See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

1. Suicide Voters | Mark's Soap Box
2. Right Voices » Blog Archive » Howard Dean Is Getting Nervous At The Thought Of A Brokered Convention
3. Let Freedom Ring » Blog Archive » Dean’s Desparate Attack Against McCain
4. California Conservative » Dean’s Desparate Attack Against McCain

Trackback URL

Comments

1. #1
   On February 6th, 2008 at 12:46 pm, billhedrick said:

   Stuff like this make me feel better about McCain (not really, but there’s hope?)

2. #2
   On February 6th, 2008 at 12:49 pm, walterc said:

   So how do we beat him? We stand up — right now — start fighting, and show the American people that he’s not who they think he is.

   Is this a hint that Dean knows about the CIA documents recieved from the Russians?

3. #3
   On February 6th, 2008 at 12:49 pm, Zippy_Slug said:

   Funny he didn’t mention McCain’s liberal accomplishments..

4. #4
   On February 6th, 2008 at 12:51 pm, DesertLover said:

   The best hope we have is that McCain’s temper finally erupts and he blows a gasket with a tirade that dwarfs the Dean Scream …

5. #5
   On February 6th, 2008 at 12:51 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

   Well, looks like Dean is still the moron he was 4 years ago.

   Yeah, as if opposition research hasn’t been done by the Clintons (with the help of the FBI files they stole) for years.

   As IF the Democrats never, ever do smear campaigns that have destroyed dozens of careers.

   Oh no, the Democrats are pure angels, and they never speak badly of Republicans.

   Please, spare me. These people are just as evil, if not more evil than the Republicans.

   And lets not forget all the nutroots like Soros, Moveon.org, and the rest of their ilk who trash Republicans on a minute-by-minute basis — i.e., surrogates.

   What hypocrites.

6. #6
   On February 6th, 2008 at 12:53 pm, WarTip said:

   That whole scenario about McCain is so full of garbled crap it is unfathomable that anyone would buy into it.

   John McCain is a media darling, but don’t trust his carefully-crafted image - he’s worked for years to brand himself.

   As what? A true blue lib?

   And this? They actually put this in?

   Only the Democratic Party is legally allowed to spend unlimited amounts of money to back our nominee and tell the real story about John McCain.

   They are doing what? Bragging that with McCain’s help they have silenced We the People and effectively removed the first amendment from blocking their path to power?

   Okay, I sit here humbled. It is not the Republican Party that has failed us, it is all of the political partying above the people!

   Disgusting!

7. #7
   On February 6th, 2008 at 12:54 pm, KaosKlerik said:

   The liberal MSM tactic this cycle is to actively work to promote the least conservative candidate (a RINO) to the Republican ticket.

   Once the RINO has knocked out any real conservative the true conservative base will be disheartened resulting in fewer Republican grassroots volunteeers and ultimately fewer Republican voters.

   The MSM will switch from promoting the RINO to bashing the RINO to swing undecided voters towards O’Billary.

   Once McCain locks it up the MSM will start hammering him.

8. #8
   On February 6th, 2008 at 12:54 pm, FloridaBill said:

   Zippy_Slug

   He didn’t need to, everyone already knows them.

9. #9
   On February 6th, 2008 at 1:00 pm, Gabe said:

   John McCain is a media darling, but don’t trust his carefully-crafted image - he’s worked for years to brand himself. From Iraq to health care, Social Security to special interest tax cuts to ethics, he’s promising nothing more than a third Bush term.

   What this letter proves is that Democrats know that McCain has conservative positions that differ from Barack Hussein Obama or Hillary Clinton.

   Yet many conservatives (I know many are venting right now) would rather have Hussein Obama in power than McCain.

   They would rather Obama be elected and immediately pull out all the troops from Iraq and destroy the mission that 4000 Americans have died for.

   Yet it matters more for them to “prove a point” than to support the troops or the mission. Sorry, but that is MDS. Like it or not, McCain is the nominee now. I would have some conservative positions (particularly on the War on Terror) than NO conservative positions with Hussein Obama.

10. #10
    On February 6th, 2008 at 1:00 pm, graysonret said:

    Good thing his e-mail didn’t come to me. It would have been zapped by most of my spam catchers, classifying it as another “Nigerian scam”.

