<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BDS group to spend $8.5 million against lame duck president</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/24/bds-group-to-spend-85-million-against-lame-duck-president/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/24/bds-group-to-spend-85-million-against-lame-duck-president/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:40:33 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: StarCMC&#8217;s Enemedia Roundup</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/24/bds-group-to-spend-85-million-against-lame-duck-president/comment-page-1/#comment-254411</link>
		<dc:creator>StarCMC&#8217;s Enemedia Roundup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 18:44:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/24/bds-group-to-spend-85-million-against-lame-duck-president/#comment-254411</guid>
		<description>[...] Bush’s public approval doesn’t improve as his days in the White House come to an end.&#8221; Michelle Malkin has the dirt on these playas. What a bunch of whiners.  Published [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Bush’s public approval doesn’t improve as his days in the White House come to an end.&#8221; Michelle Malkin has the dirt on these playas. What a bunch of whiners.  Published [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pgtips</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/24/bds-group-to-spend-85-million-against-lame-duck-president/comment-page-1/#comment-227216</link>
		<dc:creator>pgtips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 19:53:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/24/bds-group-to-spend-85-million-against-lame-duck-president/#comment-227216</guid>
		<description>Seriously, people like lgm have a very warped view of the world. There&#039;s no point reasoning with them and providing historical precedents. They can never put two and two together.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seriously, people like lgm have a very warped view of the world. There&#8217;s no point reasoning with them and providing historical precedents. They can never put two and two together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: garyt</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/24/bds-group-to-spend-85-million-against-lame-duck-president/comment-page-1/#comment-226533</link>
		<dc:creator>garyt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 02:39:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/24/bds-group-to-spend-85-million-against-lame-duck-president/#comment-226533</guid>
		<description>LGM what methods would you use to get intelligence. You think listening to rap music, lack of sleep is real torture? Remember when these guys get questioned they are not at some five star hotel but a prisoner of US forces. Would you surrender US cities nuclear hits to obtain your purity? Would FDR and Truman do this? Remember I used to be a democrat when the demos had some foreign policy sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LGM what methods would you use to get intelligence. You think listening to rap music, lack of sleep is real torture? Remember when these guys get questioned they are not at some five star hotel but a prisoner of US forces. Would you surrender US cities nuclear hits to obtain your purity? Would FDR and Truman do this? Remember I used to be a democrat when the demos had some foreign policy sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: garyt</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/24/bds-group-to-spend-85-million-against-lame-duck-president/comment-page-1/#comment-226516</link>
		<dc:creator>garyt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 02:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/24/bds-group-to-spend-85-million-against-lame-duck-president/#comment-226516</guid>
		<description>LGM sorry I am late in responding but just got home from work. First if Israel is the problem of Muslim anger then why are they pisssed off in Thailand and the Phillipines which both nations are far from Israel? I don&#039;t want to sound too preachy but the bible says Israel won&#039;t be going anywhere so shedding of Israel will not appease your Muslim friends. Muslims are already outraged and remember they had the 67 war and the Munich crisis before there was much USA involvement. Chamberlain also proved to us your appeasement doesn&#039;t work. So why doesn&#039;t Hillary, Billery, Edwards and the rest of them advocates these points out in the public? Are they ashamed of Democratic alternatives?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LGM sorry I am late in responding but just got home from work. First if Israel is the problem of Muslim anger then why are they pisssed off in Thailand and the Phillipines which both nations are far from Israel? I don&#8217;t want to sound too preachy but the bible says Israel won&#8217;t be going anywhere so shedding of Israel will not appease your Muslim friends. Muslims are already outraged and remember they had the 67 war and the Munich crisis before there was much USA involvement. Chamberlain also proved to us your appeasement doesn&#8217;t work. So why doesn&#8217;t Hillary, Billery, Edwards and the rest of them advocates these points out in the public? Are they ashamed of Democratic alternatives?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sunshinerbray</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/24/bds-group-to-spend-85-million-against-lame-duck-president/comment-page-1/#comment-226285</link>
		<dc:creator>sunshinerbray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 22:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/24/bds-group-to-spend-85-million-against-lame-duck-president/#comment-226285</guid>
		<description>Among the donors Michelle listed was &quot;Reggie Weaver, president of the National Education Association, the powerful teachers lobby.&quot;

Let me tell you guys, there are still teachers in the public school system who are still fighting the BDS syndrome anywhere we can - and I&#039;m a history teacher, so I&#039;ve got even more opportunity to let kids &lt;em&gt;gasp!&lt;/em&gt; think for themselves on these sorts of issues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Among the donors Michelle listed was &#8220;Reggie Weaver, president of the National Education Association, the powerful teachers lobby.&#8221;</p>
<p>Let me tell you guys, there are still teachers in the public school system who are still fighting the BDS syndrome anywhere we can &#8211; and I&#8217;m a history teacher, so I&#8217;ve got even more opportunity to let kids <em>gasp!</em> think for themselves on these sorts of issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ordinary Coloradan</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/24/bds-group-to-spend-85-million-against-lame-duck-president/comment-page-1/#comment-226183</link>
		<dc:creator>Ordinary Coloradan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 20:08:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/24/bds-group-to-spend-85-million-against-lame-duck-president/#comment-226183</guid>
		<description>LGM, we left them to their own devices, and ultimately, this menat they were in the hands of Pakistan&#039;s ISI.  Hence the Taliban ,and all that follows. (And we apparently are in no better shape to oppose the IS now than we were then with accomodationist forgein policy toward Pakistan being the same be it Bush or Clinton).

