State of the Grab Bag Address 2008

By Michelle Malkin  •  January 28, 2008 05:08 PM

Last update: Video here, here, and here.

Scroll down for updates…Democrat Kansas Gov. Kathleen Sibelius responds blandly to SOTU…McCain skips out, gives advice from Florida…Sen. Jim DeMint gives conservative response…Obama disses Bush…

Nancy Pelosi final blink count: 1,002.
Dick Cheney final blink count: 2.

***
I’ll be liveblogging the State of the Union Address at 89pm Eastern, if I can drag myself out of depression. Electile dysfunction. Whatever it’s called. These annual rituals have become dreary exercises in grand government grab-bag rhetoric. President Bush’s final SOTU address promises to be no different. The White House sends along this handy online guide to all the spending initiatives to be unveiled today. On top of stimulation-palooza, we’ll hear about:

“Reauthorizing No Child Left Behind And Expanding Education Options: President Bush will call on Congress to pass bipartisan legislation reauthorizing and strengthening No Child Left Behind. He will also ask Congress to support a new $300 million “Pell Grants for Kids” program to help poor children in underperforming schools afford the schools of their choice and announce a White House Summit on inner city children in faith-based and other non-public schools that will be held this spring.”

“Increasing Energy Security And Confronting Climate Change: President Bush will call on Congress to build on the success of the energy bill he signed in December and take the next steps to improve our energy security and confront the challenge of climate change without undermining economic growth. He will reaffirm the United States’ commitment to work with the other major economies and through the UN toward an international agreement on climate change that can slow, stop, and then reverse the growth of greenhouse gas emissions through actions by every major economy. He will also call for the creation of a new $2 billion international clean technology fund.”

“Empowering America’s Armies Of Compassion: President Bush will call on Congress to help ensure equal treatment for faith-based organizations seeking Federal funding by permanently extending Charitable Choice provisions guaranteeing their participation on equal footing in certain Federal programs. In addition, the President will honor the resilience of the people of the Gulf Coast, and the contributions volunteers have made to the region, by announcing that the United States will host the annual North American Leaders’ Summit in New Orleans this April.”

“Improving Border Security, Immigration Enforcement, And Assimilation: President Bush will review the steps his Administration is taking to improve our border security and address immigration challenges within the boundaries of existing law. Although Congress has not passed legislation to address the immigration challenges our Nation faces, the Administration continues to build upon progress we have already made in strengthening our borders, enforcing our worksite laws, prosecuting criminal aliens, keeping our economy well-supplied with vital workers, and helping new Americans successfully assimilate into our society. Without legislation that creates a lawful way for foreign workers to support our economy, however, we cannot fully relieve the pressure on the border.”

“Supporting A Compassionate Foreign Policy: President Bush believes freedom can only be advanced if the United States does its part to eliminate the hunger, disease, poverty, and illiteracy that creates despair and allows violent extremism to take root. The President will ask Congress to reauthorize the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, consistent with the program’s successful founding principles, and to double the Plan’s historic initial commitment with an additional $30 billion over five years. He continues to support the President’s Malaria Initiative to combat malaria in 15 African countries, and the President will also ask Congress to support an innovative proposal to provide food assistance by purchasing crops directly from farmers in the developing world.”

Meantime, a few tipsters sent the following photo of the media gallery seats. One correspondent e-mails: “If any of you want the terrorist reaction to tonight’s State of the Union Speech, you have to go no further than the U.S. Capitol. Democrat Leaders in Congress have arranged for the media voice representing all things terror to get front row seats in the press stake-out in the US Capitol tonight—where members of Congress will give their reactions to the President’s speech. Congressional leaders have conveniently placed Al Jazeera a mere 3 or 4 steps outside the House (Democrat) Majority Whip’s Office. I wonder how all the U.S. and Western media outlets that got pushed out to make room for Al Jazeera feel about this? I wonder how the U.S. Military—who lost countless brothers and numerous strategic edges in the War on Terror due to terrorist-TV—will feel about this? I wonder how mom and pop America will feel about this? PS—As a Texan, I am offended that they put Al Jazeera in front of the statue of my hero, Sam Houston. Why couldn’t they put them in front of the statue for Jeanette Rankin of Montana—the only member of Congress to vote against declaring war on Japan after the Pearl Harbor massacre?”

