<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Vice Presidential prediction exercise</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/01/the-vice-presidential-prediction-exercise/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/01/the-vice-presidential-prediction-exercise/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 05:07:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin &#187; Obama VP choice: Will the pick be as whiny as The One?</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/01/the-vice-presidential-prediction-exercise/comment-page-3/#comment-412124</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin &#187; Obama VP choice: Will the pick be as whiny as The One?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 21:26:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/01/the-vice-presidential-prediction-exercise/#comment-412124</guid>
		<description>[...] will it be? I hashed out the veepstakes game back in February. Nothing&#8217;s changed. CNN is speculating that it&#8217;s Joe Biden, who once endorsed [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] will it be? I hashed out the veepstakes game back in February. Nothing&#8217;s changed. CNN is speculating that it&#8217;s Joe Biden, who once endorsed [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin &#187; Veepstakes: Pooh-Silky &#8216;08!</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/01/the-vice-presidential-prediction-exercise/comment-page-3/#comment-355017</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin &#187; Veepstakes: Pooh-Silky &#8216;08!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 05:25:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/01/the-vice-presidential-prediction-exercise/#comment-355017</guid>
		<description>[...] Edwards. (Story at Townhall.) The Nunn pick is in line with what I wrote about the veepstakes in February: Obama’s pick is a bit more difficult to game out. I think he’d also go for an older [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Edwards. (Story at Townhall.) The Nunn pick is in line with what I wrote about the veepstakes in February: Obama’s pick is a bit more difficult to game out. I think he’d also go for an older [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Super Tuesday state by state Updated; Maps, delegate counts added Video update: McCain claims front-runner status</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/01/the-vice-presidential-prediction-exercise/comment-page-3/#comment-236960</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Super Tuesday state by state Updated; Maps, delegate counts added Video update: McCain claims front-runner status</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 06:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/01/the-vice-presidential-prediction-exercise/#comment-236960</guid>
		<description>[...] A Clinton-Obama ticket carries a lot of history, but would be a regionalized, two-Senator ticket. Michelle called her pick, assuming Clinton becomes the nominee, for Wesley Clark. That seems likely as things stand now. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A Clinton-Obama ticket carries a lot of history, but would be a regionalized, two-Senator ticket. Michelle called her pick, assuming Clinton becomes the nominee, for Wesley Clark. That seems likely as things stand now. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin &#187; The Sunday talk shows open thread</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/01/the-vice-presidential-prediction-exercise/comment-page-3/#comment-234391</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin &#187; The Sunday talk shows open thread</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 14:43:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/01/the-vice-presidential-prediction-exercise/#comment-234391</guid>
		<description>[...] move to the Democrat VP game.  Posted in: 2008 campaign, John McCain, Hillary Clinton  Send to a Friend Printer Friendly   [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] move to the Democrat VP game.  Posted in: 2008 campaign, John McCain, Hillary Clinton  Send to a Friend Printer Friendly   [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stop The ACLU &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Who Will the Vice President Be?</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/01/the-vice-presidential-prediction-exercise/comment-page-3/#comment-234027</link>
		<dc:creator>Stop The ACLU &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Who Will the Vice President Be?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 20:57:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/01/the-vice-presidential-prediction-exercise/#comment-234027</guid>
		<description>[...] Michelle Malkin also mentions Charlie Crist. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Michelle Malkin also mentions Charlie Crist. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bit_boy</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/01/the-vice-presidential-prediction-exercise/comment-page-3/#comment-233903</link>
		<dc:creator>bit_boy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 17:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/01/the-vice-presidential-prediction-exercise/#comment-233903</guid>
		<description>McVain needs no V.P. for he is Little Caesar.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.painterwebsite.com/littlecaesar.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;But you can see his &lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Morph&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt; Helper.&lt;/a&gt;

