<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stimulation-palooza: Why are we extending unemployment benefits?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/29/stimulation-palooza-why-are-we-extending-unemployment-benefits/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/29/stimulation-palooza-why-are-we-extending-unemployment-benefits/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 21:50:07 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Reid Report &#124; Michelle Malkin&#8217;s crazy unemployment theory debunked by the economist she quotes</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/29/stimulation-palooza-why-are-we-extending-unemployment-benefits/comment-page-1/#comment-762924</link>
		<dc:creator>The Reid Report &#124; Michelle Malkin&#8217;s crazy unemployment theory debunked by the economist she quotes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 18:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/29/stimulation-palooza-why-are-we-extending-unemployment-benefits/#comment-762924</guid>
		<description>[...] Clinton administration economist, &#8220;Larry&#8221; Katz &#8212; something she&#8217;s been selling for months on her blog, every time the notion of extending unemployment benefits comes up. In January, she wrote: A [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Clinton administration economist, &#8220;Larry&#8221; Katz &#8212; something she&#8217;s been selling for months on her blog, every time the notion of extending unemployment benefits comes up. In January, she wrote: A [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin &#187; Liveblogging the Senate war spending debate; Update: Republicans abandon fiscal conservatism, vote for non-war lard-up; Update: Roll call vote added, McCain skips vote</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/29/stimulation-palooza-why-are-we-extending-unemployment-benefits/comment-page-1/#comment-330256</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin &#187; Liveblogging the Senate war spending debate; Update: Republicans abandon fiscal conservatism, vote for non-war lard-up; Update: Roll call vote added, McCain skips vote</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 17:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/29/stimulation-palooza-why-are-we-extending-unemployment-benefits/#comment-330256</guid>
		<description>[...] extension of unemployment benefits (for my previous posts on why this is a bad idea, see here  and here ); - a provision blocking Medicaid rules implemented by the Bush administration; - global food aid [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] extension of unemployment benefits (for my previous posts on why this is a bad idea, see here  and here ); &#8211; a provision blocking Medicaid rules implemented by the Bush administration; &#8211; global food aid [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin &#187; Liveblogging the Senate war spending debate; Update: Republicans abandon fiscal conservatism, vote for non-war lard-up; Update: Roll call vote added, McCain skips vote</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/29/stimulation-palooza-why-are-we-extending-unemployment-benefits/comment-page-1/#comment-330255</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin &#187; Liveblogging the Senate war spending debate; Update: Republicans abandon fiscal conservatism, vote for non-war lard-up; Update: Roll call vote added, McCain skips vote</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 17:10:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/29/stimulation-palooza-why-are-we-extending-unemployment-benefits/#comment-330255</guid>
		<description>[...] extension of unemployment benefits (for my previous posts on why this is a bad idea, see here  and here ); - a provision blocking Medicaid rules implemented by the Bush administration; - global food aid [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] extension of unemployment benefits (for my previous posts on why this is a bad idea, see here  and here ); &#8211; a provision blocking Medicaid rules implemented by the Bush administration; &#8211; global food aid [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin &#187; Monday moocher of the morning</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/29/stimulation-palooza-why-are-we-extending-unemployment-benefits/comment-page-1/#comment-262931</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin &#187; Monday moocher of the morning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 11:11:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/29/stimulation-palooza-why-are-we-extending-unemployment-benefits/#comment-262931</guid>
		<description>[...] when I blogged about the stimulus-palooza-driven campaign to extend unemployment benefits? As I pointed out at that time &#8220;temporary&#8221; extensions are never temporary. The Senate [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] when I blogged about the stimulus-palooza-driven campaign to extend unemployment benefits? As I pointed out at that time &#8220;temporary&#8221; extensions are never temporary. The Senate [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin &#187; Stimulation-palooza: Temporary tax rebates, permanent jobless benefits</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/29/stimulation-palooza-why-are-we-extending-unemployment-benefits/comment-page-1/#comment-232172</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin &#187; Stimulation-palooza: Temporary tax rebates, permanent jobless benefits</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 19:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/29/stimulation-palooza-why-are-we-extending-unemployment-benefits/#comment-232172</guid>
		<description>[...] days ago, I highlighted the Senate push for cramming extended unemployment benefits into the economic stimulus [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] days ago, I highlighted the Senate push for cramming extended unemployment benefits into the economic stimulus [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tantor</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/29/stimulation-palooza-why-are-we-extending-unemployment-benefits/comment-page-1/#comment-229935</link>
		<dc:creator>Tantor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 23:05:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/29/stimulation-palooza-why-are-we-extending-unemployment-benefits/#comment-229935</guid>
		<description>Actually, the requirement to interview to get your benefits makes things worse.  Any time an online employment ad is posted, it gets dozens, even hundreds, of resumes from people collecting unemployment who are not remotely qualified nor interested in the position.  However, sending in a resume allows them to check off their interview squares so they can get their check.  Meanwhile, that deposits a pile of resume sludge on the computers of the HR folks, who must delete nine to nineteen unqualified resumes to find one remotely qualified one.  