1jaz.jpg

Update: 8:52pm Eastern. Lots of pre-speech schmoozing on the floor. Teddy Kennedy is now welded to Barack Obama’s hip. Hillary Clinton is making a beeline to every black House member. Dick Cheney looks bored.

Update: 9:01pm Eastern. The Cabinet has entered. Michael Chertoff is winking at someone. Gack. CNN’s reporting that Hillary went over to shake hands with Sen. Windbag. Obama, the network reports, avoided Hill. Meeooow.

Update 9:06pm Eastern. The president is introduced. A momentary break in the BDS clouds over Washington. Standing ovation. The president just rubbed someone’s bald head. There’s Sheila Jackson Lee, as usual, parked right up in Bush’s face. Another shot of Sen. Windbag and his new best friend. How many times will the cameras cut away to Obama and Kennedy?

The first ovation lasted 4 minutes. Pelosi formally introduces Bush. Another ovation.

Blink. Blink. Blink. Blink. I have to stop watching Nancy Pelosi’s eyes. She’s making me blink, blink, too. My contacts are going to slip out.

Update 9:13pm Eastern. President Bush opens with the economy. He talks about trusting people with their own money and empowering them to make their own decisions.

(Except, of course, when they make bad decisions in an election year. Then it’s Washington To The Rescue!)

The president cracks a joke about wealthy people offering to pay more in taxes. “I welcome their enthusiasm. The IRS accepts both checks and money orders.” Charlie Rangel smirks, Hillary Clinton rolls her eyes slightly, Nancy Pelosi blink-blinks.

Bush calls for making tax cuts permanents.

Cheers to that. Applause from Republicans.

Mentions earmark reform, spending reform. “Americans have to balance their budgets. So should their government.”

Loud cheers and applause. Vows to veto appropriations bill that don’t meet his earmark cuts. More cheers.

Moving on to health care: “Expand consumer choice, not government control.” Obama has his fingers on his mouth. Pelosi looks at her shoes. Blink, blink.

Update 9:22pm Eastern. Bush is hyping the No Child Left Behind Act. His good friend, Teddy Kennedy, with whom he partnered on NCLB, doesn’t even bother to look up. Bush talks about liberating poor children trapped in failing public schools. Applause. Well, Pelosi doesn’t applaud. Guess she’s for keeping poor children hostage in failing public schools.

Update 9:26pm Eastern. Bush talks free trade. He moves on to energy independence. Too funny: CNN focuses on a snoozing member of Congress. Not sure who it is. He’s in Deep Sleep Stage 4. At least.

Bush talks green talk: We must “confront global climate change.” Hillary claps perfunctorily.

Update 9:31pm Eastern. Bush speaks passionately in defense of ethical science, addresses embryonic stem cell research. “We must ensure that all life is treated with the dignity it deserves.” Applause, standing o. Moves to judges and calls for prompt up-or-down votes. Applause.

Update 9:33pm Eastern. Announces a summit in New Orleans. Standing ovation.

Moving to failures. “Entitlement spending and immigration.” “I’ve laid out my proposals. Now I ask for your proposals.”

Woo-hoo! Everybody claps! Yay! Let’s have entitlement reform! Clap for the cameras.

Then: Do nothing.

Bush reviews border enforcement. He calls for “a lawful way for foreign workers to come here and participate in the economy…We must find a humane way…that upholds both our laws and our highest ideals.” Applause

There is a lawful way. Through the front door. The most “humane” thing the feds can and should do is apply the law in a consistent, coherent manner. Enforce it. Stop perpetuating selective policies. Stop protecting law-breakers from the consequences of their actions. Put law-abiding Americans’ interests above those of Big Business and the “diversity” industry.

Update 9:38pm Eastern. Terrorism. We have taken the fight to terrorists and extremists. We will stay on the offense. We will keep up the pressure. We will deliver justice to our enemies. Standing ovation. Democrats get up…reluctantly.

Bush reviews the surge. “One year ago, our enemies were succeeding in their efforts to plunge Iraq into chaos…improvements in security followed by improvements in daily life…thanks the troops…” Everyone stands. Oh, how things have changed in a year. Bush touts improvements in Iraqi security forces. Standing ovation. “No doubt…al Qaeda is on the run in Iraq and this enemy will be defeated.”

