…

DownWithTyranny!

If Florida Republicans needed another reason to stay away from the polls next week, they found it on MSNBC tonight: the political snooze-fest of the year. Big loser: Giuliani. He had the most to lose if nothing happened. Nothing happe…

As much as Rudy is lagging thus far, I too think he can surprise come Super Tuesday.

But I think, thus far, Romney is the “chosen one.” Will have to monitor the radio and tele today to confirm whether they still want Giuliani though.

You know Fox News Corp. does.

Fed Up

Conservative Cat, your ongoing obsession with flenser is sort of disturbing brah.

Take a look at what ugo is doing down south, a vote for the dems and in four years you might not recognize your country. If anyone thinks this era is like Reagan’s era they are mistaken, during Reagan we were already well adapted to soviet nuclear warheads aimed at us. We had already experienced inflation, odd and even gas lines, industry collapses such as construction, yes and housing too. They can’t scare me I have already lived though most every thing they can come up with.

A vote for hillbillary is not the same as a vote for jimmuh, way different world, much more dangerous, you see back then the soviets wanted to win but they also wanted to live to tell about it afterwards. Thompson’s withdrawl, no not the one he had while campaigning, left a bit of a mess but like the man said, don’t get stuck on stupid. Fred either didn’t really want to be Pres or he realized that he was not exactly what people had made him out to be so for the good of the country he withdrew, he’s that kind of guy. And the final possibility, the campaign was keeping him up past his bedtime. Just kidding.

I’m giving you a big ol Rush Limbaugh SITYS.

All in all, debate was long on wind and short on substance, just like the remaining candidates.

Romney “won”, but the bar was set pretty lowe.

“Senator John McCain of Arizona is the only Republican who promises to end the George Bush style of governing from and on behalf of a small, angry fringe. With a record of working across the aisle to develop sound bipartisan legislation, he would offer a choice to a broader range of Americans than the rest of the Republican field,” the newspaper said.

This especially

With a record of working across the aisle to develop sound bipartisan legislation

CONSERVATIVE TRANSLATION: you can depend on him to sell out.

promises to end the George Bush style of governing from and on behalf of a small, angry fringe.

CONSERVATIVE TRANSLATION: That, boys and girls, mean us. Doesn’t it just make you all tingly inside to be acknowledged like that?

he would offer a choice to a broader range of Americans than the rest of the Republican field,”

CONSERVATIVE TRANSLATION: you can depend on him to sell out – again.

I don’t know about you, but I find this to be a stunning lack of political understanding and savvy on the part of the NY Times, unless they believe that McCain would be the strongest candidate to beat Hillary, which seems nearly impossible.

Think of it: on the eve of a huge winner-take-all primary when only the Republican faithful are allowed to vote, McCain, already on terrible footing with all conservatives, gets nails absolutely powerdrilled into the coffin of his Florida ambitions by getting an endorsement from the one source more than any other that conservatives truly despise.

I’ll bet that famous penchant he has for 4-letter words is running on all cylinders right now.

It’s always possible that they believed that Florida’s more centerist Republican transplants from NYC will go for the centerist endoresment, but they’ve gone way astray: this makes Florida’s harder conservatives hate McCain more and gains him nothing because the NYC transplants are Rudy’s most secure demographic because they saw what he could do first hand and love him for it.

Winner? Rudy of course, by having their anti-endorsement. He gets a much-deserved shot in the arm by having it proved to the skeptics that his actual record is far more conservative than his negative publicity makes him out to be. And thanks to bumbling Chris Matthews (who really looked shocking old) Rudy got to address that anti-endorsement directly, and he did it in so relaxed a fashion I think most conservatives can immediately feel better about how he really sees the world as a Republican.

I’ll go way out on a limb and predict that at worst Rudy comes in a very close second to Mitt and McCain goes a more distant third. Rudy will play this up and McCain can’t run from it because it’s only a few days from the vote and McCain just isn’t that fast. When this settles Rudy is going to get alot more well-earned mileage out of this than it appears at first blush.

Second-place winner from the editorial effect: Romney, of course, who only needs to worry about Rudy for the next few days.McCain is no longer a threat.

I hope Mitt and Rudy’s ad people are fast: Announcer: “Senator McCain has long been an outsider to the republican party, and this endorsement from the extremely liberal, pro-democrat NY Times editorial board proves it.” You can imagine the rest.

Thank you, New York Times. From now on I’ll save the editorial pages for the really stinky fish, just to show my appreciation. I mean it. For real.

My old pal. Well, aren’t you cute, coming back with a lengthy response 1 1/2 hours later when the room is empty. Too typical.

Everything you wrote about Rudy relevent to the race is BS. You can’t substantiate a word of it and I know because I was in NYC during his terms as Mayor. You also left out that he closely worked with Reagan, reduced taxes and never raised them, turned a deficit into a surplus, stood up and beat organized crime (huge), fought against abortion in NYC(!) by promoting adoption (his only legal recourse as Mayor, duh!) and a host of other entirely conservative views and more importantly, accomplishments. Oh yeah, he led the largest city in the US out of it’s worst attack on US soil brilliantly.

But A, you have time for this but still haven’t kept your word by answering a single question 10 weeks ago, here’s the link everyone

http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/08/the-kerik-indictment-giuliani-and-the-gop/

and

B. You said only a few days ago that you would vote for Hillary Clinton over McCain. Let me repeat that for eveyone: Flenser said he would pro-actively vote for Hillary to put her in the White House.

You’d like to call me unhinged, but the truth is you’d like to breeze in here as a liberal shill undermining enthuisiasm among the conservative faithful without anyone pointing you out. Frustrating isn’t it?

I’ll be here every day between now and November, Flenser, just for the occasional newbie who might show up and take your garbage as truth, and show you up for what you are.

Anyway, say Hi to Hillary for me when you cast your vote for her in Nov, as you indicated you would.

And I’m still waiting for you to keep your word on that thread.

Good idea……But where would you ever find any MSM media talking heads to act as moderators who are not lib/dems?