<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stimulicious stupidity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/25/stimulicious-stupidity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/25/stimulicious-stupidity/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 19:57:55 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: tgillian</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/25/stimulicious-stupidity/comment-page-1/#comment-227745</link>
		<dc:creator>tgillian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 21:25:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/25/stimulicious-stupidity/#comment-227745</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m anxious to see an explanation of the $50B for businesses.  I bet California gets most of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m anxious to see an explanation of the $50B for businesses.  I bet California gets most of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TMoney</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/25/stimulicious-stupidity/comment-page-1/#comment-227614</link>
		<dc:creator>TMoney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 14:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/25/stimulicious-stupidity/#comment-227614</guid>
		<description>Oops...That&#039;ll teach them to give me someone else&#039;s money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops&#8230;That&#8217;ll teach them to give me someone else&#8217;s money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TMoney</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/25/stimulicious-stupidity/comment-page-1/#comment-227613</link>
		<dc:creator>TMoney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 14:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/25/stimulicious-stupidity/#comment-227613</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m going to teach the government a lesson: When I get my rebate, I&#039;m going to cash it and put it in a box - out of the economy and out of their reach.

That&#039;ll teach them to give me money!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going to teach the government a lesson: When I get my rebate, I&#8217;m going to cash it and put it in a box &#8211; out of the economy and out of their reach.</p>
<p>That&#8217;ll teach them to give me money!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greenLibertarian</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/25/stimulicious-stupidity/comment-page-1/#comment-227574</link>
		<dc:creator>greenLibertarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 09:42:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/25/stimulicious-stupidity/#comment-227574</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s the new American way.  The least deserving get the most handouts, disgusting.  Of course, hard-working people deserve it, regardless of their wage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s the new American way.  The least deserving get the most handouts, disgusting.  Of course, hard-working people deserve it, regardless of their wage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin K.</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/25/stimulicious-stupidity/comment-page-1/#comment-227424</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin K.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 01:58:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/25/stimulicious-stupidity/#comment-227424</guid>
		<description>lgm (#11) said:
&lt;blockquote&gt;You can work 50 hours/week at minimum wage and pay no taxes. Not all poor people are slackers. And not all slackers are poor.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

This is a good point.  I&#039;ll bet a bunch of our lower enlisted will also fall into that employed but paying no taxes category, and many of them work their butts off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lgm (#11) said:</p>
<blockquote><p>You can work 50 hours/week at minimum wage and pay no taxes. Not all poor people are slackers. And not all slackers are poor.</p></blockquote>
<p>This is a good point.  I&#8217;ll bet a bunch of our lower enlisted will also fall into that employed but paying no taxes category, and many of them work their butts off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Common Sense</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/25/stimulicious-stupidity/comment-page-1/#comment-227394</link>
		<dc:creator>Common Sense</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 00:48:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/25/stimulicious-stupidity/#comment-227394</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m the only one of my siblings who will qualify for a rebate, barely. And I&#039;m lucky enough to still have 2 kids at home. My husband&#039;s job pays half of what his old jobs does, otherwise we wouldn&#039;t make the cut either.

My sibs works their butts off at their jobs and pay gobs of taxes. Why don&#039;t they get theirs? Some rebate! Doesn&#039;t my brother get credit for having a successful business that employs a bunch of other people? Creating jobs isn&#039;t stimulating the economy?

As for unemployment, my 21 year old son with a high school diploma and 4 years of work experience got 3 job offers within 2 days of applying. There&#039;s not an unemployment problem. The summer of 2002 when there wasn&#039;t a single IT job posted when I was unemployed, THAT was a problem.

And is it even going to be a REAL rebate anyway? The last one wasn&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m the only one of my siblings who will qualify for a rebate, barely. And I&#8217;m lucky enough to still have 2 kids at home. My husband&#8217;s job pays half of what his old jobs does, otherwise we wouldn&#8217;t make the cut either.</p>
<p>My sibs works their butts off at their jobs and pay gobs of taxes. Why don&#8217;t they get theirs? Some rebate! Doesn&#8217;t my brother get credit for having a successful business that employs a bunch of other people? Creating jobs isn&#8217;t stimulating the economy?</p>
<p>As for unemployment, my 21 year old son with a high school diploma and 4 years of work experience got 3 job offers within 2 days of applying. There&#8217;s not an unemployment problem. The summer of 2002 when there wasn&#8217;t a single IT job posted when I was unemployed, THAT was a problem.</p>
<p>And is it even going to be a REAL rebate anyway? The last one wasn&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Klaatu</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/25/stimulicious-stupidity/comment-page-1/#comment-227359</link>
		<dc:creator>Klaatu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 23:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/25/stimulicious-stupidity/#comment-227359</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m surprised that everyone is getting so worked up about this.  In my view, it&#039;s no different than a tax cut.... delayed.