11. #11
    On February 6th, 2008 at 1:02 pm, madchef said:

    “On immigration reform, he’s run as far to the right as he can, aligning himself with the most extreme elements of the Republican Party.” - Howard Dean

    If Howard Dean thinks that McShame is extreme on immigration then GOD help us if Billary or Obama get elected.

    I might as well order my Rosetta Stone DVDs now so I can learn Spanish.

12. #12
    On February 6th, 2008 at 1:03 pm, thirteen28 said:

    I don’t just want to beat John McCain - I want it to be a landslide.

    Thanks to our own party’s suicidal tendencies, exhibited by nominating a candidate that is unacceptable to the GOP core, Howard is going to get his wish.

    I’m not the least bit suprised by this letter, btw. I knew that once McCain became inevitable, the Democrats and their MSM enablers would turn viciously against him after doing their best to prop him up. Newsweek has already run an article about McCain’s temper. And get ready to learn more about the Keating 5 than you ever knew.

    The irony is that despite all of McCain’s liberal positions, his disingenuous flips to the conservative positions for the primary season will be used to paint him by Dems and the MSM (but I repeat myself) as the most hardcore rightwinger ever. Their base will believe it, while our base knows he’s closer to one of them. The squishy moderates will probably go to the Dem/MSM side. And McCain will lose, big time.

    I guess there could be a little bit of karmic justice in that. McCain has stabbed conservatives in the back numerous times while courting liberals. Now that he’s going to be the GOP nominee, the liberals he courted are (very predictably) going to stab him in the back.

    It’s just too bad that such karmic justice is going to come at the price of a president Hillary or Obama, a high price indeed for both the GOP and the country at large.

13. #13
    On February 6th, 2008 at 1:03 pm, Larraby said:

    Given Howard Dean’s letter, can anybody doubt that McCain is far superior to Hillary Clinton? Let bufoons like Anne Coulter get her 15 minutes of fame by making outlandish statements about McCain, if Howard Dean disparages McCain, we should know that McCain is therefore acceptable and preferable to Hillary. McCain, with all his faults, will not make Janet Reno Attorney General. And there will never be an attorney general under McCain who says that terrorism should be treated as a law enforcement matter. Case closed.

14. #14
    On February 6th, 2008 at 1:07 pm, Renee_VA said:

    Yet it matters more for them to “prove a point” than to support the troops or the mission.

    Kind of hard to say McVain is for the troops and the mission when he WILL NOT secure the border or the homeland. Give it a break, he makes us less safe by leaving the back door open…and with the troops overseas (since he won’t secure the mainland), we are less secure. Be different if ol’ Benedict McVain had not pushed his amnesty BS down our throats and called us all “racist” when we shoved it back down his throat. As such, he is no better than the libs.

15. #15
    On February 6th, 2008 at 1:09 pm, Renee_VA said:

    And there will never be an attorney general under McCain who says that terrorism should be treated as a law enforcement matter. Case closed.

    Uhhh, no he’ll pick one that will give them ACLU lawyers at tax payers expense.

16. #16
    On February 6th, 2008 at 1:14 pm, Blind_Mule said:

    Only the Democratic Party is legally allowed to spend unlimited amounts of money to back our nominee and tell the real story about John McCain. We proved that our strategy worked in 2006, and it will work again this fall.

    He forgot, Because we can spend as much Chinese money that we want as long as it is given under the table, so those of you that know Mr. Hsu we have another source to give you thousands to donate.

    Dean: Does anyone know how to translate this into Chinese?

17. #17
    On February 6th, 2008 at 1:16 pm, fourstringfuror said:

    On immigration reform, he’s run as far to the right as he can, aligning himself with the most extreme elements of the Republican Party.

    Really? That’s news to me!

18. #18
    On February 6th, 2008 at 1:18 pm, Gabe said:

    Kind of hard to say McVain is for the troops and the mission when he WILL NOT secure the border or the homeland.

    No, McCain WILL stay in Iraq and get the job done, and we know that Hussein WON’T stay in Iraq and will give the terrorists a victory. To not vote for McCain is to not support the troops and the veterans at this stage.