It will take a while for the above link to render for 56k but it will Morph/slowly while downloading.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McVain needs no V.P. for he is Little Caesar.  <a href="http://www.painterwebsite.com/littlecaesar.html" rel="nofollow">But you can see his <em><strong>Morph</strong></em> Helper.</a></p>
<p>It will take a while for the above link to render for 56k but it will Morph/slowly while downloading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DanME</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/01/the-vice-presidential-prediction-exercise/comment-page-3/#comment-233812</link>
		<dc:creator>DanME</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 13:22:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/01/the-vice-presidential-prediction-exercise/#comment-233812</guid>
		<description>I have NO respect for Ann Coulter. She&#039;s just looking out for herself and wants to create as much noise as possible to sell more books. She doesn&#039;t care about conservatives or Republicans. I can&#039;t stand her !!! I much prefer Michelle and Laura Ingraham who present intelligent aguments to support their views. Coulter just makes conservatives look like idiots!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have NO respect for Ann Coulter. She&#8217;s just looking out for herself and wants to create as much noise as possible to sell more books. She doesn&#8217;t care about conservatives or Republicans. I can&#8217;t stand her !!! I much prefer Michelle and Laura Ingraham who present intelligent aguments to support their views. Coulter just makes conservatives look like idiots!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr_Conservative_Cat</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/01/the-vice-presidential-prediction-exercise/comment-page-3/#comment-233699</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr_Conservative_Cat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 04:15:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/01/the-vice-presidential-prediction-exercise/#comment-233699</guid>
		<description>On February 1st, 2008 at 9:40 pm, RealImmigrantChick said:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Talk like that only encourages weak republicans and the beltway elites to think: we got this one in the bag, no need to worry, they’ll all come out, t vote out of fear of the Hilldabeast. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

It cuts both ways, RIC. The flip side is that the more libs hear that conservatives will stay home, the more they&#039;ll push McCain on Mr. and Mrs. Joe Uninformed, you simply have neither the time nor good fortune for a larger education in these matters.

The best thing to do is to drive home the point that they have a fight on their hands. Libs always choke when they know that the intensely driven, well-organized right is outflanking the statistically larger but much softer left. And when they choke they make mistakes. They lie to over-compensate and then get tripped up in front of the nation, which makes general left support even softer.

Right now the media is portraying the right wing as disorganized and falling apart, though when we&#039;re unified we&#039;re classified as being lock-step robots who don&#039;t think for themselves. Trying to be clever and &quot;send messages&quot; on the scale you&#039;re talking about is a too-cute-by-half mistake. No one can predict what these kind of messages will do.

Here, in my opinion as someone in the media in capacities in which influencing people has, alas, been part of my bread and butter for over 25 years: 

1. &lt;strong&gt;Put Up A United Front.&lt;/strong&gt; At the end of the day, this will be necessary anyway, and yes, that means saying you&#039;ll vote for the Republican candidate and guess what - doing it. I assume that much of this stay home talk is being fostered by Rush. Well, I hate to say it but it may be that Rush needs a bit more recovery and Ann Coulter needs to remember that there is only one God (Rush has also framed this idea on the assumption of a republican congress, which isn’t in the cards right now): they&#039;re both over-strategizing, and one thing is for sure: &lt;em&gt;whatever Rush and Coulter are doing as influences is backfiring because Hillary is the dem frontrunner and McCain is ours. That is just precisely what we &lt;em&gt;don&#039;t&lt;/em&gt; want.&lt;/em&gt;

B. &lt;strong&gt;Get the word out about McCain now. &lt;/strong&gt;There is only one way to send a message, and this needs to be done by absolutely everyone pronto: e-mail, message like you do here and call in. All take time. All being done together is a pain in the ass. All being done together is absolutely necessary. SCREAM McCain talking points until the media starts reporting, &quot;Extremist Republicans Hate McCain&quot; - that&#039;s the best we can get, but it may influence enough voters to deny McCain the nod, but it needs to be done now, not tomorrow. Today! Will you do that, RIC? Will everyone? And then still vote for McCain in big numbers if we must. If you love your country RIC, this is what must be done. It matters more than your conscience, because your conscience may be based on disastrously wrong conclusions. 



On the issue of personal integrity about not voting for McCain, remember what Hillary will do: she will appoint judges like Ruth Bader Ginsberg. Taxes will go up with Reid and Pelosi hot and anxious help. Weakness will be seen by our enemies who will redouble their efforts, and Hillary may be remembered my the MSM in 20 years as presiding over the worst disaster in US history when a dirty bomb kills 500,000 people outright in NYC - a disaster she herself will have precipitated by being a dove in the white house in a time of terror. Children in 1st grade will be encouraged to experiment sexually and our economy will be ruined so badly that when those kids grow up, they may still never see what it was like today, and today isn’t so great.