We paid tax money... we get it back.  Except of course, some who didn&#039;t pay get it back... just overlook that part of the argument.

I say: any money that comes to me instead of the government is money well spent.  Even if we use it to pay debts, we reduce the amount of interest we pay, leaving more money for consumption of other goods.  And, no offense to the debtors here, but if you did it once, you will do it again.  If you put $600 on your credit card bill, you&#039;ll have it back on in 3 months.  Think back-to-school computer or summer vacation or... you get the point.

And as to that cartoon: baloney!  You can&#039;t get a decent handgun for $600 much less a long weapon.  And $7 for a six-pack?!!??  What are you people drinking?????  It ain&#039;t no Stella Artois.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m surprised that everyone is getting so worked up about this.  In my view, it&#8217;s no different than a tax cut&#8230;. delayed.</p>
<p>We paid tax money&#8230; we get it back.  Except of course, some who didn&#8217;t pay get it back&#8230; just overlook that part of the argument.</p>
<p>I say: any money that comes to me instead of the government is money well spent.  Even if we use it to pay debts, we reduce the amount of interest we pay, leaving more money for consumption of other goods.  And, no offense to the debtors here, but if you did it once, you will do it again.  If you put $600 on your credit card bill, you&#8217;ll have it back on in 3 months.  Think back-to-school computer or summer vacation or&#8230; you get the point.</p>
<p>And as to that cartoon: baloney!  You can&#8217;t get a decent handgun for $600 much less a long weapon.  And $7 for a six-pack?!!??  What are you people drinking?????  It ain&#8217;t no Stella Artois.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StephC</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/25/stimulicious-stupidity/comment-page-1/#comment-227332</link>
		<dc:creator>StephC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 22:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/25/stimulicious-stupidity/#comment-227332</guid>
		<description>I will also apply it to debts, and use some for a little extra spending money for our vacation in July.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will also apply it to debts, and use some for a little extra spending money for our vacation in July.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: corona</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/25/stimulicious-stupidity/comment-page-1/#comment-227310</link>
		<dc:creator>corona</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 21:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/25/stimulicious-stupidity/#comment-227310</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Darth Vader nixes Hans Bader!&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;em&gt;404 error&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Darth Vader nixes Hans Bader!</strong></p>
<p><em>404 error</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnHolliday</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/25/stimulicious-stupidity/comment-page-1/#comment-227289</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnHolliday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 21:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/25/stimulicious-stupidity/#comment-227289</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.attackcartoons.com/article.php?story=2008011910390571&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;There are a lot of things you can buy with a tax rebate.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know.  <a href="http://www.attackcartoons.com/article.php?story=2008011910390571" rel="nofollow">There are a lot of things you can buy with a tax rebate.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: graysonret</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/25/stimulicious-stupidity/comment-page-1/#comment-227287</link>
		<dc:creator>graysonret</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 21:26:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/25/stimulicious-stupidity/#comment-227287</guid>
		<description>What gets me is what Pelosi said about returning money to the &quot;hard-working&quot; people.  Really?  We ought to remember that when, later, you want to raise taxes, and do away with the tax cuts, on the &quot;hard-working&quot; people of America. Aren&#039;t you being a hypocrite, Pelosi?  You want to take more money from us, yet, now, you want to return money to us. I hope when tax increase speech time comes, someone will point it out to you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What gets me is what Pelosi said about returning money to the &#8220;hard-working&#8221; people.  Really?  We ought to remember that when, later, you want to raise taxes, and do away with the tax cuts, on the &#8220;hard-working&#8221; people of America. Aren&#8217;t you being a hypocrite, Pelosi?  You want to take more money from us, yet, now, you want to return money to us. I hope when tax increase speech time comes, someone will point it out to you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GlenW</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/25/stimulicious-stupidity/comment-page-1/#comment-227285</link>
		<dc:creator>GlenW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 21:22:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/25/stimulicious-stupidity/#comment-227285</guid>
		<description>The problem is our system is flat out broken.  Now we&#039;re seeing that neither party seems to have a clue except to try to resort to pandering.

To recycle something I said on another board today:

...short of some grass roots Constitutional tack-on&#039;s to go to a Fair Tax and strict 2 term limits for Congressmen (with no lobbying afterwards), we&#039;ll always be getting the Vaseline end of the stick. Then when the long term filibuster blowhards are gone, start doing some real reform to start capping out of control lawyers &amp; lawsuits, and reform the campaigns to where you don&#039;t need millions of dollars to get elected - you need to be able to debate the issues and nothing more. We have public broadcasting... let&#039;s use it.

