About Contact Archives RSS Columns Photos

Schwarzenegger pumps up Obama and McCain

By Michelle Malkin  •  January 29, 2008 05:56 PM

I know this won’t shock many of you. California Gov. Arnold Kennedy Schwarzenegger hasn’t formally endorsed anyone yet, but he gave rave reviews of Obama and McCain to the SF Chronicle editorial board today:

California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, weighing in on the presidential race, said that both Republican presidential candidate John McCain and Democrat Barack Obama are on the right track in “talking about bringing people together” across partisan lines…

…Schwarzenegger, during a wide-ranging session with the Chronicle editorial board, also declined to formally endorse a GOP presidential candidate. But the California governor didn’t rule it out - and came closest when he said that McCain should be congratulated for working across party lines to get things done, despite being hammered by conservative pundits around the country as being too friendly with Democrats. .

“I think that you should never worry about being hammered,” he said. “If you want to lead, there will always be people against it. I hear this kind of stuff all the time.”

McCain “is smart to continue talking about those issues. It is smart for Obama to continue talking about those issues, crossing the line,” Schwarzenegger said. “You will see worldwide, more and more people are going to look at that as a way of bringing people together. And there’s nowhere more important to do that than in America.”

Schwarzenegger said he will appear with President Bush at an economic event in the Los Angeles area this week. And he will also be present at the live televised GOP debate from the Reagan Library in Simi Valley, where he is expected to escort Nancy Reagan to watch the final meeting of the candidates before the Feb. 5 Super Tuesday primaries.

As we have seen time and again, “bringing people together” is code for increasing the size and scope of government. Note how “bipartisan” legislation and “unifying” programs are always liberal efforts that conservatives compromise on or sell out for–never the other way around.

Witness:

McCain-Feingold.
McCain-Kennedy.
Bush-Kennedy’s No Child Left Behind.
Stimulation-palooza.

Cal Thomas has a related column on the Republican retreat:

The aptly named Republican “retreat” last weekend at the ritzy Greenbrier resort in West Virginia should have included Democrats because Republicans are behaving just like them.

There was President Bush arguing for his “bipartisan stimulus package” and supporting government handouts with borrowed money. Republicans can always cut a bipartisan deal if they behave like Democrats…

…What Republicans need is a dose of Barack Obama, who recently praised Ronald Reagan to the consternation of leading Democrats. Obama correctly noted that “Ronald Reagan changed the trajectory of America in a way that Richard Nixon did not, and a way that Bill Clinton did not.” That’s because Reagan had core principles from which he rarely deviated.

Instead of standing in front of those silly signs they use to promote whatever it is they are talking about, Republicans should use backdrops that promote some of Reagan’s greatest sayings. These include:

“Entrepreneurs and their small enterprises are responsible for almost all the economic growth in the United States”; “Government always finds a need for whatever money it gets”; “Government does not solve problems; it subsidizes them”; “Government exists to protect us from each other. Where government has gone beyond its limits is in deciding to protect us from ourselves”; “Government’s view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it.”

My personal favorite is: “Man is not free unless government is limited.”

That last one should be tattooed on every Republican member of Congress.

And on every GOP presidential candidate, too.

Posted in: Uncategorized

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Michelle Malkin » The McRudy alliance
  2. Link Time - srar dot net
  3. House of Eratosthenes
  4. Webloggin - Blog Archive » Best Sentence XXV
  5. Most Influential Liberals « Nicholas B. Jackson

Trackback URL

Comments

  1. #1
    On January 29th, 2008 at 6:11 pm, DanME said:

    Arnold,what another outright disaster !
    How many more Democrats in Republican clothes can we stand?

  2. #2
    On January 29th, 2008 at 6:12 pm, lucnmf said:

    But the California governor came closest when he said that McCain should be congratulated for working across party lines to get things done, despite being hammered by conservative pundits around the country as being too friendly with Democrats. .

    Wish I never voted for Arnold Shriver. He’s more of a democrat than a republican and has spent California into a bigger deficit than Gray Davis ever did. This is the same that McPain would do, but to the entire US. And… now that Thompson is out, I’m voting for Romney. Again, my vote comes down to the lesser of two evils.