9:46pm Eastern. Big applause. Oh, boy. What do you do if you’re a Dem? The surge is working? Stand? Sit? Bite one’s tongue?

I heard some strange yelling. Not sure if it’s someone trying to disrupt the speech.

Promises men and women in uniform: “You wil have all you need to protect our nation…I ask Congress to…fully fund our troops.”

“20,000 troops will be coming home.” Louder applause from Dems than when Bush declared that al Qaeda was on the run. Pelosi smiles broadly.

On political reconciliation: “We’re seeing some encouraging signs…de-Baathification reform…Iraqis still have a distance to travel, but after decades of pain and dictatorship, progress is being made…Iraqis taking control of their future…it is in the vital interest of the U.S. that we succeed…My fellow Americans: We will not rest until this enemy has been defeated.” Applause.

9:52pm Eastern. Moves to Israel-Palestine and security threat from Iran.

Nancy Pelosi is fidgety. Fiddle with program. Sniffles.

“We will defend our vital interests in the Persian Gulf.” Ovation. “We will take every lawful measure to protect our country.” Mentions no attacks on American soil since 9/11. “Not for lack of desire.” Bush calls for giving them tools to protect America.

That is: Permanent FISA reform.

Pelosi purses her lips. Or rather, tries to purse her lips.

Bush: “We’ve had ample time to debate. The time to act is now!” Standing ovation from Republicans. All Democrats seated.

Yes, as I said last week, there are still differences between the parties.

9:59pm Eastern. Bush wants $30 billion for AIDS, new spending to prevent global famine…VA reform, aid for wounded warriors…expanded child care for vets…

10:03pm Eastern. Riffs on “We, the people.” “So long as we trust the people…the state of our union will remain strong…with confidence in freedom’s power and trust in the people, let us set forth to do their business. God bless America.”

Nancy Pelosi blink count: 1,002.

Dick Cheney blink count: 2.

Update 10:18pm Eastern. Democrat Kansas Gov. Kathleen Sebelius gives the Dem response to the SOTU. She has a lovely fire in the fireplace behind her. She says she’s going to give an “American response” instead of a “partisan response.” She’s talking about a “new American majority.” “Families can’t pay their bills, they’re losing their jobs, they’re threatened with losing their homes.” So spit it out. What do you want, governor? Ok, ok: Raise the minimum wage and reduce college loans. Of course! She wants S-CHIP expansion. What else? “Building Green.” “Going Green.” Translation: Thermostat control and light bulb nannyism. “Will you join us, Mr. President?” Uh, yeah. He’s already on board. Guess she was too busy preparing her speech to listen to his.

Boy, is she stiff. Her neck muscles are really, really tense. She should get closer to the fire. She needs to be warmed up. “On behalf of the new American majority…we ask you, Mr. President, to join us. We’re ready to work together.” He’s already ready to work with the Dems: On shamnesty, stimulation-palooza, NCLB. What else does she want?

She bids adieu and hopes President Bush “sleeps well” tonight.

Does she have some milk and cookies, too?

Update 10:30pm Eastern. John McCain’s on MSNBC telling Chris Matthews what he would have said. Criticizes Bush for not pushing hard enough on earmarks. “I would have been tougher on spending, would have talked more about serving something greater than your self-interest, more urgency to stimulus package passed…I appreciate the President.” Not enough to show up in Washington for the SOTU, though. Matthews and McCain cackle about Romney’s criticism of McCain’s liberal record. Cackle, cackle.

Update 10:34pm Eastern. Sen. Jim DeMint’s YouTube conservative response to the SOTU:

And the text:

Hello, I’m Senator Jim DeMint from South Carolina, the Chairman of the conservative Steering Committee here in the Senate.

It’s traditional for the opposing party to offer a response to the President’s State of the Union. My purpose tonight is not to oppose the president but to compliment what he said and to add some ideas from the conservative perspective that we want to focus on in the Senate this year.

Id like to present tonight 10 points that we will work on this year in the Senate, attempting to force votes, so that America can see where Republicans and Democrats stand and as a way to highlight the conservative agenda.

The first and the most important thing for our country is for us to assure the security of our nation. One of the problems we’ve had is the funding of our security systems and our military has fluctuated every year. Our proposal is that we spend 4% of our Gross Domestic Product every year, so the military can plan on the funding that they will get and to plan on the weapons systems and the armament and the number of troops that we need to secure our nation.

