See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

1. No Runny Eggs » Blog Archive » Humor break
2. Have some fun and make a good point « Bookworm Room
3. ricketyclick » Blog Archive » Six Words

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: « 1 [2]

101. #101
     On February 7th, 2008 at 9:29 am, Larraby said:

     Last week, The Times ran a lenghty iconic article about Ted Kennedy. The article began by mentioning that Kennedy addressed a Hispanic audience by speaking in “imperfect Spanish”. Actually, Kennedy spoke in broken Spanish, mixing up his singulars and plurals in the ONE sentence of Spanish that was written for him. Kennedy’s staff can’t even get one sentence of Spanish correct. And of course the Times writer did not mention the reason that Kennedy’s Spanish is so “imperfect”. Kennedy was expelled from Harvard after he was caught cheating on a Spanish exam. Kennedy paid a smart student to take the exam for him. Papa Joe eventually bought Teddy’s readmission to Harvard. Then the Times writer wrote that Teddy is often slouched and “wears the burdens of his life” on his face. No mention of Mary Jo Kopechne in the article, however. Mary Jo’s mother died quietly in a nursing home in Pa. two weeks ago. No Kennedys attended the funeral. Teddy had not seen the Kopechnes since he showed up at Mary Jo’s funeral in 1969 wearing a phony collar around his neck. The Times writer would never mention any of this. The Times piece on Teddy is so inconic that the Times writer seems downright giddy over Teddy.

102. #102
     On February 7th, 2008 at 9:34 am, jsr said:

     Too cool for you patriotic fools.

     Providing cover for liberal idiots daily.

103. #103
     On February 7th, 2008 at 9:39 am, Barry F. said:

     The article began by mentioning that Kennedy addressed a Hispanic audience by speaking in “imperfect Spanish”. Actually, Kennedy spoke in broken Spanish, mixing up his singulars and plurals in the ONE sentence of Spanish that was written for him.

     He doesn’t even manage the English language well, Larraby. Surely, you don’t expect him to do any better with Spanish.

104. #104
     On February 7th, 2008 at 9:40 am, DarthRove said:

     Useful idiots? We’re not that useful.

105. #105
     On February 7th, 2008 at 9:59 am, TexasPride said:

     The Liberal 5th Column of Choice

106. #106
     On February 7th, 2008 at 10:06 am, DaveInAustin said:

     Home of Paul Krugman, Lying Douchebag

     And Also Maureen Dowd, Filthy ****

107. #107
     On February 7th, 2008 at 10:17 am, coffee260 said:

     NYT’s! The opium of the socialist’s

108. #108
     On February 7th, 2008 at 10:24 am, Darwin Akbar said:

     Simple is good:

     “Frank Rich! Paul Krugman! Maureen Dowd!”

109. #109
     On February 7th, 2008 at 10:24 am, pressto said:

     What the author didn’t bother to research is that the US already has an official motto that the US Congress passed back in 1956. That motto is: “In God We Trust”

     This being the NY Times no wonder they did not bother to research this little fact before deciding to hold a contest. Talk about a stupid reporter.

110. #110
     On February 7th, 2008 at 11:06 am, James Felix said:

     The New York Times…

     … because Al Jazeera doesn’t publish newpapers here

111. #111
     On February 7th, 2008 at 11:25 am, Tantor said:

     The New York Times:

     Making liberal lies conventional wisdom.

112. #112
     On February 7th, 2008 at 11:44 am, nbarry said:

     Since “All the news that fits we print” is seven words, I go with “Suitable for framing or training puppies.”

113. #113
     On February 7th, 2008 at 11:51 am, et said:

     Our new small size flushes easier.

114. #114
     On February 7th, 2008 at 12:19 pm, whatthecrap? said:

     I posted the serious one:

     “Freedom to pursue dreams, unhindered, unaided.”

     -Andrew

115. #115
     On February 7th, 2008 at 12:21 pm, GaijinBob said:

     BKennedy said:
     

     Saving lives since Nineteen Seventeen-Seventy-Six!

     Supporting Freedom since Nineteen Seventeen-Seventy-Six!

     Fixed it for ya.

116. #116
     On February 7th, 2008 at 12:26 pm, Khyris said:

     The New York Times

     “Shut up. We think FOR you.”

117. #117
     On February 7th, 2008 at 12:50 pm, amigoneus said:

     NYTimes = The ninth circle of hell.

     Truth? You can’t handle the truth!

118. #118
     On February 7th, 2008 at 12:58 pm, amigoneus said:

     We’re better than you are, nannynannybooboo.

     Okay, I know I cheated a bit on the last word, but I love it.

119. #119
     On February 7th, 2008 at 1:01 pm, coldfront said:

     NOW YOU WILL BE FOREVER CHANGED.
     http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3166797753930210643&q=invisible%20children&total=1836&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0

120. #120
     On February 7th, 2008 at 1:07 pm, DBNinKY said:

     “How’s that stock chart doing, Pinch?”

     That pretty much sums it all up!

121. #121
     On February 7th, 2008 at 1:21 pm, max said:

     If News, It’s News to Us!

122. #122
     On February 7th, 2008 at 1:58 pm, KaosKlerik said:

     We Distort. You Snort. We Deride.

123. #123
     On February 7th, 2008 at 2:12 pm, coldfront said:

     comfortable in American freedom,so what.

     http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3166797753930210643&q=invisible%20children&total=1836&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0

124. #124
     On February 7th, 2008 at 2:55 pm, Frank DiGiorgio said:

     Making up the news for You!

125. #125
     On February 7th, 2008 at 3:08 pm, secondsight said:

     All teh Screws fix too pink.

126. #126
     On February 7th, 2008 at 4:16 pm, walterc said:

     All Of America’s Secrets On Display.

127. #127
     On February 7th, 2008 at 6:21 pm, duff65 said:

     If you people don’t like the NYT why don’t you just ignore them like most of the rest of us?

128. #128
     On February 7th, 2008 at 7:29 pm, Tennessee Dave said:

     I didn’t read through all of them so I apologize if someone gets copied. My submissions:

     Lose your mind-read our paper.

     Insulting the military that protects us.

     Berkley paper of the east coast.

     We like code pink; don’t you.

129. #129
     On February 8th, 2008 at 1:31 am, TomB said:

     Six words describing the NYT, in haiku format for extra credit:

     agenda driven
     newspaperlike deception
     promoting treason

130. #130
     On February 8th, 2008 at 1:34 am, TomB said:

     On February 7th, 2008 at 6:21 pm, duff65 said:

     If you people don’t like the NYT why don’t you just ignore them like most of the rest of us?

     I do ignore them as a source of information. I just like to make fun of them. Come to think of it though, it’s sort of like calling a pig fat.

131. #131
     On February 10th, 2008 at 9:58 am, reine.de.tout said:

     Someone may have already noted this, but in case not: LGF had its own six-word contest: http://littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/?entry=28865&only&rss

     and got more than 1700 comments (not a lousy 700)

132. #132
     On February 10th, 2008 at 2:44 pm, DannoJyd said:

     The Shot Sinking Ship At Dock

     or

     The Paper Mache’ Slowly Sinking Ship

Comment pages: « 1 [2]