<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;There once was a kafir named Steyn&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/08/there-once-was-a-kafir-named-steyn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/08/there-once-was-a-kafir-named-steyn/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 02:10:02 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steynianism 49.0 &#171; Free Mark Steyn!</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/08/there-once-was-a-kafir-named-steyn/comment-page-1/#comment-241889</link>
		<dc:creator>Steynianism 49.0 &#171; Free Mark Steyn!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 20:33:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/08/there-once-was-a-kafir-named-steyn/#comment-241889</guid>
		<description>[...] ALL TOGETHER NOW! “There once was a kafir named Steyn.. his battle is yours and it’s mine.” &#8230;. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ALL TOGETHER NOW! “There once was a kafir named Steyn.. his battle is yours and it’s mine.” &#8230;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flagwaver</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/08/there-once-was-a-kafir-named-steyn/comment-page-1/#comment-240578</link>
		<dc:creator>flagwaver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 03:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/08/there-once-was-a-kafir-named-steyn/#comment-240578</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Pamela Geller - aka Atlas Shrugs gave a terrific introduction to Mark Steyn.&lt;/strong&gt;
It&#039;s great that the world&#039;s wittiest voice was introduced by another witty and beautiful voice for TRUTH - the one and only - Atlas!

Thanks for sharing this</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Pamela Geller &#8211; aka Atlas Shrugs gave a terrific introduction to Mark Steyn.</strong><br />
It&#8217;s great that the world&#8217;s wittiest voice was introduced by another witty and beautiful voice for TRUTH &#8211; the one and only &#8211; Atlas!</p>
<p>Thanks for sharing this</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin K.</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/08/there-once-was-a-kafir-named-steyn/comment-page-1/#comment-239977</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin K.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 13:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/08/there-once-was-a-kafir-named-steyn/#comment-239977</guid>
		<description>Steyn has many good points.  I hope he wins against the Canadian kangaroo court that he&#039;s up against, too.  

The British band played &quot;The World Turned Upsidedown&quot; when Cornwallis surrendered to Washington at the end of the Revolutionary War: kind of feels like that now, with these little radical pro-Islamist groups being able to get dhimmi-like reactions from people who should know better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steyn has many good points.  I hope he wins against the Canadian kangaroo court that he&#8217;s up against, too.  </p>
<p>The British band played &#8220;The World Turned Upsidedown&#8221; when Cornwallis surrendered to Washington at the end of the Revolutionary War: kind of feels like that now, with these little radical pro-Islamist groups being able to get dhimmi-like reactions from people who should know better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gollumclone</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/08/there-once-was-a-kafir-named-steyn/comment-page-1/#comment-239832</link>
		<dc:creator>gollumclone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 23:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/08/there-once-was-a-kafir-named-steyn/#comment-239832</guid>
		<description>Yes, let&#039;s all boycott this next election and allow a Clinton or Obama presidency by default. I guarantee they will push for socialism and higher taxes. And how many justices will they appoint in the mold of Ruth Bader Ginsberg? And how about surrendering to the islamomutantpsychos asap?  I am NOT a McCainiac, but it seems to me conservatives didn&#039;t do that much for Thompson and a few others, nor did those candidates help themselves all that much. Huckleberry candiacy only helped McCain and those sanctimonious  religious zealots who buy into Huck&#039;s Christian purity and had a big bias against Mormonism take a share of blame too. 
  So if we are very lucky, we get a McCain presidency who might appoint judges in mold of Roberts, who WILL fight the evil terrorists and most likely will cave on shamnesty. He doesn&#039;t seem all that healthy, so perhaps his veep would end up potus. So PULEEZE NO huckster as running mate. 
  I happen to think there is good possibility every thing will go to hell in  handbasket regardless who is in whitehouse, but neither obama or the clintons (plural) should be anywhere near it. Like I said imagine the Supremes, Congress and WH as ALL socialism all the time. Funny that in places like France and Germany they are showing sense and backing off on socialism to some extent and I suppose all those give me my free kaka state benefits naturally will embrace Barack and Hillary&#039;s Xmas all year long.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, let&#8217;s all boycott this next election and allow a Clinton or Obama presidency by default. I guarantee they will push for socialism and higher taxes. And how many justices will they appoint in the mold of Ruth Bader Ginsberg? And how about surrendering to the islamomutantpsychos asap?  I am NOT a McCainiac, but it seems to me conservatives didn&#8217;t do that much for Thompson and a few others, nor did those candidates help themselves all that much. Huckleberry candiacy only helped McCain and those sanctimonious  religious zealots who buy into Huck&#8217;s Christian purity and had a big bias against Mormonism take a share of blame too.<br />
  So if we are very lucky, we get a McCain presidency who might appoint judges in mold of Roberts, who WILL fight the evil terrorists and most likely will cave on shamnesty. He doesn&#8217;t seem all that healthy, so perhaps his veep would end up potus. So PULEEZE NO huckster as running mate.<br />
  I happen to think there is good possibility every thing will go to hell in  handbasket regardless who is in whitehouse, but neither obama or the clintons (plural) should be anywhere near it. Like I said imagine the Supremes, Congress and WH as ALL socialism all the time. Funny that in places like France and Germany they are showing sense and backing off on socialism to some extent and I suppose all those give me my free kaka state benefits naturally will embrace Barack and Hillary&#8217;s Xmas all year long.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Azygos</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/08/there-once-was-a-kafir-named-steyn/comment-page-1/#comment-239822</link>
		<dc:creator>Azygos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 22:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/08/there-once-was-a-kafir-named-steyn/#comment-239822</guid>
		<description>The McCain thread is over there folks