That&#039;s why good job positions are posted online for only a few hours.  They collect so many trash resumes they have to shut them down quickly as soon as they get three interviewable prospects.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, the requirement to interview to get your benefits makes things worse.  Any time an online employment ad is posted, it gets dozens, even hundreds, of resumes from people collecting unemployment who are not remotely qualified nor interested in the position.  However, sending in a resume allows them to check off their interview squares so they can get their check.  Meanwhile, that deposits a pile of resume sludge on the computers of the HR folks, who must delete nine to nineteen unqualified resumes to find one remotely qualified one.  </p>
<p>That&#8217;s why good job positions are posted online for only a few hours.  They collect so many trash resumes they have to shut them down quickly as soon as they get three interviewable prospects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Common Sense</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/29/stimulation-palooza-why-are-we-extending-unemployment-benefits/comment-page-1/#comment-229882</link>
		<dc:creator>Common Sense</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 22:06:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/29/stimulation-palooza-why-are-we-extending-unemployment-benefits/#comment-229882</guid>
		<description>5% unemployment is NOT an employment problem!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>5% unemployment is NOT an employment problem!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ScottyDog</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/29/stimulation-palooza-why-are-we-extending-unemployment-benefits/comment-page-1/#comment-229856</link>
		<dc:creator>ScottyDog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 21:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/29/stimulation-palooza-why-are-we-extending-unemployment-benefits/#comment-229856</guid>
		<description>The only reason we are in this financial mess is because of outrageous Government spending and the fact they have outsourced and insourced our Jobs at the alter of the Global Economy.(Forced Socialism)

The immigration free for all is finally coming home to roost. 

Don&#039;t forget about the H1B visas that allow employers to hire foreigners in favor of the American citizen too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only reason we are in this financial mess is because of outrageous Government spending and the fact they have outsourced and insourced our Jobs at the alter of the Global Economy.(Forced Socialism)</p>
<p>The immigration free for all is finally coming home to roost. </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t forget about the H1B visas that allow employers to hire foreigners in favor of the American citizen too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: graysonret</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/29/stimulation-palooza-why-are-we-extending-unemployment-benefits/comment-page-1/#comment-229834</link>
		<dc:creator>graysonret</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 21:23:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/29/stimulation-palooza-why-are-we-extending-unemployment-benefits/#comment-229834</guid>
		<description>sfrvn, that&#039;s what I meant.  The consumer eventually pays for all increases dealt by the government to businesses, and we are all consumers. So, when they want to &quot;tax the corporations or businesses&quot;, in the end, it is us who pay for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sfrvn, that&#8217;s what I meant.  The consumer eventually pays for all increases dealt by the government to businesses, and we are all consumers. So, when they want to &#8220;tax the corporations or businesses&#8221;, in the end, it is us who pay for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cadman</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/29/stimulation-palooza-why-are-we-extending-unemployment-benefits/comment-page-1/#comment-229753</link>
		<dc:creator>Cadman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 19:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/29/stimulation-palooza-why-are-we-extending-unemployment-benefits/#comment-229753</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt; I like the idea of getting ALL my money back. I mean I’ve worked steady for the same company for the last 3 years, I paid INTO unemployment, dammit, I want my money back.

Reply:
Might be different in your state, but in most states, unemployment is an employer tax, not an employee tax. So you probably have not actually paid into unemployment, and thus, have no money to get back.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Actually the employees pay for it before it makes it to their paychecks. Better benefits = lower wage rates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> I like the idea of getting ALL my money back. I mean I’ve worked steady for the same company for the last 3 years, I paid INTO unemployment, dammit, I want my money back.</p>
<p>Reply:<br />
Might be different in your state, but in most states, unemployment is an employer tax, not an employee tax. So you probably have not actually paid into unemployment, and thus, have no money to get back.</p></blockquote>
<p>Actually the employees pay for it before it makes it to their paychecks. Better benefits = lower wage rates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glamchild</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/29/stimulation-palooza-why-are-we-extending-unemployment-benefits/comment-page-1/#comment-229726</link>
		<dc:creator>Glamchild</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 18:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/29/stimulation-palooza-why-are-we-extending-unemployment-benefits/#comment-229726</guid>
		<description>Why don&#039;t we just hand out a million dollars to everyone?, then we can all be millionaires !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why don&#8217;t we just hand out a million dollars to everyone?, then we can all be millionaires !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shimauma2</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/29/stimulation-palooza-why-are-we-extending-unemployment-benefits/comment-page-1/#comment-229690</link>
		<dc:creator>shimauma2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 18:21:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/29/stimulation-palooza-why-are-we-extending-unemployment-benefits/#comment-229690</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Why not just solve the problem? Deport a few illegals and watch the unemployment rate drop&lt;/blockquote&gt;