The other thing that we need to consider is our economy. The President addressed it tonight. There are concerns that we need to do more to stimulate our economy. While the President has some good ideas, it’s very important that we give some predictability to our businesses so that they can plan and grow. So we would force a vote this year on making the current tax rates permanent. The tax cuts that were passed several years ago have worked to stimulate our economy and we need to make sure that we have a permanent and predictable tax system.

We also need for our economy to control government spending. Unfortunately today, our government spends way too much money and takes way too much money out of our private economy. So, we’re proposing a balanced budget amendment. Every year states, if they add spending, they have to find ways to cut in order to balance their budget. We need to do that at the federal level in order to assure continued economic growth and to make sure we don’t take too many dollars out of the hands of Americans.

Another important issue that the President discussed that we need to continue to stress as conservatives is border security. The immigration problem is an issue we need to deal with as a nation. But we can’t deal with it in any rational way until we can control our borders. We will force votes this year on the funding of this fence to make sure it is completed. As well as a worker ID program that must be implemented.

Another problem that can be related to our economy, as well as the growth of our government, is wasteful Washington spending. And a big part of that are these earmarks that you keep hearing about, when congress designates money to their favorite local projects or special interests groups. This year there were over 10,000 earmarks in the bills that were passed, for local museums, bike paths and water and sewer plants. This is wasting our money and wasting our time as a Congress. When we should be dealing with the bigger issues that face our nation, we’re scrambling over who will get money for some local project. We need to reform the entire earmark system.

I’ve mentioned we need to make tax cuts permanent but we also need to reform our tax code. Every year we find our tax code is running jobs offshore as more and more other countries are more competitive than we are with our tax rates. We need to lower our corporate tax rates from where they are now at nearly 35 percent to 25 percent so that we’ll at least be competitive with Europe. We also need to offer some options: the flat tax, for people who would like to get away from the current tax code and to use a simpler, more understandable tax system. We’re going to do everything we can to make sure that the Senate this year votes on some tax reform proposals so that America can see who is serious about fixing our tax code.

We also, as conservatives, need to talk about Social Security. Social Security’s going to be running out of money over the next few years and one of the things that we need to do immediately is to stop spending Social Security on other things. People are astounded when they find out we’re really doing it but every year when people pay their Social Security taxes out of every paycheck, Congress spends some for today’s seniors and they spend the rest on other things. We have a bill that we call “Stop the Raid on Social Security” that we will force members of the Senate to vote on.

We also need to fix our health care system, and we’ll be proposing that we make it easier for individuals to buy health insurance. And one way to do that is to allow individuals to deduct the cost of their health insurance the same way employers do. Another thing we can do to dramatically lower the cost of health insurance is to allow individuals to buy health insurance from any state in the country. Today we’re limited to buying health insurance from the state we live in. This creates statewide monopolies and raises the cost of health insurance. We can fix that with some legislation that we will force a vote on this year in the Senate.

There are things we can do with education, such as the A-PLUS bill that we’ve talked about. This would allow states to have more flexibility in how they deal with the No Child Left Behind system. They can agree to certain standards, but do it their way – more creative ways, more flexible ways. So we can improve No Child Left Behind, which the president talked about tonight, by giving the states more flexibility.

We can also empower our businesses to be more competitive as we look at regulations like Sarbanes-Oxley that continue to chase capital away from America to other countries.

The last point I want to mention is the United Nations. We talk about it a lot – the United Nations is corrupt, and probably is a source of much anti-American sentiment around the world. We would propose that we withhold funding from the United Nations until they implement the reforms that have been discussed so many times here in Washington.

Those are just several of the things as conservatives that we’re going to push in the Senate this year. The state of the union is good, but the state of the future would be much better if conservatives come together and force the Senate to tackle these difficult issues that we’ve mentioned tonight.

Thank you, and God bless.

Hear, hear!

Update 10:36pm Eastern. Obama disses Bush SOTU for “warmed-over past State of the Union speeches.” And Obama would offer something different? He’s giving his laundry list right now of what he would have proposed. Same old, same old.

Update 10:42pm Eastern. Anderson Cooper tells Mitt Romney that calling McCain a “liberal Democrat” is a “personal attack.” Er, wouldn’t that be a compliment if you’re a CNN anchor?