*Points stage left*

This is the Mark Steyn thread :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The McCain thread is over there folks</p>
<p>*Points stage left*</p>
<p>This is the Mark Steyn thread <img src='http://michellemalkin.com/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Speakup</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/08/there-once-was-a-kafir-named-steyn/comment-page-1/#comment-239810</link>
		<dc:creator>Speakup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 22:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/08/there-once-was-a-kafir-named-steyn/#comment-239810</guid>
		<description>Political asylum for Mark Steyn!
We need him!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Political asylum for Mark Steyn!<br />
We need him!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fairyfoose</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/08/there-once-was-a-kafir-named-steyn/comment-page-1/#comment-239689</link>
		<dc:creator>fairyfoose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 19:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/08/there-once-was-a-kafir-named-steyn/#comment-239689</guid>
		<description>Well said, BarryF. That is what I was trying in vain to say: McCain is going to HAVE to show me with deeds he WILL support a more Conservative Agenda. And I don&#039;t want to hear him reference the word &quot;soldier&quot; one more time in a speech. I get it. He served. Ah, that would be past tense. I&#039;m not stupid. I want Constitutionalist Judges. I want the Bush Tax cuts done ONE BETTER. I want him to `build the damn fence&#039;. I want action, Soldier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said, BarryF. That is what I was trying in vain to say: McCain is going to HAVE to show me with deeds he WILL support a more Conservative Agenda. And I don&#8217;t want to hear him reference the word &#8220;soldier&#8221; one more time in a speech. I get it. He served. Ah, that would be past tense. I&#8217;m not stupid. I want Constitutionalist Judges. I want the Bush Tax cuts done ONE BETTER. I want him to `build the damn fence&#8217;. I want action, Soldier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GaijinBob</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/08/there-once-was-a-kafir-named-steyn/comment-page-1/#comment-239658</link>
		<dc:creator>GaijinBob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 18:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/08/there-once-was-a-kafir-named-steyn/#comment-239658</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;unclemonkey&lt;/strong&gt; said:&lt;blockquote&gt;that does NOT insulate him from criticism for actions as a Senator. We can seperate the two, it’s not our fault if you can’t.&lt;/blockquote&gt;+1

&lt;strong&gt;pclevenger&lt;/strong&gt; said:&lt;blockquote&gt;Whining about McCain does no good. Neither will voting for him. Vote for conservative Senators and Congressmen.&lt;/blockquote&gt;That&#039;s pretty much all we got left at the moment. (Not much use in fighting for a conservative party platform plank if we all know too darn well McAmnesty will never honor it.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>unclemonkey</strong> said:<br />
<blockquote>that does NOT insulate him from criticism for actions as a Senator. We can seperate the two, it’s not our fault if you can’t.</p></blockquote>
<p>+1</p>
<p><strong>pclevenger</strong> said:<br />
<blockquote>Whining about McCain does no good. Neither will voting for him. Vote for conservative Senators and Congressmen.</p></blockquote>
<p>That&#8217;s pretty much all we got left at the moment. (Not much use in fighting for a conservative party platform plank if we all know too darn well McAmnesty will never honor it.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry F.</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/08/there-once-was-a-kafir-named-steyn/comment-page-1/#comment-239636</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry F.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 18:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/08/there-once-was-a-kafir-named-steyn/#comment-239636</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t recall on any of the threads on Michelle&#039;s blog that any conservative has ever knocked John McCain&#039;s record of service or his time as a POW.  What has been said, including by me, is that it is not what is going to make a good POTUS.

