<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Preview of Bush&#8217;s CPAC remarks; Update: Approval rating at all-time low with Republicans</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/07/preview-of-bushs-cpac-remarks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/07/preview-of-bushs-cpac-remarks/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 06:55:09 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ford houston</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/07/preview-of-bushs-cpac-remarks/comment-page-1/#comment-252047</link>
		<dc:creator>ford houston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 20:40:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/07/preview-of-bushs-cpac-remarks/#comment-252047</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;ford houston...&lt;/strong&gt;

Cars have many basic safety problems - for example, they have human drivers who can make mistakes, wheels that can lose traction when...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>ford houston&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Cars have many basic safety problems &#8211; for example, they have human drivers who can make mistakes, wheels that can lose traction when&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LerP</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/07/preview-of-bushs-cpac-remarks/comment-page-1/#comment-242463</link>
		<dc:creator>LerP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 05:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/07/preview-of-bushs-cpac-remarks/#comment-242463</guid>
		<description>Out of respect for Michelle, I wont leave a profanity laced posting on how I feel about President Bush.  He is no longer &quot;W&quot;.  He is scum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Out of respect for Michelle, I wont leave a profanity laced posting on how I feel about President Bush.  He is no longer &#8220;W&#8221;.  He is scum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: publiuswarmac9999</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/07/preview-of-bushs-cpac-remarks/comment-page-1/#comment-239861</link>
		<dc:creator>publiuswarmac9999</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 00:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/07/preview-of-bushs-cpac-remarks/#comment-239861</guid>
		<description>President Bush did two good things during his 8 years.  He took the war on terror to the terrorists around the world and he was able to get a reduction in taxes that spurred an economy reeling after 9/11.  

Unfortunately, he also participated in the largest growth in government in history - although I would point out that 2/3 of the budget is fixed cost entitlements.  Add in defense and interest on the debt and you only have $200 to $300 billion on everything else.  The reason Hillary Obama wants to bring home the troops is so that they use the money for the war on terror to create yet another immortal entitlement.  We are really at a crossroad here with socialistic ideology consuming ever more of the federal budget.

At some point in the next 10 to 20 years, we will be unable to fund anything other than entitlements unless something drastic happens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>President Bush did two good things during his 8 years.  He took the war on terror to the terrorists around the world and he was able to get a reduction in taxes that spurred an economy reeling after 9/11.  </p>
<p>Unfortunately, he also participated in the largest growth in government in history &#8211; although I would point out that 2/3 of the budget is fixed cost entitlements.  Add in defense and interest on the debt and you only have $200 to $300 billion on everything else.  The reason Hillary Obama wants to bring home the troops is so that they use the money for the war on terror to create yet another immortal entitlement.  We are really at a crossroad here with socialistic ideology consuming ever more of the federal budget.</p>
<p>At some point in the next 10 to 20 years, we will be unable to fund anything other than entitlements unless something drastic happens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RobM1981</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/07/preview-of-bushs-cpac-remarks/comment-page-1/#comment-239553</link>
		<dc:creator>RobM1981</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 16:45:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/07/preview-of-bushs-cpac-remarks/#comment-239553</guid>
		<description>Bush can go lower still.  Just wait until he endorses the Republican Candidate McCain.

That&#039;ll do it.  

Do you think he can get to 20% favorability?  15%?  Dare we think 10%?

What a train wreck...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bush can go lower still.  Just wait until he endorses the Republican Candidate McCain.</p>
<p>That&#8217;ll do it.  </p>
<p>Do you think he can get to 20% favorability?  15%?  Dare we think 10%?</p>
<p>What a train wreck&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nfbailey</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/07/preview-of-bushs-cpac-remarks/comment-page-1/#comment-239471</link>
		<dc:creator>nfbailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 15:18:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/07/preview-of-bushs-cpac-remarks/#comment-239471</guid>
		<description>One thing Jimmuh did that really screwed up the country was attempted to manage energy and it’s distribution. That was fun … Are you listening Hillary? You don’t want to go there. Jimmuh also gave us the Mullahs now running Iran after he found the current government not to his liking.

Oh yeah, Jimmuh’s legacy, the world runs out of oil by the year 2000, he knew because he used to be a nuclear engineer or something like that.

And let&#039;s not forget the Chi-Coms have virtual control of most of the Panama Canal thanks to Jimmuh!!

