See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

1. Hot Air » Blog Archive » Nonpartisan avatar of hope and healing somehow has most liberal voting record in Senate
2. Michelle Malkin » The MoveOn seal of approval goes to…

Trackback URL

Comments

1. #232210
   On January 31st, 2008 at 2:40 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

   By all means, bring it on. Let’s see how the “chosen” Dem presidential candidate is going to squirm on this one.

   The entertainment of it all would be worth it to watch.

2. #232214
   On January 31st, 2008 at 2:43 pm, ajmontana said:

   I’m surprised their not backing McCain.

3. #232220
   On January 31st, 2008 at 2:46 pm, md1964 said:

   On January 31st, 2008 at 2:43 pm, ajmontana said:
   I’m surprised their not backing McCain.

   Would make sense… George Soros could get Double the bang for his buck, since he is heavily funding both Moveon and the Mex-Amero candidate McCain.

4. #232221
   On January 31st, 2008 at 2:46 pm, ammo john said:

   So, if they endorse Hussein Obama, does that mean they ‘bought and own’ a black man (slave)?

   And ‘bought and own’ Hillary (sex slave)?

   Ewwww! I shudder at the combo use of ‘Hillary’ and ’sex’.

5. #232223
   On January 31st, 2008 at 2:48 pm, Lan Astaslem said:

   Ouch! If MoveOnMorons.org supports Obama, the Clintons will be majorly pissed off after defending them last year!

   AJ — I thought it was going to be McCain too. Heh!

6. #232239
   On January 31st, 2008 at 3:08 pm, jsr said:

   I’m betting they go with Fidel Castro.

7. #232241
   On January 31st, 2008 at 3:11 pm, Dave from Flint said:

   Hulk Hogan endorsed Obama, so moonbats.org might as well endorse someone, too.

8. #232243
   On January 31st, 2008 at 3:18 pm, ScottG said:

   Ron Paul!!!!!!!

9. #232250
   On January 31st, 2008 at 3:34 pm, walterc said:

   On January 31st, 2008 at 2:43 pm, ajmontana said:
   I’m surprised their not backing McCain.

   That was my first thought when I saw the heading.

10. #232255
    On January 31st, 2008 at 3:43 pm, Armigerous said:

    Oh please,please,please let them endorse Rodham and end all the pretense that she is anything other than in Soros’s pocket

11. #232260
    On January 31st, 2008 at 3:45 pm, LC said:

    What next? Are the democratic candidates going to argue why they feel they are the nuttiest and therefore deserve MoveOn.org’s endorsement? That should be a hoot.

12. #232261
    On January 31st, 2008 at 3:46 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    I will make it a three-fer. I though McCain too.

    Fidel Castro – ROFL

    Ron Paul? I can see that.

13. #232265
    On January 31st, 2008 at 3:48 pm, gridlock said:

    The MoveOn membership will probably vote to endorse John McCain…

14. #232267
    On January 31st, 2008 at 3:48 pm, TexasTiger said:

    Then MoveOn set a deadline of 11 am Thursday for members to back a virtual endorsement vote.

    Pssst, MorveOn. Yeah, over here. Don’t you know that Diebold makes the machines that tabulate online votes? Pass it on.

15. #232269
    On January 31st, 2008 at 3:49 pm, MrVIBEMAN said:

    I wonder if they realize that whomever they support will be, if anything, hurt by their endorsement. Maybe they’re counting on that.
    Nah…they take themselves too seriously for that.

16. #232301
    On January 31st, 2008 at 4:23 pm, Duke of Pronia said:

    OH.MY.GOD! I haven’t been this excited since they started broadcasting Women’s Pro Beach Volleyball! Someone pass the popcorn and turn out the light. This is gonna be GREAT!

17. #232305
    On January 31st, 2008 at 4:24 pm, rightisright said:

    I’m surprised their not backing McCain.

    He’s their second choice

18. #232315
    On January 31st, 2008 at 4:31 pm, graysonret said:

    Boy, I’ll probably not be able to sleep tonight, wondering what candidate Soros and MoveOn decide to support; a worthless organization that is useless except to the MSM that has to report on every “sneeze” and “cough” it utters.

19. #232330
    On January 31st, 2008 at 4:42 pm, Gull said:

    Don’t forget —

    Soros funds John McCain’s personal PAC which employs McCain’s Mex-American advisor!

    Maybe Soros/MoveON will endorse two candidates?

20. #232342
    On January 31st, 2008 at 4:51 pm, nyc123me said:

    “asking its members whether to host a virtual vote on Thursday to endorse Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton for President.”

    They forgot McCain!

21. #232365
    On January 31st, 2008 at 5:17 pm, blues said:

    ammojohn-Hillary(sex slave)?Ewwww,yuck,ptoooie.I’ll probably have nightmares after that.