There is a lot more that we have to consider and not the least of that is how he has conducted himself since getting elected to public office.

If you support John McCain, fine.  Vote for him.  At this juncture, I have no intention of checking his name in November nor do I intend to check the name of Clinton or Obama.  I am leaning strongly toward leaving the box empty on the top slot of the ballot and focusing on other offices down the list.

The last thing I want to do is see our troops left hanging out to dry.  But, I&#039;m just not sure that I believe McCain on his advocacy of finishing the War on Terror.  I get the uneasy feeling that he is using it as an issue that he thinks can set him apart from the other party.

Might I change my mind.  We&#039;ll see.  But, McCain is going to have to show me a lot better than what I&#039;ve seen from him over the years, including here lately.

He is just too disingenuous for me at this point.  Things like brining Juan Hernandez onboard, when he is talking about securing our borders bothers me to no end.  You can&#039;t say one thing and do another, if you don&#039;t want to be seen an untrustworthy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t recall on any of the threads on Michelle&#8217;s blog that any conservative has ever knocked John McCain&#8217;s record of service or his time as a POW.  What has been said, including by me, is that it is not what is going to make a good POTUS.</p>
<p>There is a lot more that we have to consider and not the least of that is how he has conducted himself since getting elected to public office.</p>
<p>If you support John McCain, fine.  Vote for him.  At this juncture, I have no intention of checking his name in November nor do I intend to check the name of Clinton or Obama.  I am leaning strongly toward leaving the box empty on the top slot of the ballot and focusing on other offices down the list.</p>
<p>The last thing I want to do is see our troops left hanging out to dry.  But, I&#8217;m just not sure that I believe McCain on his advocacy of finishing the War on Terror.  I get the uneasy feeling that he is using it as an issue that he thinks can set him apart from the other party.</p>
<p>Might I change my mind.  We&#8217;ll see.  But, McCain is going to have to show me a lot better than what I&#8217;ve seen from him over the years, including here lately.</p>
<p>He is just too disingenuous for me at this point.  Things like brining Juan Hernandez onboard, when he is talking about securing our borders bothers me to no end.  You can&#8217;t say one thing and do another, if you don&#8217;t want to be seen an untrustworthy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: itzWicks</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/08/there-once-was-a-kafir-named-steyn/comment-page-1/#comment-239598</link>
		<dc:creator>itzWicks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 17:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/08/there-once-was-a-kafir-named-steyn/#comment-239598</guid>
		<description>Senator McCain&#039;s Vietnam War record is the stuff of legends. He will forever be held up with high respect and esteem in my book for it.

That said, there are OTHER vets who were POWs in Vietnam who now hold elected federal office without the same view points as the man from Arizona. Why should THEIR point-of-view be summarily dismissed? 

And as an aside, when will we let go of the Vietnam War from the political equation??  It is over, it has been over, and yet we continue to use it as a metaphorical bat in which to beat on the heads of those individuals who either didn&#039;t serve, or whose sentiments don&#039;t fit the template of the MSM.

As said by many all over the place, the ONLY reason to vote GOP in the fall election are the twin issues of National Security and SCOTUS nominations. To not do so will cost American lives and change the political / social landscape of our nation forever (and not in a good way).

Conservatives punished Republicans in 2006 -- look at how that worked out for us. I mean, Trent Lott got his old job back for Pete&#039;s sake. The current NRC leadership still doesn&#039;t get it, IMHO.

The only recourse left to Conservatives is take matters into their own hands, starting with the election of their own at the local and grass root levels and building up, period. That means no sitting out of the elections in November. 