See now here&#039;s a plan I can get behind. In the meantime, I am still employed and unlike some folks, I HAVE a savings plan, so there&#039;s no need to get snarky about my wanting the money *I* paid into unemployement back, just like I want back any &quot;extra&quot; tax that&#039;s taken from me. I don&#039;t trust the government with any of my money, PERIOD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Why not just solve the problem? Deport a few illegals and watch the unemployment rate drop</p></blockquote>
<p>See now here&#8217;s a plan I can get behind. In the meantime, I am still employed and unlike some folks, I HAVE a savings plan, so there&#8217;s no need to get snarky about my wanting the money *I* paid into unemployement back, just like I want back any &#8220;extra&#8221; tax that&#8217;s taken from me. I don&#8217;t trust the government with any of my money, PERIOD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: unclemonkey</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/29/stimulation-palooza-why-are-we-extending-unemployment-benefits/comment-page-1/#comment-229686</link>
		<dc:creator>unclemonkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 18:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/29/stimulation-palooza-why-are-we-extending-unemployment-benefits/#comment-229686</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;okay I know this sounds kinda crazy, but as someone who may be unemployed in the near future and is considering NOT going back in the workforce so I can homeschool my kid, I like the idea of getting ALL my money back. I mean I’ve worked steady for the same company for the last 3 years, I paid INTO unemployment, dammit, I want my money back.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I respect what you&#039;re wanting to do there, but unemployment benefits are not actually meant for people who have no intention of working(even for a good reason). Their meant to tide you over while you look for a job. 

Here in Alabama(can&#039;t speak for any other state) you have to go on at least two interviews every week or you bet cut off; also you can&#039;t turn down any job that&#039;s offered to you or you lose the benefits. I&#039;m sure there are loopholes, but that&#039;s the law anyway. 

Also, as has been pointed out, unemployment insurance is paid for by employers, not workers. So, although I have no doubt you&#039;ve been overtaxed, you don&#039;t technically have any money &quot;coming to you&quot; through unemployment benefits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>okay I know this sounds kinda crazy, but as someone who may be unemployed in the near future and is considering NOT going back in the workforce so I can homeschool my kid, I like the idea of getting ALL my money back. I mean I’ve worked steady for the same company for the last 3 years, I paid INTO unemployment, dammit, I want my money back.</p></blockquote>
<p>I respect what you&#8217;re wanting to do there, but unemployment benefits are not actually meant for people who have no intention of working(even for a good reason). Their meant to tide you over while you look for a job. </p>
<p>Here in Alabama(can&#8217;t speak for any other state) you have to go on at least two interviews every week or you bet cut off; also you can&#8217;t turn down any job that&#8217;s offered to you or you lose the benefits. I&#8217;m sure there are loopholes, but that&#8217;s the law anyway. </p>
<p>Also, as has been pointed out, unemployment insurance is paid for by employers, not workers. So, although I have no doubt you&#8217;ve been overtaxed, you don&#8217;t technically have any money &#8220;coming to you&#8221; through unemployment benefits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nyc123me</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/29/stimulation-palooza-why-are-we-extending-unemployment-benefits/comment-page-1/#comment-229661</link>
		<dc:creator>nyc123me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 17:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/29/stimulation-palooza-why-are-we-extending-unemployment-benefits/#comment-229661</guid>
		<description>Just wow.. it seems everything coming out of the government these days (from either side) is a message to live way beyond your means, break the law, abuse privileges, and don&#039;t lift a finger to contribute. SAid it before and I&#039;ll say it again, I&#039;ve lived through that in another country that is now near economic ruin, and it is exactly what is happening here now. There is nobody on either side willing to do anything about it - the US is doomed, I no longer have any hope.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wow.. it seems everything coming out of the government these days (from either side) is a message to live way beyond your means, break the law, abuse privileges, and don&#8217;t lift a finger to contribute. SAid it before and I&#8217;ll say it again, I&#8217;ve lived through that in another country that is now near economic ruin, and it is exactly what is happening here now. There is nobody on either side willing to do anything about it &#8211; the US is doomed, I no longer have any hope.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sfrvn</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/29/stimulation-palooza-why-are-we-extending-unemployment-benefits/comment-page-1/#comment-229657</link>
		<dc:creator>sfrvn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 17:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/29/stimulation-palooza-why-are-we-extending-unemployment-benefits/#comment-229657</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;On January 29th, 2008 at 12:22 pm, graysonret said: 
If employer tax goes up because of extended benefits, who pays for it? Yep, not the employer.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Actually, the way it works, at least here in NY, is that the employer pays an amount to the state based on a formula.  Not-For-Profits also have the option of &quot;self-insuring&quot; unemplyment, meaning we can pay our actual unemployment costs.

Botttom line:  Unemployment is paid by the employer and not by the tax-payer, although I suppose you could say it is paid by the consumer who does business with the employer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>On January 29th, 2008 at 12:22 pm, graysonret said:<br />
If employer tax goes up because of extended benefits, who pays for it? Yep, not the employer.</p></blockquote>
<p>Actually, the way it works, at least here in NY, is that the employer pays an amount to the state based on a formula.  Not-For-Profits also have the option of &#8220;self-insuring&#8221; unemplyment, meaning we can pay our actual unemployment costs.</p>
<p>Botttom line:  Unemployment is paid by the employer and not by the tax-payer, although I suppose you could say it is paid by the consumer who does business with the employer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- NEW -->
