How would McCain, Hillary, and Obama vote on tax rebates for illegals? Update: Ensign, Baucus agree to bar; Update: Illegal alien home loan sob stories

By Michelle Malkin  •  January 30, 2008 03:00 PM

Update 3:08pm Eastern. Sen. Ensign is addressing the issue right now in the Senate Finance Committee. He says that the Congressional Research Service confirms that the tax rebates would go to illegal aliens as the House bill is currently written. Sen. Baucus says changes will be made to make certain the rebates don’t go to illegal aliens.

Just a reminder, to keep it in perspective: This illegal alien issue is just one small problem with stimulation-palooza. It’s the tip of the icebeg.

Meanwhile, another Fed interest rate cut.

And on a related note, I’ve reported before on the illegal alien home loan scam (see here and here). Now the press is ramping up illegal alien subprime victim sob stories. The presidential candidates in both parties should really be pressed for their views on this:

As an economic slowdown and the subprime mortgage crisis deepen across the United States, Hispanic immigrants are increasingly in danger of losing their jobs and their homes. Both legal and illegal immigrants joined Americans in buying homes they could barely afford when the market spiraled upward and many have been caught with mortgages higher than the value of their homes as prices have slumped in the past year. Just as subprime mortgage payments rose and house prices fell, the economy’s slowdown has hurt the construction sector, which employs large numbers of Hispanics and other immigrants. Unemployment among Hispanics in the United States jumped to 6.3 percent in December, up from 5.7 percent the previous month and well above the national average of 5 percent, U.S. Department of Labor statistics show. And almost half of the mortgage loans in the hands of Hispanics are subprime, making them especially vulnerable to the housing downturn.

***

Sen. John Ensign is currently working on a fix to bar illegal aliens from receiving tax rebates offered under the economic stimulus package speeding through Congress. The bill is being discussed in the Senate Finance Committee this afternoon and is slated for markup.

As I noted earlier today, the bill would apparently allow so-called “Resident Aliens” to receive rebate checks. The Treasury department classifies someone as a “Resident Alien” based on how much time that person has spent in the United States. No proof of legal presence is required. Some GOP aides believe illegal alien deportees who meet that definition could be eligible for rebates sent back to their home countries.

Another House aide sent out this e-mail this afternoon:

Folks – I wanted to make sure you all have the correct information. A number of press reports have suggested the economic growth bill passed by the House on Tuesday contains language would somehow enable illegal immigrants to receive a tax rebate. That is not accurate. The bill includes language similar to the provisions included in the 2001 and 2003 tax relief bills designed specifically to prevent illegal immigrants from receiving benefits. – steel

Here are the facts:

1. The bill includes language similar to the provisions included in the 2001 and 2003 tax relief bills designed specifically to prevent illegal immigrants from receiving benefits. There is no language in the measure that would enable illegal immigrants to receive a tax rebate.

2. Illegal immigrants who steal or fabricate a Social Security number are NOT ELIGIBLE to receive checks under the House bill.

3. An illegal immigrant who files taxes based on stolen or fraudulent information in order to attempt to receive a check under the House bill is committing tax fraud.

The aide also included this fact sheet:

Fact Sheet: Illegal Immigrants & Checks

* The procedures in this agreement are similar to what was done in the tax relief laws of 2001 and 2003.

* Illegal immigrants who steal or fabricate a Social Security number are NOT ELIGIBLE to receive checks under the House bill. As long as a tax return is accompanied by a valid Social Security number, the IRS has no capacity to know whether a given tax return was filed by a citizen, a legal immigrant, or an illegal immigrant. Illegal immigrants, of course, don’t have their own Social Security number, so if they file with the IRS, as the IRS believes very few do, they must take one of the following three routes, any one of which could lead to their being identified as committing fraud, and increasing the likelihood that they will be located and deported.

* They could use someone else’s stolen Social Security number. That is fraud, which the IRS attempts to identify both on a real-time basis and as part of its ongoing enforcement and program integrity efforts.