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Malkin: Drunkblogging [Dan Collins]
  2. Captain's Quarters
  3. The State of the Trough Address Preview : The Sundries Shack
  4. Keith Burgess-Jackson » The State of the Union
  5. Liberty Pundit
  6. Still At It! » Freedom Folks
  7. silent E speaks - Conservatively Speaking from Western Waukesha County » Look Who’s In The Front Row.
  8. Macsmind
  9. A Blog For All
  10. A NEWT ONE
  11. Miss Beth's Victory Dance
  12. AMERICAN NONSENSE » The Seventh and Last SOTU By President Bush
  13. Leaning Straight Up » The State of the Union Address: The best lines, my summary and some interesting reactions
  14.   TLF: Transform America — Pirate’s Cove
  15. Plains Feeder
  16. Divided We Stand United We Fall
  17. Michelle Malkin » And still more sneering from Democrat women

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: « 1 2 [3]

  1. #201
    On January 28th, 2008 at 10:28 pm, txvet2 said:

    Best thing he could do for global famine/skyrocketing food prices is to throw out his ethanol mandate.

  2. #202
    On January 28th, 2008 at 10:28 pm, shooter said:

    Just NO ONE bend over….
    sebelius should be in hiding or doing a better job raising her kid, not jawin’ on TV.

  3. #203
    On January 28th, 2008 at 10:28 pm, DougT said:

    Kucinich and Cameron aren’t related, are they?

  4. #204
    On January 28th, 2008 at 10:28 pm, DarkKnight said:

    Hmmmm Barry, are you sure? I watched the whole thing, and I didn’t catch the part where he says “Joining us here tonight are ___________.” With the exception of Bob Dole.

    The President didn’t single out the lady visiting from Africa when he was talking about AIDS. He didn’t mention any military families like he has done in previous years, IIRC. Of course, I could be wrong. But it was just an observation.

  5. #205
    On January 28th, 2008 at 10:29 pm, Barry F. said:

    Stiff, yes. Boring too. Typical liberal.

    I think it is some dark trance the Left puts them into, causing the body to become as rigid as their thought process.

  6. #206
    On January 28th, 2008 at 10:30 pm, DougT said:

    Mitt is attacking! About time.

  7. #207
    On January 28th, 2008 at 10:30 pm, Jacob Hammond said:

    Im sorry I fell asleep durning Sebelius responce what did i miss

  8. #208
    On January 28th, 2008 at 10:31 pm, Barry F. said:

    No. What I was saying DK was that I didn’t know if he did it in the first part of the address, which I missed.

  9. #209
    On January 28th, 2008 at 10:31 pm, Barry F. said:

    Im sorry I fell asleep durning Sebelius responce what did i miss

    Nothing. Nothing at all.

  10. #210
    On January 28th, 2008 at 10:32 pm, Dersu said:

    On January 28th, 2008 at 10:29 pm, Barry F. said:

    Stiff, yes. Boring too. Typical liberal.

    Maybe it is that Electile dysfunction Michelle mentioned.

  11. #211
    On January 28th, 2008 at 10:33 pm, TexasTiger said:

    Wonder if Mr. Rezko is beta-testing “Don’t Drop the Soap” tonight.
    :shock:

  12. #212
    On January 28th, 2008 at 10:33 pm, DougT said:

    Sebelius was very stiff, I agree. Apparently for us to be united, we must do it in lockstep with the upcoming DNC platform.

  13. #213
    On January 28th, 2008 at 10:33 pm, Barry F. said:

    “…I appreciate the President.”

    I don’t know that John McCain appreciates anything, from what I have seen over the years and, especially, as of late.

  14. #214
    On January 28th, 2008 at 10:35 pm, TexasTiger said:

    Boy, is she stiff.

    Probably played a couple of rounds of her son’s game before the speech. :lol:

  15. #215
    On January 28th, 2008 at 10:36 pm, RealImmigrantChick said:

    Mitt did a good job on Fox just now but he needs to loose that smile and use it very sparingly. He looks more presidential when he is serious. He keeps trying too hard to be a nice guy.