And I notice you completely skipped all the other points, including the Withdraw from Iraq rebuttal.

Nice try.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LGM, we left them to their own devices, and ultimately, this menat they were in the hands of Pakistan&#8217;s ISI.  Hence the Taliban ,and all that follows. (And we apparently are in no better shape to oppose the IS now than we were then with accomodationist forgein policy toward Pakistan being the same be it Bush or Clinton).</p>
<p>And I notice you completely skipped all the other points, including the Withdraw from Iraq rebuttal.</p>
<p>Nice try.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lgm</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/24/bds-group-to-spend-85-million-against-lame-duck-president/comment-page-1/#comment-226167</link>
		<dc:creator>lgm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 19:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/24/bds-group-to-spend-85-million-against-lame-duck-president/#comment-226167</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Ordinary Coloradan&lt;/strong&gt; said (#30):

&lt;blockquote&gt;So stop with the stupid “withdraw from Iraq and Afghanistan”.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Please read.  I said &quot;withdraw from Iraq, rebuild Afganistan.&quot;  What you say the left says and what they actually say may not be the same.  If we had not invaded Iraq and left 100,000 troops in Afganistan they would not be the heroin capital of the world, the Taliban would not be making a comeback, and we might have been able to (re) build a country that would be an example to the world.  Now it&#039;s just another example of a US created failed state.

&lt;blockquote&gt;We tried it in Afghanistan in the 1990’s, and look where it got us.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Please, what did we try?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Ordinary Coloradan</strong> said (#30):</p>
<blockquote><p>So stop with the stupid “withdraw from Iraq and Afghanistan”.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Please read.  I said &#8220;withdraw from Iraq, rebuild Afganistan.&#8221;  What you say the left says and what they actually say may not be the same.  If we had not invaded Iraq and left 100,000 troops in Afganistan they would not be the heroin capital of the world, the Taliban would not be making a comeback, and we might have been able to (re) build a country that would be an example to the world.  Now it&#8217;s just another example of a US created failed state.</p>
<blockquote><p>We tried it in Afghanistan in the 1990’s, and look where it got us.</p></blockquote>
<p>Please, what did we try?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: graysonret</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/24/bds-group-to-spend-85-million-against-lame-duck-president/comment-page-1/#comment-226115</link>
		<dc:creator>graysonret</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 19:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/24/bds-group-to-spend-85-million-against-lame-duck-president/#comment-226115</guid>
		<description>Waste of money..  Hope the ads run at 2am, along with other infomercials.  Well, they have the &quot;right&quot; to waste their money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Waste of money..  Hope the ads run at 2am, along with other infomercials.  Well, they have the &#8220;right&#8221; to waste their money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Salt</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/24/bds-group-to-spend-85-million-against-lame-duck-president/comment-page-1/#comment-226064</link>
		<dc:creator>Salt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 18:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/24/bds-group-to-spend-85-million-against-lame-duck-president/#comment-226064</guid>
		<description>I thought this was the party of saving the chiiiildren?

Couldn&#039;t they spend that money on helping others instead?

What a waste.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought this was the party of saving the chiiiildren?</p>
<p>Couldn&#8217;t they spend that money on helping others instead?</p>
<p>What a waste.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JammieWearingFool</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/24/bds-group-to-spend-85-million-against-lame-duck-president/comment-page-1/#comment-226048</link>
		<dc:creator>JammieWearingFool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 17:57:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/24/bds-group-to-spend-85-million-against-lame-duck-president/#comment-226048</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Pathetic Leftwing Fringe Group to Spend $8.5 Milli...&lt;/strong&gt;

These nutcases pretend to care so much about the poor and the homeless, so wouldn&#039;t it be money better spent if they donated it to charity.

Besides, when you have 99.8% of the media bashing Bush on a daily basis, spending this kind of coin is rath....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Pathetic Leftwing Fringe Group to Spend $8.5 Milli&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>These nutcases pretend to care so much about the poor and the homeless, so wouldn&#8217;t it be money better spent if they donated it to charity.</p>
<p>Besides, when you have 99.8% of the media bashing Bush on a daily basis, spending this kind of coin is rath&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Regulus</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/24/bds-group-to-spend-85-million-against-lame-duck-president/comment-page-1/#comment-226031</link>
		<dc:creator>Regulus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 17:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/24/bds-group-to-spend-85-million-against-lame-duck-president/#comment-226031</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;&quot;You hate me... that&#039;s good.  Hate keeps a man alive!&quot;&lt;/em&gt;
- From the film, &quot;Ben Hur&quot;

The one relevant thing that lgm got at in his post #16 was to hint at the reason why the donkeys and their clients are still running against George Bush: it worked for them in 2006 as a way to tar the entire Republican party, and they&#039;re going back to the well in 2008.

