one who hasn’t flip-flopped on an important issue. I started off wanting Hunter, then Fred, and they’re both gone. Rudy was my number 3 because McCain is totally unacceptable, and Romney is unelectable. He has been losing in all the head-to-head polls against either Hillary or Obama from day one.

    GOD YES! At last someone here gets the whole picture from start to finish! Keep saying it over and over, everywhere you go! (Mitt has been my number 2 guy, but even the pundits on the right are starting to see Mitt doesn’t have the kind of dirty fighting style you need to win against the titanic Clinton Machine)

  56. #156
    On January 24th, 2008 at 7:42 pm, Al in St. Lou said:

    The MSM want to see Huckabee or McCain get the nomination because they would be easy to defeat. I hope Romney would win if he got the nomination, but I’m much more certain Rudy will.

  57. #157
    On January 24th, 2008 at 10:37 pm, Ombre Rose said:

    The MSM want to see Huckabee or McCain get the nomination because they would be easy to defeat. I hope Romney would win if he got the nomination, but I’m much more certain Rudy will.

    BET THE FARM ON IT!

    hehehehehhe

    I will sit back and watch your ship sink to the bottom of the Marianna Trench.
    Just Like I did with Robert Dole, H. Ross Perot, and Gerald Ford.

    I will not vote for McCain, or Ruby, or Huckleberry, nor a single one of those who have already dropped out.

    I might vote for Mitt, I do not know.

    Otherwise, it will be Michelle, or Ann Coulter, or Franklin Graham, or Oliver North…

    I’ll be worlds’ polite and NOT tell you how strongly I feel about THAT.

  58. #158
    On January 24th, 2008 at 10:43 pm, Ombre Rose said:

    On January 24th, 2008 at 2:12 pm, Joshua P. Allem said:
    I’ve taken all the Advil the label says I can take without killing myself. I’m onto Tylenol now, but it’s not working either.

    Try Alka Seltzer Cold or Flu, and a tub of hot water with several cups of Epsom Salts (equal amount of Borateem or Boric Acid will make it PH balanced and do the same job) for 20 minutes.

Comment pages: « 1 [2]

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Attack of the killer GOP balloons!

September 5, 2008 01:35 PM by Michelle Malkin

37 Comments | 0 Trackbacks

Andrea Mitchell in hostile territory.

Conservatives played it coy

August 29, 2008 11:14 PM by see-dubya

135 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

Condiments scored!

ABC reporter throttled in Denver…by police

August 28, 2008 01:08 PM by Michelle Malkin

174 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

Choked up.

What if they held a riot and no one came?

August 27, 2008 08:33 AM by Michelle Malkin

93 Comments | 8 Trackbacks

Fizzle.

Video: Mobbed at the Mint

August 26, 2008 02:43 PM by Michelle Malkin

204 Comments | 21 Trackbacks

Love, peace, justice…kill. (Photo credit: Liberty on the Rocks)


Categories: 2008 campaign, Mike Huckabee


JustOneMinute

» Seeing Is Not Believing

JustOneMinute

» Sweetheart Deal

Power Line

» The Bounce, Cont.