See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

Trackback URL

Comments

1. #1
   On February 9th, 2008 at 9:25 am, MDH3 said:

   Lord, girl, not before I’ve finished my coffee!

2. #2
   On February 9th, 2008 at 9:31 am, Laree said:

   Michelle,

   Speaking of liberal media shilling for the Clintons. Did David Shuster take a dive for the Clintons? His remarks were way out of character he usually fawns at the Clinton’s feet. I thought about it now Hillary gets to look victimized by the MSM is this an attempt to make her look more sympathetic after the delegate count, was finally getting reported correctly? Obama is ahead. I know you will say MSNBC is run professionally and so well, you can’t tell through their expert news reporting if they had any political bias. LOL. I am saying, what are the results of Shuster’s comments. Hillary wants to give the impression she is the under dog and insurgent and the MSM is hostile in covering her. No it isn’t. CNN Clinton News Network. I know you will say the Clintons wouldn’t ever try and manipulate the Media. I know what am I thinking of? The woman needs to stop playing the victimization card and crying on cue, it isn’t Presidential.

   link

3. #3
   On February 9th, 2008 at 9:40 am, CarpiJugulum said:

   Shocked and surprise…..nope. Not that they voted liberal. The fact they admited to it is a little surpriseing seeing how they vehemitly deny being biased. Oh well. We have the first election where the press has chosen for us the candidates and more then likely the President for the next 8 years.

   Note how before while Mitt was still in the race they (the press) touted how McCain was conservative and needs to unite. Now they are all pointing out what we already new. McCains voteing record and battles with moderates and Conservatives in the Senate. They gaggle of 14 and hios support for an open boarder.

   If anything the press will make this into a large soap opra for their entertainment before November.

4. #4
   On February 9th, 2008 at 9:49 am, nyc123me said:

   hehe nice one.

5. #5
   On February 9th, 2008 at 9:53 am, TMoney said:

   Had I not been up and running for 5 hours already, this headline would certainly have shocked me awake.

   But after a few minutes reflection, what Times reporter would admit such a thing?

6. #6
   On February 9th, 2008 at 9:55 am, Lindsay said:

   Is this April Fool’s Day already?

7. #7
   On February 9th, 2008 at 10:13 am, Charles B. Simpson said:

   I am from Pennsylvania. I donated to Romney. Our primary is in April. I can’t vote for Mitt, now that he is gone. I WILL NOT vote for McCain. I am actually donating one last time to Mitt in appreciation of his effort. Also, I am now a voter without a candidate. Pretty sad.

8. #8
   On February 9th, 2008 at 10:13 am, meatpieandtatters said:

   theliberalmediaiseverywhere!

9. #9
   On February 9th, 2008 at 10:17 am, zorro said:

   Good one Michelle! I’m awake now!

   I’m right there with you Charles.

   If McCain wants to show us some action in the way of introducing a bill to close the borders instead of opening them, that would be a start.

10. #10
    On February 9th, 2008 at 10:23 am, Gator70 said:

    That was funny, I’m on Pacific time so I’m still waking up here, that grabbed my attention.

11. #11
    On February 9th, 2008 at 10:44 am, Laree said:

    This is Marty’s blog that was posted the morning of Feb 6th she states Obama in the lead with delegates. I didn’t view the samething on the Imus in the Morning- Crawl, until Friday Feb 8th. Did anyone notice when it started being reported that Obama was ahead in the MSM the cablenews outlets?

    David Shuster made this remark on Thursday. I am just saying everyone is discussing Shuster’s remark about CLINTON in the newscycle but not the important news Obama has been leading in the delegate count, at least known since Marty reported it on Wednesday Morning.

    http://chickaboomer.blogspot.com/2008/02/crouching-tiger-hidden-dragon.html

    The result of the Shuster comment, Hillary can posture as the underdog and insurgent…no she isn’t, with the Shuster comment, Clinton is getting more attention, then Obama’s delegate lead. Which appeared to break the MSM membrane on Friday?