And if elected President, I WILL see to it that Shiner Bock is available in all 50 states!   Now THAT is pandering.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem is our system is flat out broken.  Now we&#8217;re seeing that neither party seems to have a clue except to try to resort to pandering.</p>
<p>To recycle something I said on another board today:</p>
<p>&#8230;short of some grass roots Constitutional tack-on&#8217;s to go to a Fair Tax and strict 2 term limits for Congressmen (with no lobbying afterwards), we&#8217;ll always be getting the Vaseline end of the stick. Then when the long term filibuster blowhards are gone, start doing some real reform to start capping out of control lawyers &amp; lawsuits, and reform the campaigns to where you don&#8217;t need millions of dollars to get elected &#8211; you need to be able to debate the issues and nothing more. We have public broadcasting&#8230; let&#8217;s use it.</p>
<p>And if elected President, I WILL see to it that Shiner Bock is available in all 50 states!   Now THAT is pandering.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mixer14</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/25/stimulicious-stupidity/comment-page-1/#comment-227278</link>
		<dc:creator>Mixer14</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 21:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/25/stimulicious-stupidity/#comment-227278</guid>
		<description>Let me see if I have this right. 

The Democrats wre first telling us we need to remove the tax cuts becuase more money is needed to expand the government. Now they&#039;re giving us (along with Republicans in a bi-partisan effort) money back in the forma of a rebate. This tells me that our government - by even the Democrats admission by deed - &lt;strong&gt;has too much of our money&lt;/strong&gt;.  That&#039;s gonna make a strong case aganist tax increases going forward.  

Now let&#039;s look at what this &#039;rebate&#039; does.  First, it is riddled with class warfare (and outright tax wlfare) in the way it is being doled out. Work real hard - get nothing.  Do nothing - get a rebate. HUH?

And then there is a big unintended consequence. Great - we put money onto consumer&#039;s hands. The money is spent on TVs, cars, electronics, clothing - which means most of the money will flow out of the country and most of those items - or the parent companies - reside overseas. This will do nothing to improve our industrial base to make the econonmic boom permanent. Oh, if people actually do the right thing and save the money - wait for the bureacrats to complain about that too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me see if I have this right. </p>
<p>The Democrats wre first telling us we need to remove the tax cuts becuase more money is needed to expand the government. Now they&#8217;re giving us (along with Republicans in a bi-partisan effort) money back in the forma of a rebate. This tells me that our government &#8211; by even the Democrats admission by deed &#8211; <strong>has too much of our money</strong>.  That&#8217;s gonna make a strong case aganist tax increases going forward.  </p>
<p>Now let&#8217;s look at what this &#8216;rebate&#8217; does.  First, it is riddled with class warfare (and outright tax wlfare) in the way it is being doled out. Work real hard &#8211; get nothing.  Do nothing &#8211; get a rebate. HUH?</p>
<p>And then there is a big unintended consequence. Great &#8211; we put money onto consumer&#8217;s hands. The money is spent on TVs, cars, electronics, clothing &#8211; which means most of the money will flow out of the country and most of those items &#8211; or the parent companies &#8211; reside overseas. This will do nothing to improve our industrial base to make the econonmic boom permanent. Oh, if people actually do the right thing and save the money &#8211; wait for the bureacrats to complain about that too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: On-my-soap-box</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/25/stimulicious-stupidity/comment-page-1/#comment-227266</link>
		<dc:creator>On-my-soap-box</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 21:05:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/25/stimulicious-stupidity/#comment-227266</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;On January 25th, 2008 at 3:39 pm, Barry F. said: 
Oooooooh! I’m feeling over-stimulated.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

That is what happens when you get scre_ed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>On January 25th, 2008 at 3:39 pm, Barry F. said:<br />
Oooooooh! I’m feeling over-stimulated.</p></blockquote>
<p>That is what happens when you get scre_ed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shooter</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/25/stimulicious-stupidity/comment-page-1/#comment-227256</link>
		<dc:creator>shooter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 20:52:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/25/stimulicious-stupidity/#comment-227256</guid>
		<description>Huh, silly me. 
I&#039;m trying to teach my kid about personal responsibility, integrity, honor, the work ethic.
Maybe I can find some old book at the library because looking at the business section of the newspaper today sure won&#039;t do it.
Listening to our elected &#039;leaders&#039; wont do it either. 
I do wonder what the teens of today will be like in 30 years...worse than the dope smoking mad hippies? like the anti-everything Clintonians? Probably.
We can call them The Entitlement Generation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huh, silly me.<br />
I&#8217;m trying to teach my kid about personal responsibility, integrity, honor, the work ethic.<br />
Maybe I can find some old book at the library because looking at the business section of the newspaper today sure won&#8217;t do it.<br />
Listening to our elected &#8216;leaders&#8217; wont do it either.<br />
I do wonder what the teens of today will be like in 30 years&#8230;worse than the dope smoking mad hippies? like the anti-everything Clintonians? Probably.<br />
We can call them The Entitlement Generation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- NEW -->