    P.S. if Rudy drops out, I bet he will endorse McCain. Birds of a feather I gather. I am so glad Rudy is out though. I just hope McCain gets kicked out and peopel don’t fall for these phony polls showing he alone can win with Hillary. How can anyone buy these polls? I.e., the MSMs are trying to force this guy on scared people. I pray Mitt wins Fla or we are toast until 4 years after Hill’s presidency since she will cream Mccain, her buddy.

  16. #216
    On January 28th, 2008 at 10:37 pm, Dersu said:

    MCSham up next on FOX

  17. #217
    On January 28th, 2008 at 10:37 pm, Barry F. said:

    Too bad Jim DeMint’s conservative response wasn’t put on where everyone not online could see it. :-(

  18. #218
    On January 28th, 2008 at 10:37 pm, Barry F. said:

    Probably played a couple of rounds of her son’s game before the speech.

    I almost fell out of my chair on that one, Tiger!!!! LOL

  19. #219
    On January 28th, 2008 at 10:38 pm, DougT said:

    Olberman is one of the most analytical and insightful broadcasters that I have ever had the pleasure of watching.

    Barack is right. The American people want special guests and the House band off to the side. The VP and the speaker would be the sycophantic and belligerent sidekicks respectively.

    Hey, fifty years in Korea…where’s the complaints, BO?

    I didn’t expect MSNBC to be available here in Texas. I’m surprised.

  20. #220
    On January 28th, 2008 at 10:39 pm, Barry F. said:

    Update 10:36pm Eastern. Obama disses Bush SOTU for “warmed-over past State of the Union speeches.” And Obama would offer something different? He’s giving his laundry list right now of what he would have proposed. Same old, same old.

    Is he reading it from the list Teddy gave him, Michelle?

  21. #221
    On January 28th, 2008 at 10:42 pm, Barry F. said:

    Well, I’m going to turn in for the night, folks. I’m not interested in listening to every Republican and Democrat Senator give their views on the SOTU and the coming political year. Good night.

  22. #222
    On January 28th, 2008 at 10:44 pm, rightisright said:

    I.m so sick of these lying ba$tards…give give give…take take take is all they do…both sides. Impeach ‘em all. close it down and start over using the constitution.

  23. #223
    On January 28th, 2008 at 10:46 pm, Jacob Hammond said:

    Update 10:42pm Eastern. Anderson Cooper tells Mitt Romney that calling McCain a “liberal Democrat” is a “personal attack.” Er, wouldn’t that be a compliment if you’re a CNN anchor?

    Calling a pig a cat is a lie just as calling McCain a republican is a lie.

  24. #224
    On January 28th, 2008 at 10:47 pm, Wes S. said:

    And did I just see Steny Hoyer - Steny F’n Hoyer! - on Fox lambasting Bush for not doing enough to curb Congressional earmarks?!

    Ugh. Which is worse: the fact that Hoyer is demanding that Bush use the discipline and self-control in spending matters that Hoyer and the rest of the congressional porkers clearly lack…

    …or the fact that Hoyer, despite being a total hypocrite, does actually have a point?

  25. #225
    On January 28th, 2008 at 10:48 pm, DougT said:

    McCain just doesn’t come across as remotely sincere.

    So, MM, how the heck are you getting from channel to channel so quickly? PiP? TiVo? Combination? Multiple televisions? Slingboxes on a suite of laptops?

    Clearly, I am out of my league when it comes to watching news channels.

  26. #226
    On January 28th, 2008 at 10:53 pm, DougT said:

    Silky is weighing in on the SOTU over on a Florida public access show.

    He’s becoming the new maverick, breaking the rules of his own party to rise above these children that he is running against.

  27. #227
    On January 28th, 2008 at 10:59 pm, Dersu said:

    Barry says AIDS funding is really the best thing he heard.

    PUKE

  28. #228
    On January 28th, 2008 at 11:00 pm, conservativesRus said:

    can somebody explain to me how it’s a rebate when if you paid little taxes, you can get more than you paid in the first place - and if you paid a whole lot of taxes, you get very little back. Please call it what is it. Income transfer. I have a suggestion - why don’t we take Washington out of it - I’ll just send my money directly to someone not quite as well off. I might even get a thank you note.

    Also - as long as I’m venting on this - since when is it wise to send money to the least productive? I learned that efficiency is a good thing - and generally speaking, the most productive are those who earn the most, paid the most taxes. They are the ones who would really boost the economy the most - not the person who blows it on $500 large screen tv made in China.

