Most importantly he needs to get out there and dispel this myth of McCain’s making that McCain is already the nominee. There are too many in this country that will buy into it because there are too many people who are lemmings. The MSM know that as well as McCain and thus the reason he has adopted that tactic. The MSM want McCain in there because they know that he doesn’t have a chance to make it on his record, and in one on one debates against the Democrat nominee, he will get his clock cleaned and lose out on the chance to have the Presidency remain in Republican control which cannot be lost during this point and time in American history.

To have Mitt do anything less. will most certainly blow it for him come Tuesday, leaving nothing left of his campaign but a dust covered smoking hulk of what was our last chance of having someone with decent scruples and morals getting the shot at taking on an insane woman or an empty suit.

On February 3rd, 2008 at 12:49 pm, rotarymunkey said:

Are the citizens of this country really too stupid to see this?

Mmmm, yeah.

We might not get excited about fighting an “Obama” or a “McCain” Presidency, but we’d, sure as the sun rises in the east, sound the wr drums the minute Hillary (and Bill) took office.

Now back to the current discussion… I personally can’t understand WHY anyone would support McCain. Why didn’t he switch parties? Because the voters in AZ would have kicked his butt out of Washington, and he happens to like that cushy job. Would he switch parties as President? Most likely he wouldn’t, but heck, he’s running for Prez now on the most liberal platform this side of Huckabee! He wouldn’t need to switch. Once elected, he can do what he wants for 4 years and there’s little anyone could say or do to stop him.

Romney might have just now found his “conservative roots”, but as an proven, effective business leader, just so long as he continues to listen to what we, the Conservative Masses, have to say, I’ll support him.

I don’t need to bash McCain; I’ve already seen the damage G.W. Bush has done to the GOP cause with his “compassionate conservative” ideas. McCain would only be the same, or even worse since he’s consistently opposed Bush’s better ideas (tax cuts). Of course the MSM loves McCain; he opposes Republican ideas too! Are the citizens of this country really too stupid to see this?

However, what you have stated will more than likely occur.

There will be no more flags, pledges, patriotic songs, military, etc.

We are in the beginning stages of no more USA.

Therefore as a punishment; NO MORE TAXES from me and I hope others will follow.

I feel like I’m beating a dead horse on the issue, but the continued high pitched battle between conservative Republicans who have rallied around conservative-come-lately Mitt Romney in hopes of defeating Teddy Kennedy’s Good Friend John Mc…

I pledge allegiance

To the flags

Of the diverse states of the Americas

And to the cesspools

For which they stand,

Many migrants,

Bajo Dios,

Indistinguishable,

With gringo dollar$ for all.

I’ve bombarded Fox News for 5 years – to absolutely NO avail.

Not on one single solitary issue.

I won’t waste my time on THEM anymore.

It’s up to the GOP leadership – they know how things are breaking – “deep down inside, I mean” – and you cannot tell me they don’t remember Gerald Ford and Robert Dole.

God Speed the GOP Titanic.

1. How can you claim to have the Straight Talk Express when in Florida and California you misrepresented Mitt Romney statement’s on Iraq withdrawal timetables?

Yes, Romney called for private timetables and milestones. But before Romney made his comments, McCain had already called for a set of public benchmarks for Iraq:

“One of the areas we really want to work on is setting some benchmarks, so the American people and Congress will know if we’re making progress or not,” McCain said.

If Iraqis don’t meet the benchmarks his resolution would set, “I think everyone knows the consequence,” McCain said. “Then you have to examine your mission. But it’s important that we know whether they’re meeting benchmarks or not.” – CNN January 26, 2007

Is McCain now flipflopping on what he said just a year ago? How can he condemn Romney when it’s very clear from his comments that he intended his benchmarks to be public so “the American people and Congress will know if we’re making progress or not.” It is also very clear he intended to have deadlines (timetables); otherwise, at what point could he say his benchmarks had not been met?

If you are for benchmarks and deadlines, how can you be against milestones and timetables? It’s all a dishonest game of semantics on the part of McCain.

Maine has spoken. According to the reports I have seen, it appears that GOV ROMNEY has won in a land slide and will take most of Maine’s 18 delegates. At the time I am writing this, Gov. Romney is at 52% with McCain at 21% and Paul at 19% with 68% re….

On February 2nd, 2008 at 5:42 pm, granite said:
#
His “reaching across the aisle” over the past years sure has looked more like yielding the conservative position(s) across the aisle.

More like a “reach around” if you ask me.