    This is a clear choice. We support the troops by voting for the candidate that won’t have them prematurely withdraw. . .or we stay home and let the socialist win and have their mission be in vain.

    Listen. We conservatives blew it by splitting the vote between Romney, Thompson, Huckabee, and Giuliani. And now McCain is the nominee. This is the reality now.

19. #19
    On February 6th, 2008 at 1:26 pm, Blind_Mule said:

    Howard Dean obviously has not been listening to Republican’s, who has been blowing smoke up his a$$ about McCain.

    I like this logic, if Howard Dean wants to beat McCain so bad McCain must be our man if Dean said it, it must be true. BAAAHHH, BAAAHHH the sheep are calling to be force fed McCain.
    Oh yeah like I believe anything Howard Dean say’s or trust anything he does.

    McCain did not win in any state win the majority of conservitive votes, so who exactly voted for him? because it was not conservitives

20. #20
    On February 6th, 2008 at 1:26 pm, Lindsay said:

    The Dems are smelling blood.

    This begins the rocky road (and not the ice cream version—a bucket of which I may put my head in and inhale).

21. #21
    On February 6th, 2008 at 1:27 pm, Lindsay said:

    Thank you, Rush. He just defined “bipartisanship” as “the Democrats getting what they want.”

    Amen!

22. #22
    On February 6th, 2008 at 1:29 pm, Blind_Mule said:

    Lindsay said:

    This begins the rocky road (and not the ice cream version—a bucket of which I may put my head in and inhale).

    thats funny

23. #23
    On February 6th, 2008 at 1:29 pm, mattymatt10 said:

    None of the candidates are going to pull out of Iraq right away. Even Hillary and Barack have not commmitted to withdrawing, saying they have to look at the facts on the ground when they take office. Withdrawal is only demanded by a few on the fringe left. Pulling out and leaving the region in chaos will not be something the Dem’s want on their hands.

24. #24
    On February 6th, 2008 at 1:33 pm, lgm said:

    MM didn’t say what she objected to in Dean’s email. Think about it.

    Dean is head of the DNC, which makes him something like the head coach. He should start giving pep talks right away, which is what the email really is. The quarterback, the candidate, well be picked soon.

25. #25
    On February 6th, 2008 at 1:34 pm, The Raging Republican said:

    On February 6th, 2008 at 12:51 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    Well, looks like Dean is still the moron he was 4 years ago.

    Yes! BUT, the bigger morons would have to be Mike Duncan (current Chairman of our GOP), and Ken Mehlman (Chairman 2005-2007) What the hell have these fools done to our party??

    McCain is definitely the lesser of three evils and he might have some conservative tendencies, but he is not representative of what the base this party wants representing them in our representative republic.

    TAKE BACK THE GOP - IT HAS BEEN HIJACKED!

26. #26
    On February 6th, 2008 at 1:35 pm, The Raging Republican said:

    On February 6th, 2008 at 1:33 pm, lgm said:

    MM didn’t say what she objected to in Dean’s email. Think about it.

    Sometimes things do speak for themselves.

27. #27
    On February 6th, 2008 at 1:35 pm, twiggman said:

    # 7 That is exactly what happen, It’s over, anyone who voted for McCaint took the bait.

28. #28
    On February 6th, 2008 at 1:37 pm, The Raging Republican said:

    On February 6th, 2008 at 1:27 pm, Lindsay said:

    Thank you, Rush. He just defined “bipartisanship” as “the Democrats getting what they want.”

    Amen!

    Dems never reach across the isle, but always moan and complain about Republicans when they wont. Sorry, but bi-partisanship means that Republican leaders are compromising our their traditional American values for the sake of politics. That is NOT exceptable!

29. #29
    On February 6th, 2008 at 1:39 pm, The Raging Republican said:

    On February 6th, 2008 at 12:54 pm, KaosKlerik said:

    The liberal MSM tactic this cycle is to actively work to promote the least conservative candidate (a RINO) to the Republican ticket.

    Once the RINO has knocked out any real conservative the true conservative base will be disheartened resulting in fewer Republican grassroots volunteeers and ultimately fewer Republican voters.