I confess, I mistakenly thought W was going to govern like a conservative, and was sorely disappointed on an increasing basis over the past few years. The one thing he declined to address in his speech is the abysmal approach to border security his administration has adopted, and his playing footsies with our neighbors to the south, and the north.  As we watch our dollar slip away to nothing, it is planned that we will welcome the AMero with open arms....it&#039;s coming folks, right along with totally blurred borders both north and south.  Bye-bye soveriegnty and true security.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing Jimmuh did that really screwed up the country was attempted to manage energy and it’s distribution. That was fun … Are you listening Hillary? You don’t want to go there. Jimmuh also gave us the Mullahs now running Iran after he found the current government not to his liking.</p>
<p>Oh yeah, Jimmuh’s legacy, the world runs out of oil by the year 2000, he knew because he used to be a nuclear engineer or something like that.</p>
<p>And let&#8217;s not forget the Chi-Coms have virtual control of most of the Panama Canal thanks to Jimmuh!!</p>
<p>I confess, I mistakenly thought W was going to govern like a conservative, and was sorely disappointed on an increasing basis over the past few years. The one thing he declined to address in his speech is the abysmal approach to border security his administration has adopted, and his playing footsies with our neighbors to the south, and the north.  As we watch our dollar slip away to nothing, it is planned that we will welcome the AMero with open arms&#8230;.it&#8217;s coming folks, right along with totally blurred borders both north and south.  Bye-bye soveriegnty and true security.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NBF</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/07/preview-of-bushs-cpac-remarks/comment-page-1/#comment-239456</link>
		<dc:creator>NBF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 15:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/07/preview-of-bushs-cpac-remarks/#comment-239456</guid>
		<description>Bush&#039;s ratings among republicans would plummet if they knew this:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Gun Owners of America (GOA), a grassroots lobby representing over 300,000 Americans, has called on the Bush administration to withdraw an anti-gun brief field by the Solicitor General in the U.S. Supreme Court. 

The amicus brief, filed last Friday in the D.C. gun ban case of D.C. v. Heller, argued that any gun ban -- no matter how sweeping -- could be constitutional if some court determines that it is &quot;reasonable.&quot; &lt;/blockquote&gt;