So before you stand on &quot;conscience&quot;, ask your conscience if it&#039;s ready to absorb the guilt of all that, when by being a bit more courageous in the face of adversity, you did something equally disdainful, but for more reasonable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On February 1st, 2008 at 9:40 pm, RealImmigrantChick said:</p>
<blockquote><p>Talk like that only encourages weak republicans and the beltway elites to think: we got this one in the bag, no need to worry, they’ll all come out, t vote out of fear of the Hilldabeast. </p></blockquote>
<p>It cuts both ways, RIC. The flip side is that the more libs hear that conservatives will stay home, the more they&#8217;ll push McCain on Mr. and Mrs. Joe Uninformed, you simply have neither the time nor good fortune for a larger education in these matters.</p>
<p>The best thing to do is to drive home the point that they have a fight on their hands. Libs always choke when they know that the intensely driven, well-organized right is outflanking the statistically larger but much softer left. And when they choke they make mistakes. They lie to over-compensate and then get tripped up in front of the nation, which makes general left support even softer.</p>
<p>Right now the media is portraying the right wing as disorganized and falling apart, though when we&#8217;re unified we&#8217;re classified as being lock-step robots who don&#8217;t think for themselves. Trying to be clever and &#8220;send messages&#8221; on the scale you&#8217;re talking about is a too-cute-by-half mistake. No one can predict what these kind of messages will do.</p>
<p>Here, in my opinion as someone in the media in capacities in which influencing people has, alas, been part of my bread and butter for over 25 years: </p>
<p>1. <strong>Put Up A United Front.</strong> At the end of the day, this will be necessary anyway, and yes, that means saying you&#8217;ll vote for the Republican candidate and guess what &#8211; doing it. I assume that much of this stay home talk is being fostered by Rush. Well, I hate to say it but it may be that Rush needs a bit more recovery and Ann Coulter needs to remember that there is only one God (Rush has also framed this idea on the assumption of a republican congress, which isn’t in the cards right now): they&#8217;re both over-strategizing, and one thing is for sure: <em>whatever Rush and Coulter are doing as influences is backfiring because Hillary is the dem frontrunner and McCain is ours. That is just precisely what we </em><em>don&#8217;t</em> want.</p>
<p>B. <strong>Get the word out about McCain now. </strong>There is only one way to send a message, and this needs to be done by absolutely everyone pronto: e-mail, message like you do here and call in. All take time. All being done together is a pain in the ass. All being done together is absolutely necessary. SCREAM McCain talking points until the media starts reporting, &#8220;Extremist Republicans Hate McCain&#8221; &#8211; that&#8217;s the best we can get, but it may influence enough voters to deny McCain the nod, but it needs to be done now, not tomorrow. Today! Will you do that, RIC? Will everyone? And then still vote for McCain in big numbers if we must. If you love your country RIC, this is what must be done. It matters more than your conscience, because your conscience may be based on disastrously wrong conclusions. </p>
<p>On the issue of personal integrity about not voting for McCain, remember what Hillary will do: she will appoint judges like Ruth Bader Ginsberg. Taxes will go up with Reid and Pelosi hot and anxious help. Weakness will be seen by our enemies who will redouble their efforts, and Hillary may be remembered my the MSM in 20 years as presiding over the worst disaster in US history when a dirty bomb kills 500,000 people outright in NYC &#8211; a disaster she herself will have precipitated by being a dove in the white house in a time of terror. Children in 1st grade will be encouraged to experiment sexually and our economy will be ruined so badly that when those kids grow up, they may still never see what it was like today, and today isn’t so great.</p>
<p>So before you stand on &#8220;conscience&#8221;, ask your conscience if it&#8217;s ready to absorb the guilt of all that, when by being a bit more courageous in the face of adversity, you did something equally disdainful, but for more reasonable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blind_Mule</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/01/the-vice-presidential-prediction-exercise/comment-page-3/#comment-233683</link>
		<dc:creator>Blind_Mule</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 03:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/01/the-vice-presidential-prediction-exercise/#comment-233683</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;beenthere said:
Her points are well worth considering,&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I think Ann was voicing her frustration, do I think Ann will campaign for Hillary? He!! no she won&#039;t, do I think Ann will vote for Hillary? no, but I also think if McCain is the GOP candidate that she will not vote for him either, I think Ann may be right when she said Hillary is more conservitive than McCain. 