* They could fabricate a Social Security number. Tax returns accompanied by non-existent Social Security numbers should be rejected as invalid, although much of that enforcement currently occurs through on-going program integrity efforts (as opposed to identifying the error in real-time and flagging the return for further attention). Nevertheless, those who use such fabricated numbers face real risks of being identified as committing tax fraud and facing resulting penalties.

* They could obtain an ITIN (Individual Tax Identification Number). ITINs, however, are not valid for work and illegal immigrants who enter the workforce generally do not attempt to use an ITIN either as proof of employability or for the purpose of filing a tax return, because an ITIN on a tax return is a clear indication it was filed by a non-citizen.

Two points in response:

1) There’s no harm in clarifying the language in a proactive, ironclad way to make certain it’s barred by law. Right?

2) We know enough about how understaffed and shortchanged “ongoing enforcement and program integrity efforts” are to know that fraud will happen, it will go undetected or unpunished, and these checks will get into illegal aliens’ hands. We also know that in the land of reality, ITINs are being used by illegal aliens for work, for banking purposes, to obtain driver’s licenses, to obtain home loans, and to file tax returns. Far beyond this tax rebate issue, the widespread ITIN scam needs to be addressed:

Question: How would McCain, Hillary, and Obama vote on an amendment to ban tax rebates for illegal aliens?

Who bets for “Not present?”

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Michelle Malkin » Illegal alien tax rebate loophole closed, but…
  2. Random Nuclear Strikes » Sadly

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #231028
    On January 30th, 2008 at 3:08 pm, corona said:

    Actually, Obama loves to vote “present”.

  2. #231029
    On January 30th, 2008 at 3:09 pm, Michelle Malkin said:

    Yeah. That’s the joke.

  3. #231030
    On January 30th, 2008 at 3:10 pm, madchef said:

    Most illegal aliens don’t file taxes, they claim 7 or 8 dependents to keep withholdings to a minimum and just throw their W-2’s away.

  4. #231033
    On January 30th, 2008 at 3:13 pm, yt1300inHtown said:

    On January 30th, 2008 at 3:10 pm, madchef said:
    Most illegal aliens don’t file taxes, they claim 7 or 8 dependents

    Which is not too far from the truth generally.

  5. #231035
    On January 30th, 2008 at 3:15 pm, Michelle Malkin said:

    From the IRS commissioner’s testimony I linked to:

    As I indicated earlier, many illegal aliens, utilizing ITINs, have been reporting tax liability to the tune of almost $50 billion from 1996 to 2003.

  6. #231040
    On January 30th, 2008 at 3:18 pm, malkin_fan said:

    If the government sends rebates to illegals…..

    ……arent they then guilty of aiding and abetting illegals(which is against the law)

  7. #231041
    On January 30th, 2008 at 3:19 pm, navywife91 said:

    If these people who break our laws are allowed to benefit (again), it’s ridiculous. I hope this is brought up in the debate, but I don’t have much hope.

  8. #231045
    On January 30th, 2008 at 3:23 pm, madchef said:

    yt1300inHtown,
    I see it all the time in restaurant. I have had 17 – 20 year olds claim that many dependents. When I tell them that the IRS will want proof when they file they just smile because they don’t intend to file.

  9. #231046
    On January 30th, 2008 at 3:26 pm, iamsaved said:

    I’m sure Senator Senor Juan McCain will join Hillarycita and Obamanito on the Senate floor to cast his “yes to illegals should get tax rebates” vote and to add his stamp of approval to condeming the Attorney General’s failure to call water-boarding illegal.

  10. #231056
    On January 30th, 2008 at 3:41 pm, corona said:

    I would have gotten the joke if there was a ;) on the end of the line!

  11. #231062
    On January 30th, 2008 at 3:50 pm, petergwynne75 said:

    Sean fuggin’ Hannity is on the radio right now bowing down to John McCain.

    It’s absolutely disgusting. He’s saying well maybe McCain will lead the new modern conservative movement with these new modern priorities.

    Today, when Hannity said “Ted Kennedy’s not always wrong”, I felt like I was listening to a man who’s suddenly been indoctrinated by his own sell out.