source: http://www.gunowners.org/pr0801.htm

more:
http://www.gunowners.org/a012508.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bush&#8217;s ratings among republicans would plummet if they knew this:</p>
<blockquote><p>Gun Owners of America (GOA), a grassroots lobby representing over 300,000 Americans, has called on the Bush administration to withdraw an anti-gun brief field by the Solicitor General in the U.S. Supreme Court. </p>
<p>The amicus brief, filed last Friday in the D.C. gun ban case of D.C. v. Heller, argued that any gun ban &#8212; no matter how sweeping &#8212; could be constitutional if some court determines that it is &#8220;reasonable.&#8221; </p></blockquote>
<p>source: <a href="http://www.gunowners.org/pr0801.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.gunowners.org/pr0801.htm</a></p>
<p>more:<br />
<a href="http://www.gunowners.org/a012508.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.gunowners.org/a012508.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whysoangry</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/07/preview-of-bushs-cpac-remarks/comment-page-1/#comment-239429</link>
		<dc:creator>whysoangry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 14:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/07/preview-of-bushs-cpac-remarks/#comment-239429</guid>
		<description>rightisright, I don&#039;t disagree.  I just haven&#039;t accepted it yet.  He had so many advantages and the right moves seem so obvious in hindsight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rightisright, I don&#8217;t disagree.  I just haven&#8217;t accepted it yet.  He had so many advantages and the right moves seem so obvious in hindsight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: namvet66</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/07/preview-of-bushs-cpac-remarks/comment-page-1/#comment-239419</link>
		<dc:creator>namvet66</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 14:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/07/preview-of-bushs-cpac-remarks/#comment-239419</guid>
		<description>I noticed no reference to our energy needs and any attempt to become self-sufficient in that area.
Though I have an MBA, economics was never my strong suit.  Nevertheless, I personally believe the slowdown in our economy is primarily attributable to the rising cost of energy and all its attendant factors.  Yet, it seems that W has now succumbed to the GloBull Warning hoax and is supporting Bio Fuels and is wavering on other policies destined to help cause further destruction of our liberties and economic prosperity.
Someone correct me if I’m mistaken, but I don’t remember W so much as lifting a little finger to fight for more oil exploration and drilling; more nuclear plants; the reversal of Klintoon’s having designated $ 1 Trillion worth super clean burning coal, in Utah, as off limits to development, etc. One can only wish he had expended as much passion in this endeavor as his efforts towards open borders and shamnesty for millions of illegal.
 And now, it appears imminent that his Secretary of the Interior Dirk Kempthorne plans to announce a decision to include &quot;threatened polar bears&quot; under the Endangered Species Act which could very well be the proverbial nail in the coffin or our way of life as we know it (See Polar bears are not endangered!  http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;pageId=55827)
Oh, I forgot, he did make an effort to help ease the cost of oil:  he apparently groveled to his buds (the most repressive, terrorist-supporting country in the world, the Saudis) and asked them increase production.  WOW!!!  Some energy independence policy.
I voted for him in 2000 and against Kerry in 2004 as so many of us were well aware by then of his compassionate conservative ideas and ideals.
Yes his record on taxes and the WOT have been commendable, albeit, he refuses to acknowledge and identify those who wish us harm by name—Islamofacist.  
I won’t even begin to express my disdain for his Middle East policy and in browbeating Israel to accept concessions, all the while ignoring the continued terrorist activities of Fattah and in fact, sending them more $ Billions to bolster their cause, solely, it appears, to bolster a chance at a “legacy?”  (Beam me up Scotty!!!)
While not thrilled at the prospects of a Hussein, Hildabeast or McPain in the oval office, I will not be saddened to see this presidency end and I dread to see what further actions he may take over the next 10 months which will be to our detriment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I noticed no reference to our energy needs and any attempt to become self-sufficient in that area.<br />
Though I have an MBA, economics was never my strong suit.  Nevertheless, I personally believe the slowdown in our economy is primarily attributable to the rising cost of energy and all its attendant factors.  Yet, it seems that W has now succumbed to the GloBull Warning hoax and is supporting Bio Fuels and is wavering on other policies destined to help cause further destruction of our liberties and economic prosperity.<br />
Someone correct me if I’m mistaken, but I don’t remember W so much as lifting a little finger to fight for more oil exploration and drilling; more nuclear plants; the reversal of Klintoon’s having designated $ 1 Trillion worth super clean burning coal, in Utah, as off limits to development, etc. One can only wish he had expended as much passion in this endeavor as his efforts towards open borders and shamnesty for millions of illegal.<br />
 And now, it appears imminent that his Secretary of the Interior Dirk Kempthorne plans to announce a decision to include &#8220;threatened polar bears&#8221; under the Endangered Species Act which could very well be the proverbial nail in the coffin or our way of life as we know it (See Polar bears are not endangered!  <a href="http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;pageId=55827)" rel="nofollow">http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;pageId=55827)</a><br />
Oh, I forgot, he did make an effort to help ease the cost of oil:  he apparently groveled to his buds (the most repressive, terrorist-supporting country in the world, the Saudis) and asked them increase production.  WOW!!!  Some energy independence policy.<br />
I voted for him in 2000 and against Kerry in 2004 as so many of us were well aware by then of his compassionate conservative ideas and ideals.<br />
Yes his record on taxes and the WOT have been commendable, albeit, he refuses to acknowledge and identify those who wish us harm by name—Islamofacist.<br />
I won’t even begin to express my disdain for his Middle East policy and in browbeating Israel to accept concessions, all the while ignoring the continued terrorist activities of Fattah and in fact, sending them more $ Billions to bolster their cause, solely, it appears, to bolster a chance at a “legacy?”  (Beam me up Scotty!!!)<br />
While not thrilled at the prospects of a Hussein, Hildabeast or McPain in the oval office, I will not be saddened to see this presidency end and I dread to see what further actions he may take over the next 10 months which will be to our detriment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morning Campaign Brew - Everyone is an Underdog &#124; Election Geek Blog 2008 Election News 24/7</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/07/preview-of-bushs-cpac-remarks/comment-page-1/#comment-239414</link>
		<dc:creator>Morning Campaign Brew - Everyone is an Underdog &#124; Election Geek Blog 2008 Election News 24/7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 14:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/07/preview-of-bushs-cpac-remarks/#comment-239414</guid>
		<description>[...] parties have a lot of good will to run on. Bush also hit all-time low with Republicans ahead of his CPAC [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] parties have a lot of good will to run on. Bush also hit all-time low with Republicans ahead of his CPAC [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabe</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/07/preview-of-bushs-cpac-remarks/comment-page-1/#comment-239379</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 13:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/07/preview-of-bushs-cpac-remarks/#comment-239379</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Bush reached his lowest approval rating in The Associated Press-Ipsos poll on Friday as only 30 percent said they like the job he is doing, including an all-time low &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Truman&#039;s was lower than Bush&#039;s when he left office, and history has vindicated him.

The MSM will try to make it out that President Bush&#039;s approval rating is low because of the war in Iraq or the economy.  It really is because conservatives have stopped supporting him because of his support for illegals.