    The MSM will switch from promoting the RINO to bashing the RINO to swing undecided voters towards O’Billary.

    Once McCain locks it up the MSM will start hammering him.

    Bullseye!

    But the MSM were not the only ones playing this game - The Dem candidates were also trumpeting McCain as the inevitable GOP nominee in many of their debates.

30. #30
    On February 6th, 2008 at 1:41 pm, The Raging Republican said:

    Flashback: YEEEEEEEEEAHHHHHhhhh!

31. #31
    On February 6th, 2008 at 1:43 pm, The Raging Republican said:

    I don’t just want to beat John McCain - I want it to be a landslide. If you’re as committed as I am…

    I think what he meant to say was:

    ‘If you’re as committed as I am should be…’

32. #32
    On February 6th, 2008 at 1:43 pm, Lindsay said:

    Raging Rep: Bipartisian (giving into Democrats) is McCain’s platform. Other than amnesty, this is the main reason I simply don’t like the man.

33. #33
    On February 6th, 2008 at 1:52 pm, Yashmak said:

    Dean didn’t learn from his defeat. He’s still obviously smoking crack. McCain aligned with the far right on immigration? WHAT?!?

    That’s the issue I have the biggest problem with McCain on. . .that he’s NOT aligned with the right on immigration.

    TheRagingRepublican has it dead right on his comment about ‘commitment’.

34. #34
    On February 6th, 2008 at 1:53 pm, Lan Astaslem said:

    Howard who?

35. #35
    On February 6th, 2008 at 1:56 pm, davidleerothmann said:

    No, McCain WILL stay in Iraq and get the job done, and we know that Hussein WON’T stay in Iraq and will give the terrorists a victory. To not vote for McCain is to not support the troops and the veterans at this stage.

    Gabe, if Hillary or Obama withdraw our troops THAT Democrat President, not Conservative Republicans will deserve the blame.

    It won’t do our veterans any good to win in Iraq, and come home to find low wages because 20-30 million illegals have depressed wages in every community in the land.

    It won’t do our veteran’s kids any good if they come home to find public schools that teach mostly in Spanish, and spend more tax money on ESL than they do math and reading.

    It won’t do them any good to secure Baghdad and come home to neighborhoods in America that are MS-13 warzones. (McCain wanted GANG MEMBERS given Amnesty)

    It won’t help the troops if they win in Iraq, but come home and are forced to subsidize the health care of 10’s of millions of illegals, and find themselves unable to afford to take their kid to the doctor.

    Finally, And it certainly won’t have been much of a victory if we defeat the terrorists over there, only to have AlQaeda drive a nuke across our unenforced southern border (courtesy of the LaRaza candidate, John McCain) in a rented van.

    That’s just one issue. They will also come home to an economy wrecked by McCain’s naive ideas about taxes and Global Warming. They will also have a President who might just decide to limit their First Ammendment rights if he doesn’t like what they have to say.

    Let’s let the Democrat Party assume the responsibility for their bad ideas.

36. #36
    On February 6th, 2008 at 2:04 pm, Rinoalert said:

    and show the American people that he’s not who they think he is.

    Even a stopped clock is exactly right twice a day.

37. #37
    On February 6th, 2008 at 2:06 pm, whysoangry said:

    Yeeeaaaargh!!!!

38. #38
    On February 6th, 2008 at 2:07 pm, granite said:

    #35:

    Well said.

39. #39
    On February 6th, 2008 at 2:09 pm, dm60462 said:

    Gee, makes me want to contribute. After all, Dean and I have the same goal…defeat McCain.

40. #40
    On February 6th, 2008 at 2:10 pm, Boomer said:

    Nicely stated #35!

41. #41
    On February 6th, 2008 at 2:13 pm, J S Ragman said:

    Here’s what U.S. News and World Report recently reported about how the RNC is getting ready…

    [RNC Chairman Mike] Duncan and his aides want to be ready to go on the offensive against the Democratic nominee presumptive in an effort to define the opposition candidate on GOP terms. Opposition research is already well along, and the plan is for surrogates to talk to the media around the country while a TV ad campaign in key states and media markets as soon as the Democratic nominee is determined.