  3. #3
    On January 29th, 2008 at 6:17 pm, dutchcedar said:

    Arnie’s 14.5 B-b-b-billion health care for all Californians bonanza just got shot in the foot… maybe he’d be better off staying out of the advisory role for awhile… now that he’s got us into debt deeper than Grey Davis had us.

    To Michelle’s point, the only “bipartisan” stuff we need involves mutual federal program destruction. If its got three letters, destruct it.

  4. #4
    On January 29th, 2008 at 6:22 pm, Azygos said:

    “talking about bringing people together” across partisan lines

    Yup, grab your wallets once again folks.

  5. #5
    On January 29th, 2008 at 6:28 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    I live here in CA, and I don’t know of anyone who actually plays attention to RINO Arnold.

    I could care less who he endorses. All I know is I am NOT voting for McCan’t.

  6. #6
    On January 29th, 2008 at 6:33 pm, Jacob Hammond said:

    I want to bring people and ideas together. Together to bring down McCain and Hillary and Obama. Will you join me.

  7. #7
    On January 29th, 2008 at 6:41 pm, gayle said:

    Odd isn’t it?

    All these high stylin’ liberals and neo Republicans who have so much money they could care less about what us tax paying, month to month income, debts, etc., have to say.

    They live behind gated communities and don’t associate with the likes of us.

  8. #8
    On January 29th, 2008 at 6:41 pm, Barry F. said:

    Cal Thomas was quoted as saying:

    My personal favorite is: “Man is not free unless government is limited.”

    That last one should be tattooed on every Republican member of Congress.

    Michelle Malkin wrote:

    And on every GOP presidential candidate, too.

    Okay. I have to disagree with Cal and Michelle here, slightly.

    Tattoes won’t help them with their recall. Now, branding…that might do the trick. ;-)

  9. #9
    On January 29th, 2008 at 6:45 pm, The Raging Republican said:

    The Top 20 most influential US liberals:

    You will notice that Schwarzenegger (R) is #8 (Right below Michael Moore and above many Democratic Congressmen).

    Sadly I think McCain will win the GOP nomination. After all, he has gained the nomination from the MSM, as well as each of the Dem’s Big 3 (Billarry, Barrack-O, and Silky).

    VOTE ROMNEY!

  10. #10
    On January 29th, 2008 at 6:47 pm, The Raging Republican said:

    Schwarzenegger, Obama, and McCain

    Need I say more about “birds of a feather”????

  11. #11
    On January 29th, 2008 at 6:49 pm, John Ansell said:

    I can’t believe I voted for that A (and I don’t mean “A” as in Arnold)

  12. #12
    On January 29th, 2008 at 6:50 pm, Barry F. said:

    Sadly I think McCain will win the GOP nomination. After all, he has gained the nomination from the MSM, as well as each of the Dem’s Big 3 (Billarry, Barrack-O, and Silky).

    I fear the same that McCain could get the nomination. The Democrats and their allies, the MSM, want McCain to be the GOP nominee. He is the easiest one for them to beat. They know that he is too polarizing for the GOP base to fully support him, which will kill him in the general election. He is banking on independents but I don’t think he can/will garner the support from them that can put him over the top. And, besides, what would the difference between Hillary and McCain, in the long run, besides the “(R)” or the “(D)” after their name? *sigh*

    Every conservative should be saying a prayer each night that Romney gets the votes to become the Republican nominee, so conservatism has a somewhat fighting chance this November.

  13. #13
    On January 29th, 2008 at 6:53 pm, CarpiJugulum said:

    I have been saying this for years now. Ever since Bush Sr. was elected. This country has moved so far to the left it has no clue as to what a conservative or the right is.

    I hate to break it to you all once again. However, even though I voted for Reagon twice, he was a moderate. Not this big conservative. He made you feel proud to be an American. This is not a convservative value. Unfortunately it has now become that label. Arnold is a lefty and was before Californians voted him in. Though he at times makes you proud to be American, his policies are socialist.

    The last true conservative in the public eye was William F. Buckley. We need more of his caliber now more then ever.