Maybe Ann, MM and other conservitive&#039;s that own the blogosphere and air waves could be convinced (If McCain look&#039;s as if he will be nominated after Feb 5) to start a write in campaign for a suitable conservitive candidate. I&#039;ve been thinking alot about this latley but everyone that is displeased at the prospect of McCain becoming POTUS or holding your nose and voting for the lesser of two evil&#039;s need&#039;s to be on the same page and vote for the same write in nationwide, here is the website address, &lt;strong&gt;www.conservitivewritein.org&lt;/strong&gt;  like I said everyone need&#039;s to be on the same page though, some may think this is an impossible task but I think that as American&#039;s we should think about all of the thing&#039;s men have said where impossible and that have been proven to be possible. The fact is if this is to happen the time is now, after Feb 5 we have 1 month to organize and choose a suitable candidate and 8 month&#039;s to campaign for the write in candidate that is longer than the two parties themselve&#039;s have to organize behind their respective choice at their convention&#039;s. This would be a true grass root&#039;s campaign and if successful would be a wake up call to not only the Republican leadership that have hijacked the party but the Democrat&#039;s whom think that the people of this country can&#039;t think for themselves. Unite and take our country and political system back from the bloated over feed arogant career politician&#039;s that think that we have no choice but to vote for them and their party.
One question how many of you started to or did click the link above? That was an object lesson A focus of attention, feeling, thought, or action. If you did then you should be able to support this idea. If not oh well. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>beenthere said:<br />
Her points are well worth considering,</p></blockquote>
<p>I think Ann was voicing her frustration, do I think Ann will campaign for Hillary? He!! no she won&#8217;t, do I think Ann will vote for Hillary? no, but I also think if McCain is the GOP candidate that she will not vote for him either, I think Ann may be right when she said Hillary is more conservitive than McCain. </p>
<p>Maybe Ann, MM and other conservitive&#8217;s that own the blogosphere and air waves could be convinced (If McCain look&#8217;s as if he will be nominated after Feb 5) to start a write in campaign for a suitable conservitive candidate. I&#8217;ve been thinking alot about this latley but everyone that is displeased at the prospect of McCain becoming POTUS or holding your nose and voting for the lesser of two evil&#8217;s need&#8217;s to be on the same page and vote for the same write in nationwide, here is the website address, <strong><a href="http://www.conservitivewritein.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.conservitivewritein.org</a></strong>  like I said everyone need&#8217;s to be on the same page though, some may think this is an impossible task but I think that as American&#8217;s we should think about all of the thing&#8217;s men have said where impossible and that have been proven to be possible. The fact is if this is to happen the time is now, after Feb 5 we have 1 month to organize and choose a suitable candidate and 8 month&#8217;s to campaign for the write in candidate that is longer than the two parties themselve&#8217;s have to organize behind their respective choice at their convention&#8217;s. This would be a true grass root&#8217;s campaign and if successful would be a wake up call to not only the Republican leadership that have hijacked the party but the Democrat&#8217;s whom think that the people of this country can&#8217;t think for themselves. Unite and take our country and political system back from the bloated over feed arogant career politician&#8217;s that think that we have no choice but to vote for them and their party.<br />
One question how many of you started to or did click the link above? That was an object lesson A focus of attention, feeling, thought, or action. If you did then you should be able to support this idea. If not oh well. <img src='http://s.michellemalkin.com/wp/wp-content/themes/mm/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr_Conservative_Cat</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/01/the-vice-presidential-prediction-exercise/comment-page-3/#comment-233681</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr_Conservative_Cat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 03:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/01/the-vice-presidential-prediction-exercise/#comment-233681</guid>
		<description>Eric,

#201  I did think you were being sarcastic and no problem, I&#039;ll take you on your word that you weren&#039;t and apologize for the tenor oif the end of my last response. When you think about it, this is still a very young medium in which we&#039;re debating, and like all things young in communication, inflection is often the unseen landmine, which is why I always try to use the &quot;emphasis&quot; button for clarity.