  29. #229
    On January 28th, 2008 at 11:01 pm, blues said:

    rightisright–That is why I keep saying “two cycles,no incumbents.The politicians must be shown that we the people have the power.Throwing the incumbents out once doesn’t do much good,because after the next cycle,the freshmen are the incumbents.Two cycles of fresh faces will put those who seek public office on notice that the people are watching and will not accept thepolitics of the past.They have bitten the hand that feeds them too many times.

  30. #230
    On January 28th, 2008 at 11:02 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    :claps for all of you.

    You have guts to go through with watching.

    I played with the grandson.

    On the other hand…

    :claps for himself

  31. #231
    On January 28th, 2008 at 11:10 pm, Leatherneck said:

    With my tax refund, I am planning to sell all my weapons, and buy a colt AR15/A2 with six extra 30 round clips. Of course the extra clips will go on my H-harness so I can speed load.

    You can only use one weapon at a time, and at about 800 bucks I will help the economy too.

    I will use the sitting, or prone position on sleepers, and MS-13 types. Make sure those boots are polished men, and get a hair cut.

  32. #232
    On January 28th, 2008 at 11:24 pm, rightisright said:

    Blues, I appreciate and understand what your saying I was so pissed I just let it go…sorta, kinda. You and I agree I think, term limits your saying, but how are we going to do that…not with incumbents. The U.S. has the greatest and best form of government there has been so far,that’s not say it can’t be refined. Such as term limits and more control by the “people” as the constitution says since most all politicians forget or don’t want to accept that premise.
    Most people don’t serve to serve they serve to take advantage of the system, as most do. the Klintoons perfect example.

  33. #233
    On January 29th, 2008 at 12:03 am, Alphonse said:

    I was most astonished that Bush seems unable to adjust or learn anything from past failures.

  34. #234
    On January 29th, 2008 at 12:09 am, rightisright said:

    Think he has those damn rose colored glasses on again or still or as always?

  35. #235
    On January 29th, 2008 at 12:21 am, BlameAmericaLast said:

    Anderson Cooper tells Mitt Romney that calling McCain a “liberal Democrat” is a “personal attack.” Er, wouldn’t that be a compliment if you’re a CNN anchor?

    Mitt called that one correctly. He must be reading MM’s blog. So, if you call someone a liberal democrat that’s a personal attack now?

    Makes sense.

    I’d be insulted too.

  36. #236
    On January 29th, 2008 at 12:48 am, Dimsdale said:

    I especially think this likely if Hillary is elected. She is the Democratic Nixon without the ethics.

    And unlike Nixon, she is a crook.

  37. #237
    On January 29th, 2008 at 4:26 am, graysonret said:

    About all I got out of all this, was a workout hanging on to my wallet that kept trying to fly out of my back pocket.

  38. #238
    On January 29th, 2008 at 5:44 am, AuntiEm said:

    “The actions of the 110th Congress will affect the security and prosperity of our nation long after this session has ended,” the president said.

    Isn’t that code for North American Union? :)

  39. #239
    On January 29th, 2008 at 6:50 am, gayle said:

    Welcome to the new and improved Divided States of America.

    Wonder if the national anthem will be changed; something Hispanic with a Muslim touch…..no more pork…..we’ll work for free…….if you have money, it will be taken from you…..no military used except against those that rebel against this new society…….your property will be taxed so high, that you’ll be forced into foreclosure…….Oh, what a utopia.

  40. #240
    On January 29th, 2008 at 7:27 am, William Teach said:

    Anyone else notice that almost no Democrats bothered to wear an American Flag pin on their lapel? I never saw Nancy P. wearing one.

  41. #241
    On January 29th, 2008 at 7:48 am, petergwynne75 said:

    I turned it off as soon as he mentioned “CLIMATE CHANGE”

  42. #242
    On January 29th, 2008 at 8:00 am, William Teach said:

    Oh, BTW, I wonder how Gov. Sebelius feels about the House failing to pass a motion “Expressing the sympathy of the House of Representatives to the citizens of Greensburg, Kansas, over the devastating tornado of May 4, 2007″? Is she pleased that they blew her people off?