    If you think this is conspiracy stuff, think how easy it was for the “Don’t Taze me Bro” kid to manipulate the newscycle and these folks work for a cablenews outlet so they kind of know how it works to manipulate the MSM, with a soundbite. In this case Pimping Chelsea Clinton. Unfair advantage Clinton? That is one of her favorite words Fair or Unfair, she uses it all the time. Well we are not talking about Obama’s lead are we?

12. #12
    On February 9th, 2008 at 10:48 am, lgm said:

    Reporters follow politicians full time. They know what they said yesterday. They watch them duck questions they don’t want to answer. Is it any wonder that they didn’t vote for the biggest “candidate of change” (McCain’s phrase) in the race?

    They know McCain has only a vague understanding of the economy. Why should they trust him to run it?

    And Huck? Heck! He doesn’t know anything about anything.

13. #13
    On February 9th, 2008 at 10:53 am, capitano said:

    Yesterday Chris Matthews was interviewed by an MSNBC news bunny (yes, I know, but he’s on the payroll and they have a lot of airtime to fill). So she asked him whether John McCain could bring the Republican Party together?

    Matthews: Would that be a good thing?

    Newsbunny (obviously taken aback by his frank response): Well for the Republicans I suppose it would.

    Matthews: (Drivel about his prior interview with Tom Delay who refused to kiss McCain’s ring after the speech).

14. #14
    On February 9th, 2008 at 10:59 am, Laree said:

    Is this what no one is supposed to be noticing and the reason David Shuster took one for the home team? Don’t look at the results, I am dissing Hillary Clinton look over here, over here. Why am I not hearing more about Obama the real insurgent on the Dem side?

    http://blogs.villagevoice.com/runninscared/archives/2008/02/attack_of_the_s.php

15. #15
    On February 9th, 2008 at 11:39 am, Boomer said:

    Thanks for the levity Michelle it is greatly appreciated with the bad news we have had to swallow over the last couple of weeks. I actually have a smile on my face now.

16. #16
    On February 9th, 2008 at 12:07 pm, JHSII said:

    The first thing that came through my mind wasn’t shock and surprise, but wondering who at Time magazine would be stupid enough to admit voting republican – and counting down the seconds until they were fired!

    Good one though!! LOL

17. #17
    On February 9th, 2008 at 12:48 pm, Yiddish Steel said:

    No surprise at all. A “media critic” for Time Mazgazine confessing that he voted for Obama just to “come clean” for his readers. SHOCK! I still don’t have any respect for these MSM nit-wits, regardless of their political disclosures.

18. #18
    On February 9th, 2008 at 2:17 pm, Dave Turson said:

    The Obama voter at Time magazine blogged last year about his support for reporters who donate to political campaigns, except for political writers, of course.

19. #19
    On February 9th, 2008 at 4:13 pm, mattymatt10 said:

    Wow, I totally fell for that headline. hehe

    Nice job.

20. #20
    On February 9th, 2008 at 4:52 pm, Ragspierre said:

    I came in from my appointed chores to find your headline.

    That was harsh, Michelle…

21. #21
    On February 9th, 2008 at 7:07 pm, Laree said:

    I thought I would wrap up Shuster, any NYT newspaper left? This is a link to Extreme Mortman, Spud on ICN last blog on more pimping, linked to this. So Olbermann can state, that they were pimping General Patraeus, back in 2007, meaning the Bush administration was prostituting him. BUT Chelsea Clinton is off limits, no pimping zone. hmm.. when is it just slang and when is it an offense. I think it is when you can look like an offended victim in the national media, during a presidential election cycle.

    http://www.extrememortman.com/cable-tv/pimp-my-right/

22. #22
    On February 10th, 2008 at 1:00 am, Mr_Conservative_Cat said:

    Michelle,

    the gag in the title is funny once you read it’s a set-up, and I chuckled, but the fact that so many people would be surprised by such a hypothetical event really underscores the utterly sad state of affairs when it comes to this country’s “unbiased journalism”.

    Ben Franklin would be a very dispirited man right now.