Yes, I suppose we do disagree on McCain, but one of the things I admired about Rudy, despite his mind-bending endorsement of Sheriff OpenBorders, is that even though he was liberal on a few issues (only a few), I absolutely, positively always felt that I knew where he honestly stood. That much was crystal clear eventually in NYC, and he is still the same guy today.

As far as McCain (who is slaying McAble), exactly the reverse is true. The very fact that he could call himself a conservative means he&#039;s either dillusional or a liar. His credentials don&#039;t make than an honest statement, Eric, though you and I probably disagree on the matter of degree to shich one can not act like a conservative and still be so classified.

Anyway, thanks for being smart and pulling the lever for anyone but Hillary. We&#039;ll always be on the same side of that issue, and in the final analysis, that may very well be the most important issue of the decade.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric,</p>
<p>#201  I did think you were being sarcastic and no problem, I&#8217;ll take you on your word that you weren&#8217;t and apologize for the tenor oif the end of my last response. When you think about it, this is still a very young medium in which we&#8217;re debating, and like all things young in communication, inflection is often the unseen landmine, which is why I always try to use the &#8220;emphasis&#8221; button for clarity.</p>
<p>Yes, I suppose we do disagree on McCain, but one of the things I admired about Rudy, despite his mind-bending endorsement of Sheriff OpenBorders, is that even though he was liberal on a few issues (only a few), I absolutely, positively always felt that I knew where he honestly stood. That much was crystal clear eventually in NYC, and he is still the same guy today.</p>
<p>As far as McCain (who is slaying McAble), exactly the reverse is true. The very fact that he could call himself a conservative means he&#8217;s either dillusional or a liar. His credentials don&#8217;t make than an honest statement, Eric, though you and I probably disagree on the matter of degree to shich one can not act like a conservative and still be so classified.</p>
<p>Anyway, thanks for being smart and pulling the lever for anyone but Hillary. We&#8217;ll always be on the same side of that issue, and in the final analysis, that may very well be the most important issue of the decade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry F.</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/01/the-vice-presidential-prediction-exercise/comment-page-3/#comment-233664</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry F.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 02:47:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/01/the-vice-presidential-prediction-exercise/#comment-233664</guid>
		<description>At this point, I think I am rooting for a coup at the RNC and Jim DeMint gets the nomination.

He&#039;s the only one that has stepped up and had the cajones to confront this &lt;a href=&quot;http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/01/code-pink-if-it-werent-for-people-like-the-people-in-berkeley-standing-up-for-what-they-believe-wed-be-living-under-hitler/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Berkley issue&lt;/a&gt; head on.