  43. #243
    On January 29th, 2008 at 8:27 am, michele hampton said:

    Just remember people…if we get McCain we get the same exact type of talk on immigration. I feel completely powerless this morning as I go to the polls here in Florida. I will vote for Mitt.

  44. #244
    On January 29th, 2008 at 8:46 am, MrVIBEMAN said:

    On January 28th, 2008 at 10:03 pm, zorro said:
    VA reform, aid for wounded warriors…expanded child care for vets…

    I’m more than willing to fund that.

    Dont’ hold your breath. Have you been to a VA Hospital lately? Other than the changes at Walter Reed due to the negative limelight, all the other VA’a are still terrible, dirty, red-tape filled, bureaucratic dens of frustration, waste, and death.

    ….but maybe I’m just bitter…

  45. #245
    On January 29th, 2008 at 9:18 am, BOB said:

    On January 28th, 2008 at 11:00 pm, conservativesRus said:
    can somebody explain to me how it’s a rebate when if you paid little taxes, you can get more than you paid in the first place - and if you paid a whole lot of taxes, you get very little back. Please call it what is it. Income transfer.

    Not trying to be picky, but you get money even if you paid zero taxes. No federal income tax “rebate” can get by the Dems unless it is available to those who pay NO federal income tax.

    Do you know what the “earned income tax credit” is?

  46. #246
    On January 29th, 2008 at 9:51 am, RedRepub said:

    Did anyone catch Bush shaking hands with a Spanish speaker after the address? It wasn’t anything special: The guy said “Mi aamigo”. Bush said “Por supuesto” and the guy responded “Claro que si”.
    (Translated that was “My friend” “Of course” , and “of course”.)

    I thought it was a little symbolic considering his positions on immigration. He said we need illegals to support our economy. NO WE DON’T!!! We have actual citizens who are unemployed !!!

    Some folks want illegals so they can exploit them for cheap labor and servitude. Exploitation of that nature is criminal. (IMHO)

  47. #247
    On January 29th, 2008 at 9:55 am, RedRepub said:

    Some folks want illegals so they can exploit them for cheap labor and servitude. Exploitation of that nature is criminal. (IMHO)

    Case in point.

  48. #248
    On January 29th, 2008 at 9:58 am, DanME said:

    It’s interesting, many of the more moderate and liberal talking heads on MSNBC are saying they think Mitt has the momentum in FL. I sure hope we can put McCain down for the count today ! They say many of the McCain attacks the last few days are untrue ( we already knew that ) and that McCain must have his back to the wall. I hope the wall crashes down.

  49. #249
    On January 29th, 2008 at 10:06 am, taylork said:

    What else? “Building Green.” “Going Green.”

    I guess no one told her that green building increases the cost of a home by 20%. That’ll help homeownership.

  50. #250
    On January 29th, 2008 at 10:38 am, Boomer said:

    Michelle,

    Thanks for doing the dirt work and covering this event the wife and I just couldn’t stomach to watch or hear how we will be taxed into oblivion to support the feel good programs that will result in not return for investment. After reading your detailed coverage I know I would be searching for a new TV today had we tried to suffer through the SOTU address. I really didn’t want to see Pelosi blinking anyways I am sure she was trying to hypnotize the entire nation into falling a sleep to allow her party to take over the country.

  51. #251
    On January 29th, 2008 at 4:25 pm, corona said:

    more good news from Iraq:
    here

Comment pages: « 1 2 [3]

You must be logged in to post a comment.

What is Barney Frank up to now?

July 1, 2009 12:13 PM by Michelle Malkin

67 Comments | 7 Trackbacks

And next: A Fine Print Czar

June 30, 2009 06:00 PM by Michelle Malkin

75 Comments | 12 Trackbacks

After the “Special Master of Compensation”

June 9, 2009 04:39 PM by Michelle Malkin

82 Comments | 11 Trackbacks

Making Government Motors official

May 19, 2009 04:52 PM by Michelle Malkin

114 Comments | 12 Trackbacks

Washington can’t meet the Cheerios Standard

May 15, 2009 09:07 AM by Michelle Malkin

79 Comments | 16 Trackbacks

California wants a piece of TARP

May 14, 2009 08:41 AM by Michelle Malkin

49 Comments | 6 Trackbacks


Categories: George W. Bush, Subprime crisis



Pundit & Pundette

» She just can't keep a secret