We should not underestimate the potential efficacy of this idea.  The 2008 election will be the last practical opportunity for the Angry, Vengeful Left to express its hatred toward the man who has driven them so crazy for the past several years.  

Even if they&#039;re not enthusiastic about Madame Hillary, they may still be roused to the polls for one last, heartfelt thrust of the middle finger into the air in the general direction of their nemesis, George W. Bush.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>&#8220;You hate me&#8230; that&#8217;s good.  Hate keeps a man alive!&#8221;</em><br />
- From the film, &#8220;Ben Hur&#8221;</p>
<p>The one relevant thing that lgm got at in his post #16 was to hint at the reason why the donkeys and their clients are still running against George Bush: it worked for them in 2006 as a way to tar the entire Republican party, and they&#8217;re going back to the well in 2008.</p>
<p>We should not underestimate the potential efficacy of this idea.  The 2008 election will be the last practical opportunity for the Angry, Vengeful Left to express its hatred toward the man who has driven them so crazy for the past several years.  </p>
<p>Even if they&#8217;re not enthusiastic about Madame Hillary, they may still be roused to the polls for one last, heartfelt thrust of the middle finger into the air in the general direction of their nemesis, George W. Bush.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greenfairie</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/24/bds-group-to-spend-85-million-against-lame-duck-president/comment-page-1/#comment-226018</link>
		<dc:creator>greenfairie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 17:20:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/24/bds-group-to-spend-85-million-against-lame-duck-president/#comment-226018</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s easy to waste $8.5 million dollars when you got it from union members who have no choice but to pay you dues!

I don&#039;t care how much you dislike Bush; a campaign to make sure the hate won&#039;t end with his presidency is pathetic.  Next stop:  BDS-ing any Bush 43 presidential library!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s easy to waste $8.5 million dollars when you got it from union members who have no choice but to pay you dues!</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t care how much you dislike Bush; a campaign to make sure the hate won&#8217;t end with his presidency is pathetic.  Next stop:  BDS-ing any Bush 43 presidential library!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dakine</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/24/bds-group-to-spend-85-million-against-lame-duck-president/comment-page-1/#comment-226014</link>
		<dc:creator>dakine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 17:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/24/bds-group-to-spend-85-million-against-lame-duck-president/#comment-226014</guid>
		<description>Good stuff OC and lgm...enjoyed the discourse.  OC, I have to disagree with you a  bit regarding waterboarding however.  In my somewhat expert opinion, waterboarding is pretty clearly illegal, and my buddies in the IC tell me that it is largely ineffective.  Reasonably minds can almost always differ however, so you&#039;re obviously entitled to your opinion.

garyt, hyperbole much?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good stuff OC and lgm&#8230;enjoyed the discourse.  OC, I have to disagree with you a  bit regarding waterboarding however.  In my somewhat expert opinion, waterboarding is pretty clearly illegal, and my buddies in the IC tell me that it is largely ineffective.  Reasonably minds can almost always differ however, so you&#8217;re obviously entitled to your opinion.</p>
<p>garyt, hyperbole much?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SHoward</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/24/bds-group-to-spend-85-million-against-lame-duck-president/comment-page-1/#comment-226003</link>
		<dc:creator>SHoward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 17:05:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/24/bds-group-to-spend-85-million-against-lame-duck-president/#comment-226003</guid>
		<description>lgm, responding to your first post: &quot;They can&#039;t be too big of losers if they&#039;re good for $8.5M.&quot;

Well, yes they can. Remember how much Soros poured into the 2004 presidential election? Aroun $24M? Well, his side lost.

A loser with money is still a loser.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lgm, responding to your first post: &#8220;They can&#8217;t be too big of losers if they&#8217;re good for $8.5M.&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, yes they can. Remember how much Soros poured into the 2004 presidential election? Aroun $24M? Well, his side lost.</p>
<p>A loser with money is still a loser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: juliesa</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/24/bds-group-to-spend-85-million-against-lame-duck-president/comment-page-1/#comment-225995</link>
		<dc:creator>juliesa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 16:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/24/bds-group-to-spend-85-million-against-lame-duck-president/#comment-225995</guid>
		<description>Losers, indeed. That Mattzie guy from Moveon is the one who led their campaign last summer to get congressmen to turn against the war and cut off funding. It didn&#039;t work so well.

The senators who were going wobbly on Iraq got back on the the bus, and congressional support for the war actually increased.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Losers, indeed. That Mattzie guy from Moveon is the one who led their campaign last summer to get congressmen to turn against the war and cut off funding. It didn&#8217;t work so well.</p>
<p>The senators who were going wobbly on Iraq got back on the the bus, and congressional support for the war actually increased.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- NEW -->