Where is the Great John &quot;Judge Me By My Friends&quot; McCain, when our service members are being treated like this by Berkley, et al?  Isn&#039;t he the guy that likes to flaunt his military service so flagrantly in the campaign.  Where&#039;s the loyalty, John?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At this point, I think I am rooting for a coup at the RNC and Jim DeMint gets the nomination.</p>
<p>He&#8217;s the only one that has stepped up and had the cajones to confront this <a href="http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/01/code-pink-if-it-werent-for-people-like-the-people-in-berkeley-standing-up-for-what-they-believe-wed-be-living-under-hitler/" rel="nofollow">Berkley issue</a> head on.</p>
<p>Where is the Great John &#8220;Judge Me By My Friends&#8221; McCain, when our service members are being treated like this by Berkley, et al?  Isn&#8217;t he the guy that likes to flaunt his military service so flagrantly in the campaign.  Where&#8217;s the loyalty, John?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RealImmigrantChick</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/01/the-vice-presidential-prediction-exercise/comment-page-3/#comment-233660</link>
		<dc:creator>RealImmigrantChick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 02:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/01/the-vice-presidential-prediction-exercise/#comment-233660</guid>
		<description>Dear Conservative CAt: You make so much sense about McCain (not supporting him) that it is hard to understand how then you could hold your nose and possibly or for sure vote for him in the general.  Talk like that only encourages weak republicans and the beltway elites to think: we got this one in the bag, no need to worry, they&#039;ll all come out, t vote out of fear of the Hilldabeast.  Well, I stayed home in 2006 ON PURPOSE.  No fear could keep me from seating on my a**.  I saw the republicans and their fake border fence act and I said, no way no how. All the pics of Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid sent by the GOP DID not work.  I will not be intimidated by the hildabeast either.  My fear is to betray my beliefs.  I was fooled 2 times by Bush.  If I get fooled again to vote for McCain, I will be ashamed beyond belief.  Again, the only chance there is I MAY vote for the scum is if Mitt Romney is his VP (hoping Mitt actually takes over).  Does that sound bad?  Well, that is how much I do not trust McCain.   And I am not a person to change my mind.  I just wish more peole felt the same when push comes to shove.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Conservative CAt: You make so much sense about McCain (not supporting him) that it is hard to understand how then you could hold your nose and possibly or for sure vote for him in the general.  Talk like that only encourages weak republicans and the beltway elites to think: we got this one in the bag, no need to worry, they&#8217;ll all come out, t vote out of fear of the Hilldabeast.  Well, I stayed home in 2006 ON PURPOSE.  No fear could keep me from seating on my a**.  I saw the republicans and their fake border fence act and I said, no way no how. All the pics of Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid sent by the GOP DID not work.  I will not be intimidated by the hildabeast either.  My fear is to betray my beliefs.  I was fooled 2 times by Bush.  If I get fooled again to vote for McCain, I will be ashamed beyond belief.  Again, the only chance there is I MAY vote for the scum is if Mitt Romney is his VP (hoping Mitt actually takes over).  Does that sound bad?  Well, that is how much I do not trust McCain.   And I am not a person to change my mind.  I just wish more peole felt the same when push comes to shove.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hadsil</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/01/the-vice-presidential-prediction-exercise/comment-page-3/#comment-233654</link>
		<dc:creator>hadsil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 02:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/01/the-vice-presidential-prediction-exercise/#comment-233654</guid>
		<description>Not a prediction, a conjecture ...

Romney/Lieberman - try to steal away the decent and honest good faith we just disagree Democrats.  True Independents would give a second look too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not a prediction, a conjecture &#8230;</p>
<p>Romney/Lieberman &#8211; try to steal away the decent and honest good faith we just disagree Democrats.  True Independents would give a second look too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beenthere</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/01/the-vice-presidential-prediction-exercise/comment-page-3/#comment-233642</link>
		<dc:creator>beenthere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 02:05:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/01/the-vice-presidential-prediction-exercise/#comment-233642</guid>
		<description>Given his vanity, the absolutely perfect running mate for McCain -- really there an be no other -- would be the one and only and utterly incomparable John McCain.  

I apologize if anyone has already used that joke.

Below is the Coulter video in which she vows not only to vote for Hillary but even to campaign for me if McCain is the nominee.  Her points are well worth considering, and given the fact that the Republicans only function well in opposition -- they would roll over if McCain were to become president -- I&#039;m with her 100%.  Naturally.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HuTqgqhxVMc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given his vanity, the absolutely perfect running mate for McCain &#8212; really there an be no other &#8212; would be the one and only and utterly incomparable John McCain.  </p>
<p>I apologize if anyone has already used that joke.</p>
<p>Below is the Coulter video in which she vows not only to vote for Hillary but even to campaign for me if McCain is the nominee.  Her points are well worth considering, and given the fact that the Republicans only function well in opposition &#8212; they would roll over if McCain were to become president &#8212; I&#8217;m with her 100%.  Naturally.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HuTqgqhxVMc" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HuTqgqhxVMc</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alamedaman</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/01/the-vice-presidential-prediction-exercise/comment-page-3/#comment-233626</link>
		<dc:creator>alamedaman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 01:27:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/01/the-vice-presidential-prediction-exercise/#comment-233626</guid>
		<description>Paul/Palin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul/Palin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