22. #232396
    On January 31st, 2008 at 6:09 pm, Laree said:

    Wait a minute a virtual poll? that means the Canadians can vote for the canidate they want to Lead the United States of America. Has anyone ever taken a look at the demographics of Move on.org – do we all assume they are all Americans? Remember this crowd doesn’t believe in Nations it believes in Regions and are Global citizens. I mean for all we know Osama Bin Laden lurking where? could vote in this virtual poll online.

23. #232403
    On January 31st, 2008 at 6:22 pm, TexasTiger said:

    Laree:

    You have a point. I’ve taken a look at Moveron.Org and discovered how they supplement the Soros donations.

    Stay away from these cats!

24. #232410
    On January 31st, 2008 at 6:30 pm, brooklyn red said:

    nyc123me #20.

    Exactly… Soros could care less about party labels or who is in the white house as long as they will do his evil bidding. He probably has covered all the bases and funded Hillary, Obama AND McCain.

25. #232414
    On January 31st, 2008 at 6:37 pm, Barry F. said:

    I’m surprised their not backing McCain.

    Give ‘em time, AJ. You never know what might come down the pike from them on any given day.

26. #232432
    On January 31st, 2008 at 7:01 pm, Laree said:

    Texas Tiger, I should have known

    Chickaboomer says, Hillary’s got some splainin to do. Remember Obama brought up Wallmart and everyone seems to have forgotten because Hillary Clubed him with the Chicago slum lord.

    http://chickaboomer.blogspot.com/2008/01/always-low-vices-always.html

27. #232445
    On January 31st, 2008 at 7:27 pm, TXRose said:

    ammojohn…it’s going to take a lot of soap to get that picture out of my head. UGH!

28. #232453
    On January 31st, 2008 at 7:53 pm, reutersrutter said:

    Just who’s ass are they going to endorse?
    The One who has no ass?
    The one who is all ass?
    The one who likes ….?

29. #232457
    On January 31st, 2008 at 8:02 pm, The Raging Republican said:

    MoveOn.org’s presidential endorsement:

    John McCain

30. #232503
    On January 31st, 2008 at 8:33 pm, Speakup said:

    Seal of approval…or kiss of death?

    Amazingly despicable, seal of approval.

31. #232551
    On January 31st, 2008 at 8:52 pm, beenthere said:

    . . . open only to the group’s 3.2 million activists,

    Maybe it’s just me, but that is an awfully impressive, imposing figure. Does the non-Left have anything, anywhere near to matching it? I don’t think so. No wonder these guys are running circles around us and now have the entire democrat party as a wholly owned subsidiary. That’s impressive. Why can’t we do something like that? Does the question answer itself? I really doubt the presence of suger-daddy Soros explains the whole of it. Is there an opportunity here that is not being taken? Seriously, we have to match this somehow or they are guaranteed to win, and not just in 2008. We do it every now and then, such as stopping the Shamnesty thing. Why can’t we do it continuously?

32. #232672
    On January 31st, 2008 at 10:24 pm, DannoJyd said:

    On January 31st, 2008 at 8:52 pm, beenthere said:
    Maybe it’s just me, but that is an awfully impressive, imposing figure. Does the non-Left have anything, anywhere near to matching it? I don’t think so. No wonder these guys are running circles around us and now have the entire democrat party as a wholly owned subsidiary. That’s impressive. Why can’t we do something like that?

    Speaking for myself, I work for a living. Maybe if I were going to school on someone elses dime, or was ‘busy’ collecting funds from one of America’s social programs I could join such a group.

    Belong to CannotMoveOn dot org? Perhaps you need to get a real life.

33. #232789
    On February 1st, 2008 at 6:48 am, RetFireman said:

    The seal of approval of the despicable, military-smearing , speech-suppressing minions of MoveOn!

    What? They LOVE the military. They raised all that money for phone cards. Remember? We were all supposed to drop to our knees and worship them, and use that as the…oh now what was it that was said to me when I was being ridiculed for not falling for their crap like other easilly fooled “Conservatives” on here…an Olive Branch?

    What ever happened with that anyway? Seems to me there are some apologies in order over that…and maybe a “Thanks for not rubbing our noses in ‘I told you so’s’.”

    How’s that olive branch workin out for you guys? They suuuuure were sincere in their support of the troops and wanting to make nice, huh?

    Are you really so desperate to make nice with traitors? You should know better than to ever trust a Liberal about ANYTHING.

34. #232944
    On February 1st, 2008 at 10:34 am, Laree said:

    beenthere,

    I brought that up in above comment, who are all these folks do they all LIVE IN AMERICA? Moveon is a Internet movement, some members could be squatting in say a cave in NW Pakistan. Also why do you assume they are telling the truth about their numbers? I can post something right here does it make it a true or a fact?

    How many people are being counted that don’t participate anymore, remember why the movement started just because people would have signed up then doesn’t mean they continued their participation..but I could see this org trying to make themselves look larger by adding in anyone who ever went to their website.

35. #233137
    On February 1st, 2008 at 1:00 pm, fairyfoose said:

    Michelle, this morphed pic of Soros is
    creeping me out. Can you put the blue
    dot over his face or the black block across his eyeballs?

    yeeesh!