    We must be ready to fight back, and fight back hard, today.

    In other words, “Let’s beat them to the mudslinging.”

    On the war, McCain scoffed at Bush’s call to leave troops in Iraq for 50 years, saying “Make it a hundred!”

    Pay no attention to the troops we have had stationed in Germany and Japan for 63 years.

    We can’t afford four more years with a President who gives tax cuts to companies who ship jobs overseas;

    So let’s elect a president who will raise taxes on companies, forcing them to ship even more jobs overseas to remain in business.

    Howard Dean’s stupidity is breathtaking.

42. #42
    On February 6th, 2008 at 2:18 pm, granite said:

    #41 On February 6th, 2008 at 2:13 pm, J S Ragman said:

    “Howard Dean’s stupidity is breathtaking.”

    Yep.

    And he’s a doc (as is Ron Paul).

43. #43
    On February 6th, 2008 at 2:22 pm, Archon said:

    he’s promising nothing more than a third Bush term.

    I’ll be danged…Dean actually said something with a hint of truth to it.

    Gabe,

    Like it or not, McCain is the nominee now.

    No, he isn’t. Not yet. I’ve never been one to believe in inevitablility.

    To not vote for McCain is to not support the troops and the veterans at this stage.

    What a steaming pile of bovine fecal matter! I would expand on that statement, but I would just be repeating what davidleerothmann said in #35.

44. #44
    On February 6th, 2008 at 2:37 pm, ddhinnyc said:

    Howard Dean is a liar and a hypocrite.

    “John McCain is a media darling…”

    HILLARY CLINTON IS A MEDIA DARLING!

    “…don’t trust his carefully-crafted image - he’s worked for years to brand himself…”

    THAT’S PRECISELY WHAT HILLARY HAS DONE!

    “…..now has a staggering amount of lobbyists involved in every aspect of his campaign.”

    UMM…HILLARY ANYONE?

    On immigration reform, he’s run as far to the right as he can, aligning himself with the most extreme elements of the Republican Party.

    IS DEAN FINALLY ADMITTING THAT HILLARY IS FOR AMNESTY?

    On a woman’s right to choose, McCain has vowed to appoint judges who would overturn Roe v. Wade.

    YET ANOTHER ADMISSION THAT DEMOCRATS HAVE NO PROBLEM WITH KILLING BABIES.

    No wonder the Democrats abandoned Howard Dean…the liar…the hypocrite.

45. #45
    On February 6th, 2008 at 2:37 pm, Mark said:

    From Iraq to health care, Social Security to special interest tax cuts to ethics, he’s promising nothing more than a third Bush term.

    See I told you so.

46. #46
    On February 6th, 2008 at 3:10 pm, mycroft69 said:

    Here in Vermont, he ain’t called Howdy Doody for nothin’.

47. #47
    On February 6th, 2008 at 3:22 pm, dan708 said:

    I nearly fell out of my chair when I read the part about McCain aligning himself with the most right-wing Republicans on immigration. Really, Howard?
    YEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHH!

48. #48
    On February 6th, 2008 at 3:33 pm, bit_boy said:

    It’s now time for McVain to convince the Democrats he is the most qualified to spend their money (and tell those xenophobes to shut up).

49. #49
    On February 6th, 2008 at 4:02 pm, tgillian said:

    On February 6th, 2008 at 1:03 pm, Larraby said:
    Given Howard Dean’s letter, can anybody doubt that McCain is far superior to Hillary Clinton? Let bufoons like Anne Coulter get her 15 minutes of fame by making outlandish statements about McCain, if Howard Dean disparages McCain, we should know that McCain is therefore acceptable and preferable to Hillary. McCain, with all his faults, will not make Janet Reno Attorney General. And there will never be an attorney general under McCain who says that terrorism should be treated as a law enforcement matter. Case closed.

    Tell me again why I should believe anything Dean says? Why do you think McCain is the MSM darling; because he can win?

    Case reopened.

50. #50
    On February 6th, 2008 at 4:02 pm, Artbyruth said:

    #35 wrote:
    “Let’s let the Democrat Party assume the responsibility for their bad ideas.”