  14. #14
    On January 29th, 2008 at 6:58 pm, olympian2008 said:

    New Obama TV ad featuring Caroline Kennedy, at the Obama website with details on where it is running here, or just the video at YouTube here.

    Very powerful IMHO.

  15. #15
    On January 29th, 2008 at 7:11 pm, deepdiver said:

    The only reason at this point to vote for someone with an (R) after their name is federal and SCOTUS judge appointments. Besides that we gain nothing by voting for any of the RINOs left in the GOP race.

  16. #16
    On January 29th, 2008 at 7:16 pm, Chard402003 said:

    Not surprising. Like McCain and Obama, Arnold is a democrat.

  17. #17
    On January 29th, 2008 at 7:31 pm, zorro said:

    The Arnold is just another RINO (republican in name only). Maybe worse.

  18. #18
    On January 29th, 2008 at 9:14 pm, TexasTiger said:

    On January 29th, 2008 at 7:11 pm, deepdiver said:
    The only reason at this point to vote for someone with an (R) after their name is federal and SCOTUS judge appointments.

    That is a heckuva of a big reason, but don’t forget a bigger reason: Our men and women deserve the best Commander-in-Chief we can give them. Their lives depend on our decision.

  19. #19
    On January 29th, 2008 at 9:27 pm, malkin_fan said:

    Its all over. They are forcing mccennedy down our throats and no one will come out and vote for him in November…..

    ……..Hillary will becom the czar she always wanted to be.

  20. #20
    On January 29th, 2008 at 9:56 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    I just don’t get it. What do people see in McCan’t?

    This herd mentality in the media is inexplicable.

    He’s a flat out liberal. That’s probably it.

  21. #21
    On January 29th, 2008 at 10:07 pm, navywife91 said:

    Our men and women deserve the best Commander-in-Chief we can give them. Their lives depend on our decision.

    Please try to remember this. I didn’t vote for Mccain today, but if it means Hillary (who has no respect for the military) or Obama (who doesn’t have a clue about the military)I’ll do what I can to help Mccain if he gets the nomination.

  22. #22
    On January 29th, 2008 at 10:20 pm, realitycheck said:

    I used to like Swhwarzenegger. He had some backbone in the early days. Unfortunately, over the years, the “Terminator” became the “Blovinator”.

    Lately, he’s a shill for the Kennedys.

  23. #23
    On January 30th, 2008 at 12:05 am, Alphonse said:

    There seems to be growing support for selling some of the “M” states, i.e., Mexifornia, Mexizona, Mexas. This would serve a dual purpose of getting shed of a whole passel of illegal aliens, and raising revenue while lowering taxes–of great appeal to conservatives.

  24. #24
    On January 30th, 2008 at 12:29 am, normsrevenge said:

    EUroSocialism advocates.. peas in a pod.. p-toooey

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Where in the world

October 9, 2008 01:45 PM by Michelle Malkin

26 Comments | 0 Trackbacks

Creed’s Scott Stapp supports the troops

September 29, 2008 08:43 PM by Michelle Malkin

21 Comments | 0 Trackbacks

Tell all your friends: FactCheck.org is useless

September 23, 2008 03:09 PM by Michelle Malkin

89 Comments | 5 Trackbacks

Saturday open thread

September 20, 2008 02:40 PM by Michelle Malkin

247 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

Sunday open thread

September 14, 2008 11:32 AM by Michelle Malkin

366 Comments | 1 Trackback

Sunday open thread

September 7, 2008 11:39 AM by Michelle Malkin

406 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

My favorite new bumper sticker

August 31, 2008 10:30 PM by Michelle Malkin

86 Comments | 10 Trackbacks

Andrew Sullivan jumps in on Palin’s grandma-gate rumor

August 31, 2008 10:16 PM by see-dubya

140 Comments | 17 Trackbacks

It’s this year’s “Dick Cheney’s Gay Daughter”. UPDATE: “Fair Game,” then and now.


Categories: Uncategorized


JustOneMinute

» Reading Incomprehension

JustOneMinute

» Paulson Speaks!

JustOneMinute

» New Bank Capital

Riehl World View

» Yeah, It All Adds Up

Riehl World View

» McCain Pumps Up The Base