…President Bush won’t support Mitt Romney because he changed his mind about shamnesty…

Oh, well! That seals it. If George “The hard-line border enforcer” Bush says Romney has the wrong stance on illegal immigration, I guess I had better cast my vote tomorrow for McCain.

/sarcasm off

*gag*

Rob Haney, a Republican Party chairman in McCain’s home district. The candidate’s bus, the Straight Talk Express, should be renamed, Haney says: “We call it the Forked Tongue Express around here. He’ll lie about anything.”

This statement brings the name of Bill Klinton to mind.

It’s going to be a long year, my friends.

Yes. Michelle is correct. A long, aggravating, disappointing political year lies ahead. And the following four years will not be inspiring either.

Michelle, I am looking forward to CPAC! I hope and pray you will be able to “Vent” with the President, the VP, Mitt and the Maverick. I can not wait!

Real “Conservative”.

SO NOT! That is what you call a BACKROOM DEALER.

On February 3rd, 2008 at 8:52 pm, DannoJyd said:
Wow! Our republican leadership sure is working overtime to get Hilary elected. I KNEW that we should have supported impeachment!

You can thank Fred Thompson for bailing out the Clintons TWICE IN AS MANY YEARS.
AND KEEPING THEM AVAILABLE ON THE POLITICAL SCENE.

He chaired the Senate Committee to investigate the Chinese DONATIONS to the CLINTON CAMPAIGN FUNDS and diverted it from its goal and prevented it from accomplishing what it was assigned to do. Turned it to investigating GOP members, instead. “Fair and balanced.”

THEN he was one of 4 GOP Senators to vote NOT GUILTY for Bill for Perjury – Fred is a former WATERGATE PROSECUTOR and has no excuse for his conduct in EITHER SITUATION.
He bailed out the CLINTONS and thus saved the DIMS tons of embarrassment and KILLED many Conservative Republican’s careers in the process.

Ann Coulter, George Will and half a dozen other Conservative columnists have the details in the last half the yr ‘07.

On February 2nd, 2008 at 6:35 pm, DarleenClick said:
…And if Huck thinks he’s getting the VP spot on the McCain ticket just because he’s doing Cap. Queeg a favor by splitting the conservative vote with Romney he’s dumber than I thought. McCain has never met a conservative he didn’t want to poke in the eye.

And what does that have to do with the SOCIALIST, Huckleberry?
Or maybe you have been listening to HIM and not what HE SAYS, or doing any RESEARCH on WHAT HE SAYS.

I don’t mean to be short and snippy about it, but I’m going to be doing good to stay engaged til after the Texas Primary, MArch 4.
If McCain get this nomination WITH THE HELP of SUCK-UP OPEN BORDERS, SLAVE REPARATIONS Huckleberry, I’ll be relieved to be finished with it – it will be over.

All I’ll have left to do is pick my favorite Conservative from a short list for election Day in Nov, and go enjoy the movies.

But I will launch on anyone who had the opportunity to investigate and STILL calls folks like Huckleberry and Fred Conservatives.

On February 4th, 2008 at 12:02 am, purplepeep said:

’s for plurals should be important to every American taxpayer.

It is most certainly a sign of the poor state of education in America and possibly a sign of the end of the American English and Western civilization as we know it.

I think a Bush endorsement for McCain is just fine by me. The more distance Romney can put between McCain’s and Bush’s immigration policies the better.

Straight_Talk_Luigi said:
If you don’t like immigrants, then tell all the people who think life is one big party to settle down and have a family.

I don’t know anyone who “doesn’t like immigrants”, Luigi. It’s against the law, if nothing else, for foreigners to violate America’s borders and America’s laws. Two entirely different critters.

tell all the people who think life is one big party to settle down and have a family.

Doesn’t make sense on at least several counts.

One count being that responsible people do just that, a second being that I wouldn’t want the goofballs to reproduce and give us more goofballs to take care of, and, third, if your argument is that for some reason we “need” more immigrants there’s millions of good, law abiding people waiting who have no problem with respecting America and it’s laws from which to draw. We don’t need to illegally import criminals.

Mr_Conservative_Cat said:
“Worry not about your typos, for it is the substance that matters, and your substance rings true for God and Country.”

Wouldn’t it be fun if the rules of grammar required that the term “typo” itself would have to be misspelled? (Yes, I do have to much time to think…)

slp said:
On February 3rd, 2008 at 8:40 am, Blind_Mule …. #61
Do you have a spell check program on your computer that changes every plural into a possessive or did you miss the day when the English teacher taught that ’s is for possessives not plurals.

Y’know, slp, unless errors are causing me to not understand what a person is saying or getting at, I don’t give second thought to such things. It’s not distracting to me, so it’s not a big deal.

I understand that folks have their individual pet peeves, I guess I don’t share this particular one.

I’m not a big fan of internet shorthand, though. (”ur” for “you are” “your”, 4 for “for”, 2 for “to”, etc.)

Besides, I have my hands full with my own grammar and spelling!