Any questions?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Senator McCain&#8217;s Vietnam War record is the stuff of legends. He will forever be held up with high respect and esteem in my book for it.</p>
<p>That said, there are OTHER vets who were POWs in Vietnam who now hold elected federal office without the same view points as the man from Arizona. Why should THEIR point-of-view be summarily dismissed? </p>
<p>And as an aside, when will we let go of the Vietnam War from the political equation??  It is over, it has been over, and yet we continue to use it as a metaphorical bat in which to beat on the heads of those individuals who either didn&#8217;t serve, or whose sentiments don&#8217;t fit the template of the MSM.</p>
<p>As said by many all over the place, the ONLY reason to vote GOP in the fall election are the twin issues of National Security and SCOTUS nominations. To not do so will cost American lives and change the political / social landscape of our nation forever (and not in a good way).</p>
<p>Conservatives punished Republicans in 2006 &#8212; look at how that worked out for us. I mean, Trent Lott got his old job back for Pete&#8217;s sake. The current NRC leadership still doesn&#8217;t get it, IMHO.</p>
<p>The only recourse left to Conservatives is take matters into their own hands, starting with the election of their own at the local and grass root levels and building up, period. That means no sitting out of the elections in November. </p>
<p>Any questions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fairyfoose</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/08/there-once-was-a-kafir-named-steyn/comment-page-1/#comment-239595</link>
		<dc:creator>fairyfoose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 17:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/08/there-once-was-a-kafir-named-steyn/#comment-239595</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t decided whether I&#039;ll fill in a
President or not.  I may vote for him.
I was depressed and bummed out for about
10 minutes. But, living in California, I&#039;m used to not getting who or what I vote for. (I didn&#039;t live here when Ronaldus Magnus was The Gov.) I agree w/
Michelle, Melanie Morgan, et al who say
STAND AND FIGHT. Look, we HAVE 2 Parties
(okay, MAIN Parties). There should be a 
debate of ideas no matter what the MSM
says. Getting along to them means acquiesing. Sorry, not going to happen.
This isn&#039;t about feelings; this is about
facts. McCain is no Conservative. As was said this morning locally, he is probably as Conservative as he&#039;s going to be RIGHT NOW. If American&#039;s moved Congress on the last Immigration Bill, we HAVE influence. I am keeping my powder dry. I will be &quot;communicating&quot; my
ideas to Mr. McCain. Do we really need him to feel like he&#039;s going against &quot;THE
MAN&quot; which is his preferred position? I say no. Gentle, CONSTANT, firm pressure
can crumble walls....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t decided whether I&#8217;ll fill in a<br />
President or not.  I may vote for him.<br />
I was depressed and bummed out for about<br />
10 minutes. But, living in California, I&#8217;m used to not getting who or what I vote for. (I didn&#8217;t live here when Ronaldus Magnus was The Gov.) I agree w/<br />
Michelle, Melanie Morgan, et al who say<br />
STAND AND FIGHT. Look, we HAVE 2 Parties<br />
(okay, MAIN Parties). There should be a<br />
debate of ideas no matter what the MSM<br />
says. Getting along to them means acquiesing. Sorry, not going to happen.<br />
This isn&#8217;t about feelings; this is about<br />
facts. McCain is no Conservative. As was said this morning locally, he is probably as Conservative as he&#8217;s going to be RIGHT NOW. If American&#8217;s moved Congress on the last Immigration Bill, we HAVE influence. I am keeping my powder dry. I will be &#8220;communicating&#8221; my<br />
ideas to Mr. McCain. Do we really need him to feel like he&#8217;s going against &#8220;THE<br />
MAN&#8221; which is his preferred position? I say no. Gentle, CONSTANT, firm pressure<br />
can crumble walls&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pclevenger</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/08/there-once-was-a-kafir-named-steyn/comment-page-1/#comment-239538</link>
		<dc:creator>pclevenger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 16:31:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/08/there-once-was-a-kafir-named-steyn/#comment-239538</guid>
		<description>Whining about McCain does no good.  Neither will voting for him.  Vote for conservative Senators and Congressmen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whining about McCain does no good.  Neither will voting for him.  Vote for conservative Senators and Congressmen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: unclemonkey</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/08/there-once-was-a-kafir-named-steyn/comment-page-1/#comment-239491</link>
		<dc:creator>unclemonkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 15:37:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/08/there-once-was-a-kafir-named-steyn/#comment-239491</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;But to call John McCain all of these vicious names and to hurl all these personal insults at him is a form of sickness. When I see some of the former POWs (which I do from time to time because I live near a big navy base in an area filled with retired navy guys), I always thank them for their service. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

And if I ever met John McCain the first thing I would do is shake his hand and thank him for his service. The 2nd thing would be to ask him how in the hell anyone was supposed to take him seriously on immigration refore with Juan Lopez on his staff and Geraldo Rivera singing his praises.

