<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: S-CHIP: Here we go again; Update: Override fails, roll call vote added</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/23/s-chip-here-we-go-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/23/s-chip-here-we-go-again/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 22:08:33 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: My sentiments, exactly &#124; skewred.com</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/23/s-chip-here-we-go-again/comment-page-1/#comment-525950</link>
		<dc:creator>My sentiments, exactly &#124; skewred.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 15:09:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/23/s-chip-here-we-go-again/#comment-525950</guid>
		<description>[...] showed his conservative side when he could.  Look at the expanded SCHIP bill.  When held out on its own, Bush vetoed it because it covered children (and young adults) who [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] showed his conservative side when he could.  Look at the expanded SCHIP bill.  When held out on its own, Bush vetoed it because it covered children (and young adults) who [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rightisright</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/23/s-chip-here-we-go-again/comment-page-1/#comment-225639</link>
		<dc:creator>rightisright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 04:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/23/s-chip-here-we-go-again/#comment-225639</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure you all can imagine what the country would be like if HRottenC was president with a democrapic congress...don&#039;t think you&#039;d have time to grab your wallet and hide enuf money for yourself.
Come next nov. we need to regain the congress, uphill battle or not, the county&#039;s future rides on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure you all can imagine what the country would be like if HRottenC was president with a democrapic congress&#8230;don&#8217;t think you&#8217;d have time to grab your wallet and hide enuf money for yourself.<br />
Come next nov. we need to regain the congress, uphill battle or not, the county&#8217;s future rides on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Health Care BS</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/23/s-chip-here-we-go-again/comment-page-1/#comment-225628</link>
		<dc:creator>Health Care BS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 03:40:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/23/s-chip-here-we-go-again/#comment-225628</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;WHAT PART OF &#8220;VETO&#8221; DON&#8217;T YOU GET?...&lt;/strong&gt;

Well, as I noted a couple of days ago, Nancy Pelosi and her accomplices in the House of Representatives were determined to waste everyone&#8217;s time with another veto override vote on their fraudulent SCHIP bill.
As anyone with an IQ exceeding sin...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>WHAT PART OF &#8220;VETO&#8221; DON&#8217;T YOU GET?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Well, as I noted a couple of days ago, Nancy Pelosi and her accomplices in the House of Representatives were determined to waste everyone&#8217;s time with another veto override vote on their fraudulent SCHIP bill.<br />
As anyone with an IQ exceeding sin&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: monoblogue &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Gilchrest sides with Pelosi again</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/23/s-chip-here-we-go-again/comment-page-1/#comment-225573</link>
		<dc:creator>monoblogue &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Gilchrest sides with Pelosi again</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 02:03:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/23/s-chip-here-we-go-again/#comment-225573</guid>
		<description>[...] Hat tip: the lovely and talented Marylander Michelle Malkin. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hat tip: the lovely and talented Marylander Michelle Malkin. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: garyt</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/23/s-chip-here-we-go-again/comment-page-1/#comment-225542</link>
		<dc:creator>garyt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 01:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/23/s-chip-here-we-go-again/#comment-225542</guid>
		<description>When the Demos control the congress and control the White House they should close up the Defense Dept and mothball all the ships and close all the forts and bases. Then there would be enough money for a great health care plan. Wonder why Harry Truman and FDR didn&#039;t think of that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the Demos control the congress and control the White House they should close up the Defense Dept and mothball all the ships and close all the forts and bases. Then there would be enough money for a great health care plan. Wonder why Harry Truman and FDR didn&#8217;t think of that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin &#187; The Trojan Horse S-CHIP Republicans</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/23/s-chip-here-we-go-again/comment-page-1/#comment-225541</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin &#187; The Trojan Horse S-CHIP Republicans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 01:15:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/23/s-chip-here-we-go-again/#comment-225541</guid>
		<description>[...] today, I blogged the failure of the Democrat attempt to override President Bush&#8217;s S-CHIP expansion bill veto. I linked to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] today, I blogged the failure of the Democrat attempt to override President Bush&#8217;s S-CHIP expansion bill veto. I linked to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry F.</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/23/s-chip-here-we-go-again/comment-page-1/#comment-225513</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry F.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 00:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/23/s-chip-here-we-go-again/#comment-225513</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Aside from the vote buying aspect, this whole S-CHIP rigmarole is also a strawman argument intended to divert public discourse from the fact it is the legal system, with its over the top awards and ambulance chaser lawsuits, that makes health care costs and insurance coverage unaffordable and unobtainable for some people.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

John Edwards:  &quot;&lt;em&gt;Ambulance?  Did someone page me?&lt;/em&gt;&quot;

Thanks to the likes of Mr. &quot;Two Americas&quot;, we have such high medical malpractice costs for doctors.  And, to whom do those additional costs get transferred?  Well, yes - us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Aside from the vote buying aspect, this whole S-CHIP rigmarole is also a strawman argument intended to divert public discourse from the fact it is the legal system, with its over the top awards and ambulance chaser lawsuits, that makes health care costs and insurance coverage unaffordable and unobtainable for some people.</p></blockquote>
<p>John Edwards:  &#8220;<em>Ambulance?  Did someone page me?</em>&#8221;</p>
<p>Thanks to the likes of Mr. &#8220;Two Americas&#8221;, we have such high medical malpractice costs for doctors.  And, to whom do those additional costs get transferred?  Well, yes &#8211; us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DBNinKY</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/23/s-chip-here-we-go-again/comment-page-1/#comment-225498</link>
		<dc:creator>DBNinKY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 00:33:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/23/s-chip-here-we-go-again/#comment-225498</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;On January 23rd, 2008 at 2:20 pm, Azygos said:

&quot;...we need tort reform.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Bingo! 