    It’s sickening.

    “Ted Kennedy’s not always wrong”?!
    “Ted Kennedt’s not always wrong”?!

    It sickening.

  12. #231067
    On January 30th, 2008 at 4:01 pm, thirteen28 said:

    If McVain weren’t running for president right now, he’d be there, he’d vote in favor of giving illegals the rebates, and would say “f— off” and “this is chickens–t” stuff to anyone who opposed him.

    If he were president, he’d push for it as well.

  13. #231070
    On January 30th, 2008 at 4:04 pm, Zippy_Slug said:

    #11 It’s a joke.

  14. #231077
    On January 30th, 2008 at 4:12 pm, ajmontana said:

    Tancredo just put the smack down on McCain , fox news….callin em out on immigration…. ha! hope peeps were listening.

  15. #231078
    On January 30th, 2008 at 4:14 pm, Andy said:

    Sean sure got me wound up with an hour of the sellout meme. I had to laugh when a 12 year old girl called and asked if he lost his mind.

    How do you spell relief? Rock-ribbed Conservative. And if the GOP loses this election, so be it, but principle will not be lost.

  16. #231081
    On January 30th, 2008 at 4:22 pm, letget said:

    I just saw Tancrado on Fox and he says there are going to be MILLIONS of illegals getting money. He seems to be trying to stop this, but thinks Mc won’t do squat. Much less HR or BH. My gosh I am tired of bailing out people sucking off me as a tax payer. How did we come to the point a few elected in DC can dictate how and what MY money goes to? This country isn’t going to last long with this attitude.
    L.

  17. #231082
    On January 30th, 2008 at 4:24 pm, Reg.conservative said:

    ajmontana #14 Yes he did,I was watching .He said he would NEVER vote for mC cain at the end!!

  18. #231084
    On January 30th, 2008 at 4:26 pm, CarpiJugulum said:

    I gues according to the staffer that the State of Colorado is not eligable for the refund. I say this as here in the Mile High State ITIN’s are an acceptable way of getting work, getting welfare handouts, getting not only home loans but personal signature loans (all of which are being purposely nonpaid). So if ITINs are ot accepatble, Colorado is not eligable.

    In a way I am glad. I for one am tired of paying for their education, medical, and welfare.

  19. #231087
    On January 30th, 2008 at 4:29 pm, CarpiJugulum said:

    An Addition:

    There has been several investigations into the ITIN scandles here in Denver alone. Where companies are purposely heklping ILLEGALS get theri ITIN filed. SO far the State and Federal governments have ignored it. Seeing how Denver under Hickenlooper is a sanctuarty city and Gov.Bill Ritter favors open boarders. I do not see much geting done about this problem.

  20. #231088
    On January 30th, 2008 at 4:29 pm, petergwynne75 said:

    PTL for Hannity’s sense of humor

  21. #231090
    On January 30th, 2008 at 4:30 pm, Michelle Malkin said:

    There has been several investigations into the ITIN scandles here in Denver alone.

    Watch the video I included in the post.

  22. #231100
    On January 30th, 2008 at 4:46 pm, John Ansell said:

    How do I become illegal so I can get all the benefits they get?

  23. #231103
    On January 30th, 2008 at 4:49 pm, John Ansell said:

    petergwynne75 said: #11,

    Hannity is just upset that His man (and others on Fox) is out of the race today. They wanted that subway election and it’s not going to happen.

  24. #231104
    On January 30th, 2008 at 4:50 pm, Khyris said:

    “Unemployment among Hispanics in the United States jumped to 6.3 percent in December, up from 5.7 percent the previous month and well above the national average of 5 percent”

    Wait, I thought they were doing all the jobs Americans won’t do? Wouldn’t that make them more easily employed, while “lazy” white folks are sitting on their hands refusing to do honest manual labor? Shouldn’t they have a LOWER unemployment rate than the national average?

  25. #231114
    On January 30th, 2008 at 5:05 pm, John Ansell said:

    Khyris #24, Great point.