I&#039;ve yet to see anyone here denigrate John Mccain&#039;s service or his time as a POW. However, that does NOT insulate him from criticism for actions as a Senator. We can seperate the two, it&#039;s not our fault if you can&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>But to call John McCain all of these vicious names and to hurl all these personal insults at him is a form of sickness. When I see some of the former POWs (which I do from time to time because I live near a big navy base in an area filled with retired navy guys), I always thank them for their service. </p></blockquote>
<p>And if I ever met John McCain the first thing I would do is shake his hand and thank him for his service. The 2nd thing would be to ask him how in the hell anyone was supposed to take him seriously on immigration refore with Juan Lopez on his staff and Geraldo Rivera singing his praises.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve yet to see anyone here denigrate John Mccain&#8217;s service or his time as a POW. However, that does NOT insulate him from criticism for actions as a Senator. We can seperate the two, it&#8217;s not our fault if you can&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ordinary Coloradan</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/08/there-once-was-a-kafir-named-steyn/comment-page-1/#comment-239492</link>
		<dc:creator>Ordinary Coloradan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 15:37:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/08/there-once-was-a-kafir-named-steyn/#comment-239492</guid>
		<description>Ombre - tone it down you sound like a Ron Paul style idiot.   Frothing and kvetching and full of bile, but not proposing ANY solutuion that will help the nation.  Just steaming hatred and irrationality.

Do you want to be seen as the same as DailyKos people?

Leave that crap for the Dems.

Remember Ronaldus Magnus&#039;s 11th commandment.

And also remember the old adage if you cannot say somethgin good, then say nothing at all.

Silence is far more eloquent than the frenzied over-emotional spazzing that you and others are doing.

All that is is energy &lt;em&gt;wasted&lt;/em&gt;.  Energy that could be used to fight for CONSERVATIVE planks on the party platform regarding immigraion, the border, taxes, judges, global warming, amensty, etc.  Energy that could be used to force a conservative for the VP slot, and look forward to 2012 with a deserving conservative already in place as a leader.  Energy that coudl be used to elect CONSERVATIVE local, state and congressional representatives, who will be even more vital given the likelihood of a liberal president.

You and those like you are so angry and muddleheaded that you ARE quitting.  You actions speak for you.  You;d rather continue attackign McCain uselessly than doing somethign about things that you can change.  You&#039;d rather quit than fight the battles we have remaining.

As I said in another thread, there&#039;s a word for folks that quit while important fights still loom:

COWARD

Stand and FIGHT for your values instead of uselessly whining on and on about McCain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ombre &#8211; tone it down you sound like a Ron Paul style idiot.   Frothing and kvetching and full of bile, but not proposing ANY solutuion that will help the nation.  Just steaming hatred and irrationality.</p>
<p>Do you want to be seen as the same as DailyKos people?</p>
<p>Leave that crap for the Dems.</p>
<p>Remember Ronaldus Magnus&#8217;s 11th commandment.</p>
<p>And also remember the old adage if you cannot say somethgin good, then say nothing at all.</p>
<p>Silence is far more eloquent than the frenzied over-emotional spazzing that you and others are doing.</p>
<p>All that is is energy <em>wasted</em>.  Energy that could be used to fight for CONSERVATIVE planks on the party platform regarding immigraion, the border, taxes, judges, global warming, amensty, etc.  Energy that could be used to force a conservative for the VP slot, and look forward to 2012 with a deserving conservative already in place as a leader.  Energy that coudl be used to elect CONSERVATIVE local, state and congressional representatives, who will be even more vital given the likelihood of a liberal president.</p>
<p>You and those like you are so angry and muddleheaded that you ARE quitting.  You actions speak for you.  You;d rather continue attackign McCain uselessly than doing somethign about things that you can change.  You&#8217;d rather quit than fight the battles we have remaining.</p>
<p>As I said in another thread, there&#8217;s a word for folks that quit while important fights still loom:</p>
<p>COWARD</p>
<p>Stand and FIGHT for your values instead of uselessly whining on and on about McCain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Concerned Citizen</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/08/there-once-was-a-kafir-named-steyn/comment-page-1/#comment-239486</link>
		<dc:creator>Concerned Citizen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 15:32:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/08/there-once-was-a-kafir-named-steyn/#comment-239486</guid>
		<description>At one point in time, Benedict Arnold was a hero of the (soon to be) United States.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At one point in time, Benedict Arnold was a hero of the (soon to be) United States.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- NEW -->