    Why?

    As you wrote, “It won’t do our troops any good….”

51. #51
    On February 6th, 2008 at 4:06 pm, bear1909 said:

    Howard Dean is not who Americans think he is. Hillary Clinton is not who her supporters think she is. And Barack Obama is not what his supporters think he is.

    All of this crowing and blowing about landslide and victory for the Dhimmicrats.

    Are they headed down the same road as they did the past two elections?

    Will this bloodbath between Bubba’s wife and the Cliche from Illinois, leave the party vulnerable?

    The Pubbies are suckin wind because they couldn’t produce anybody better than the suits who have been taking up air the past 2 years. And unless the Clintons have dirt on McCain (which I am told is ready to be served up in the final run after the conventions) and he folds— i don’t believe the American people will landslide in favor of the Dhimmicrats.

    No matter how many women vote for Hillary or Oprah viewers vote for Obambi, bedrock, salt-o-the-earth America will speak loudly again in this election as it did the last two.

    The Bubba Stink is too strong. It is allowing someone as shallow as Obama to turn the Dhimmi frontrunner into a self-conscious looking stiff.

    I dunno. Just my gut. And the more rancor Dean stirs up to “energize the base” the more i am reminded how ineffectual his leadership has been along with the rest of the Dhimmis who were crowing about the midterm elections.

    If they are so damn good where is the inspiring message grounded in reality?

    Universal health care? Open borders?

    The legislative battles fought and won by bedrock salt-o-the-earth America these past two years should show these idiots something about their chances trying to run the Soros scam against the American people.

    This nation has bigger fish to fry than either Hillary or the Sophomoric Senator from Illinois have enough skillet for.

    Bear1909 out.

52. #52
    On February 6th, 2008 at 4:13 pm, Miss Ladybug said:

    I don’t understand who the Dems are the only ones legally allowed to spend unlimited funds on this election. As far as I know, McCain hasn’t taken federal matching funds (although he apparently considered it) which would have forced a limit on what he spent. Or is he talking about all the money they get through MoveOn.org and such?? Since there isn’t an equivalent on the right?

53. #53
    On February 6th, 2008 at 4:15 pm, Miss Ladybug said:

    that would be “HOW the Dems”, not “WHO”… oops

54. #54
    On February 6th, 2008 at 4:27 pm, bear1909 said:

    Howard is runnin his rap based on the false dichotomy that snows most lib-Tards about their own history.

    That dichotomy is basically: Right =Evil corporations; Left = Angelic Non-profits.

    The Left believes that the American political Right is fascist and completely tainted in anything it tries or does.

    And the Left is pure as the driven snow.

    Dean speaks of McCain’s use of lobbyists as if that is the equivalent of fraud. The Left lobby is enormous and comes from all walks of life.

    Yet, the spin is based on the mythologies the Left believes in.

    And remains subservient to.

    Until then, Dean can pretty much say anything he wants to his base about where the political Right’s money comes from.

    I notice he isn’t asking where Al Gore’s money came from? And where is it going to?

    Scam artists all.

55. #55
    On February 6th, 2008 at 6:09 pm, Grey Fox said:

    Well, for all his faults, I think I’d settle for another four years of George W. Bush, especially since we have proven that we can successfully hold his feet to the fire when necessary. I rather suspect we will miss Bush when he is gone.

    What I am worried about is that McCain is going to be a lot worse than Bush.

56. #56
    On February 6th, 2008 at 6:38 pm, Barry F. said:

    So how do we beat him? We stand up — right now — start fighting, and show the American people that he’s not who they think he is.

    You don’t know how much it pains me to have to say that Howard Dean has shown some insight here. But, it isn’t anything that hasn’t already been predicted amongst the comments on Michelle’s blog before.

    It has been said time and again, if McCain gets the nomination that the Democrats will turn on him and expose his true colors in a general election. *sigh*

57. #57
    On February 6th, 2008 at 7:10 pm, Dandapani said:

    They don’t need to smear McCain. Just tell the truth! Oops. That won’t work. Most of McCain’s positions are right out of the looney left leaning liberal playbook!