Aside from the vote buying aspect, this whole S-CHIP rigmarole is also a strawman argument intended to divert public discourse from the fact it is the legal system, with its over the top awards and ambulance chaser lawsuits, that makes health care costs and insurance coverage unaffordable and unobtainable for some people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>On January 23rd, 2008 at 2:20 pm, Azygos said:</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;we need tort reform.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Bingo! </p>
<p>Aside from the vote buying aspect, this whole S-CHIP rigmarole is also a strawman argument intended to divert public discourse from the fact it is the legal system, with its over the top awards and ambulance chaser lawsuits, that makes health care costs and insurance coverage unaffordable and unobtainable for some people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Right Angles &#187; Blog Archive &#187; N.C. Dems on losing side&#8230;again</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/23/s-chip-here-we-go-again/comment-page-1/#comment-225395</link>
		<dc:creator>Right Angles &#187; Blog Archive &#187; N.C. Dems on losing side&#8230;again</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 22:23:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/23/s-chip-here-we-go-again/#comment-225395</guid>
		<description>[...] House Republican Leader John Boehner commenting on the vote: Democrats and Republicans alike established SCHIP a decade ago to ensure our nation’s low-income [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] House Republican Leader John Boehner commenting on the vote: Democrats and Republicans alike established SCHIP a decade ago to ensure our nation’s low-income [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Salt</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/23/s-chip-here-we-go-again/comment-page-1/#comment-225384</link>
		<dc:creator>Salt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 22:11:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/23/s-chip-here-we-go-again/#comment-225384</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Rusty said:

260-152.

This will pass in 2009. It’s inevitable.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

So, they went from a 273-156 vote in October to a 260-152 now.

If it were truly inevitable, would you still have the need to convince everyone else of it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Rusty said:</p>
<p>260-152.</p>
<p>This will pass in 2009. It’s inevitable.</p></blockquote>
<p>So, they went from a 273-156 vote in October to a 260-152 now.</p>
<p>If it were truly inevitable, would you still have the need to convince everyone else of it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SHoward</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/23/s-chip-here-we-go-again/comment-page-1/#comment-225374</link>
		<dc:creator>SHoward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 22:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/23/s-chip-here-we-go-again/#comment-225374</guid>
		<description>Rusty, I&#039;m not quite sure it is inevitable, as the future brings many surprises. 

I will agree with you that if the dems get everything they want in the bill, we will wish we had taken this compromise. I believe you there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rusty, I&#8217;m not quite sure it is inevitable, as the future brings many surprises. </p>
<p>I will agree with you that if the dems get everything they want in the bill, we will wish we had taken this compromise. I believe you there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: graysonret</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/23/s-chip-here-we-go-again/comment-page-1/#comment-225342</link>
		<dc:creator>graysonret</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 21:41:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/23/s-chip-here-we-go-again/#comment-225342</guid>
		<description>“No man’s life, liberty or property are safe while the legislature is in session.” —Judge Gideon Tucker</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“No man’s life, liberty or property are safe while the legislature is in session.” —Judge Gideon Tucker</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AuntiEm</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/23/s-chip-here-we-go-again/comment-page-1/#comment-225341</link>
		<dc:creator>AuntiEm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 21:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/23/s-chip-here-we-go-again/#comment-225341</guid>
		<description>How many healthcare policies would Hillary&#039;s campaign funds buy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How many healthcare policies would Hillary&#8217;s campaign funds buy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rusty</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/23/s-chip-here-we-go-again/comment-page-1/#comment-225334</link>
		<dc:creator>Rusty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 21:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/23/s-chip-here-we-go-again/#comment-225334</guid>
		<description>260-152.

This will pass in 2009. It&#039;s inevitable. And if there&#039;s a Dem president (which is more than likely), I think conservatives would have preferred the compromise legislation offered here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>260-152.</p>
<p>This will pass in 2009. It&#8217;s inevitable. And if there&#8217;s a Dem president (which is more than likely), I think conservatives would have preferred the compromise legislation offered here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: right_on</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/23/s-chip-here-we-go-again/comment-page-1/#comment-225263</link>
		<dc:creator>right_on</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 20:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/23/s-chip-here-we-go-again/#comment-225263</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.
-Benjamin Franklin&lt;/blockquote&gt;

This is &lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;exactly&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt; how the Democrats think...&quot;It didn&#039;t work before, because &lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;I&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt; wasn&#039;t the one in charge!!!&quot;

Don&#039;t confuse these people with facts...any facts, not supported by mainstream liberal thinking, are not true facts...true facts are what the liberals &lt;em&gt;wish&lt;/em&gt; were true facts, not actual facts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.<br />
-Benjamin Franklin</p></blockquote>
<p>This is <strong><em>exactly</em></strong> how the Democrats think&#8230;&#8221;It didn&#8217;t work before, because <em><strong>I</strong></em> wasn&#8217;t the one in charge!!!&#8221;</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t confuse these people with facts&#8230;any facts, not supported by mainstream liberal thinking, are not true facts&#8230;true facts are what the liberals <em>wish</em> were true facts, not actual facts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- NEW -->