This is a lesson for all (especially McCain) who think they can be popular with a &quot;new tone&quot; (appeasement to liberals and the MSM) and by coddling the MSM, instead of taking them on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Bush reached his lowest approval rating in The Associated Press-Ipsos poll on Friday as only 30 percent said they like the job he is doing, including an all-time low </p></blockquote>
<p>Truman&#8217;s was lower than Bush&#8217;s when he left office, and history has vindicated him.</p>
<p>The MSM will try to make it out that President Bush&#8217;s approval rating is low because of the war in Iraq or the economy.  It really is because conservatives have stopped supporting him because of his support for illegals.</p>
<p>This is a lesson for all (especially McCain) who think they can be popular with a &#8220;new tone&#8221; (appeasement to liberals and the MSM) and by coddling the MSM, instead of taking them on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hannibal</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/07/preview-of-bushs-cpac-remarks/comment-page-1/#comment-239377</link>
		<dc:creator>Hannibal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 13:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/07/preview-of-bushs-cpac-remarks/#comment-239377</guid>
		<description>#33 Do you have some thoughts of your own or do you want us to believe that if it&#039;s on youtube it has to be the truth?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#33 Do you have some thoughts of your own or do you want us to believe that if it&#8217;s on youtube it has to be the truth?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maisy</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/07/preview-of-bushs-cpac-remarks/comment-page-1/#comment-239375</link>
		<dc:creator>maisy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 13:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/07/preview-of-bushs-cpac-remarks/#comment-239375</guid>
		<description>Many years ago I was a democrat. Then I grew up and became a republican. Now I am an independant . When I survey those who count themselves as republicans....McCain for instance,... I realize that I did not leave this party....this party left me. It is far time to start a new CONSERVATIVE party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many years ago I was a democrat. Then I grew up and became a republican. Now I am an independant . When I survey those who count themselves as republicans&#8230;.McCain for instance,&#8230; I realize that I did not leave this party&#8230;.this party left me. It is far time to start a new CONSERVATIVE party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: On-my-soap-box</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/07/preview-of-bushs-cpac-remarks/comment-page-1/#comment-239373</link>
		<dc:creator>On-my-soap-box</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 13:19:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/07/preview-of-bushs-cpac-remarks/#comment-239373</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Approval rating at all-time low with Republicans&lt;/blockquote&gt;

DUH statement of the day.  My buddy (who is a conservative Republican) always says to me when we talk about politics:

&quot;Bush will go down as the worst POTUS in history.&quot;

I used to argue with him up until the last year.  I am more inclined to agree.

&lt;blockquote&gt;On February 7th, 2008 at 11:30 pm, bit_boy said: 
And what did he get from his war other than a huge debt that is the largest in our history.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Whenever I hear a liberal talk about the debt I always ask (and I ask you bitboy):

Before 9/11 when you got your check from &quot;Bush&quot;, did you give it back and say, &quot;no theanks, apply it to the debt.&quot;?  If so, good for you.  If not, shut up.  Oh, I bet a nickle to a dollar you will not send the next check back either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Approval rating at all-time low with Republicans</p></blockquote>
<p>DUH statement of the day.  My buddy (who is a conservative Republican) always says to me when we talk about politics:</p>
<p>&#8220;Bush will go down as the worst POTUS in history.&#8221;</p>
<p>I used to argue with him up until the last year.  I am more inclined to agree.</p>
<blockquote><p>On February 7th, 2008 at 11:30 pm, bit_boy said:<br />
And what did he get from his war other than a huge debt that is the largest in our history.</p></blockquote>
<p>Whenever I hear a liberal talk about the debt I always ask (and I ask you bitboy):</p>
<p>Before 9/11 when you got your check from &#8220;Bush&#8221;, did you give it back and say, &#8220;no theanks, apply it to the debt.&#8221;?  If so, good for you.  If not, shut up.  Oh, I bet a nickle to a dollar you will not send the next check back either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Renee_VA</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/07/preview-of-bushs-cpac-remarks/comment-page-1/#comment-239360</link>
		<dc:creator>Renee_VA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 12:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/07/preview-of-bushs-cpac-remarks/#comment-239360</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;He takes an oath to preserve, protect and defend THE CONSTITUTION. Methinks he has occasionally forgotten that fact.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Totally agree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>He takes an oath to preserve, protect and defend THE CONSTITUTION. Methinks he has occasionally forgotten that fact.</p></blockquote>
<p>Totally agree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Renee_VA</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/07/preview-of-bushs-cpac-remarks/comment-page-1/#comment-239359</link>
		<dc:creator>Renee_VA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 12:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/07/preview-of-bushs-cpac-remarks/#comment-239359</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;President Bush has not been our best president - nor has he been our worst.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

That is what sums up President Bush.  Makes you want to &quot;ZZZzzzzzzzzzzzz&quot;.  All tough talk, starts to do the right and tough things and then...halt, doesn&#039;t give 100%, hence where we are now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>President Bush has not been our best president &#8211; nor has he been our worst.</p></blockquote>
<p>That is what sums up President Bush.  Makes you want to &#8220;ZZZzzzzzzzzzzzz&#8221;.  All tough talk, starts to do the right and tough things and then&#8230;halt, doesn&#8217;t give 100%, hence where we are now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- NEW -->