58. #58
    On February 6th, 2008 at 7:55 pm, John Ansell said:

    the dollars are starting to pour in from special interests who will do anything to beat the Democratic nominee.

    With a statement like that, Dean is officially crazy. Unless he’s thinking Tyson Food money. Or other big corporations breaking our laws hiring illegals.

59. #59
    On February 6th, 2008 at 7:57 pm, John Ansell said:

    For those of you that will be at CPAC, can somebody do me a favor and Boo Mccain once for me?

60. #60
    On February 6th, 2008 at 7:58 pm, Barry F. said:

    He’s probably talking about Jerry Perenchio money, John.

61. #61
    On February 6th, 2008 at 8:15 pm, John Ansell said:

    Ah, right in front of my nose Barry F. Thanks for reminding me why I didn’t vote for Mcinsane.

62. #62
    On February 6th, 2008 at 8:18 pm, John Ansell said:

    hope. I’m just saying, hope that they pick up a really big fish for ransom.

63. #63
    On February 6th, 2008 at 8:41 pm, bear1909 said:

    We can’t afford four more years with a President who drives the economy into the ground.

    Says Dean. What will Hillary’s MegaMonster Healthcare Program do to our tax rates? What will Barack’s Health Care Program do to our tax rates?
    What will their cuts in military spending do to our economy—take a look at Oakland, CA if you want to see what has happened because of the Lee-Dellums cuts in military spending: the Oakland School District is in state receivership because the tax base has shriveled up. Government money in social programs just doesnt quite shore uop the tax base that military readiness provides as an economic cornerstone.

    No, Dean’s Dhimmicrats are going to slam a President who has presided over unprecedented economic growth and job expansion- despite 9/11.

    The only people who drive economies into the ground will be the Dhimmicrats with their tax increases and pork barrel spends.

    Dean is an utter fool if he thinks “Fundraising” letters are going to help the Dhimmis win in November. THey are out of touch with most American’s lives: and now they will prove it by nominating either of these two social fascists who aspire to make government “solutions” (oxymoron) the religious dogma of the electorate.

    I was living in Vermont while Dean was governor. The man couldnt keep the potholes filled with asphalt let alone be a mastermind political strategist.

    He is as much a media creation as Barry Ossein and Bubbaz Wife.

    Let’s end this in November.

64. #64
    On February 6th, 2008 at 8:42 pm, bear1909 said:

    Who’d make the best Commander-in-Chief? Bubbaz Wife; Barry Ossein; or John McCain?

    oy!

65. #65
    On February 7th, 2008 at 12:26 am, right_on said:

    Howard Dean issued a “doctored” list? YEE HAAA!

66. #66
    On February 7th, 2008 at 12:24 pm, JohnnyD said:

    I might be just a little late to this party but a few things hit me.

    it’s time to build a national effort on the programs you and I have worked so hard to create over the last four years - from our cutting-edge technology to our voter protection programs, it’s time to shift gears.

    Voter protection programs? Since when did the Facist GOP start rounding up Dem voters? Is the GOP that vicious? /sarc off

    And I wonder, how does the GOP start a program to get a conservative’s reputation re-instated after a smear attack from the Dems?

    And then there was this little gem:

    he’s promising nothing more than a third Bush term.

    As opposed to a third Clinton administration? Get real Howie!

    And finally, bear1909 beat me to it but this one hit me the same way.

    We can’t afford four more years with a President who drives the economy into the ground.

    As if Universal Healthcare and the end of the Tax cuts won’t have the same effect.

67. #67
    On February 7th, 2008 at 7:22 pm, Chard402003 said:

    Howard Dean is a gift to the Republcan party. With Dean, the Dems might lose even though conservatives are want to support McCain.

68. #68
    On February 7th, 2008 at 9:52 pm, garyt said:

    Hey LGM, You know when Dean said quit the war in Iraq did that mean that the other side is going to quit too? I keep asking you did the Germans quit after the Brits left Dunkirk? Appeasement doesn’t do any good does it? Face it the Demos have no plan to stop the Islamofascists and Kerry had no plan either in 04. Its kinda hard to give pep talks when you tell your team is that all you have is abortion and surrender.