  26. #231122
    On January 30th, 2008 at 5:14 pm, right_on said:

    “Unemployment among Hispanics in the United States…”

    Would this be a survey done about “legal resident Hispanics” and Hispanic-Americans, or just anyone who is Hispanic? Doesn’t it make a difference?

  27. #231133
    On January 30th, 2008 at 5:25 pm, corona said:

    The ramping up illegal alien subprime victim sob stories link just goes back to the same post.

    Maybe you meant to link to the story I discovered.

  28. #231161
    On January 30th, 2008 at 6:10 pm, John Ansell said:

    I have a suggestion for the illegals that can’t afford the houses they bought here: Go back to Mexico, I’m sure the houses are cheaper there.

  29. #231168
    On January 30th, 2008 at 6:20 pm, TXRose said:

    It’s too bad that the illegals could not read the loan documents because they
    were written in English. Even with Spanish interpretation they may have missed some important information. Ta….I wouldn’t want to have to rely on
    someone else’s interpretation of important documents….I would learn the
    language. So sorry if things are not working out for lawbreakers who just keep breaking the law by staying here.

  30. #231172
    On January 30th, 2008 at 6:23 pm, John Ansell said:

    LOL TX ROSE #29, I was just going to post this Solution: Learn how to read English or move back to Mexico where they have no mortgage loans

  31. #231197
    On January 30th, 2008 at 7:02 pm, xler8bmw said:

    This is what happens when you’re arrogant enough not to try to become a citizen when you break in and don’t learn the common language. You get taken advantage of LMAO!

  32. #231611
    On January 30th, 2008 at 9:55 pm, capitano said:

    Might as well let the “stimulus package” die a natural death in the Senate. It’s already had a positive psychological impact on the economy and nobody thinks it will have any real impact anyway.

  33. #231807
    On January 31st, 2008 at 6:37 am, BadIdeaGuy said:

    According to Foxnews, the “stimulus package loophole” that allows some illegal aliens to receive the rebate has been closed in the Senate.

    Now if they could just close the border loophole.

  34. #231941
    On January 31st, 2008 at 11:06 am, corona said:

    The TINs will not qualify for the rebates, according to what I read in the Corner. The problem remains that there are illegal aliens who do have valid SSNs, generally as the result of coming to the U.S. on work visas and overstaying.

  35. #232015
    On January 31st, 2008 at 12:05 pm, shooter said:

    OUCH. Scariest thing EVER!
    MM on Glenn Beck talking about McCain:
    “I mean, he’s Juan Hernandez with a billion dollars.”

  36. #232023
    On January 31st, 2008 at 12:08 pm, shooter said:

    whoops, lost half my post? shoulda hit preview…

  37. #232134
    On January 31st, 2008 at 1:40 pm, FirstSkirt said:

    I don’t get it! ALL of the candidates have a very poor understanding of immigration law and its enforcement. Is this the best the country has to offer? For us Repubs, methinks we’re in trouble.

  38. #232399
    On January 31st, 2008 at 6:13 pm, Laree said:

    I always wondered how many people in our country illegally, got sub prime loans? I mean think about it, checking someones Legal Idenity and ability to pay back the loan doesn’t seem to be high on the list of the sub prime loan companys criteria! I am asking is there any statistics to who defaulted and their legal resident standing in the USA.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

The “media justice” mob strikes again

October 30, 2009 12:19 PM by Michelle Malkin

68 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

Witch hunt.

Lou Dobbs discusses physical attacks, harassment

October 29, 2009 10:35 AM by Michelle Malkin

40 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

Culture of Corruption: Obama U.S. Attorney nominee clams up

October 28, 2009 10:23 AM by Michelle Malkin

52 Comments | 1 Trackback

Stephanie Villafuerte, evader.

SEIU leads new banking shakedown campaign

October 25, 2009 11:25 PM by Michelle Malkin

35 Comments | 5 Trackbacks

Punchline of the day

October 19, 2009 10:33 PM by Michelle Malkin

45 Comments | 0 Trackbacks


Categories: Immigration, Subprime crisis



The Other McCain

» Paralysis by analysis

HotAir GreenRoom